|
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33 USA
|
To add...
I think the choices being offered are too polarizing. (I am thus far abstaining)
How about, "As long as we develop the team, either way works. I am cool with losing because many guys here who could help us win or contribute to stinking are only signed until 2010. We've got a backup plan now, but if we win, it could help us attract those guys."
I want to see us DEVELOP the team, while continuing to position ourselves to improve the roster.
We have our pick this year, and I honestly just don't have a strong sense that this team will be THAT bad to get a top pick.
The Knicks are not going to tank, no matter what some fans may want. This is about as as close to rebuilding in NYC as it gets, I think.
I will admit it's still possible we don't perform well, so the spectrum for performance seems somewhere between 28-40 wins, since we haven't seen the new guys play, and even then I'd like to wait a bit to see how that affects the team's performance.
D'Antoni is a REAL coach, and after February 15 Steph will be gone (for those that don't know, Knickgerblogger reported that the Knicks can't send Steph home because of the CBA, not sure why Tim Thomas was able to before...perhaps it was because Tim may have been cool with it, where as Steph may not be).
My thing is, if we do stink, it's okay because we then see a lot of players gone anyway after 2010, and then get to use our pick to compensate.
If all this means we win more and either barely get in the playoffs or not, then so be it.
I'm cool with either scenario.
[Edited by - PresIke on 11-24-2008 1:03 PM]
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
|