[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Would you rather see the Knicks make the playoffs or get into the draft lottery


Author Poll
Ira
Posts: 4692
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
I have a conflict in this. I can't root against the Knicks and feel happy when they lose. At the same time, this season means nothing to me. Getting into the playoffs without competing for a championship, is not a big deal. Talking about getting players like Griffin, Curry, Rubio or Aminu is music to my ears. But we can't have it both ways. If you could chose for the Knicks, which way would you go - lottery or playoffs?
Lose as many games as possible and get a top pick.
Win, win, win - on the way to our first playoff appearance in a long time.
View Results


Author Thread
Michael6835
Posts: 21319
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/12/2004
Member: #828
11/24/2008  11:17 AM
I want them to win,win,win. This season is much different than any other season, reason is we can see some light at the end of the tunnel. Things are in motion for getting under the cap so we can sign a mega free agent, hell they are even working on being able to sign 2 in 2010. However part of signing the mega stars means we need to have something tangible to show them. Being a solid competitor or possibly even squeaking into the playoffs is a very important thing to show prospective talent.
M
AUTOADVERT
DarkKnicks
Posts: 21064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/29/2005
Member: #882
Spain
11/24/2008  11:34 AM
This is the hardest poll ever. I dont really know what to choose.
Knicksfan
Posts: 33594
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
11/24/2008  11:55 AM
I can hope the Knicks lose enough to get the best draft pick. But when the game is on and I see this guys working so hard to compete, Im sorry but I want them to win.

I guess the best attitude you can have is to enjoy whatever happens with the team. They will be entertaining and fun to root for, but the loses will take care of themselves and in the end we might see an improvement in victories but will still have a chance in the lottery.
Knicks_Fan
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
11/24/2008  12:02 PM
If the NYK picks are going to be LeBron, Bosh, Amare or Wade whats the point of the draft. Knicks need to win now and develop Chandler and Gallo. The draft picks from lottery aren't going to be the main focal point if LeBron is gonna be a Knick.

Once you get a high profile FA you have to build around them and basically a win now mode is placed on the Knicks. Just need rotation players.
Knicksfan
Posts: 33594
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
11/24/2008  12:08 PM
Posted by Vmart:

If the NYK picks are going to be LeBron, Bosh, Amare or Wade whats the point of the draft. Knicks need to win now and develop Chandler and Gallo. The draft picks from lottery aren't going to be the main focal point if LeBron is gonna be a Knick.

Once you get a high profile FA you have to build around them and basically a win now mode is placed on the Knicks. Just need rotation players.

Why build around them after getting them when you can start now. What a better way than with draft picks. Even if the 2010 plan is to sign the big free agents, you just don't sit down and wait for them to come in 2 years. You build a good team with young and cheap talent that could attract them to the franchise. Not caring for the draft is having short sight and we've had enough of that with Isiah.

Right now draft picks and young talent is as important as clearing cap space for this franchise's plan to happen.
Knicks_Fan
Knicksfan
Posts: 33594
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
11/24/2008  12:10 PM
And we have to remember that Lebron and Bosh or whoever else is still a big "if" for this team so you have to keep building the team and be prepared to live with those stars or without them.
Knicks_Fan
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/24/2008  12:13 PM
I am rooting for Chandler to become an absolute stud, and Rooster to get healthy and show he can be a good player. Everyone else is trade bait as far as I am concerned. Be that as it may there is no downside to this team playing well and I think we are better surved getting high value back for whoever we trade rather than picking #6 instead of #16.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
11/24/2008  12:19 PM
You want to establish a winning culture. The Knicks will get draft picks and good ones that will fill roles. They aren't going to be picking last or anything like that they may pick late teens early twenties. A team can still get a good pick there.

You have to establish a winning culture to get the most out of players like Chandler, Gallo, Nate and Lee. They got to be battle tested before LeBron gets here or any other high profile FA. If they start losing I won't complain to much knowing it may lead to high pick but I don't see the improtance of the high pick as I use to knowing that LeBron, Wade, Bosh or Amare may be in the plans. It to much of a crap shoot for the knicks they are very unsuccessful when it comes to the draft lottery. Its not like they have San Antonio, Houston or Orlando luck going into the draft lottery.
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
11/24/2008  12:24 PM
For free agent marketing purposes- I'd like to see some winning here. If FA's look at us winning games and making the playoffs with a crap roster, they are going to want to come here.

Similar situation to Orlando a few years back. Doc Rivers got them winning even with a lousy roster and they attracted McGrady and Grant Hill
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
11/24/2008  12:39 PM
Posted by VDesai:

For free agent marketing purposes- I'd like to see some winning here. If FA's look at us winning games and making the playoffs with a crap roster, they are going to want to come here.

Similar situation to Orlando a few years back. Doc Rivers got them winning even with a lousy roster and they attracted McGrady and Grant Hill

I don't know if they attracted Hill or McGrady they were the only ones with a boat load of money to offer. T-Mac was from the area and Hill Detroit just didn't want to pay him. Hill had the most to lose from leaving Detroit because that was his team he was the man. McGrady left because he didn't want to be second fiddle to VC. If I'm not mistaken Hill was a trade.



[Edited by - Vmart on 11-24-2008 12:41 PM]
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
11/24/2008  12:46 PM
I voted lottery.


Don't judge me!
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
11/24/2008  12:48 PM
Tough question.

I can see both sides of the discussion as making some sense.

The big issue seems to be whether one thinks it is necessary to create a culture of winning in order to lure the big free agents after 2010.

I'm pretty much on the side of what Walsh and D'Antoni stated early on and appear to be doing, which is try to be competitive and win a little while developing players, and trying to increase their value to enhance roster flexibility.

Certainly, adding a nice prospect this year, given that we have no pick in 2010, seems to be sensible, but if we truly wanted to tank, it could hurt the value of guys we may need to move, or consider moving.

I just don't think it's realistic to see us tank. Plus, the team is not THAT bad, as constructed with D'Antoni's system, so I'd expect us to remain competitive, but also see the young guys get PT.

In other words, if we don't make the playoffs, I won't be mad at all, but I doubt we are a bottom feeding team a la the Oklahoma City Scabs...sorry Thunder, and could sneak in. That could be good for attracting guys, and the likelihood of landing a top player at the bottom of the lotto is not very good anyway, even though it can happen.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
PhilinLA
Posts: 24941
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/12/2004
Member: #696
11/24/2008  12:52 PM
Win. In 2010 the FA's are gonna want to see a strong basketball culture and the way to establish that is to win. The Knicks can trade up in the draft if they target someone, and they can buy more picks if they see a D'Antoni type sticking out like a sore thumb. Knowing so specifically the types of players that'll work will make them less dependant on the lottery than teams that don't have this much of a blueprint. Players they can "win with" will fall into positions where they can get them.
http://amonthhoffundays.blogspot.com/ We got a ringer.
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
11/24/2008  1:00 PM
To add...

I think the choices being offered are too polarizing. (I am thus far abstaining)

How about, "As long as we develop the team, either way works. I am cool with losing because many guys here who could help us win or contribute to stinking are only signed until 2010. We've got a backup plan now, but if we win, it could help us attract those guys."

I want to see us DEVELOP the team, while continuing to position ourselves to improve the roster.

We have our pick this year, and I honestly just don't have a strong sense that this team will be THAT bad to get a top pick.

The Knicks are not going to tank, no matter what some fans may want. This is about as as close to rebuilding in NYC as it gets, I think.

I will admit it's still possible we don't perform well, so the spectrum for performance seems somewhere between 28-40 wins, since we haven't seen the new guys play, and even then I'd like to wait a bit to see how that affects the team's performance.

D'Antoni is a REAL coach, and after February 15 Steph will be gone (for those that don't know, Knickgerblogger reported that the Knicks can't send Steph home because of the CBA, not sure why Tim Thomas was able to before...perhaps it was because Tim may have been cool with it, where as Steph may not be).

My thing is, if we do stink, it's okay because we then see a lot of players gone anyway after 2010, and then get to use our pick to compensate.

If all this means we win more and either barely get in the playoffs or not, then so be it.

I'm cool with either scenario.



[Edited by - PresIke on 11-24-2008 1:03 PM]
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
Knicksfan
Posts: 33594
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
11/24/2008  1:48 PM
Posted by SlimPack:

I voted lottery.


Don't judge me!


Knicks_Fan
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34074
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

11/24/2008  1:55 PM
Playoffs. What do you think would entice a primetime UFA more, a young player with upside or hearing the Garden rock in May?

I know I'll be screaming like someone cut my nuts off or I was set on fire. It's been a while. I'm sure everyone will be like that. The Knicks won't go very far, but then Mike and Donnie get to tell the UFAs, "imagine what it'll sound like when *you* bring a chip. Imagine what it'll sound like when the banner is raised."
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Knicksfan
Posts: 33594
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
11/24/2008  2:03 PM
I guess it would be easier to jump on the playoff wagon if we had more young players having starring roles in the run or if we were sure the young players we have are part of the future. It is certainly exciting to watch Chandler, Nate and Lee develop this season and if they are all part of the future then bring on the playoffs, but nothing is sure yet. Lee could be traded soon.

It would also be easier if Gallinari was healthy and helping.

But watching the Knicks make it to the playoffs knowing that most of them will be gone certainly doesn't get many excited about such a run, therefore a pick with the potential to be a stud would help our cause of getting talented players with potential and small contracts.
Knicks_Fan
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
11/24/2008  3:47 PM
Lottery is overrated and is worth only if Stern has some aces in the sleeve.
Does he?
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/24/2008  4:23 PM
whatever happens happens but i think it would favor us to end up w/a better pick in the draft over a playoff appearance.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
11/24/2008  4:34 PM
Pounding out aggression Turns into obsession Cannot kill the Lottery

Lottery!
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
Would you rather see the Knicks make the playoffs or get into the draft lottery

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy