|
DarkKnicks
Posts: 21064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/29/2005
Member: #882 Spain
|
Well, Im on the minority here who thinks it was stupid to do this thing this way. Though I cant nor wont forget nor forgive what he has done in the past years, you can not do this just because "he is not the future", especially when there has been no complains nor soap-operas about him this summer. It is just unnecesary. You either release him in August to not make him a distraction or you play him because, as much as you dont like me saying this, it is a joke that Duhon, Nate or whoever PG we have, plays ahead him. But jokes only happen at MSG lately. We have won more games with Marbury than without him, its just a fact, as much as we all like to say he is a cancer, etc. We ARE better with Marbury, and to make this look even worse to me, Duhon is NOT the future of a good Knicks team. He is just an overpaid PG signed to play a couple of years (and he will be 29 by the end of his contract). So we did fine, we send a message that Marbury is still useful in preseason and that he even can accept playing as a backup PG, then we release him, and in the end he will score a bunch of points on us playing for other team, while we play the mighty Duhon, Collins and Nate (among the best PG's in the league the 3 of them) because we are building a "glorious" future. Meh, I dont buy that, Im sorry.
Despite my words make you think Im angry, Im not. Its not a big deal, just a stupid move IMO, just as the Ewing's one. I understand we celebrate Marbury no longer playing for us, but this way is just.... damn only Isiah could have done worse than this I have to say.
|