[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Zach getting high marks
Author Thread
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
10/6/2008  10:23 PM
TMS - u really really wanna tell me that's the play that Isiah called, or wanted to see? Zach w/an iso at the top of the key w/the shotclock winding down? please dude... yes it happens to 90% of the players at some point or another, & each one of those times i'd say at least 90% of the time it's the fault of that player making that boneheaded gaffe on the play, not the coaching, or lack thereof.
Of course Isiah didn't call that play. The entire point is that Isiah didn't call ANY play. Nor did the Knicks practice what to do when there are only 5 or 6 seconds left in the half and the ball has to be brought upcourt. If the team was the least bit together, a guard would have had control of the ball and passed it to someone open for a shot.

Last year ---just write it off to Isiah and the entire team mess. You can't single out plays from last year to prove your point this year. It is an entirely different situation. And that is the point.
The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
AUTOADVERT
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
10/7/2008  1:34 AM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by tkf:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Ira:

Thanks, Markji. I never got the 'Zach is a cancer' bit that's so popular here. He turned out to be a horrible fit, but that wasn't his fault. Considering his health and weight, Curry isn't going to be able to work his way into the rotation for a while. I'm glad we have Zach.

this wasn't Zach's fault?



yea, that was zach's fault, but looking at the big picture, we don't need to harp on that one silly play by zach, but how we as a team got to such a point where players would even th'm ink to do that?...

we know that shot was zach's fault, but again looking at the bigger picture the coach and GM allowed that toxic atmosphere to exist, even thrive..



[Edited by - tkf on 06-10-2008 9:50 PM]

i'm not harping only on that one play, it's the overall non-effect he's had on this team (at least positive effect)... i think his supposed "20 & 10" numbers are just about as hollow & transparent as they get... his teams in POR sucked too when he became a mainstay in the rotation so it's not like it's anything new w/him... what was this, the 3rd or 4th 20-something win team he's been a major part of over his relatively short career? i lost count... i don't see any new system created by D'Antoni making him into a great player for us... the only way i can ever fathom Zach being a good player & impacting games to result in success for our franchise is if he's the 2nd or 3rd scoring option & we have a stud like Lebron, Kobe or someone else of that stature leading the squad, but that'll never have a chance to happen cuz Zach's contract is pretty much the main reason why we can't land guys like that... so yeah, i still think he needs to go... i don't care what i hear from D'Antoni about how much of a pro he's been in training camp or how much i hear him say he wants to be a team player this year... i'll believe in Zach when i see it resulting in a lotta W's, & i don't see that happening.


hey, I am not defending zach here,I am with you on this one, I am one of those people that never wanted him here. All I am saying is that the guy seems to be comming into camp in the right frame of mind. We need to ride that for all it is worth and then ship him out, but that involves giving him a clean slate. He is here, we can't move him now, might as well make the best of it..
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
10/7/2008  4:54 AM
Posted by Markji:
TMS - u really really wanna tell me that's the play that Isiah called, or wanted to see? Zach w/an iso at the top of the key w/the shotclock winding down? please dude... yes it happens to 90% of the players at some point or another, & each one of those times i'd say at least 90% of the time it's the fault of that player making that boneheaded gaffe on the play, not the coaching, or lack thereof.
Of course Isiah didn't call that play. The entire point is that Isiah didn't call ANY play. Nor did the Knicks practice what to do when there are only 5 or 6 seconds left in the half and the ball has to be brought upcourt. If the team was the least bit together, a guard would have had control of the ball and passed it to someone open for a shot.

Last year ---just write it off to Isiah and the entire team mess. You can't single out plays from last year to prove your point this year. It is an entirely different situation. And that is the point.

Did the same coach who has Roy and Aldridge--two kids with little experience--playing very well together not call any plays when Zach was on the team? Or did Zach ignore the called plays because he's selfish?
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
10/7/2008  6:43 AM
Posted by Markji:
TMS - u really really wanna tell me that's the play that Isiah called, or wanted to see? Zach w/an iso at the top of the key w/the shotclock winding down? please dude... yes it happens to 90% of the players at some point or another, & each one of those times i'd say at least 90% of the time it's the fault of that player making that boneheaded gaffe on the play, not the coaching, or lack thereof.
Of course Isiah didn't call that play. The entire point is that Isiah didn't call ANY play. Nor did the Knicks practice what to do when there are only 5 or 6 seconds left in the half and the ball has to be brought upcourt. If the team was the least bit together, a guard would have had control of the ball and passed it to someone open for a shot.

Last year ---just write it off to Isiah and the entire team mess. You can't single out plays from last year to prove your point this year. It is an entirely different situation. And that is the point.

bro, how do u know Isiah didn't call any play? maybe the guys on the team just didn't execute? i mean i wouldn't put it past any of these guys last year to completely ignore what was being run so they could just take guys on iso's & try to pad their stats... seems to me that's exactly what Zach was doing on that particular play, at least the iso part... who knows what Isiah was doing but Zach sure wasn't doing what he was supposed to do, that's for damn sure.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Ira
Posts: 24692
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
10/7/2008  7:17 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Markji:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Ira:

Thanks, Markji. I never got the 'Zach is a cancer' bit that's so popular here. He turned out to be a horrible fit, but that wasn't his fault. Considering his health and weight, Curry isn't going to be able to work his way into the rotation for a while. I'm glad we have Zach.
Why? Even if he, for the first time in his career, helps his team win games, we'll still be a bad team. What matters is cap space in 2010.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 10-06-2008 07:03 AM]
I don't agree with the idea that the only thing that matters is 2010 cap space. What matters to me as a fan is that the team pulls itself together; gets rid of all of the conflicts from previous years; and plays good, enjoyable basketball. Also, if you want to trade Zach for cap space, then him playing well with no disturbances will help that.

I don't buy into the idea of we'll be terrible for 2 years and then in 2010 we'll get our savior and then we'll be great. We have to start being good now and keep improving so we have a solid core of players for the 2010 FA. And it isn't even guaranteed that we can land a top FA in 2010.
I wouldn't say that we have to be bad for the next 2 years. I'd say that the difference between 23 and 31 wins doesn't mean a whole lot to me though. And Zach must be off this team by 2010 so that we can get a *real* star player or perhaps *two* (one in 2010 and one in 2011).

You're definitely right that him playing better should make trading him easier but it will take a reputation change, not merely a statistical change where he improves back to his 24/10 Portland stats. He's gonna have to actually play hard for the first time in his life on both ends of the court. He's gonna have to share the ball with his teammates for the first time in his life. He's gonna have to not be a jerk who fights with his teammates for the first time in his life whenever times get tough. Impossible? No. Likely? No.

He does share the ball. In his last three seasons, he had 2, 2.2 and 2 assists per game respectively. For big men, that's pretty good. Garnett, Boozer, Duncan, Nowitzki and Diaw do better, but that's about it in the nba. It's no secret that Zach is a very good rebounder. The only thing lacking is his defense. But that's also the case with Chris Bosch and Amare Stoudemire. Some big men just don't have quick enough feet to be good defenders.

Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
10/7/2008  9:10 AM
Isiah was a horrible coach and Zach Randolph made horrible plays at times. When you combine the 2, you tend to get 23 win teams.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
TheSage
Posts: 21039
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/20/2003
Member: #386
10/7/2008  9:25 AM
Quite frankly, its really about Zach buying into D'A share the ball, move the ball concept. If he does D'A is a genius and we have a star stud. We know he's is/can be 20/10/2. Change the attitude and we have a star and a team that can compete and a player that is wanted around the league. He made no real trouble last year which, for him, was progress. Yes he was a selfish player at times but is still young and maybe just maybe has grown up a little.
purple012870
Posts: 21778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2003
Member: #432
10/7/2008  10:17 AM
We know the Zach to Memphis deal died. How about this? It can be done with or w/o Malik Rose:

New York Knicks

Incoming Players
Darko Milicic
Salary: $7,020,000 Years Remaining: 2


Outgoing Players: Eddy Curry, Malik RoseMemphis Grizzlies

Incoming Players
Eddy Curry
Salary: $9,723,983 Years Remaining: 2

Malik Rose
Salary: $7,647,500 Years Remaining: 1


Outgoing Players: Darko Milicic
purple012870
Posts: 21778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2003
Member: #432
10/7/2008  10:18 AM
w/ Rose gives Memphis a trade chip & repected vet for a young team

w/o Rose merely means they get a low post threat for Darko (who is better facing up)
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
10/7/2008  11:42 AM
Posted by Ira:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Markji:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Ira:

Thanks, Markji. I never got the 'Zach is a cancer' bit that's so popular here. He turned out to be a horrible fit, but that wasn't his fault. Considering his health and weight, Curry isn't going to be able to work his way into the rotation for a while. I'm glad we have Zach.
Why? Even if he, for the first time in his career, helps his team win games, we'll still be a bad team. What matters is cap space in 2010.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 10-06-2008 07:03 AM]
I don't agree with the idea that the only thing that matters is 2010 cap space. What matters to me as a fan is that the team pulls itself together; gets rid of all of the conflicts from previous years; and plays good, enjoyable basketball. Also, if you want to trade Zach for cap space, then him playing well with no disturbances will help that.

I don't buy into the idea of we'll be terrible for 2 years and then in 2010 we'll get our savior and then we'll be great. We have to start being good now and keep improving so we have a solid core of players for the 2010 FA. And it isn't even guaranteed that we can land a top FA in 2010.
I wouldn't say that we have to be bad for the next 2 years. I'd say that the difference between 23 and 31 wins doesn't mean a whole lot to me though. And Zach must be off this team by 2010 so that we can get a *real* star player or perhaps *two* (one in 2010 and one in 2011).

You're definitely right that him playing better should make trading him easier but it will take a reputation change, not merely a statistical change where he improves back to his 24/10 Portland stats. He's gonna have to actually play hard for the first time in his life on both ends of the court. He's gonna have to share the ball with his teammates for the first time in his life. He's gonna have to not be a jerk who fights with his teammates for the first time in his life whenever times get tough. Impossible? No. Likely? No.

He does share the ball. In his last three seasons, he had 2, 2.2 and 2 assists per game respectively. For big men, that's pretty good. Garnett, Boozer, Duncan, Nowitzki and Diaw do better, but that's about it in the nba. It's no secret that Zach is a very good rebounder. The only thing lacking is his defense. But that's also the case with Chris Bosch and Amare Stoudemire. Some big men just don't have quick enough feet to be good defenders.
Well I think you're nitpicking on one point rather than looking at the overall point. That said, I think you have to take into account turnovers when talking about sharing the ball because Zach's turns it over because he's unwilling to give the ball up much more often than those other players do.
fimslim3
Posts: 20051
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/27/2008
Member: #2245

10/7/2008  12:17 PM
That play was Zach's fault, he was dribbling the ball for about three seconds, lost his dribble, got it back, dribbled again and chucked it. What was he doing out on top of the key to begin with and why didn't he pass it to Nate Robinson....
"Dissension is the greatest form of patriotism" - Thomas Jefferson
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
10/7/2008  3:37 PM
Posted by fimslim3:

That play was Zach's fault, he was dribbling the ball for about three seconds, lost his dribble, got it back, dribbled again and chucked it. What was he doing out on top of the key to begin with and why didn't he pass it to Nate Robinson....


good question, ask the coach, who never seemed to have any real offenive sets or strategy. Zach was freelancing, pretty much what everyone did on that team last year...
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
10/7/2008  7:17 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:

Isiah was a horrible coach and Zach Randolph made horrible plays at times. When you combine the 2, you tend to get 23 win teams.

Zach musta had some other horrible coaches in POR too cuz he's got a history of playing on 20-something win teams.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Zach getting high marks

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy