[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

OT: First Presidential Debate Thread
Author Thread
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
9/26/2008  11:03 PM
Yeah, apparently from CNN, Independents did not like McCain "you don't know what you are talking about". I think it was an even debate. McCain kept beating on Obama about the surge. Obama went back at him saying McCain thinks the war began back in 2007. I notice that it was Obama who also kept bringing up Bin Laden and going after him. McCain seemed to back off that. Obama held his own on McCain's speciality. He needed to knock Obama out of the park.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
AUTOADVERT
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
9/26/2008  11:07 PM
Obama seemed to knock McCain "Out of the park" on the financial issues. Those freeze comments were downright scary, by McCain.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Hank
Posts: 20109
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 7/1/2008
Member: #2082

9/26/2008  11:08 PM
McCain's experience 20+ years of public speaking showed tonight. He didn't stutter as much as Barack, his answers were more focus, and he did better a job anticipating and countering attacks. Kind of disappinted that Barack didn't do better a job explaining why he doesn't support the war in Iraq and why Americans shouldn't either. Obama tried to focus on too many reasons, when one or two detailed reasons would be more than enough.

My response was based on the second half of the debate. I didn't get to see/hear them talk about the financial issues, only tuned in after they started talking about Russia fighting Georgia.

[Edited by - hank on 09-26-2008 11:12 PM]
"It almost as if Bonn is relying on techniques he has learned for academic debates." "I can pay someone to find a statistic that will prove cloudy days cause stock market crashes." -Silverfuel
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
9/26/2008  11:17 PM
Posted by Hank:

McCain's experience 20+ years of public speaking showed tonight. He didn't stutter as much as Barack, his answers were more focus, and he did better a job anticipating and countering attacks. Kind of disappinted that Barack didn't do better a job explaining why he doesn't support the war in Iraq and why Americans shouldn't either. Obama tried to focus on too many reasons, when one or two detailed reasons would be more than enough.

My response was based on the second half of the debate. I didn't get to see/hear them talk about the financial issues, only tuned in after they started talking about Russia fighting Georgia.

[Edited by - hank on 09-26-2008 11:12 PM]

Obama kept mentioning that $10 billion dollars a month reference. McCain didn't touch that at all.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
9/26/2008  11:18 PM
I don't think Obama won but - here's the important thing - he didn't lose either.
https:// It's not so hard.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
9/26/2008  11:19 PM
One scary part that should get the biggest attention is that McCain actually said he would shut down Government spending with the exception of National defense and administration functions. That's basically a federal shut down.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
izybx
Posts: 22366
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 10/16/2006
Member: #1178
USA
9/26/2008  11:28 PM
Putting aside whether or not the candidates were right or wrong on the issues, I think that when it came to foriegn policy Mac showed his superior knowledge. Obama could only fall back on the fact that he opposed the Iraq war. When it comes down to who is the superior candidate in dealing with foreign policy in the world that we currently live in, Mccain demonstrated to me that he is the better candidate. Granted, Im as biased toward my candidate as the majority of this board is toward Barry Obama, but its just my two cents.
Beat the Evil Empire. BEAT MIAMI
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
9/26/2008  11:31 PM
Posted by izybx:

Putting aside whether or not the candidates were right or wrong on the issues, I think that when it came to foriegn policy Mac showed his superior knowledge. Obama could only fall back on the fact that he opposed the Iraq war. When it comes down to who is the superior candidate in dealing with foreign policy in the world that we currently live in, Mccain demonstrated to me that he is the better candidate. Granted, Im as biased toward my candidate as the majority of this board is toward Barry Obama, but its just my two cents.

It's definitely the case that partisans will tend to think their guy won, unless he really blows it like Ford in '76 or Dukakis in '88, etc.
https:// It's not so hard.
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
9/26/2008  11:35 PM
Apparently in the post-debate polls, most viewers thought Obama won. The CNN guys said it might be because more democrats watched the debate...

[Edited by - BasketballJones on 09-26-2008 23:36]
https:// It's not so hard.
LBeast
Posts: 20319
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/29/2005
Member: #994

9/26/2008  11:40 PM
Looks like the crowd here likes image vs answers. You're all impressed by McCain's bluster?

In terms of actual answers Obama won hands down.

In terms of what voters actually pay attention to, slight edge to McCain.

He was non-sensical at times, and even tried to get emotional about how he loves the troops. That sort of bull**** plays well. He hit Obama with attack that lacked truth, but, again since Obama had to defend himself, I think that will fool voters into believing McCain was stronger.

It's who's right vs who's loud.

Obama made him look foolish at times, and there are points I can't understand Obama not bringing up. Like the Keating 5 and the fact that Iraq's leaders agree with him on withdrawal.

I'll call this one a tie.


[Edited by - LBeast on 09-26-2008 11:40 PM]
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
9/26/2008  11:43 PM
Oh the braclet moment for freaking hillarous. The fact that Obama flash his too torpedo McCain's prop tatics. I could tell McCain didn't like that.

[Edited by - pharzeone on 09-26-2008 11:44 PM]
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
izybx
Posts: 22366
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 10/16/2006
Member: #1178
USA
9/27/2008  12:46 AM
Posted by LBeast:

Looks like the crowd here likes image vs answers. You're all impressed by McCain's bluster?

In terms of actual answers Obama won hands down.

In terms of what voters actually pay attention to, slight edge to McCain.

He was non-sensical at times, and even tried to get emotional about how he loves the troops. That sort of bull**** plays well. He hit Obama with attack that lacked truth, but, again since Obama had to defend himself, I think that will fool voters into believing McCain was stronger.

It's who's right vs who's loud.

Obama made him look foolish at times, and there are points I can't understand Obama not bringing up. Like the Keating 5 and the fact that Iraq's leaders agree with him on withdrawal.

I'll call this one a tie.


[Edited by - LBeast on 09-26-2008 11:40 PM]

I wouldnt be taking much of a risk by saying that if we liked image vs answers we would all love Obama. Mccain looks old and frail, and the scars from his service and his cander are pronounced. In terms of answers Obama won in the eyes of his supporters, and the same goes to Mccain. One thing that cant be denied, Mccain's experience in foreign policy matters is vastly superior to Obamas, which is fine if that is not an issue for you.
Beat the Evil Empire. BEAT MIAMI
izybx
Posts: 22366
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 10/16/2006
Member: #1178
USA
9/27/2008  12:48 AM
I think that Mccain must have done very well if most of you are saying that it was a tie or very close. Im sure that if it was actually a tie most UK posters would be saying that Obama destroyed Mccain. I know I would.
Beat the Evil Empire. BEAT MIAMI
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
9/27/2008  12:53 AM
imho, i'm looking at two weak candidates that do not give me any confidence in fixing this country. i am not inspired by either guy. and i see alot of empty promises from both sides. i think there's a high chance that the winner of this election will last only one term...

[Edited by - djsunyc on 09-27-2008 12:54 AM]
izybx
Posts: 22366
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 10/16/2006
Member: #1178
USA
9/27/2008  12:59 AM
Posted by djsunyc:

imho, i'm looking at two weak candidates that do not give me any confidence in fixing this country. i am not inspired by either guy. and i see alot of empty promises from both sides. i think there's a high chance that the winner of this election will last only one term...

[Edited by - djsunyc on 09-27-2008 12:54 AM]

I agree

Beat the Evil Empire. BEAT MIAMI
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
9/27/2008  1:04 AM
One interesting thing that seems to happen with these debates - the consensus on who won tends to emerge after a few days and it isn't always apparent immediately after the debate.

I think a tie in this case is a win for Obama, given that foreign policy is supposed to be McCain's strong suit.

And again, on demeanor and temperament, I think the edge goes to Obama.

But I guess we'll see in the coming days who really "won".
https:// It's not so hard.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
9/27/2008  1:30 AM
Posted by djsunyc:

imho, i'm looking at two weak candidates that do not give me any confidence in fixing this country. i am not inspired by either guy. and i see alot of empty promises from both sides. i think there's a high chance that the winner of this election will last only one term...

[Edited by - djsunyc on 09-27-2008 12:54 AM]

You know what's funny about that is that never generally holds true. It's exactly just the opposite. For example, George H Bush was seen as one of the most strongest candidates during his general election in 1988. I think he won almost every state except 4. His approval rating was nearly 80% before and during the Gulf war. On the flip side Clinton was viewed by many pundits as one of the weakest candidates that the Democrats put forward in recent history with all sort of baggage to boot. The guy was polling way behind both Ross Perot and George Bush. Everyone predicted that he would be knocked off, hell it was so bad that he couldn't help his fellow Democrats to hold onto their congressional seats in 93. But his approval ratings began to take off. That is remarkable. People said that there was no way that George W Bush would win another term. Not only did he win but he also won with a majority vote. No one can ever predict politics. That's the best thing about it.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
martin
Posts: 80034
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
9/27/2008  2:15 AM


dig this shiot
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
martin
Posts: 80034
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
9/27/2008  2:19 AM
^ "that's pathetic" hahhhhhhahahahahaha
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

9/27/2008  4:02 AM
McCain came off to me as a total bitch. He's winey and arrogant. He's still talking about experience yet picked a no name Govenor of alaska to run with him to get the hilary votes. McCain has all this "experience" yet talked about canceling the debate to concentrate on the economic crisis.

There was one part of the debate where McCain was trying to call Obama out about talking with world leaders without any conditions. He brought up some douche bag that I can't recall and Obama explained himself.....Obama was basically like duh, you can't expect him to meet with maniacs without certain things happening. Then McCain continues like Obama didn't just say that wasn't the case. McCain was sounding like a little kid mocking someone during recess.

Damn man, all the experience and he still comes off looking like a total bitch. Its comical. I've said it before I can't understand why anyone would consider voting for this guy.

As far as the next few months and 4 years down the line? Both of these guys are screwed. There is nothing they can do in months, or the first year or 2 to really make things that are happening now disappear. Either candidate will get screwed.

while I'm talking about the economy.......isn't it funny that just 6 months ago it seemed like everything was cool? Banks opening up everywhere. Like a banking boom. All the big spaces around town have been getting filled with banks. Now we are in an economic crisis that people are saying "another great depression" and even "armagedon". What the hell is going on seriously? And why all of a sudden things start poppin off less that 2 months before election day? Where the hell is Playa?!?!?
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
OT: First Presidential Debate Thread

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy