[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Alan Hahn blog about D'Antoni/Team USA Offense
Author Thread
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

8/26/2008  11:14 AM
One of the 2 positions would have to sacrifice in order to work. Dave DeBusschere was a big time scorer while with Detroit. Dave is probably the one who made the sacrifice for the sake of the team.

In the Knicks case with Zach and Curry, I think Curry should be the ont to sacrifice. He's not very good as a lead post threat. He was successful when Isiah was force feeding him but the team sucked. I believe Curry would be better suited as a trailer and a finisher. Curry gets in trouble when he's asked to dribble and basically be Shaq. The reality with Curry is he doesn't want to dribble. He wants to turn and shoot and run in for a dunk. Zach on the other hand wants to be involved in the post. He wants to dribble and be crafty with the ball inside.......I say let them.

What's important to me is how everything else is used around them. That's why I'm excited about how D'antoni uses Crawford. See Crawford isn't a point guard but you coulda fooled me you know? The guy passes like a point guard and he has the best handle at the 2 spot in the entire league. He needs to be given a focus and role in an offense instead of just given the green light. People like to say he played his best ball under Larry Brown. I dunno, maybe that's because he was given a role. D'antoni will give him that focus again, and I'm hoping Craw can capitalize and be the soul of what goes on from here on out........btw where is the back-up shooting guard? Roberson?

The problem for me is still the small fwd spot. Wilson is kind of a power small fwd. The Knicks don't have a real bonified slasher. Wilson is close but not really loosey goosey enough. Which brings the problem.......where do Q, Jared, David Lee, and Gallo fit if there are no trades? Is Wilson really going to be annointed the starting sf?

The team is not complete yet, duh, but there is countless ways this team can improve.....but with no trades this is what we're looking at.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
AUTOADVERT
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

8/26/2008  5:26 PM
Posted by Markji:


But another thing, originally, we had 2 "Big Men" in Reed and Walt Belamy (one of the premier centers and top all-time scorers of his time) and yet we couldn't win. It was only when we traded Bellamy for DeBusschere that we gelled as a team. Same thing in the 90's. We had Ewing and Cartwright. When we traded Cartwright for Oakley, we again became prominant. Both oakley and Dave D could shoot form outside, were tough inside, and played team ball. So 2 Bigs isn't critical. Having a PF and Center who play well together, teamwork, and play smart, and can shoot is critical. I think Gallo can fill that role.

One would think that Zach could fill the role of a Debuschere or Oakley. He rebounds and shoots as well as any PF. Maybe he's lacking the teamwork. Maybe D'A can fix his teamwork problem? (Just a thought; really a hope. A Big hope!).

Forgot about the Bellamy deal. Reed and he were just not simpatico on the inside. Debusschere did have a running hook that he would use at times, but he was primarily a perimeter player, who had good range. Getting rid of Bellamy allowed Reed to roam free on the inside where he was more comfortable.


Very wishful thinking on Randolph, and for me, it is almost sacrilegious to hear Randolph's name mentioned in the same breath as Debusschere, who was my favorite Knick as a kid. I just don't believe that Zach can play the helping D that the Knicks will need to play.

I don't think that Randolph will be around much longer because if Milicic is healthy, anyway, I think they will make the Memphis deal if the Grizzlies are willing.

By the way, IMHO, Frazier was a decent shooter, although he did not have the classic jump shooter release like Bradley or Debusshere. No 3pt range at all- more like 17 ft and under, if you ask me- and more likely to take his man down low for a short jumper, but he could hit the midrange shot when open.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
8/26/2008  6:12 PM
Posted by Paladin55:
Posted by Markji:


But another thing, originally, we had 2 "Big Men" in Reed and Walt Belamy (one of the premier centers and top all-time scorers of his time) and yet we couldn't win. It was only when we traded Bellamy for DeBusschere that we gelled as a team. Same thing in the 90's. We had Ewing and Cartwright. When we traded Cartwright for Oakley, we again became prominant. Both oakley and Dave D could shoot form outside, were tough inside, and played team ball. So 2 Bigs isn't critical. Having a PF and Center who play well together, teamwork, and play smart, and can shoot is critical. I think Gallo can fill that role.

One would think that Zach could fill the role of a Debuschere or Oakley. He rebounds and shoots as well as any PF. Maybe he's lacking the teamwork. Maybe D'A can fix his teamwork problem? (Just a thought; really a hope. A Big hope!).

Forgot about the Bellamy deal. Reed and he were just not simpatico on the inside. Debusschere did have a running hook that he would use at times, but he was primarily a perimeter player, who had good range. Getting rid of Bellamy allowed Reed to roam free on the inside where he was more comfortable.


Very wishful thinking on Randolph, and for me, it is almost sacrilegious to hear Randolph's name mentioned in the same breath as Debusschere, who was my favorite Knick as a kid. I just don't believe that Zach can play the helping D that the Knicks will need to play.

I don't think that Randolph will be around much longer because if Milicic is healthy, anyway, I think they will make the Memphis deal if the Grizzlies are willing.

By the way, IMHO, Frazier was a decent shooter, although he did not have the classic jump shooter release like Bradley or Debusshere. No 3pt range at all- more like 17 ft and under, if you ask me- and more likely to take his man down low for a short jumper, but he could hit the midrange shot when open.
Wishful thinking on Randolph - I said that - I am just "hoping"...only because I believe in D'A - in his ability to coach and to motivate players. But I also agree with you that Randolph will be gone if there is a decent deal to be had. Maybe the Grizzlies? as it has come up again. My main point was that having 2 Big men up front doesn't always work.....as you also pointed out that Belamy and Reed didn't play well together.

Yes- Frazier was short range jumper - no 3 pt. range. Yet a great player.
Sorry to offend you on the Debuschere comparison. Zach does have the talent, but not the B-ball knowledge, team concept, or motivation. Debuschere was great - and a player coach at, I believe, 26 years old.
The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
8/26/2008  8:10 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by BRIGGS:

If I remember correctly--every single nba champion since I recall had 2 big conventional players on the frontline in the starting line up. Were trying to compare international basketball to NBA basketball.

The styles of every single sport change over time. The NBA has slowly been moving towards the international game and with the influx of foreign players in recent years, it's only going to expedite.

It's also about the rule changes in the NBA that have made the tough D we saw in the from the 70s-90s (especially in the early-mid 90s, except for the Jordan Rules, of course) a figment of the past for the most part. Most bigs are not even learning how to play with their back to the basket, for the most part.

Just recently on the Ex-NY Times forum, I believe tomverve had some good insights into the manner in which athletic bigs on defense may now be key (amongst other factors). He argued, I believe, that because of the emphasis on offense that makes keeping such players out of their comfort zone harder (no more hand checking, for example) that you then need some bigs who can defend the paint and the rim.

There is little question that this is what has caused a major problem for the Knicks over the past few years, and worsened last year with Z-Bo and Curry manning the paint. To me, this will be the most difficult problem to surmount this year, but last year we knew that too, and just thought we would outscore folks. The problem was the offense was not geared towards doing anything good, and the pairing of those two seems like a mismatch after last year. If we don't move one before the season starts, under D'Antoni's creative offensive mind there will be hardly any arguments from folks defending them if they can't do better this year. I like the idea of Chandler and Gallo getting minutes at the 4 if they can earn the minutes. Sounds to me like D'Antoni & Walsh believes at least The Mayor can get serious rotation minutes this year so it will be fun to see what happens.

On a related note djsu suggests the league is more beneficial to guards, a position we see several stars come from, yet I think it is just that offenses are allowed more freedom so more offensive minded players at any position, especially those who play from the wing, which can really be anyone 1-4 these days, and sometimes the 5, are going to do well. However, in fairness, many of the top offensive players are guards.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
8/26/2008  8:41 PM
People like to say he played his best ball under Larry Brown. I dunno

Crawford was much better the next season under Isiah. I don't know how any can argue this. He had better numbers, the team played better, he ran the point nicely and the team had more wins than the previous entire season when Crawford went down with a broken foot with 20 games left to play.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
8/26/2008  9:08 PM
EXCELLENT ARTICLE!!!!! I agree with this observation 110%. This is what i've seen and have been looking forward to from day one. I think it's exactly what we're going to see happen with this team over the next few years.

We can look forward to seeing this team coached like it hasn't been coached in a while. We should see a weeding out process as Mike gets a better look at the players we have and identifies who is smart enough and skilled enough to help us going forward. Until Mike gets these guys in camp and starts to install his system, there's no way any of us can really know who will excel and who won't. We can venture a guess, but it remains to be seen.

I like the idea of using Gallo and Chan as the forwards, it may not happen from day one, but I think it can happen and I think it could work. This is the direction we're headed in folks. So long as the team is built right, I think you can win with just about any style. Like i've said before. The Montana 49'ers and Magic Lakers were primarily offensive teams and won that way. It's not impossible to win with a great offense and a good defense.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
8/27/2008  3:37 AM
Posted by nixluva:

EXCELLENT ARTICLE!!!!! I agree with this observation 110%. This is what i've seen and have been looking forward to from day one. I think it's exactly what we're going to see happen with this team over the next few years.

We can look forward to seeing this team coached like it hasn't been coached in a while. We should see a weeding out process as Mike gets a better look at the players we have and identifies who is smart enough and skilled enough to help us going forward. Until Mike gets these guys in camp and starts to install his system, there's no way any of us can really know who will excel and who won't. We can venture a guess, but it remains to be seen.

I like the idea of using Gallo and Chan as the forwards, it may not happen from day one, but I think it can happen and I think it could work. This is the direction we're headed in folks. So long as the team is built right, I think you can win with just about any style. Like i've said before. The Montana 49'ers and Magic Lakers were primarily offensive teams and won that way. It's not impossible to win with a great offense and a good defense.

Magic is not walking through that door.
James is not walking through that door.
Kareem is not walking through that door.

I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
8/27/2008  7:29 AM
I have spouted much the same logic about the rules changing in the nba and favoring offensive players. but, reflect on the fact the the teams winning it all do play a physical brand of defense- it might not be thug-like our 90s knicks- but let's be honest- the celts were sure close.

think about recent champions and which of our players would get into the rotation- maybe lee & crawford- we have a long way to go- I think 5+ years. I doubt curry or zach will be in our equation.
Ira
Posts: 24692
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
8/27/2008  8:35 AM
Posted by Paladin55:
Posted by Markji:

Gallo's first half in Summer league - he would always be trying to pass the ball, but no one was cutting or doing anything. So he looked lost. Now the rest of the team will learn to play that way also (passing, moving, teamwork). It is inspiring! because that was the Knicks' style when they won championships.

[Edited by - markji on 08-26-2008 07:32 AM]

As an older fan I would love to see this. The only problem is that every guy on the Knicks starting 5 back then on those teams, including the centers- Reed, Lucas, and even Gianelli, could hit jump shots beyond 15 ft, and they had guys coming off the bench who could do the same thing. You also need an intelligent team to play this way, and that is another question I have with the Knicks at this time.

Reed and Debusschere were defensive studs on the inside at that time, and got 10RPG each/game. Reed was also a shot-blocker. We don't have this kind of D inside with our guys now.


You are also dead-on with the Gallo comment. He did make a couple of nice passes, but it looked like our strategy in that game was to hang around the perimeter and wait for open 3s, and the movement by our players was terrible.
But recall the Olympics again...whenever the U.S. got itself into trouble was when it pounded the ball on the floor instead of passing it. The most important thing to keep in mind when you play in this system is movement. Catch it and do something...NOW. If you watched Team USA, there was a lot of that going on.

That was one of the things that made those Knick championship teams so great. When Willis got the ball in the low post, he either started his move or passed the ball. You have to know where your teammates are before you get the ball. If you have to look for them after you got the ball, the offense slows down and stops.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
8/27/2008  9:53 AM
Posted by oohah:
People like to say he played his best ball under Larry Brown. I dunno

Crawford was much better the next season under Isiah. I don't know how any can argue this. He had better numbers, the team played better, he ran the point nicely and the team had more wins than the previous entire season when Crawford went down with a broken foot with 20 games left to play.

oohah

once marbury got shut down:

march:
24 mins
11.6 pts
2.3 asts
2.5 rebs
47 fg%
4.1 fta

april:
42 mins
22.2 pts
5.7 asts
3.2 rebs
43 fg%
7.5 fta

i think the final two months saw crawford become a better player and that's why some think he was starting to "get it" under brown.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
8/27/2008  3:27 PM
I think we have some guys who can play D'Antoni Ball. Jamal, Nate, Chan, Gallo and Q, are the most capable IMO. Then we have a few other guys that are a little sketchy. Lee can do it if he can gain confidence in his shot. He does everything else needed. He hustles, moves the ball, runs, catches and finishes. I don't think that's a bad place to start when looking to rebuild. We have a clear need to fix the roster, but I think for right now there's hope we can play better in this system and be more successful with many of the guys we already have.
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

8/27/2008  8:43 PM
The problem was never in our few good player......the problem was all the retards and headcases the Knicks have. Isiah's GM'ing and coaching.

Even now Donnie only added gallo, roberson, and deleted Balkman......knicks still have Q, jared, mardy, Jerome, malik, and Marbs with the same poor mix of talent.

Key now is for D'antoni to come in and sort out the bad.....

I just have an observation......this is 2008 right? You mean to tell me Donnie doesn't have internet access? They don't have game film? Does he have infor or an outside opinion on NY's situation?

Knicks have retards(no disrespect to any seriously mentally challenged people btw).......Malik, jerome, Q, Marbs, Mardy, jared......they gotta go. Anybody.....absolutely anybody in the league they can get for these bums would be upgrades. Even if they simply waived them all and just signed some of us, they would be a better team. It doesn't take a genius to know that's the main problem.

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Alan Hahn blog about D'Antoni/Team USA Offense

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy