Gordon's very good at what he does although what he does is limited. I can think of a lot of two's I'd rather have, but I wouldn't mind having him on our roster depending on two things. 1) What the Bulls will want for him in a trade. 2) What we'll have to pay him.
bitty41 Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215
i think ben gordon would score 25 ppg w/ d'antoni at 45% shooting.
I second that Gordon would get the consistent role under D'Antoni which is something imo he lacked in Chicago. Gordon just needs to be a system that won't play helter skelter with him. And if he had the consistent green light that Jamal has had for the past 2 seasons he would be at least 10 times the player Crawford is.
TMS Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674 USA
Currently speaking, he might be a more efficient version of Crawford and certainly Nate --- but am I wrong in not wanting to deal with an ex-Bulls. Unless of course there is a scientific breakthrough that can regenerate Jordan back into his 1992 form. Enough is enough, we really trying to be the baby Bulls.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets.
--Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
Ira Posts: 24692
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
Currently speaking, he might be a more efficient version of Crawford and certainly Nate --- but am I wrong in not wanting to deal with an ex-Bulls. Unless of course there is a scientific breakthrough that can regenerate Jordan back into his 1992 form. Enough is enough, we really trying to be the baby Bulls.
I have no such problem. You win some and lose some on trades. With Donnie making the decisions, I'm comfortable with it.
crzymdups Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671 USA