[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

UK posters... your thoughts on Nate Robinson
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum


Author Poll
fishmike
Posts: 33902
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
Curious what you guys think. Nate has had good moments and certainly shown flashes. He's also... well, retarded. I am curious about what you guys think is best for the team at this point. I think he's got a good amount of appeal around the league, as a scorer off the bench at worst. Would you rather see him in Mike's system or be moved for another quick guard type?
See how Nate plays in Mike D's system
Move Nate for a late #1 and add a guy like DJ Aug, Ty Lawson or BPA with a pick 20-30 range
View Results


Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
6/5/2008  1:15 PM
You're a fool if you don't make that trade.

Get that piece of **** off my team, he's a loser who only cares about getting his and doing stupid pet tricks.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
AUTOADVERT
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172
6/5/2008  1:19 PM
Posted by islesfan:

You're a fool if you don't make that trade.

Get that piece of **** off my team, he's a loser who only cares about getting his and doing stupid pet tricks.

Its' funny how Nate being the small little tike he is does prove to be effective at times, when he's greenlighted and New Yorkers love him. Most don't want to see him go for whatever idiotic reason. He doesn't have a clear position really. He isn't a 2 guard and he definitely isn't a point guard but when it comes to looking at this summer's draft and prospects, there's all this concern for player's and their height's.

[Edited by - TrueBlue on 06-05-2008 12:30 PM]
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
6/5/2008  1:27 PM
Trade him to Barnum and Bailey where he belongs.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/5/2008  1:29 PM
Any player on this team is tradeable--there is no must player on the team.
RIP Crushalot😞
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/5/2008  1:33 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

Any player on this team is tradeable--there is no must player on the team.
that wasnt the question. The question was do you trade him for a late first rounder... say 18-25

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
6/5/2008  1:35 PM
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by BRIGGS:

Any player on this team is tradeable--there is no must player on the team.
that wasnt the question. The question was do you trade him for a late first rounder... say 18-25

Briggs would trade his mother for a mid to late first rounder.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/5/2008  1:36 PM
Posted by islesfan:


Briggs would trade his mother for a mid to late first rounder.
really? Have you seen his mom? She hot?

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
6/5/2008  1:38 PM
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by islesfan:


Briggs would trade his mother for a mid to late first rounder.
really? Have you seen his mom? She hot?

I didn't say that I would trade for his mother.

I'd trade for yours though.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
Ira
Posts: 24692
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
6/5/2008  1:52 PM
I wouldn't do the trade unless one of two things happens.

1) We either trade up and get Bayless or we get lucky and Bayless falls to us.
2) We can move him for a pick that would get us Augustin.
MaTT4281
Posts: 35185
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
6/5/2008  2:35 PM
I'd like to see how Nate plays under D'Antoni. I think Mike's system is the perfect fit for the little guy. If you can get a mid 1st round pick in the 15-20 range, you definitely have to consider it, but my first choice would be to see if you can buy any later picks. I would love to get our hands on that #15 from Phoenix.
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
6/5/2008  3:08 PM
I voted to keep Nate because I would want a pick in the 13-18 range for him.
~You can't run from who you are.~
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
6/5/2008  3:10 PM
I would definitely move Nate for a late 1st rounder.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
buddapaw
Posts: 23213
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 2/22/2006
Member: #1101
6/6/2008  4:18 PM
If we are lucky enough to get Mayo, I'd move Crawful and keep Nate he's a fast little bugger and Mike D needs players like that. Plus he's best shooter on the team and Mike D needs shooters.
"Low Percentage Shots r US, these are our Knicks" "NY KNICKS the cure for basketball fanatic"
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34075
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127
6/6/2008  4:30 PM
Keep him. He was stud with UWash, which was a fly-up-and-down-the-court system. He needs to grow the eff up and learn to stop being a bitch and defend, but I want to see what he can do next year. If he regresses or stagnates, we can just let him sign somewhere else.
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
6/6/2008  6:02 PM
I think if the right deal came along (i.e. a decent first round pick) I would want the Knicks to trade him. He has been around long enough to show that he has talent, and is very immature. I think there needs to be a new professionalism in the Knicks locker room that was not there under Isiah. I am not sure if Nate fits that. I think D'Antoni relies on character guys being professionals on and off the court. Nate to this point seems like he needs someone to present him with structure, expectations, rules and consequences to control his knucklehead tendencies.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
UK posters... your thoughts on Nate Robinson
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy