[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Which Knicks Will Be Sent Packing? (Daily News)
Author Thread
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215

5/18/2008  9:02 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by bitty41:
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by bitty41:
Posted by newyorknewyork:

People are acting like Marion, Amare, & Diaw were all world shooters. Marion isn't a good shooter he is an above average shooter. Amare is an above average shooter. Diaw is a below average shooter.

Lee has 4 skills that make him good for D'Antoni's system in his own way and it will be very visible come camp. Strong rebounder, he dishes out EXCELLENT outlet passes to push the tempo, pretty athletic & runs the floor well, Solid finisher.


Amare was basically playing the center position and though he isn't the world's greatest shooter he does have a solid outside J. Diaw' skills with ball-handling, passing, and some shooting made him solid contributor, and Marion has the ugliest looking jumper in the game but it still has nearly a 50% fg percentage.

I wouldn't believe most of the stuff being written in the paper until if and when any actions are taking but get serious about Lee he isn't a shooter, decent passer (he's averaged a whopping 1 assist) and still has some ways to go on his outside shot. So I think that its important to remember that no one on this roster is untouchable and nor should they be.

Who said anyone on the roster was untouchable? Lee is an excellent outlet passer to start a fast break after a rebound. That doesn't mean that he is going to end up with a bunch of assist. He doesn't touch the ball enough offensively to have a lot of assist. But it does mean that its a great attribute to have in D'Antoni's system.

I didn't say that Lee did have an jumper or was even going to improve on it. The point is that Marion, Stoud, Diaw were the players they were in D'Antoni's system not because of there shooting ability but because of there physical abilities and skill sets. So the shooting part to me is overblown. Lee can easily find a big role in D'Antoni's system with his own skill set, hustle, good teammate, high IQ even though he can't shoot. Much like Boris Diaw.

If Lee was moved it wouldn't be because of his shooting abilty but because resigning him would effect Walsh plans to go after Lebron.

No offense but you act as though outlet passing is some kind of special ability its not and every post player should be able to throw a good outlet pass. Thats an essential thing to being a post player.

Where did Lebron come into the mix? If this is Walsh's big plans for the future hoping to ensnare Lebron away from Clev and whoever else bids on him, he's going to be in for a rude awakening like many Knick fans.

No offense but you took a small comment about his outlet passing which is again EXCELLENT and turned it into how many assist he gets per game. Every big should be able to throw a good outlet pass. But most bigs don't look to do so consistantly. Which is probably why Lee's outlet passing stands out. I know im not the only one because ive seen people post commenting on Lee's outlet passing on this board. And is again a good attribute to have in D'Antoni's uptempo game.

Outlet passing a quality or not, his rebounding, hustle, IQ, low turn over rate, 82%ft shooting can't be question.

Lebron has been in the mix ever since Walsh stated he was trying to get cap flexibility by 2010 when Lebron is to become a free agent. So I guess we are in for a rude awakening.

Why do people try to make something out of nothing when it comes to Lee just stick to the rebounding, hustle, good free-throw shooter, and you'll be alright. But whats next Lee has a great running form, Lee dunks the ball better then anyone on the team, lol.

Explain this one to me if the Knicks clear out their cap and suck for the next 2 years what would Lebron's motivation exactly be again for coming to the Knicks? If it was this summer then I would be all for it but I think its foolish for Knick fans to have this dream when the Knicks have far more pressing issues right now. A lot could happen so I think a more prudent approach is taking it one step at a time and trying to put together a competitive team instead hoping for Superman to come save the day.
AUTOADVERT
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
5/18/2008  9:52 PM
Posted by franco12:
Posted by VDesai:

Its an opinion article written by one of the stupidest writers that covers the Knicks. So what exactly is it worth?

agreed!

D'Antoni said he want's players who can make quick and smart decisions with the ball. Using that definition, I think its Lee is a better fit for D'Antoni than Crawford.

Lee couldn't hit FT's his first year- now he shoots 80%.

Towards the end of last season, he started to show his 12 ft jumper. I can see Lee developing a 3pt shot in a few years- he works hard, and he gets better.

More agreeance...

Crawful can't shoot either....so why would he like him again? Crawful is a scorer, a highly inefficient scorer.


Lee is an efficient scorer, he does very well on the fast break both initiating it and finishing on it or running with it. So what's the issue?

Sounds like washed up opinions anyways to me......these aren't words from Mike's mouth. They're ancient second hand comments on Lee from 2005 and speculative comments second hand on Nate and Crawful........ then spun by a writer.

Talk about as far from fact as one can get.
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
5/18/2008  10:10 PM
King, question for you.

You know better than anyone if D'Antoni actually likes Lee or not. To me, this whole "D'Antoni doesn't like Lee thing" sounds like it's something that D'Antoni said before Lee was even drafted and played a game in the NBA, that was years ago and Lee has shown to be a very capable player.

As you've said before, D'Antoni and Lee have a relationship from the olympics. So really, what's the story here?
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
5/18/2008  10:16 PM
Posted by King1:

I think it will be interesting what you do with Lee. Do you pay him 45 million and get 16-12 from the four position the next 5 years? DO you trade him for a draft pick which would be retarded because you have no idea what your getting with a draft pick and you know what you have with him. Only 8 players in his draft are having a better career and about 5 from last year. Do you trade him with a bad contract and start all over?

Depends how bad they want to get under the cap. Signing Lee hurts those chances... but D'Antoni does like him...
¿ △ ?
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

5/18/2008  11:26 PM
Posted by EwingsGlass:

Been thinking about this lately.

Jerome James-- Needs to go. All hamburger jokes aside, he cannot fit in the gameplan. With Shaq in the West again, the reactionary 'big body' move is now completely redundant. We should look for a WC team to take him off our hands as a back up. We will need to package at least Balk to make it work. Utah might be a good fit. They have an abundance of shooting and a lesser amount of big bodies. Jerome James, NRob and Balkman for Kyle Korver and Morris Almond?
Zach Randolph--Gots to go. He can't jump. Athleticism comes at a premium in a Suns-style system. Despite the negative attacks on him, clearly this year he has shown the ability to keep his nose clean and out of the negative media spotlight. I understand that Walsh may want nothing more to do with Artest, but Randolph and Chandler to Sactown for Artest and Kenny Thomas might work.
Eddie Curry--Again, look to the West. I am thinking to Dallas with David Lee for Josh Howard.
Randolph Morris-- Can stay. costs little. Might be able to run. Let's see.
David Lee-- Trading Chip. Can work in any system, so I would love to hold onto him, but I don't want to give him the dollars he deserves at this time.
Renaldo Balkman-- Trading chip. SFs that cannot shoot are not valuble, despite his ability to finish.
Wilson Chandler-- Trading Chip. I'd like to keep him, but if we need to move him to turn over the roster, it works.
Quentin Richardson-- I'd like to move him, but not if it costs us much. Mardy Collins and Qrich to Atlanta for a resigned Josh Childress.
Jared Jeffries. Probably hard to move this contract.
Nate Robinson-- Trading Chip.
Malik Rose. Hold until the trade deadline. Leave him on the IR. I don't want to see his lame shots again. Good character though, so I won't trash him any further.
Stephon Marbury. I love the idea of Marbs for Barbosa and Diaw. I can't imagine how this works under the cap or what else we have to take back, but I see it in the news, so maybe knows things that I don't. I will throw in any other player to get this done.
Mardy Collins-- Trading chip.
Jamal Crawford--Will work in this system. Hits free throws. Has good size. Can break down nearly any defender. Good outside shot. Creates own shot.
Draft: Jerryd Bayless
MLE: Chris 'Birdman' Anderson.
LLE: Bostjon Nachbar

If perfectly executed and wishes were fishes...:
Barbosa/Jamal/Bayless
Howard/Korver
Artest/Almond/Nachbar
Childress/Kenny Thomas/Jeffries
Diaw/Anderson/Morris/Rose

Absolutely unrealistic that all this could happen, but if I had my dream offseason, this is what I would do.

I don't agree with everything but some real good points here.

(1) Nobody's taking Jerome James. Never a real good player to begin with, his complete lack of desire, being continually out of shape & injury prone along with his "check-collector" mentality since joining the Knicks will scare off even the most ignorrant and aloof GM out there. I don't think I've ever seen a bigger waste in my whole life than this clown.

(2) Love that you brought up Morris Almond. Like him a lot. As of right now it doesn't look like there's any room for this kid on Utah's roster. They have Kirilenko/Harpring/Korver that can play the 3, Ronnie Brewer/CJ Miles/Korver that can play the 2 - All appear to be ahead of Almond in Jerry Sloan's mind as of right now. Wilson Chandler might turn out to be a decent player but we should've taken this kid when we had a chance in last year's draft. Said it at the time. 6'6" 220 lb. smooth and fluid scoring machine that can score from anywhere - post up, mid range coming off screens, 3 ball, gets to the line freq. and shoots it at 85% - can play the 2 & 3, plus rebounder for a wing with a great upper body. And this kid's ready - averaged 21.9, 26.4 ppg his last 2 years at Rice and then a whopping 25.6 ppg in the D-league last year, including 2 games where he went for over 50! Would love to see the Knicks go after him. I just don't see Utah being interested in anything we have (not even Lee, they already have a similar player in Paul Millsap that's very cost effective). Really does resemble Allan Houston in a lot of ways with better rebounding ability. Maybe Utah might want cash and a future draft choice. I'd consider that.

3) I agree Lee should be a trading chip. He's gonna be looking for too much money to stay here and for a reserve forward that basically provides additional rebounding and hustle we can go with more cost-effective options (sign Justin Williams to a contract for the summer and see if he sticks). I proposed a trade the other day of Lee/Balkman/filler (Morris) to Sacramento for Shelden Williams and pick #12. Good trade for both teams.

4) Don't want to trade Marbury for Diaw and Barbosa. Too much of a cap hindrance moving forward. We should just hold onto Steph, let him play out this season (and I bet he plays fairly well - he's in his contract year) and then make a decision at the end of the year, though I'm inclined to just let him walk, esp. after all the bizarre **** he pulled last year (the wacky & embarrassing interview with Bruce Beck, the sex with the Garden intern, leaving the team in Phoenix....). Draft Jerryd Bayless as his successor.

5) Want no part of Chris Andersen with the MLE. Nachbar with the LLE is actually a good call though.

6) I want to keep Mardy Collins. He's very unique and I think he can help us moving forward. When we finally get this thing turned around I'd love to see Mardy still here being a big part of it.

7) I think Dallas might want a little more than for Josh Howard than Curry/Lee. But that's interesting. Not sure I's want Howard anyway. He's a good player but I'd rather just give Chandler a shot and maybe pick up Nachbar with the LLE for added depth at the 3.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/18/2008  11:30 PM
Fine, I respect your opinions a lot but there's no way in hell i would balk at any opportunity to get Josh Howard unless we were lucky enough to land 1 of the top 2 picks in the draft... i'd be willing to give up the #5 & Chandler for Howard if DAL would do it... he's an awesome player IMHO.

Nachbar for the LLE would be nice but i think he'd want more than that, & if he's looking for a full MLE contract he can look elsewhere.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
5/18/2008  11:35 PM
So lets get under the cup with some scrap...
What's the point?

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30259
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
5/18/2008  11:43 PM
Posted by bitty41:
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by bitty41:
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by bitty41:
Posted by newyorknewyork:

People are acting like Marion, Amare, & Diaw were all world shooters. Marion isn't a good shooter he is an above average shooter. Amare is an above average shooter. Diaw is a below average shooter.

Lee has 4 skills that make him good for D'Antoni's system in his own way and it will be very visible come camp. Strong rebounder, he dishes out EXCELLENT outlet passes to push the tempo, pretty athletic & runs the floor well, Solid finisher.


Amare was basically playing the center position and though he isn't the world's greatest shooter he does have a solid outside J. Diaw' skills with ball-handling, passing, and some shooting made him solid contributor, and Marion has the ugliest looking jumper in the game but it still has nearly a 50% fg percentage.

I wouldn't believe most of the stuff being written in the paper until if and when any actions are taking but get serious about Lee he isn't a shooter, decent passer (he's averaged a whopping 1 assist) and still has some ways to go on his outside shot. So I think that its important to remember that no one on this roster is untouchable and nor should they be.

Who said anyone on the roster was untouchable? Lee is an excellent outlet passer to start a fast break after a rebound. That doesn't mean that he is going to end up with a bunch of assist. He doesn't touch the ball enough offensively to have a lot of assist. But it does mean that its a great attribute to have in D'Antoni's system.

I didn't say that Lee did have an jumper or was even going to improve on it. The point is that Marion, Stoud, Diaw were the players they were in D'Antoni's system not because of there shooting ability but because of there physical abilities and skill sets. So the shooting part to me is overblown. Lee can easily find a big role in D'Antoni's system with his own skill set, hustle, good teammate, high IQ even though he can't shoot. Much like Boris Diaw.

If Lee was moved it wouldn't be because of his shooting abilty but because resigning him would effect Walsh plans to go after Lebron.

No offense but you act as though outlet passing is some kind of special ability its not and every post player should be able to throw a good outlet pass. Thats an essential thing to being a post player.

Where did Lebron come into the mix? If this is Walsh's big plans for the future hoping to ensnare Lebron away from Clev and whoever else bids on him, he's going to be in for a rude awakening like many Knick fans.

No offense but you took a small comment about his outlet passing which is again EXCELLENT and turned it into how many assist he gets per game. Every big should be able to throw a good outlet pass. But most bigs don't look to do so consistantly. Which is probably why Lee's outlet passing stands out. I know im not the only one because ive seen people post commenting on Lee's outlet passing on this board. And is again a good attribute to have in D'Antoni's uptempo game.

Outlet passing a quality or not, his rebounding, hustle, IQ, low turn over rate, 82%ft shooting can't be question.

Lebron has been in the mix ever since Walsh stated he was trying to get cap flexibility by 2010 when Lebron is to become a free agent. So I guess we are in for a rude awakening.

Why do people try to make something out of nothing when it comes to Lee just stick to the rebounding, hustle, good free-throw shooter, and you'll be alright. But whats next Lee has a great running form, Lee dunks the ball better then anyone on the team, lol.

Explain this one to me if the Knicks clear out their cap and suck for the next 2 years what would Lebron's motivation exactly be again for coming to the Knicks? If it was this summer then I would be all for it but I think its foolish for Knick fans to have this dream when the Knicks have far more pressing issues right now. A lot could happen so I think a more prudent approach is taking it one step at a time and trying to put together a competitive team instead hoping for Superman to come save the day.

Lee's outlet passing was just one of the little things that he does that I believe goes along with D'Antoni's style. Why you took exception to it I don't know. Its not like I said he was going to end up like Steve Nash running the fast break. I never said he was a superstar, untouchable, that he was going to become Amare now with D'Antoni. Only that he has some skills and does some little things that leads me to believe that he will find a role in D'Antoni's system even though he can't shoot. Like rebounding, outlet passing, running the floor, finishing, etc.. So if anyone was making something out of nothing regarding Lee, it was you. But I don't hold grudges

As for Lebron I can only comment by what Walsh is saying. I don't know if I agree or not. If I agree or not will strongly be based on his execution of this plan. Truthfully all I can ask for at this point is a plan and a great execution of that plan. Say we do end up going after Lebron and he doesn't sign. We are left with 20mil in cap space and lotto picks. I don't see that as a horrible consolation.

What route or plan are we missing out on if we do this? As you stated nobody is untouchable. So what players would kill our championship hopes by moving there contracts? What longterm contracts are attractive for us that we would want to take back in trades which would bring us to championship level? Curry? Randolph? Jefferies? Crawford? What mid level free agents are out there that we should sign that would bring us to new levels? Jr Smith?

I think one of the reasons D'Antoni was sought after by Walsh was so that we could run, compete, look entertaining & enticing for a guy like Lebron as well as other gms while he turns over the roster. I can't complain to much about the Idea because going after Lebron is the closest route I can picture in terms of going after a championship.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
Nalod
Posts: 72123
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
5/19/2008  12:06 AM
Remember Isish preached suns wanted to draft Balky.

Balky can't shoot.
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

5/19/2008  7:13 AM
David Lee is a good white ever improving hustle player with a suspect outside shot.

D'Antoni knows what he's looking for and david lee isn't it.

That's ok , many cities in the NBA want a guy like david lee and won't ask him to shoot jumpshots from the outside.

IMHO he's great trade bait for what we don't have , a rebounding shotblocking center and a young up and coming pg.


Thanks David , you were our great white hope in NY, but Isiah screwed up the roster and under D'Antoni you are expendable.

[Edited by - playa2 on 19-05-2008 07:14]
JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
5/19/2008  8:50 AM
Posted by playa2:

David Lee is a good white ever improving hustle player with a suspect outside shot.

D'Antoni knows what he's looking for and david lee isn't it.

That's ok , many cities in the NBA want a guy like david lee and won't ask him to shoot jumpshots from the outside.

IMHO he's great trade bait for what we don't have , a rebounding shotblocking center and a young up and coming pg.


Thanks David , you were our great white hope in NY, but Isiah screwed up the roster and under D'Antoni you are expendable.

[Edited by - playa2 on 19-05-2008 07:14]

How do we know what D'Antoni wants?

Just because Lee can't shoot doesn't mean D'Antoni will want Lee gone- No one on this team can shoot, outside of Nate.

And if D'Antoni could choose between Lee & Zach, irrespective of contracts, I strongly believe it would be Lee, not Zach, even though Zach 'can shoot'.
Nalod
Posts: 72123
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
5/19/2008  8:52 AM
A "good white"?

Its better when your not trying to hide it.

Just let it all out there! Its more genuine.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
5/19/2008  10:33 AM
lee for charlie v?
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/19/2008  10:35 AM
Lee IMO has been slowly improving his shot. The thing is that in many cases a player gains confindence the more he is called upon to shoot the ball. When exactly did Isiah ever really look to set up Lee? It's one of the few things I always bashed Isiah about. The guy produced when given a real shot, but he IMO was held back a bit by Isiah's play calling.

If you look at Lee, he shows all the signs of a guy that isn't stuck in "can't shoot" land. He improved his FT's and showed a bit more ability on his midrange. I think he would fit in well for his many other excellent skills and his shooting will be just good enough to warrant keeping him. Like others have said, you don't have to be a great shooter, just confident and adequate enough to be a threat. Why give up a rebounder and solid overall player like him, when it's hard to find guys that hustle like that?

I bet that with D'Antoni showing confidence in him, Lee will shoot with less hesistation and likely be much more successful.
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215

5/19/2008  10:37 AM
Posted by djsunyc:

lee for charlie v?



thanks but no thanks to Powder
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
5/19/2008  10:38 AM
Posted by bitty41:
Posted by djsunyc:

lee for charlie v?
thanks but no thanks to Powder

i could see a trade like that going down tho. i think charlie v is a prime target for d'antoni. he can score, shoot the 3 and play a flex 3/4 position. but most importantly, he's attainable.
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215

5/19/2008  10:44 AM
Why because he played for Toronto this guy is underachiever with a very suspect work ethic I just don't see the interest in the guy.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
5/19/2008  10:47 AM
Posted by bitty41:

Why because he played for Toronto this guy is underachiever with a very suspect work ethic I just don't see the interest in the guy.

not at all, charlie v is tim thomas redux, but it's curious why alot of articles after the donnie walsh hiring are not portraying david lee in the best light.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38516
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
5/19/2008  10:54 AM
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by bitty41:

Why because he played for Toronto this guy is underachiever with a very suspect work ethic I just don't see the interest in the guy.

not at all, charlie v is tim thomas redux, but it's curious why alot of articles after the donnie walsh hiring are not portraying david lee in the best light.

Trying to prepare us for when they trade away DLee as a sweetner for our garbage? To soften the blow?

djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
5/19/2008  10:59 AM
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by bitty41:

Why because he played for Toronto this guy is underachiever with a very suspect work ethic I just don't see the interest in the guy.

not at all, charlie v is tim thomas redux, but it's curious why alot of articles after the donnie walsh hiring are not portraying david lee in the best light.

Trying to prepare us for when they trade away DLee as a sweetner for our garbage? To soften the blow?

looks like it. or i could even see them trying to lessen his market value so they don't have to pay as much. i could also see some rival gm's leaking these bogus rumors to lessen his trade value as well.
Which Knicks Will Be Sent Packing? (Daily News)

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy