[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Boston Globe: D'Antoni Accepts Knicks Offer
Author Thread
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

5/10/2008  2:00 PM
Posted by n24d30:

Everyone here must know more about Basketball, picking good basketball coaches and running an organization better than Donnie Walsch right? Give me a break

How did hiring Jim O'brien work out for the Pacers?
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
AUTOADVERT
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
5/10/2008  2:00 PM
Walsh is a puppet. He didn't fire Isiah, he hasn't changed the media policy, and he hired a guy who screams Dolan/Isiah as the coach. Mike D'Antoni is going to be coaching Eddy, Zach, Steph, Jerome, and Nate. Good luck.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
5/10/2008  2:01 PM
Posted by CrushAlot:

I have not been able to find any other media outlets reporting this. I am hoping it is a mistake.
Espn is report it too now. but citing sources.

purple012870
Posts: 21778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2003
Member: #432
5/10/2008  2:03 PM
What's wrong with you people???????

Are you so entrenched in complaining mode that you can;t see a good thing?

VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
5/10/2008  2:03 PM
Its not like D'Antoni is some old over the hill coach being lured out of retirement, or is is one of those big name players who hasn't demonstrated any aptitude for coaching yet. This is currently one of the best coaches in the NBA, handpicked by a GM with a great track record who presumably has interviewed him and is confident that they can have a good working a relationship.

D'Antoni is one of the few coaches in the league who has demonstrated an ability to go against the grain, think outside of the box a little and create a system to make his personell better. That's EXACTLY the kind of coach we need and should want.

Now there will still be a Zach/Eddy problem, but that would be there regardless.
n24d30
Posts: 20279
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/9/2006
Member: #1165

5/10/2008  2:03 PM
Jim O'brien did okay considering his best player barely played! Wasn't that Larry's decision anyway?
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

5/10/2008  2:05 PM
Posted by n24d30:

Jim O'brien did okay considering his best player barely played! Wasn't that Larry's decision anyway?

Oh so are picking and choosing what Walsh gets credit for and what he doesn't? How did Carlisle do when he had O'neal, Artest, and Jackson gone?
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
purple012870
Posts: 21778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2003
Member: #432
5/10/2008  2:05 PM
Mark Jackson wasn't exactly a guy that made a committment to defense as a player. He was a gambler, so he had steals, but he was a lousy defensive player. And since he hasn't coached, that's all we have to go on.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
5/10/2008  2:07 PM
Posted by efw:
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by CrushAlot:

Dolan should have just rehired Layden. This is ridiculous.

It really is sad how we go about doing business. The funny thing is once again we help Phx out. D'Antoni leaves $8.8mil on the table, they can hire a dead corpse for pennies on the dollar to coach their team and still remain in contention, although they may slide just a little.


Might slide a little?! They are going dooowwn. I wouldn't be surprised if Sarver purges the dead weight this summer and looks towards starting over.

I wonder if they would trade Shaq & Nash for Zach & Marbury?
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
5/10/2008  2:08 PM
Posted by VDesai:

I have not had a chance chime on D'Antoni yet, but a couple of thoughts about him and the defense criticism

1) The Suns ranked 4th in the NBA in pace last year. What that means is that, on offense and defense, the Suns had the 4th most possessions in the league last year. When you regularly play at that heavy a pace, you're going to see more points scored on both ends than the rest of the league.

2) Even with the faster pace, the Suns ranked no.1 in the NBA in offensive efficiency, or points scored per 100 possessions. So they were the best team in the NBA in terms of scoring efficiency, not just one of the best teams in terms of volume scoring. By contrast, other fast paced scoring teams like Denver and Golden State averaged 3-4 pts below Phoenix in this mark.

3) The Suns ranked 16th in the league in defensive efficiency. So they were 16th in terms of points allowed per 100 possessions. By contrast the Knicks were 29th and gave up 5 more pts per 100. So the Suns were a full tier above the Knicks in defense. And further, the Suns ranked 9th in league in effective FG% allowed (effective FG=(FGM+3PM/2)/FGA)). The cause for the disparity was that the Suns were one of the bottom 5 teams in creating turnovers (ranked closely with the Knicks).

But I think my conclusion is that you can't say this was a coach or a team that was de-emphasizing defense if they could rank top 10 in eFG allowed. It was a team that wasn't great on defense- but considering some of the individual defenders in their lineup like Nash, Amare (a much improved defensive player in recent seasons, though not a stalwart) and Shaq (too slow) you're not gonna be outstanding. Nash in particular cannot defend quick PG's (as demonstrated again in the playoffs), but he makes such a big difference on the offensive end that you can't really play him less minutes for defense.

4) Mike D'Antoni is one of the select few coaches in the NBA that has really demonstrated a vision. He created a system, had the players to fit it, and was very successful because they were playing a way that nobody in the NBA was playing at the time. The ability to see the big picture and go against the grain is something that is extremely valuable in a coach.

That he'll coach the Knicks the same way that he coached the Suns is not a given. But if he does choose to, I am extremely confident that the Walsh and D'Antoni will find the players who can run this system effectively. The Knicks do have several players on the roster that can thrive in an uptempo game (the ones we like), and several players who cannot (namely Zach, Curry, Marbury or the ones we don't).

If the Knicks were to play a faster pace, they'd be on of a handful of teams in the Eastern Conference to do so, and going against the grain could give them the advantage they need to be a playoff team in this conference. Will it ultimately win them the championship? It might be harder to thrive like that in the West where the playoff teams are a deeper and you have to face a team like the Spurs in the first round. A team that could legitimately play up tempo in the East I would suspect would go a lot farther.

Excellent post Des... I think you bring up some good points about the pace and the defensive efficiency and while the Suns were not real good in defensive efficiency, they certainly were not that bad. I think also they just couldn't beat the Spurs these past 4 years. I attribute part of that to Amare, since he is fugazy and could NEVER limit Duncan. Nash is a poor defender and Marion was only ever looking out for himself.

About 3 weeks ago I was against the hiring of D'Antoni, but the more I've thought about it and also the more stats I've seen, I've come to embrace the hiring. I think the most important thing you mentioned in your post Des was #4, the fact that D'Antoni has demonstrated that he has a vision and he can put it on the floor. While I'm not in love with D'Antoni's vision, I do believe it can work, but it has to be done right. I honestly think that D'Antoni might have learned from his mistakes in Phoenix and can now alter his plan to where he sees fit. A better defensive player here, a less offensive player there and his style can work, especially in the East.

No matter what anyone says, I believe Donnie is fully heading this franchise and this is soley his hire. You can say whatever you want, but every team in the league would be going after D'Antoni if they had a coaching vacancy, sans the Lakers and Spurs of course. I think is a solid hire and will give the Knicks an identity. And oh yeah if the fix is in, watch out... D'Antoni + Derrick Rose (who is offensively AND defensively gifted) could be a damn good duo.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

5/10/2008  2:08 PM
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by loweyecue:

Such negativity!! And I have been part of it when it concerns Isiah, Marbury etc. But this guy at least has a winning record. His idea of how to run a team does not mesh with mine, but I am more than happy to see him coach here. All I want is that we have the ability to fire him if he doesn't produce a certain amount of progress and that's worked into the contract. The guys has 267 Ws, that's 267 more than Mark Jackson at the highest level of the game. Can we give him a chance at least?

LB was a winner coach, so was Lenny... and....?

And we need winner coaches. No coach can fix this mess, that would be the GM's job, but that is no reason to hate on the coach. You need someone like Walsh to step in and set serious expectations on what is or is not progress and if he cant make it, fine get rid of him. And I am a big LB fan, still am would take him again, his tenure here was messed up by a combination of Marbury being a Diva and Isiah letting him get away with that and encouraging it behind the scenes. You want winners then you need to put together the pieces that can win. When D'Antoni takes this job he should come in with the expectation that it will take us 2-3 years to put a real team together in the meantime he has to build a system into which we can hire new young players.

Again not trying to say Jackson would be bad, we just dont know what he would be like. This would have been an ideal situation to take a gamble on someone like him, since we have nothing to lose. But Donnie gets paid the big bucks to make that call, lets give these guys a chance to produce results. That's all I am asking for. This guy has produced results in PHX and Denver and I respect that.

TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
n24d30
Posts: 20279
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/9/2006
Member: #1165

5/10/2008  2:08 PM
VDesai knows what he's talking. A lot of you especially TrueBlue should read his posts a few more times.
I get the idea that no matter who we hired as president or coach you would find a way the pull every negative you could out of it!
Is it really fun going through life that way?
Uptown
Posts: 31378
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

5/10/2008  2:11 PM
Posted by VDesai:

I have not had a chance chime on D'Antoni yet, but a couple of thoughts about him and the defense criticism

1) The Suns ranked 4th in the NBA in pace last year. What that means is that, on offense and defense, the Suns had the 4th most possessions in the league last year. When you regularly play at that heavy a pace, you're going to see more points scored on both ends than the rest of the league.

2) Even with the faster pace, the Suns ranked no.1 in the NBA in offensive efficiency, or points scored per 100 possessions. So they were the best team in the NBA in terms of scoring efficiency, not just one of the best teams in terms of volume scoring. By contrast, other fast paced scoring teams like Denver and Golden State averaged 3-4 pts below Phoenix in this mark.

3) The Suns ranked 16th in the league in defensive efficiency. So they were 16th in terms of points allowed per 100 possessions. By contrast the Knicks were 29th and gave up 5 more pts per 100. So the Suns were a full tier above the Knicks in defense. And further, the Suns ranked 9th in league in effective FG% allowed (effective FG=(FGM+3PM/2)/FGA)). The cause for the disparity was that the Suns were one of the bottom 5 teams in creating turnovers (ranked closely with the Knicks).

But I think my conclusion is that you can't say this was a coach or a team that was de-emphasizing defense if they could rank top 10 in eFG allowed. It was a team that wasn't great on defense- but considering some of the individual defenders in their lineup like Nash, Amare (a much improved defensive player in recent seasons, though not a stalwart) and Shaq (too slow) you're not gonna be outstanding. Nash in particular cannot defend quick PG's (as demonstrated again in the playoffs), but he makes such a big difference on the offensive end that you can't really play him less minutes for defense.

4) Mike D'Antoni is one of the select few coaches in the NBA that has really demonstrated a vision. He created a system, had the players to fit it, and was very successful because they were playing a way that nobody in the NBA was playing at the time. The ability to see the big picture and go against the grain is something that is extremely valuable in a coach.

That he'll coach the Knicks the same way that he coached the Suns is not a given. But if he does choose to, I am extremely confident that the Walsh and D'Antoni will find the players who can run this system effectively. The Knicks do have several players on the roster that can thrive in an uptempo game (the ones we like), and several players who cannot (namely Zach, Curry, Marbury or the ones we don't).

If the Knicks were to play a faster pace, they'd be on of a handful of teams in the Eastern Conference to do so, and going against the grain could give them the advantage they need to be a playoff team in this conference. Will it ultimately win them the championship? It might be harder to thrive like that in the West where the playoff teams are a deeper and you have to face a team like the Spurs in the first round. A team that could legitimately play up tempo in the East I would suspect would go a lot farther.

This is an excellent post. I posted something similar in terms of Pho not being as bad a defenseive team as many preceive them to be, but this is more detailed and more on depth. Great job.

GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
5/10/2008  2:12 PM
Lame is all I gotta say. In a couple of years the people happy over this will be calling for him to be fired just like Suns fans were.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
5/10/2008  2:15 PM
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by n24d30:

Everyone here must know more about Basketball, picking good basketball coaches and running an organization better than Donnie Walsch right? Give me a break

How did hiring Jim O'brien work out for the Pacers?

how did hiring Larry Brown, Larry Bird, and Rick Carlisle work out for the Pacers???
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

5/10/2008  2:16 PM
Posted by GKFv2:

Lame is all I gotta say. In a couple of years the people happy over this will be calling for him to be fired just like Suns fans were.

Except our fans have been doing this yr after yr. We make a lame ass move, they squirt like a hose over them, then as time goes on they backtrack and bail. We won't win more than 39gms next yr. Matter of fact this is subject to drop as we approach next season.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
5/10/2008  2:17 PM
It is much more than lame but you took the high road. It screams of the past philosophy of getting a big name that doesn't fit. It also screams of Dolan interference as has every move or non move since Walsh was put into place. Walsh does not have total control of basketball operations. Isiah is still in ny, the media hasn't changed and the policy to acquire/hire guys who have big names but don't fit hasn't changed.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Uptown
Posts: 31378
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

5/10/2008  2:17 PM
Posted by VDesai:

Its not like D'Antoni is some old over the hill coach being lured out of retirement, or is is one of those big name players who hasn't demonstrated any aptitude for coaching yet. This is currently one of the best coaches in the NBA, handpicked by a GM with a great track record who presumably has interviewed him and is confident that they can have a good working a relationship.

D'Antoni is one of the few coaches in the league who has demonstrated an ability to go against the grain, think outside of the box a little and create a system to make his personell better. That's EXACTLY the kind of coach we need and should want.

Now there will still be a Zach/Eddy problem, but that would be there regardless.


The idea that this elite coach can't adapt is doing a diservice to him. He adapted to the roster he had in Phoenix, and I'm sure he can adapt top the Knicks reoster if need be.

With that said, we could have signed Pop today and he aint winning with this current roster. D'Antoi is a good hire because he brings a vision with him. A system. How many times have we complained that this team lacked identity. D Antoni brings a blueprint with him that Walsh can follow and hhelp aquire the the players to fit that system.
Uptown
Posts: 31378
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

5/10/2008  2:20 PM
Posted by GKFv2:

Lame is all I gotta say. In a couple of years the people happy over this will be calling for him to be fired just like Suns fans were.

Can't the same be said about Jackson, Avery, or coach X? In a couple of years the ship will probably just be ready to leave the port. Its all about expectations. Regardless of the coach, this team aint ready to win for a couple of years.
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
5/10/2008  2:21 PM
Posted by VDesai:

I have not had a chance chime on D'Antoni yet, but a couple of thoughts about him and the defense criticism

1) The Suns ranked 4th in the NBA in pace last year. What that means is that, on offense and defense, the Suns had the 4th most possessions in the league last year. When you regularly play at that heavy a pace, you're going to see more points scored on both ends than the rest of the league.

2) Even with the faster pace, the Suns ranked no.1 in the NBA in offensive efficiency, or points scored per 100 possessions. So they were the best team in the NBA in terms of scoring efficiency, not just one of the best teams in terms of volume scoring. By contrast, other fast paced scoring teams like Denver and Golden State averaged 3-4 pts below Phoenix in this mark.

3) The Suns ranked 16th in the league in defensive efficiency. So they were 16th in terms of points allowed per 100 possessions. By contrast the Knicks were 29th and gave up 5 more pts per 100. So the Suns were a full tier above the Knicks in defense. And further, the Suns ranked 9th in league in effective FG% allowed (effective FG=(FGM+3PM/2)/FGA)). The cause for the disparity was that the Suns were one of the bottom 5 teams in creating turnovers (ranked closely with the Knicks).

But I think my conclusion is that you can't say this was a coach or a team that was de-emphasizing defense if they could rank top 10 in eFG allowed. It was a team that wasn't great on defense- but considering some of the individual defenders in their lineup like Nash, Amare (a much improved defensive player in recent seasons, though not a stalwart) and Shaq (too slow) you're not gonna be outstanding. Nash in particular cannot defend quick PG's (as demonstrated again in the playoffs), but he makes such a big difference on the offensive end that you can't really play him less minutes for defense.

4) Mike D'Antoni is one of the select few coaches in the NBA that has really demonstrated a vision. He created a system, had the players to fit it, and was very successful because they were playing a way that nobody in the NBA was playing at the time. The ability to see the big picture and go against the grain is something that is extremely valuable in a coach.

That he'll coach the Knicks the same way that he coached the Suns is not a given. But if he does choose to, I am extremely confident that the Walsh and D'Antoni will find the players who can run this system effectively. The Knicks do have several players on the roster that can thrive in an uptempo game (the ones we like), and several players who cannot (namely Zach, Curry, Marbury or the ones we don't).

If the Knicks were to play a faster pace, they'd be on of a handful of teams in the Eastern Conference to do so, and going against the grain could give them the advantage they need to be a playoff team in this conference. Will it ultimately win them the championship? It might be harder to thrive like that in the West where the playoff teams are a deeper and you have to face a team like the Spurs in the first round. A team that could legitimately play up tempo in the East I would suspect would go a lot farther.

This is an excellent post VDeai. You seem to see the entire picture better than most here. Everyone assumes that Suns didn't play defense but they played defense. When a team plays a fast pace other teams will get more shot too. One of the most important stat is the point differential the Suns were one of the top team in the dept.

Boston Globe: D'Antoni Accepts Knicks Offer

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy