Posted by franco12:I disagree about letting them go to RFA- we'd have to match 2 offers- and teams can do stupid things, as we have seen with Isiah.
It wouldn't be that big of deal and very rarely do teams make huge offers to RFA because it ties their cap up and eliminates them for being in the running for other FA's. Teams have showed the willingness to offer UFA quite a bit of money but not RFA especially if you make it known you intend to match any reasonable offer. That's the beauty of RFA. We let the market determine their contract, we can match, we have their birds right, we can offer the higher percent of raises each yr,.
Its better to get them locked in- if for five years- great- if shorter, fine too.
If we know for certain they surely want to get a deal done now, not wanting to go the RFA route and it's clear money won't be an obstacle, sure. To openly offer them an extension unsolicited, while at the same time offering them a low ball figure would only complicate future negotiations.
But the key thing is not to give them money that makes them untradeable.
I agree
If you let them get to RFA- they might get big offers that might make them untradeable - think Jarred Jeffries- and if we match, we're screwed and if we don't, we lose them for nothing.
Now- obviously if we offer reasonable money and they both opt to go the RFA route, I think you look to trade them before the get to sign a RFA offer- because at least you will get something.
We're a different standard and a bad one at that. Being over the cap isn't a problem with our franchise nor is being over the Lux Tax. Wash was over the cap and concerned with Lux Tax dollars, plus Jeff was given a kicker by us. The kicker is really what sealed his fate here. You honestly think if we're a couple mil apart on the total contract value our pompus arrogant mgmt(I SAY UGH(if he's still here)&Dolan) group lets Lee and Nate walk? And seriously you think Washington or Seattle are crying over the fact they lost Jeff and James respectively. There's a reason those two were allowed to walk away.
Let's say Nate and Lee are given lucrative deals... we can still work a S&T, which they would be very interested in because we can offer the most money. Get back what's needed for compensation potentially giving us even more flexibility.
The problem with Isiah's 8 year building plan where he's tried to get every overpaid, underacheiving ill fitting player- is we are now set so far back from being competitive, that the money & numbers don't make sense for us to pay up for Lee & Nate.
Yeah if we're taking into account future fiscal responsibility but if we aren't, then no big deal.
[Edited by - TrueBlue on 03-05-2008 10:40 AM]