Posted by kam77:
WOW, myself, TMS, oohah, efw all point to the fact that this was not a good game for a PG, and furthermore TMS and oohah point out the hypocrisy of celebrating a statline that a guy like Nate on the Knicks has put up previously.
On point 1 there is no debate. It was a poor game for a PG. Taking 18shots means you're not thinking 'pass-first'. A fact underscored by his 4 assists.
On point 2, instead of backing off and admitting their hypocrisy, the same ol hardliners use the time-tested tactic of killing the messenger rather than manning up to the message.
but they kill oohah, they dare not touch TMS who essentially said the same thing.
shame on you weak-ass posters.
1) He didn't dish out too much but he did shoot 50% from the floor which is not too bad. From a defensive standpoint, would you leave Jefferson, VC or Williams open for the Nets on the perimeter? Makes sense that he would be the guy with the ball in his hands at the end of a play, no? Didn't see the game so you really can't go either way on the statline of one game, right?
2) oohah's post was a lot more inflammatory and baiting, no? So it would be natural to jump all over him. Plus, he is still trying to live down absolute statements like Frye being an allstar.