[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

What if this is not Isiah's doing???
Author Thread
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

1/14/2008  10:03 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by iyamwutiam:

Oh btw - when he knew his time was going to be up - he left the Knicks a few presents:

On July 23, 2003 Layden traded guard Latrell Sprewell with two years remaining on his contract to the Minnesota Timberwolves as part of a four-team trade that also included interactions with the 76ers and Hawks. In return, the Knicks acquired veteran forward Keith Van Horn. Van Horn, an integral part of the New Jersey Nets 2002 eastern conference title, played in only 47 games for New York in just one season, averaging 16.4 points and 7.3 rebounds-per-game. Van Horn's salary of 3-years still remaining on a 6-year $73 Million contract that he signed as a member of the Nets, put the Knicks further over the salary cap.

The last transaction of notable implications that Layden made as general manager came on October 9, when he signed the 37 year old center Dikembe Mutombo to a 2-year, $8.5 Million contract.

Yeah - your right - it's ALL Isiah's fault - and all of us - who have never had a single day in a job as a player, coach (or coached the all-star team) , taken a team to the playoffs 3 straight years etc - we all know - that Isiah is terribel - any white guy -like McHale/ Mullin (check his record with Adonal Foyle/Dampier/etc etc and signings for years) are way better than Isiah - who in one year turned the Knicks roster to its youngest since 1999.

yeah - after all - we pay so much attention to whats going on- I wonder why we didn't get the job and extension -huh :)

Who cares if the roster is young if its filled with players that can't play. Oh yeah, race has nothing to do with this, much to your chagrin.


When will the standard by which we judged be determined by "WINS". I'll say it yet again. Overall our fan base has "LOW to NO STANDARDS". It lowers each yr I SAY UGH remains here.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/14/2008  10:20 PM
Posted by iyamwutiam:

That was Frank Layden (HIS FATHER) - so you can see - that meritocracy is alive and well in the professional sports as well as politics. Layden signed a 7 year 28 million dollar Guaranteed contract in 1999. Not bad for a guy who got his job via nepotism. That indexed for real inflation would be a 7 year deal for 80 million dollars when Isiah signed on!! Who says black men don't get a fair shot at management - people are so willing to belive that there is such a thing as racism today -for no reason at all.

In addition - he did an outstanding job of trading Camby/F Williams and the number seven pick (Nene-who is still hurt to this day) for I will be injured and unable to play for atleast 3 years McDyess -and it was NO secret that McDyess was coming off micro-fracture surgery of his knees.

In 3 short years this is the salary situation he left for the Knicks fans:

Allan Houston $14,343,750 7-yr; 100.41M 2006-07
Antonio McDyess $12,600,000 6-yr; 67.5M 2003-04
Latrell Sprewell $11,937,500 5-yr ;61.9M 2003-04 (p)
Shandon Anderson $6,100,000 6-yr; 42.0M 2006-07
Charlie Ward $5,570,000 6-yr; 28.0M + 2002-03 (p)
Howard Eisley $5,312,500 7-yr; 41.0M 2005-06 (t)
Clarence Weatherspoon $4,991,800 5-yr; 27.23M 2005-06
Kurt Thomas $4,903,750 3-yr; 13.0M 2003-04 (t)
Travis Knight $4,000,000 7-yr; 22.0M 2003-04
Othella Harrington $2,700,000 7-yr; 17.33M 2004-05
Michael Doleac $1,400,000 2-yr; 3.00M 2003-04
Frank Williams $832,560 4-yr; 4.40M 2004-05 (t)
Mark Pope $637,435 1-yr; 637,435 2002-03
Lee Nailon $587,435 1-yr; 587,435 2002-03
Lavor Postell $587,435 2-yr; 1.05M

Notice -how the Utah connection of Anderson and Eisley is tied up for 70 million dollars. In as little as 3 years -our boy (my pop is a legend cause he drafted Malone and Stockton) our boy racked up over 300 million dollars in salary - to future hall of famers that just abound on this roster !!!

Of course his draft picks were even better- Lavar Postel, Lampje, Vujanic, F Williams- I mean we all know these players turned ot to be as good as Gilbert Arenas, Amare Stoudemire, Dwight Howard- so you can't say he didn't know how to evaluate player personnel. The guy was a genius - he so potential in people that no one did - including the entire NBA, D-League and the European league. Amazing eye for talent for sure.

Scott Layden was an exec with Utah at the time and is usually given credit for drafting Stockton and Malone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Layden
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
1/14/2008  10:23 PM
Posted by iyamwutiam:

Oh btw - when he knew his time was going to be up - he left the Knicks a few presents:

On July 23, 2003 Layden traded guard Latrell Sprewell with two years remaining on his contract to the Minnesota Timberwolves as part of a four-team trade that also included interactions with the 76ers and Hawks. In return, the Knicks acquired veteran forward Keith Van Horn. Van Horn, an integral part of the New Jersey Nets 2002 eastern conference title, played in only 47 games for New York in just one season, averaging 16.4 points and 7.3 rebounds-per-game. Van Horn's salary of 3-years still remaining on a 6-year $73 Million contract that he signed as a member of the Nets, put the Knicks further over the salary cap.

The last transaction of notable implications that Layden made as general manager came on October 9, when he signed the 37 year old center Dikembe Mutombo to a 2-year, $8.5 Million contract.

Yeah - your right - it's ALL Isiah's fault - and all of us - who have never had a single day in a job as a player, coach (or coached the all-star team) , taken a team to the playoffs 3 straight years etc - we all know - that Isiah is terribel - any white guy -like McHale/ Mullin (check his record with Adonal Foyle/Dampier/etc etc and signings for years) are way better than Isiah - who in one year turned the Knicks roster to its youngest since 1999.

yeah - after all - we pay so much attention to whats going on- I wonder why we didn't get the job and extension -huh :)

THe only think Chris Mullin did with dampier was sign and trade him to the mavs.

Anyway the reason Isiah got an extension is the same reason Layden was kept for 4 years. and that would be that Dolan has too much patience with his employees. Anyway, the arguement that since Isiah is a GM that he must be smarter than the average fan when it comes to managing a team is flawed. Remember Scott Layden and Kevin Mchale are both men who have been associated with the league for years, and Mchale was one of the greatest players and played for a great boston team, yet I don't think even you would disagree that some fans could do a better job than them at GMing. Similarly just because Isiah is a GM doesn't mean that fans shouldn't question his moves, and think they could do a better job.
iyamwutiam
Posts: 20294
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 1/15/2008
Member: #1806
USA
1/14/2008  10:28 PM
Overall- you are short sighted and have no sense of context. The roster Isiah got was burgeoning with overpaid, under-performing players - to say that Anderson and Wesley remotely deserved 70 M dollar pay out is absur. Van Horne same thing- I would any day have a procen double/double of Randolph than the 'team' guy who never helped anyone win anything Van Horne -who was grossly overpaid for what he was - another in a long list of Troy Murphy, Austin Croshere's - they could not play defense - and never averaged a double/double for 4/5 years they got starter minutes.

The future is coming :
atleast 3 young players that people outside of the knicks are truly interested in - Lee/Robinson and Balkman. Definitely Chandler joins that list next year. Two front court players who are both under 27 -one led two different teams as a leading scorer and FG% (and no its not Randolph), the other as mentioned before averaged a double/double for 4 straight years in the NBA - not JV team in the suburbs or some myhtical private gym league.


The average age of this team has gone down from 32 to 26- and is going to get younger when Marbury and Malik rose are gone! By 2010 - you will have two expiring contracts worth 27 million and your 2009 draft pick who should be player - even if he is as good as a Channig Frye - it STILL makes the team better.

You have depth at PF (lee/Randolph)/SF(Jeffires/Balkman) and SG (Crawford/Robinson) and a center who is capable of scoring on 85 percentof the centers in the NBA for atleast 20 points a nite-that is a fact -as he proved last year.

Name one member of the 2003 team that entire teams planned on double/triple teaming !!

That being said - there have been bumps - Marbury - never was the leader he promised to be, Q Rich - was a complete bust- his sole job was to hit the 3 or outside wide open jumper - to prevent undue pressure onthe front court.

I also conend - that those with some sense of pragmatism would have to attribute the Jalen Rose/Steve Francis?Jerome James signing mainly to Larry Brown. You don't make someone the highest paid coach in the NBA and not allow him to bring in his veterans or defensive players (James/ Jalen Rose/Antonio Davis and of course Steve Francis). Note- Francis/Marbury an Rose/Crawford- are virtually the same kind of players and there is no doubt - that LB brought them on - even if Isiah Thomas took the fall for them. LB did not just et fired for the a SINGLE 24 win season - he got fired because e screwed the Knicks salary cap positon even more. There would have been no necessity for a Randolph trade - if the Knicks were not potentially faced with 70 million dollars of buy out (30 for J. Rose - thats a fact -google it and see - its in the NYT). So instead of forking over another 40 million for the buy out of francis - they gave him to Paul Allen - who bought Francis out and essentially asked to be rid of Randolph and get frye in return. The rest of the players were basically salary fodder.

Anyway - you are to busy having all the answers to know if your even answering the question in an honest, meaningful way.


Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/14/2008  10:40 PM
Posted by SlimPack:
Posted by iyamwutiam:

Overall- you are short sighted and have no sense of context. The roster Isiah got was burgeoning with overpaid, under-performing players - to say that Anderson and Wesley remotely deserved 70 M dollar pay out is absur. Van Horne same thing- I would any day have a procen double/double of Randolph than the 'team' guy who never helped anyone win anything Van Horne -who was grossly overpaid for what he was - another in a long list of Troy Murphy, Austin Croshere's - they could not play defense - and never averaged a double/double for 4/5 years they got starter minutes.

The future is coming :
atleast 3 young players that people outside of the knicks are truly interested in - Lee/Robinson and Balkman. Definitely Chandler joins that list next year. Two front court players who are both under 27 -one led two different teams as a leading scorer and FG% (and no its not Randolph), the other as mentioned before averaged a double/double for 4 straight years in the NBA - not JV team in the suburbs or some myhtical private gym league.


The average age of this team has gone down from 32 to 26- and is going to get younger when Marbury and Malik rose are gone! By 2010 - you will have two expiring contracts worth 27 million and your 2009 draft pick who should be player - even if he is as good as a Channig Frye - it STILL makes the team better.

You have depth at PF (lee/Randolph)/SF(Jeffires/Balkman) and SG (Crawford/Robinson) and a center who is capable of scoring on 85 percentof the centers in the NBA for atleast 20 points a nite-that is a fact -as he proved last year.

Name one member of the 2003 team that entire teams planned on double/triple teaming !!

That being said - there have been bumps - Marbury - never was the leader he promised to be, Q Rich - was a complete bust- his sole job was to hit the 3 or outside wide open jumper - to prevent undue pressure onthe front court.

I also conend - that those with some sense of pragmatism would have to attribute the Jalen Rose/Steve Francis?Jerome James signing mainly to Larry Brown. You don't make someone the highest paid coach in the NBA and not allow him to bring in his veterans or defensive players (James/ Jalen Rose/Antonio Davis and of course Steve Francis). Note- Francis/Marbury an Rose/Crawford- are virtually the same kind of players and there is no doubt - that LB brought them on - even if Isiah Thomas took the fall for them. LB did not just et fired for the a SINGLE 24 win season - he got fired because e screwed the Knicks salary cap positon even more. There would have been no necessity for a Randolph trade - if the Knicks were not potentially faced with 70 million dollars of buy out (30 for J. Rose - thats a fact -google it and see - its in the NYT). So instead of forking over another 40 million for the buy out of francis - they gave him to Paul Allen - who bought Francis out and essentially asked to be rid of Randolph and get frye in return. The rest of the players were basically salary fodder.

Anyway - you are to busy having all the answers to know if your even answering the question in an honest, meaningful way.



I have no idea what the point of this post is even supposed be. If it was to prove that Isiah is a better manager than Layden then I guess you could say that, although I wouldn't say by much. Also I'll say that having young overpaid underperformers isn't really better than having old overpaid underperformers. But more importantly, what was the point of that post?

The point was to tell us how great our team's future is!
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
1/14/2008  10:41 PM
Posted by iyamwutiam:

Overall- you are short sighted and have no sense of context. The roster Isiah got was burgeoning with overpaid, under-performing players - to say that Anderson and Wesley remotely deserved 70 M dollar pay out is absur. Van Horne same thing- I would any day have a procen double/double of Randolph than the 'team' guy who never helped anyone win anything Van Horne -who was grossly overpaid for what he was - another in a long list of Troy Murphy, Austin Croshere's - they could not play defense - and never averaged a double/double for 4/5 years they got starter minutes.

The future is coming :
atleast 3 young players that people outside of the knicks are truly interested in - Lee/Robinson and Balkman. Definitely Chandler joins that list next year. Two front court players who are both under 27 -one led two different teams as a leading scorer and FG% (and no its not Randolph), the other as mentioned before averaged a double/double for 4 straight years in the NBA - not JV team in the suburbs or some myhtical private gym league.


The average age of this team has gone down from 32 to 26- and is going to get younger when Marbury and Malik rose are gone! By 2010 - you will have two expiring contracts worth 27 million and your 2009 draft pick who should be player - even if he is as good as a Channig Frye - it STILL makes the team better.

You have depth at PF (lee/Randolph)/SF(Jeffires/Balkman) and SG (Crawford/Robinson) and a center who is capable of scoring on 85 percentof the centers in the NBA for atleast 20 points a nite-that is a fact -as he proved last year.

Name one member of the 2003 team that entire teams planned on double/triple teaming !!

That being said - there have been bumps - Marbury - never was the leader he promised to be, Q Rich - was a complete bust- his sole job was to hit the 3 or outside wide open jumper - to prevent undue pressure onthe front court.

I also conend - that those with some sense of pragmatism would have to attribute the Jalen Rose/Steve Francis?Jerome James signing mainly to Larry Brown. You don't make someone the highest paid coach in the NBA and not allow him to bring in his veterans or defensive players (James/ Jalen Rose/Antonio Davis and of course Steve Francis). Note- Francis/Marbury an Rose/Crawford- are virtually the same kind of players and there is no doubt - that LB brought them on - even if Isiah Thomas took the fall for them. LB did not just et fired for the a SINGLE 24 win season - he got fired because e screwed the Knicks salary cap positon even more. There would have been no necessity for a Randolph trade - if the Knicks were not potentially faced with 70 million dollars of buy out (30 for J. Rose - thats a fact -google it and see - its in the NYT). So instead of forking over another 40 million for the buy out of francis - they gave him to Paul Allen - who bought Francis out and essentially asked to be rid of Randolph and get frye in return. The rest of the players were basically salary fodder.

Anyway - you are to busy having all the answers to know if your even answering the question in an honest, meaningful way.



I have no idea what the point of this post is even supposed be. You didn't really address the point I made in my previous post, but If it was to prove that Isiah is a better manager than Layden then I guess you could say that, although I wouldn't say by much. Also I'll say that having young overpaid underperformers isn't really better than having old overpaid underperformers. But more importantly, what was the point of this post? I can't really respond that will unless I know what it is.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
1/14/2008  10:43 PM
Posted by SlimPack:


I have no idea what the point of this post is even supposed be. If it was to prove that Isiah is a better manager than Layden then I guess you could say that, although I wouldn't say by much. Also I'll say that having young overpaid underperformers isn't really better than having old overpaid underperformers. But more importantly, what was the point of that post?

The point of the post was to show us what a crazy person would say about Isiah Thomas reign as President of the Knicks. Atleast now we are prepared in case it does happen. whew.

"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
1/14/2008  11:03 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by SlimPack:
Posted by iyamwutiam:

Overall- you are short sighted and have no sense of context. The roster Isiah got was burgeoning with overpaid, under-performing players - to say that Anderson and Wesley remotely deserved 70 M dollar pay out is absur. Van Horne same thing- I would any day have a procen double/double of Randolph than the 'team' guy who never helped anyone win anything Van Horne -who was grossly overpaid for what he was - another in a long list of Troy Murphy, Austin Croshere's - they could not play defense - and never averaged a double/double for 4/5 years they got starter minutes.

The future is coming :
atleast 3 young players that people outside of the knicks are truly interested in - Lee/Robinson and Balkman. Definitely Chandler joins that list next year. Two front court players who are both under 27 -one led two different teams as a leading scorer and FG% (and no its not Randolph), the other as mentioned before averaged a double/double for 4 straight years in the NBA - not JV team in the suburbs or some myhtical private gym league.


The average age of this team has gone down from 32 to 26- and is going to get younger when Marbury and Malik rose are gone! By 2010 - you will have two expiring contracts worth 27 million and your 2009 draft pick who should be player - even if he is as good as a Channig Frye - it STILL makes the team better.

You have depth at PF (lee/Randolph)/SF(Jeffires/Balkman) and SG (Crawford/Robinson) and a center who is capable of scoring on 85 percentof the centers in the NBA for atleast 20 points a nite-that is a fact -as he proved last year.

Name one member of the 2003 team that entire teams planned on double/triple teaming !!

That being said - there have been bumps - Marbury - never was the leader he promised to be, Q Rich - was a complete bust- his sole job was to hit the 3 or outside wide open jumper - to prevent undue pressure onthe front court.

I also conend - that those with some sense of pragmatism would have to attribute the Jalen Rose/Steve Francis?Jerome James signing mainly to Larry Brown. You don't make someone the highest paid coach in the NBA and not allow him to bring in his veterans or defensive players (James/ Jalen Rose/Antonio Davis and of course Steve Francis). Note- Francis/Marbury an Rose/Crawford- are virtually the same kind of players and there is no doubt - that LB brought them on - even if Isiah Thomas took the fall for them. LB did not just et fired for the a SINGLE 24 win season - he got fired because e screwed the Knicks salary cap positon even more. There would have been no necessity for a Randolph trade - if the Knicks were not potentially faced with 70 million dollars of buy out (30 for J. Rose - thats a fact -google it and see - its in the NYT). So instead of forking over another 40 million for the buy out of francis - they gave him to Paul Allen - who bought Francis out and essentially asked to be rid of Randolph and get frye in return. The rest of the players were basically salary fodder.

Anyway - you are to busy having all the answers to know if your even answering the question in an honest, meaningful way.



I have no idea what the point of this post is even supposed be. If it was to prove that Isiah is a better manager than Layden then I guess you could say that, although I wouldn't say by much. Also I'll say that having young overpaid underperformers isn't really better than having old overpaid underperformers. But more importantly, what was the point of that post?

The point was to tell us how great our team's future is!

I'm pretty sure this team's future won't even be good, much less great. So far, you can tell from his trades that Isiah doesn't know or care about assembling a team with good character, combining players who's games are compatible with each other, or making sure that the roster for the most part are signed to reasonable contracts. When you look around the league those seem to be very important factors involved in being a good GM (although there would be others obviously).

I mean even if you disagree with all of that, I don't understand how you would think the Knicks have a bright future under a Manager that created a team that should have made the playoffs but wound up one of the worse and dysfunctional teams in the league instead. Even if you blame larry for all or 2006, this is still the 3rd straight year the team has failed to meet expectations.

The fact that the roster is young is kind of cool, but to me it seems for the most part unimportant. And this is because it doesn't matter too much how young the team is if the president of basketball operations is inept at his job. With that being the case the team won't succeed whether it is young or old. Also another reason is since the Knicks aren't fully rebuilding most young playrers on the team won't develop here anyway, hence it appears that any young player that can't give results relatively immediately (like lee) is traded for someone who can. This is what happened to frye, and could happen balkman too. (for Artest). But, by far the most important reason I don't think the team being young is that important is the first one.

Anyway you can think the team has a bright future if you want to. Frankly it's not something I care to argue about too much.
iyamwutiam
Posts: 20294
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 1/15/2008
Member: #1806
USA
1/14/2008  11:43 PM
Scott Layden was an exec with Utah at the time and is usually given credit for drafting Stockton and Malone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Layden
Again - i will correct you --
that was FRANK LAYDEN - his father. I will let you do your own google quest - so you can find out for yourself - who Layden drafted in all the years he was a GM for both teams. And bTW - please feel free to write back on all of his wonderful picks- I am sure it will anyday beat Isiah's .
iyamwutiam
Posts: 20294
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 1/15/2008
Member: #1806
USA
1/14/2008  11:48 PM
Slimpack
I was answering the post and not you specifically. The psot is What is this is not all Isiah's doing-!
I think he has a point- and I have mentioned in other posts:
There is only one reason a guy like Isiah gets this job - to be the fall guy. He dutifully played along - Marbury (see my other posts-since I only joined today- it won't be too onerous), Larry Brown, Wilkens. If it weren't for Curry, Lee, Robinson and Balkman panning out (try finding any other team - that had 3 draft picks in the bottom 5 of the draft not only make the team but be contributors)- any team in the NBA - google is at your disposal my friend and I look forward to be corrected.

As for the wine and water- puh-lease- gimme a break-
How do you match the top 4 picks in the WHOLE draft against the bottom 5?/ Yeah thats 'really' fair and so sensible. Man - with your level headed and fair evaluation - I can see why you thik the Knicks would be champions over nite.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
1/15/2008  12:09 AM
Posted by iyamwutiam:

Overall- you are short sighted and have no sense of context. The roster Isiah got was burgeoning with overpaid, under-performing players - to say that Anderson and Wesley remotely deserved 70 M dollar pay out is absur. Van Horne same thing- I would any day have a procen double/double of Randolph than the 'team' guy who never helped anyone win anything Van Horne -who was grossly overpaid for what he was - another in a long list of Troy Murphy, Austin Croshere's - they could not play defense - and never averaged a double/double for 4/5 years they got starter minutes.

The future is coming :
atleast 3 young players that people outside of the knicks are truly interested in - Lee/Robinson and Balkman. Definitely Chandler joins that list next year. Two front court players who are both under 27 -one led two different teams as a leading scorer and FG% (and no its not Randolph), the other as mentioned before averaged a double/double for 4 straight years in the NBA - not JV team in the suburbs or some myhtical private gym league.


The average age of this team has gone down from 32 to 26- and is going to get younger when Marbury and Malik rose are gone! By 2010 - you will have two expiring contracts worth 27 million and your 2009 draft pick who should be player - even if he is as good as a Channig Frye - it STILL makes the team better.

You have depth at PF (lee/Randolph)/SF(Jeffires/Balkman) and SG (Crawford/Robinson) and a center who is capable of scoring on 85 percentof the centers in the NBA for atleast 20 points a nite-that is a fact -as he proved last year.

Name one member of the 2003 team that entire teams planned on double/triple teaming !!

That being said - there have been bumps - Marbury - never was the leader he promised to be, Q Rich - was a complete bust- his sole job was to hit the 3 or outside wide open jumper - to prevent undue pressure onthe front court.

I also conend - that those with some sense of pragmatism would have to attribute the Jalen Rose/Steve Francis?Jerome James signing mainly to Larry Brown. You don't make someone the highest paid coach in the NBA and not allow him to bring in his veterans or defensive players (James/ Jalen Rose/Antonio Davis and of course Steve Francis). Note- Francis/Marbury an Rose/Crawford- are virtually the same kind of players and there is no doubt - that LB brought them on - even if Isiah Thomas took the fall for them. LB did not just et fired for the a SINGLE 24 win season - he got fired because e screwed the Knicks salary cap positon even more. There would have been no necessity for a Randolph trade - if the Knicks were not potentially faced with 70 million dollars of buy out (30 for J. Rose - thats a fact -google it and see - its in the NYT). So instead of forking over another 40 million for the buy out of francis - they gave him to Paul Allen - who bought Francis out and essentially asked to be rid of Randolph and get frye in return. The rest of the players were basically salary fodder.

Anyway - you are to busy having all the answers to know if your even answering the question in an honest, meaningful way.



Nice. I believe you. Isiah is great GM.
This entire idiot GMs group from Suns, Pistons, Boston, Dallas, Spurs, Lakers, Jazz, Hornets, etc. should not even clean his boots.
Isiah created young and athletic team full with bright stars like Jerom, Jeffries, Q, and Malik
We have the best players of all time - big fat Eddy, marbs the clown, big black hole Zack, and And-one street ball maestro Craf.
We have a bunch of young and talented who cannot play because of savvy veterans mentioned above.
Yep. The future is bright.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
1/15/2008  1:15 AM
Posted by iyamwutiam:

Slimpack
I was answering the post and not you specifically. The psot is What is this is not all Isiah's doing-!
I think he has a point- and I have mentioned in other posts:
There is only one reason a guy like Isiah gets this job - to be the fall guy. He dutifully played along - Marbury (see my other posts-since I only joined today- it won't be too onerous), Larry Brown, Wilkens. If it weren't for Curry, Lee, Robinson and Balkman panning out (try finding any other team - that had 3 draft picks in the bottom 5 of the draft not only make the team but be contributors)- any team in the NBA - google is at your disposal my friend and I look forward to be corrected.

As for the wine and water- puh-lease- gimme a break-
How do you match the top 4 picks in the WHOLE draft against the bottom 5?/ Yeah thats 'really' fair and so sensible. Man - with your level headed and fair evaluation - I can see why you thik the Knicks would be champions over nite.

I certianly wouldn't say that Curry has panned. He seems like a huge bust to me. also Nate was drafted 21st which isn't technically bottom 5 although I'm kind of slitting hairs. Also he drafted ariza in the 2nd round who I think will be pretty good.

Anyway about another GM drafting 3 players in the bottom of the draft that panned out I would think that there is at least one other. I'm far too lazy to check though, I don't really care about it that much. I know tony parker, and ginobli were bottom of the draft so whoever drafted them would need one more, but I dunno.....

Also, I don't see how trading for Marbury, and hiring those coaches makes Isiah the fall guy, if anything it just makes him a reckless General Manager who's decision making is suspect. You make it sound like the only way to recover from Layden's roster was to do what Isiah did. I would only admit to that being true if Dolan really did force Isiah to win now every season and put a lot of pressure on him to make a lot of the moves he made (which is something that I believe is at least mostly false). However, if that isn't true than a good GM would have us in a much better situation long term than Isiah has us in right now, I'm not saying that we'd have a better win lose record right now than we do now, but we'd be a lot better off in the long run.

I don't see Isiah as a guy who's taking any more blame than he deserves. To me it appeared that he simply though he could turn Isiah's roster into a great roster overnight and by attempting to do so has messed up the Knicks.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
1/15/2008  2:37 AM
Posted by iyamwutiam:


There is only one reason a guy like Isiah gets this job - to be the fall guy. He dutifully played along - Marbury (see my other posts-since I only joined today- it won't be too onerous), Larry Brown, Wilkens. If it weren't for Curry, Lee, Robinson and Balkman panning out (try finding any other team - that had 3 draft picks in the bottom 5 of the draft not only make the team but be contributors)- any team in the NBA - google is at your disposal my friend and I look forward to be corrected.

Of course the trick being that ONLY Lee was actually drafted in the bottom 5 picks of the first round of the NBA draft.

Robinson was the 21st pick in the 2005 draft and Balkman was the 20th pick of the 2006 draft.

Google is at your disposal, I suggest you use it and stop looking like an idiot. I hope you enjoyed my correcting you.

And I would really be remiss if I didn't point out a serious flaw in your premise. Typically teams that regularly pick in the bottom 5 of the draft are the elite teams, who are usually already competing for championships with the players that they have. So for them to find 3 rookies that deep in the draft and find large enough roles for them, that they would be contributing on the level that you're suggesting, while remaining an elite team is extremely difficult. Even the Spurs haven't done it...yet.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/15/2008  2:42 AM
Posted by iyamwutiam:
Scott Layden was an exec with Utah at the time and is usually given credit for drafting Stockton and Malone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Layden
Again - i will correct you --
that was FRANK LAYDEN - his father. I will let you do your own google quest - so you can find out for yourself - who Layden drafted in all the years he was a GM for both teams. And bTW - please feel free to write back on all of his wonderful picks- I am sure it will anyday beat Isiah's .
Did you even read the link I posted? Here's one more on SCOTT Layden's role in Utah beginning in 1981. Is nba.com wrong?
http://www.nba.com/coachfile/scott_layden/
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

1/15/2008  2:54 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by iyamwutiam:
Scott Layden was an exec with Utah at the time and is usually given credit for drafting Stockton and Malone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Layden
Again - i will correct you --
that was FRANK LAYDEN - his father. I will let you do your own google quest - so you can find out for yourself - who Layden drafted in all the years he was a GM for both teams. And bTW - please feel free to write back on all of his wonderful picks- I am sure it will anyday beat Isiah's .
Did you even read the link I posted? Here's one more on SCOTT Layden's role in Utah beginning in 1981. Is nba.com wrong?
http://www.nba.com/coachfile/scott_layden/


Infiltration is a BISH!
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
1/15/2008  6:36 AM
a new lover on board! it's like watching a guy drive directly into mud to show off his new tires and then continue to tell you how great they are as he spins them faster and faster and gets stuck deeper and deeper.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
1/15/2008  8:28 AM
and here's the thing with our 'young' roster- we've got guys like Crawful and Curry who, while young, have been in the league a long time, and they are what you get- one dimensional, erratic players that give you some good games, one or two great games in a season, and then a whole bunch of nothing for the rest.

And Zach sure is young, but his contract sure does make sure he will age with us!

Dolan asked Isiah when he took the job 'Can you win now?' and Isiah said sure. He told Dolan what Dolan wanted to hear. There is, I think, an element of irreality between Dolan & Isiah.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
1/15/2008  9:59 AM
iyamwutiam -- I want to thank you for coming in and providing some historical context to offset the "hysterical context" that pervades this forum.

You did get a couple of facts wrong, but the overall thrust of your argument should be well received by anyone who was actually following the Knicks and is old enough to remember 7 years back: Isiah took over a team that was falling off a cliff. He did not ruin a good team. He did not push it off of the cliff. He's been trying like hell to pull it back, but he has screwed up many times.

The team Isiah took over was capped out and not getting under it anytime soon because of Houston's contract. The core of the team was all heading for retirement with the exception of Kurt Thomas.

Yes, Isiah tried to go the quick-fix route and he has to take a lot of the blame. If people don't realize that Dolan is the driving force behind that approach they probably haven't been watching. Meanwhile, those who espouse "breaking it down" will list all of the quick fixes Isiah missed out on if he GM'ed perfectly. And lament his not fixing it quick. Then they will tell you all the quick fixes that should be made now, starting with the ultimate quick fix of a new GM who will of course not try to make any quick fixes except the perfect ones in their fantasy land.

***

Anybody who takes over from Isiah will have a lot easier job than he was handed: This team can get under the cap now if they choose that route (Unlikely). This team has tradeable some assets that another team might actually want.

Patience is a virtue. In New York, it is often preached but rarely practiced.

***

iyamwutiam, A fair warning to you. Designated forum hard-on "Islesfan" already has a hard on for you. He really is not here as a basketball fan, he is a troll. As you can see, he has already violated forum rules by calling you an idiot even though you have not engaged him, and I think he should be reprimanded.

"Islesfan", you're out of line. Stop being an ass for once in your life.

iyamwutiam, if you continue to post here and attempt to provide context of what Isiah stepped into, rather tearing at him, "Islesfan" will follow you around like a rabid poodle calling you names and trying to bury you in simple-mindedness, because he has very little knowledge of the game. He simply has a disturbing "Mark David Chapman-esque" homoerotic fixation on Isiah Thomas that is a little scary.

Also, you should get ready to be called names by many others because extremism is generally more accepted than a level-headed view of what is and what was.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
Nalod
Posts: 72131
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
1/15/2008  10:16 AM
Layden is given credit as the scout who prepared the team for the drafts as they then drafted Stockton and Malone.

I contend that it is the owner who decides on the financials of the team and I give Dolan credit for getting Marbury. I think the thought was that bringing in Thomas to be his mentor would make it work. IT was a plausalbe theory then.

Trading out Latrell was also an owner who was sick and tired of his antics and distractions. He also wanted a high charactor "family values" kind of team. The veteran team with JVG kept it together. This might sound stupid but I would have liked to have seen Layden actually have a few drafts to see what he could do.

In hindsight, NENE has not proven to be a great player and if one really looks at the Dice trade objectively had he stayed healthy that team really could have done damage in the weak east. We had expirings and our picks and who knows. Its too hard to reconstruct.

I really believe that Isiah is the face of the movement regardless of who is driving the team. Dolan is a meddling fool and he dictates like most owners the direction of the team.

Quite frankly its results that count and regardless of whos name is on it the teams organizational failures are plentiful!

Curry was a huge mistake as we bet the ranch on a kid who does not love to work on the court. That one characteristic was massive in deciding to make those trade and alone should have been a warning sign.

Same for Jerome, Gazyman, and even marbury. These guys are not motivated for the right reasons.

Dolan is a fool, but Isiah should have looked further into the soul of these guys. In a way he is like the girl who thinks they can convert a good looking gay man straight! Just can't change stripes of a tiger.

I believe that if we let the higher character salaries expire and drafted high character kids we'd be further along regardless of who was GM.

YOu blend in the rookies with our two picks we gave away I think we could have done a portland type of rebuild with a bright future. Isiah's strenght of mentoring kids who actually listen might have been a better use of his talents.
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
1/15/2008  10:16 AM
Posted by oohah:

iyamwutiam -- I want to thank you for coming in and providing some historical context to offset the "hysterical context" that pervades this forum.

You did get a couple of facts wrong, but the overall thrust of your argument should be well received by anyone who was actually following the Knicks and is old enough to remember 7 years back: Isiah took over a team that was falling off a cliff. He did not ruin a good team. He did not push it off of the cliff. He's been trying like hell to pull it back, but he has screwed up many times.

The team Isiah took over was capped out and not getting under it anytime soon because of Houston's contract. The core of the team was all heading for retirement with the exception of Kurt Thomas.

Yes, Isiah tried to go the quick-fix route and he has to take a lot of the blame. If people don't realize that Dolan is the driving force behind that approach they probably haven't been watching. Meanwhile, those who espouse "breaking it down" will list all of the quick fixes Isiah missed out on if he GM'ed perfectly. And lament his not fixing it quick. Then they will tell you all the quick fixes that should be made now, starting with the ultimate quick fix of a new GM who will of course not try to make any quick fixes except the perfect ones in their fantasy land.

***

Anybody who takes over from Isiah will have a lot easier job than he was handed: This team can get under the cap now if they choose that route (Unlikely). This team has tradeable some assets that another team might actually want.

Patience is a virtue. In New York, it is often preached but rarely practiced.

***

iyamwutiam, A fair warning to you. Designated forum hard-on "Islesfan" already has a hard on for you. He really is not here as a basketball fan, he is a troll. As you can see, he has already violated forum rules by calling you an idiot even though you have not engaged him, and I think he should be reprimanded.

"Islesfan", you're out of line. Stop being an ass for once in your life.

iyamwutiam, if you continue to post here and attempt to provide context of what Isiah stepped into, rather tearing at him, "Islesfan" will follow you around like a rabid poodle calling you names and trying to bury you in simple-mindedness, because he has very little knowledge of the game. He simply has a disturbing "Mark David Chapman-esque" homoerotic fixation on Isiah Thomas that is a little scary.

Also, you should get ready to be called names by many others because extremism is generally more accepted than a level-headed view of what is and what was.

oohah

aw, isles ain't any worse than the lovers/stalkers (earl, papa, rembee, etc) who attacked anyone who had a negative comment about the job zeke's done. let's see if iyamwutiam can back up some of his statements when they’re challenged. fair game to him.
What if this is not Isiah's doing???

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy