Posted by TMS:
& who are these TONS of people who think the Knicks can rebuild AROUND Eddy Curry... the only things i've heard is that Curry can still be an effective player for you if you surround him w/complementary parts... there is a fundamental difference there that you don't seem to be getting, but i am done trying to explain what that is because i'm sure you'll just twist that again into something where Eddy Curry is all of a sudden 1 of my favorite players
[Edited by - TMS on 01-13-2008 11:46 AM]
No I wouldn't!
Saying EY can be a complementary player on a decent team is generic and vague...... a lot of NBA players fit that description TMS. I do understand the idea. On the other hand you have those who feel his worth is extremely low and those who feel if Zach wasn't here, with a few tweaks to the roster to complement Curry's game, we could still build around him. I was addressing the latter frame of thought. We always have to consider what we gave up to acquire him and I rarely talk about Curry's salary but his other costs, means he has to be more than just a complementary player.
Can't Marbury be a complementary player on a decent team?
[Edited by - TrueBlue on 01-13-2008 8:51 PM]
