[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Knicks Trying To Trade Randolph For Michael Redd?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 2 of 3 ‹ Previous 1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
1/10/2008  7:04 PM
I just woke up ftom gettinf 4 teeth extracted and I see two huge trades. Michael Redd deal is great but I want Charlie V included. I say Charlie V and Redd for Zach and Jones. Hopefully we can throw in quentin richardson ( No he no longer gets to be called Q. Rich). As for the T-Mac deal NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! I like watching him play but his health makes him a question mark. Plus we need to make room for the sign and trade with Sac Town for Artest.

2008-09

Crawford
Redd
Artest
Lee
Curry
AUTOADVERT
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/10/2008  8:38 PM
come on bro... u really think we're in any place to be making demands here? we'd be lucky to be getting back a player like Michael Redd in exchange much less ask for another piece to be added into the deal on their part... & the only way Q gets thrown into any deal is if he agrees to forfeit the illicit sex tape of Isiah & some unsuspecting intern he's obviously in possession of to warrant his playing time this year.

[Edited by - TMS on 01-10-2008 7:55 PM]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41014
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
1/10/2008  10:32 PM
Ewww Michael Redd?
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
EnySpree
Posts: 44927
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
1/10/2008  11:30 PM
Why would they trade Redd? they need to get Zach in there with Redd.....That team needs some inside scoring and Zach is the best available.....dun deal man.....if its going down it has to be for Charlie and Simmons unless Isiah is gonna take Gadzuric back......at least in my opinion. This is what I'm hoping for if infact the rumors are even true.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Solace
Posts: 30004
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
1/10/2008  11:41 PM
Why on earth would Milwaukee give us Michael Redd for Zach Randolph? This is a reach, I think.
The Knicks 2026 NBA Champions!
GKFv2
Posts: 26755
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
1/10/2008  11:44 PM
Posted by Cookdcokehop:

I just woke up ftom gettinf 4 teeth extracted and I see two huge trades. Michael Redd deal is great but I want Charlie V included. I say Charlie V and Redd for Zach and Jones. Hopefully we can throw in quentin richardson ( No he no longer gets to be called Q. Rich). As for the T-Mac deal NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! I like watching him play but his health makes him a question mark. Plus we need to make room for the sign and trade with Sac Town for Artest.

2008-09

Crawford
Redd
Artest
Lee
Curry

Now I know why some of these people defended Isiah for long. They think these types of moves are the right ones to build a team. A bunch of mini-Isiahs running around on this forum...
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
Allanfan20
Posts: 36051
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
1/11/2008  1:49 AM
Where the hell are we getting this T-Mac shizat?
“I couldn’t dunk it so I tried to, you know, just touched it.”- OG Anunoby
Solace
Posts: 30004
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
1/11/2008  8:21 AM
Posted by Allanfan20:

Where the hell are we getting this T-Mac shizat?

http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topic.asp?t=25136
The Knicks 2026 NBA Champions!
VDesai
Posts: 43302
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
1/11/2008  9:18 AM
Posted by Solace:

Why on earth would Milwaukee give us Michael Redd for Zach Randolph? This is a reach, I think.

Yup, this just looks like writer's speculation- not a real rumor.
joec32033
Posts: 30641
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
1/11/2008  11:00 AM
For the record I would do the Randolph-Redd trade in a second.
~You can't run from who you are.~
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/11/2008  11:04 AM
Posted by joec32033:

For the record I would do the Randolph-Redd trade in a second.

hell yeah
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41014
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
1/11/2008  11:14 AM
I don't think I would want Redd on our team. That's not to say he's not a good player, but he has a huge contract and with that type of contract, you have to be able to build around that player. I don't think you can build a championship around Redd, he's defintely a complimentary player but not a franchis caliber one and right now this team needs a franchise player to build around.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/11/2008  11:31 AM
his contract's about equal value to Zach's so it doesn't really negatively effect our longterm cap situation... at least he'd fill a need on this roster.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38626
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
1/11/2008  2:37 PM
This is actually a good trade for us IMHO. We can send Zach and Fred Jones(expiring) for Redd and Charlie V.

I am also down with the T-Mac for Dinglebury trade. They would probably want us to take Mike James along with T-Mac which would proably mean sending Malik and his 1 year remaining contract with Dinglebury.


C-Curry
PF-DLee
SF-T-Mac
SG-Redd
PG-Crawford

That is not bad assuming we can reign in Crawford's shot selection and concentrate on setting up people.
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34125
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127
1/11/2008  3:16 PM
Michael Redd would be the shooting guard this team has been searching for since Allan Houston retired. He'll play at SF because everyone else sucks though.

But I can tell you what, Michael Redd is statistically a better player than Randolph and fills a position of need. Both contracts run three years, so it really would be a great trade. Problem is Isiah will find some way to **** it up, and the team would improve enough to lose out on a top draft pick.
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
GKFv2
Posts: 26755
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
1/11/2008  5:42 PM
Posted by NYKBocker:

This is actually a good trade for us IMHO. We can send Zach and Fred Jones(expiring) for Redd and Charlie V.

I am also down with the T-Mac for Dinglebury trade. They would probably want us to take Mike James along with T-Mac which would proably mean sending Malik and his 1 year remaining contract with Dinglebury.


C-Curry
PF-DLee
SF-T-Mac
SG-Redd
PG-Crawford

That is not bad assuming we can reign in Crawford's shot selection and concentrate on setting up people.

Mini-Isiahs running wild I tell'ya.

Thank you, Rick Brunson.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38626
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
1/11/2008  9:37 PM
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by NYKBocker:

This is actually a good trade for us IMHO. We can send Zach and Fred Jones(expiring) for Redd and Charlie V.

I am also down with the T-Mac for Dinglebury trade. They would probably want us to take Mike James along with T-Mac which would proably mean sending Malik and his 1 year remaining contract with Dinglebury.


C-Curry
PF-DLee
SF-T-Mac
SG-Redd
PG-Crawford

That is not bad assuming we can reign in Crawford's shot selection and concentrate on setting up people.

Mini-Isiahs running wild I tell'ya.

Ouch!! You cut me deep!
TheGame
Posts: 26673
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
1/12/2008  2:07 PM
Why would the Bucks do this deal? They already have two young developing PFs. Makes no sense for them.
Trust the Process
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34125
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127
1/12/2008  2:11 PM
Posted by TheGame:

Why would the Bucks do this deal? They already have two young developing PFs. Makes no sense for them.

The logic I've heard is that the offense flows through Michael Redd now, and the Bucks don't like that. So, it's essentially a deal that allows the Bucks to essentially rebuild each player's role on the team... Randolph I suppose has more value as well, which isn't a compliment. The Bucks save some money too.

This deal would be a "first step" and is an addition by subtraction trade. Funny that it could work out that way for both teams.
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/13/2008  11:12 AM
Zach does make some sense for them in that he would provide some low post scoring to complement Yi & Mo's perimeter games... if this deal had any merit to it the Bucks had to have been asking for something else to be included to sweeten the deal on our part... that's probably why Isiah is suddenly calling these guys "untouchable" since he knows any team that's willing to take these contracts off our books is looking to arse pillage us for more... a few weeks ago Isiah was saying he was open to dealing anyone on this team.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Page 2 of 3 ‹ Previous 1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Knicks Trying To Trade Randolph For Michael Redd?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy