[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Marbury for T-Mac???
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 2 of 3 ‹ Previous 1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
1/10/2008  4:43 PM
I think you have to tank the rest of the way and start with Derek Rose if you can get him.

Look to get rid of collins, crawford, jefferies over the next two years, etc. Randolf is here to stay which is terrible but everything falls into place with a leader and a guy that can get people the ball......

A face break team with Balkman, Nate, Chandler, Lee could be effective in the future.
AUTOADVERT
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
1/10/2008  4:47 PM
Posted by Cosmic:

WFAN:

These two are clowns. I started listening today then turned it off thinking all they'd blab about was the Giants.

Apparently they talked Knicks... this is from someone who heard their convo

******************************************

Francessa seemed pretty confident on the information he heard(that none of us heard). He said it was TMac and a filler for Marbury and a player/pick(Guessing Balkman). Marburys contract ends next year, while TMac has an extra year then Steph. Mike said the reasoning behind Houston is so they can shed the salary, and move a year quicker into surrounding the team around Yao.


**************************************************


My god...what a TERRIBLE idea this would be. Another proven stat stuffing loser?

C-Curry
F-Randolph
F-QRich
G-TMac
G-Crawful

Yeah, LOVELY IDEA ISIAH YOU DUMB PIECE OF SHIT!!!!

Seriously...if he does this we're done until 2010 or 2011 instead of 2009 for any chance to tear this mess down.

TMAC? Is he serious? On THIS TEAM full of chuckers? So then we'll have a true 5-chucker lineup!?

Yeah, THATS taking us places!


Tmac is a useless, self-centered, arrogant, stupid, lowIQ, injury prone, piece of CRAP.


I guarantee Isiah could see the trade to Dolan though....cause clueless fans will wake up "Yo my dawg TMAC iz a KNICK I gots to go to da gahden and watch my boi cwossovah and chuck a 30 footer!"



[Edited by - cosmic on 01-10-2008 4:20 PM]


hahahaha.. cosmic, I feel you.. I was on realgm a while ago, and I let T-mac have it.. of course we had our usual T-mac defenders, telling us how great he still is... I mean If this happens, then Isiah is here to stay forever.. not a good sign at all..
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
jimimou
Posts: 23517
Alba Posts: 36
Lame Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/6/2004
Member: #681
USA
1/10/2008  4:49 PM
this is QRich part II - back problems and all. Q was a really good (not great) player before coming here. T-Mac is a really good player, but has health issues and is selfish. No doubt, if he were to be traded here, he would be reduced to 5pts per game. it's the 'knix jinx'
Elite
Posts: 26372
Alba Posts: 23
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #510
1/10/2008  4:50 PM
Posted by MS:

I think you have to tank the rest of the way and start with Derek Rose if you can get him.

Look to get rid of collins, crawford, jefferies over the next two years, etc. Randolf is here to stay which is terrible but everything falls into place with a leader and a guy that can get people the ball......

A face break team with Balkman, Nate, Chandler, Lee could be effective in the future.

I agree however Logic is very difficult for james dolan and isiah.
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
1/10/2008  4:52 PM
Seriously I think we do this deal and call mchale up.

Why not he is under pressure there is dumb as stone and they sit tracy for the rest of the season pick up a top 3 pick from their own record and all it takes is Ratliff's expiring deal. Mchale turns KG into Al Jefferson and Tracy.

Foye, McGrady, Brewer, Jefferson, Draft Choice
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
1/10/2008  4:53 PM
If you really want to get T-Mac, then get him in the off-season when you at least have a chance at a Rose/McGrady backcourt.

Getting him right now makes no sense. Plus, Marbury expires after next season so I don't see why Houston would be in a rush to move T-Mac to us before the deadline.

I don't want T-Mac here but I'm not against trading for him if the deal is good for us. This isn't like the Randolph trade because we actually need a dependable SG and with only 2 more years left on his contract, taking on McGrady wouldn't be that big of a risk. Worst comes to worst, you could always deal him for something because he has some value (although not as much as he used to obviously).
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
jimimou
Posts: 23517
Alba Posts: 36
Lame Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/6/2004
Member: #681
USA
1/10/2008  4:55 PM
Posted by Cosmic:

WFAN:

These two are clowns. I started listening today then turned it off thinking all they'd blab about was the Giants.

Apparently they talked Knicks... this is from someone who heard their convo

******************************************

Francessa seemed pretty confident on the information he heard(that none of us heard). He said it was TMac and a filler for Marbury and a player/pick(Guessing Balkman). Marburys contract ends next year, while TMac has an extra year then Steph. Mike said the reasoning behind Houston is so they can shed the salary, and move a year quicker into surrounding the team around Yao.


**************************************************


My god...what a TERRIBLE idea this would be. Another proven stat stuffing loser?

C-Curry
F-Randolph
F-QRich
G-TMac
G-Crawful

Yeah, LOVELY IDEA ISIAH YOU DUMB PIECE OF SHIT!!!!

Seriously...if he does this we're done until 2010 or 2011 instead of 2009 for any chance to tear this mess down.

TMAC? Is he serious? On THIS TEAM full of chuckers? So then we'll have a true 5-chucker lineup!?

Yeah, THATS taking us places!


Tmac is a useless, self-centered, arrogant, stupid, lowIQ, injury prone, piece of CRAP.


I guarantee Isiah could see the trade to Dolan though....cause clueless fans will wake up "Yo my dawg TMAC iz a KNICK I gots to go to da gahden and watch my boi cwossovah and chuck a 30 footer!"



[Edited by - cosmic on 01-10-2008 4:20 PM]

didnt zeek draft him? we might as well go for his other bff - damon stoudamire and call it a day...
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/10/2008  5:00 PM
Posted by s3231:
This isn't like the Randolph trade because we actually need a dependable SG

the problem is that T-Mac isnt' really dependable... he's an awesome talent no question, but what good is that if he's not playing half the time?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
1/10/2008  5:00 PM
Marbury and Balkman for Tmac is a great trade....... If all of Isiahs trades got a player turely as good as tmac back, the knicks wouldn't be in the problems they are today.

Curry
Zach(Lee hopefully)
Tmac
JC
Nate
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
1/10/2008  5:05 PM
Posted by Anji:

Marbury and Balkman for Tmac is a great trade....... If all of Isiahs trades got a player turely as good as tmac back, the knicks wouldn't be in the problems they are today.

Curry
Zach(Lee hopefully)
Tmac
JC
Nate

You are the same dude who defended Isiah to death. T-Mac is not a great trade. It is a band aid deal like all the other band aid deals.

Thank you, Rick Brunson.
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
1/10/2008  5:15 PM
A, your that guy that made those one liner posts.......

All of the knicks trade have never got a player as great as Tmac back, for Marbury and balkman that would be a awesome trade.
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
1/10/2008  5:21 PM
Posted by Anji:

A, your that guy that made those one liner posts.......

All of the knicks trade have never got a player as great as Tmac back, for Marbury and balkman that would be a awesome trade.

One liner posts? Yeah, you're a genius.

There is nothing awesome about T-Mac. He's always injured and is a selfish whiny waste of talent. He's put up the stats and had absolutely nothing to show for it. Now he can't even play with a guy like Yao. Sound familiar? Yeah, we have a lot of those guys on this roster. Do yourself a favor and go back to telling everyone how Isiah Thomas is the man and let the people who actually understand how to build a team discuss something here.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
1/10/2008  6:13 PM
T-Mac is still very a good player. The only problem is that he's never on the court.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Mac
Posts: 20767
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/8/2003
Member: #470
Japan
1/10/2008  6:53 PM
I'd make that trade if only to get rid of Marbury.
BigC
Posts: 22672
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/14/2004
Member: #829
1/10/2008  7:03 PM
Penny Hardway here we come.

The Knicks just need to let Marbury's contract expire and build through the draft.
BigC's Knick blogs and Knicks highlights after every Knicks game http://fromthebaseline.com/
jaydh
Posts: 23155
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/16/2001
Member: #96
1/10/2008  7:31 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by s3231:
This isn't like the Randolph trade because we actually need a dependable SG

the problem is that T-Mac isnt' really dependable... he's an awesome talent no question, but what good is that if he's not playing half the time?


When he is playing, its a bonus. When he isn't, its a bonus in that the younger guys who get little time can develop. I would do this. Tmac is better than anything we have at the guard position. Plus getting Marbs out of the locker room is a bonus. He is much more of a distraction than Tmac.
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
1/10/2008  7:33 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by s3231:
This isn't like the Randolph trade because we actually need a dependable SG

the problem is that T-Mac isnt' really dependable... he's an awesome talent no question, but what good is that if he's not playing half the time?

I agree there, but he still has a lot more value than what you would be giving up in this trade and only one more year than Marbury has.

I'm against trading for T-Mac (especially mid-season), but I don't think its that bad of an idea if its only Marbury + a prospect or two.



"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
1/10/2008  7:43 PM
Posted by Mac:

I'd make that trade if only to get rid of Marbury.

Same concept--different name

it is a max contract flipper that's all his game is we'll take on the extra 40mm for the momentary bling

funny the blazers are pretty good assembling a no named teams who like each other and avg 24 years old

RIP Crushalot😞
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
1/10/2008  8:09 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by Mac:

I'd make that trade if only to get rid of Marbury.

Same concept--different name

it is a max contract flipper that's all his game is we'll take on the extra 40mm for the momentary bling

funny the blazers are pretty good assembling a no named teams who like each other and avg 24 years old

BRIGGS, what people here fail to see is that NBA consists of seperate franchises: but they also are considered one entity. The knicks are a cash cow for the NBA and they use the Knicks to swallow bad contracts thats the overall goal given to the Knicks. I believe that the Knicks soul purpose is to help the bad market teams and help them through tough situations.



BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
1/10/2008  8:47 PM
Posted by Vmart:
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by Mac:

I'd make that trade if only to get rid of Marbury.

Same concept--different name

it is a max contract flipper that's all his game is we'll take on the extra 40mm for the momentary bling

funny the blazers are pretty good assembling a no named teams who like each other and avg 24 years old

BRIGGS, what people here fail to see is that NBA consists of seperate franchises: but they also are considered one entity. The knicks are a cash cow for the NBA and they use the Knicks to swallow bad contracts thats the overall goal given to the Knicks. I believe that the Knicks soul purpose is to help the bad market teams and help them through tough situations.

So when the NBA flushes the toilet, all the crap goes to the Knicks?

https:// It's not so hard.
Page 2 of 3 ‹ Previous 1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Marbury for T-Mac???
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy