Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by arkrud:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

did ray allen play?

How should the Bobcats feel about this victory since Ray didn't play?

I think they should feel good regardless.

I'm just wondering why TKF is inquiring if Ray played.

I was wondering if anyone was going to lessen this victory, like they do when the knicks beat a team without their best player. Regardless of record..

thats all....

I figured so.

So are you saying the Celtics without Ray aren't as good as the Bulls without Deng?

no.. that is what you are saying..

I am wondering how good the celts are going to be, without one of the big three, even if it is the lesser one.. the bobcats did a good job beating them.. you guys are like a bunch of bitter old women, looking for any instant to pile on the knicks.. try getting laid, smoke a good cigar, and follow another team for a while.. usually works for me...

No you're just someone who got overly excited about the 1 victory over the Bulls. You've reverted back to the same ole TKF. You only see fit to pile on when it's according to your liking. Anything outside of this you feel it's over the top.

please, stop acting like you didn't cream in your pants when the knicks beat the bulls and then you took a swig of vodka, put on your mean face and then went to the computer typing how much you hate the knicks, as if you are the anti knicks gangsta... please , stop posing...... you don't know me.

Actually I was thinking WOW Joe Smith and Aaron Gray really have a legit shot to win this game for the Bulls.

actually they didn't. they had to take gray out in cruch time because he was turning the ball over and commiting fouls.. Joe smith always kills the knicks, he has our number.. but I am not suprised, curry and zach can't guard their own shadows.... It is no suprise that every big, good or stiff has great games...... we know that.... but the bulls are bad, there is a reason why they are where they are... so them losing to another bad team in the knicks with or without deng is no suprise..

Posted by tkf:

Posted by GKFv2:

We say "they were missing so and so" because the Knicks flat out suck an rarely win and when they do it's really in a cheap manner. Bobcats are heaps better than the Knicks and the Celtics destroyed the Knicks by 45. Even without Ray Allen, they are a fantastic team. That was a big upset by the Bobcats and hopefully it does something for their season. I was hoping they'd make the playoffs this year.

why does this have to be a Knicks/ vs bobcats thing. I mean are you guys that miserable.... I am sure the celtics missed ray, hell they only scored 80+ points, are you telling me the bobcats are that good? I am happy they beat the celtics, I hate boston.. but lets be real.. the bobcats are not making the playoffs this year....

Bobcats are heaps better than the Knicks and the Celtics destroyed the Knicks by 45.

useless point... the cavs beat the celtics and we beat the cavs by 18.. so what is your point.. again, lets try making some sense. piling on for the sake of piling on becomes foolish. we all know the knicks suck... no need to introduce that into every argument, especially when it is not relevant...

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by arkrud:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

did ray allen play?

How should the Bobcats feel about this victory since Ray didn't play?

I think they should feel good regardless.

I'm just wondering why TKF is inquiring if Ray played.

I was wondering if anyone was going to lessen this victory, like they do when the knicks beat a team without their best player. Regardless of record..

thats all....

I figured so.

So are you saying the Celtics without Ray aren't as good as the Bulls without Deng?

no.. that is what you are saying..

I am wondering how good the celts are going to be, without one of the big three, even if it is the lesser one.. the bobcats did a good job beating them.. you guys are like a bunch of bitter old women, looking for any instant to pile on the knicks.. try getting laid, smoke a good cigar, and follow another team for a while.. usually works for me...

No you're just someone who got overly excited about the 1 victory over the Bulls. You've reverted back to the same ole TKF. You only see fit to pile on when it's according to your liking. Anything outside of this you feel it's over the top.

please, stop acting like you didn't cream in your pants when the knicks beat the bulls and then you took a swig of vodka, put on your mean face and then went to the computer typing how much you hate the knicks, as if you are the anti knicks gangsta... please , stop posing...... you don't know me.

Actually I was thinking WOW Joe Smith and Aaron Gray really have a legit shot to win this game for the Bulls.

actually they didn't. they had to take gray out in cruch time because he was turning the ball over and commiting fouls.. Joe smith always kills the knicks, he has our number.. but I am not suprised, curry and zach can't guard their own shadows.... It is no suprise that every big, good or stiff has great games...... we know that.... but the bulls are bad, there is a reason why they are where they are... so them losing to another bad team in the knicks with or without deng is no suprise..

And when they took him out the Bulls were up 92-83 10:00 left to play in the 4rth. So through 3qrts Aaron Gray a rookie mind you did more than his part to contribute to them having a legitimate chance to beat us. It was well before crunch time TKF LOL!

http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/playbyplay?gameId=280108004&period=4

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by arkrud:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

did ray allen play?

How should the Bobcats feel about this victory since Ray didn't play?

I think they should feel good regardless.

I'm just wondering why TKF is inquiring if Ray played.

I was wondering if anyone was going to lessen this victory, like they do when the knicks beat a team without their best player. Regardless of record..

thats all....

I figured so.

So are you saying the Celtics without Ray aren't as good as the Bulls without Deng?

no.. that is what you are saying..

I am wondering how good the celts are going to be, without one of the big three, even if it is the lesser one.. the bobcats did a good job beating them.. you guys are like a bunch of bitter old women, looking for any instant to pile on the knicks.. try getting laid, smoke a good cigar, and follow another team for a while.. usually works for me...

No you're just someone who got overly excited about the 1 victory over the Bulls. You've reverted back to the same ole TKF. You only see fit to pile on when it's according to your liking. Anything outside of this you feel it's over the top.

please, stop acting like you didn't cream in your pants when the knicks beat the bulls and then you took a swig of vodka, put on your mean face and then went to the computer typing how much you hate the knicks, as if you are the anti knicks gangsta... please , stop posing...... you don't know me.

Actually I was thinking WOW Joe Smith and Aaron Gray really have a legit shot to win this game for the Bulls.

actually they didn't. they had to take gray out in cruch time because he was turning the ball over and commiting fouls.. Joe smith always kills the knicks, he has our number.. but I am not suprised, curry and zach can't guard their own shadows.... It is no suprise that every big, good or stiff has great games...... we know that.... but the bulls are bad, there is a reason why they are where they are... so them losing to another bad team in the knicks with or without deng is no suprise..

And when they took him out the Bulls were up 92-83 10:00 left to play in the 4rth. So through 3qrts Aaron Gray a rookie mind you did more than his part to contribute to them having a legitimate chance to beat us. It was well before crunch time TKF LOL!

http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/playbyplay?gameId=280108004&period=4

hm. my bad, for some reason I thought gray was in the game late, but it was that other scrub, tyrus thomas, nevertheless, if you call a 9 point lead with basically a whole quarter left to play, a legitimate chance at winning a game... then have at it.. i won't bother with that argument... If you feel aaron gray gave them a legit shot at beating us, then maybe you should put your resume in to coach the bulls, because they took him out early and he never returned from what it seems, so maybe it is just not me, that felt that the bulls were not going to have a legitimate shot with gray in the game, to beat the knicks..

But keep on believing.... no matter how ridiculous it may sound..

You're hen pecking what a shame!

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by arkrud:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

did ray allen play?

How should the Bobcats feel about this victory since Ray didn't play?

I think they should feel good regardless.

I'm just wondering why TKF is inquiring if Ray played.

I was wondering if anyone was going to lessen this victory, like they do when the knicks beat a team without their best player. Regardless of record..

thats all....

I figured so.

So are you saying the Celtics without Ray aren't as good as the Bulls without Deng?

no.. that is what you are saying..

I am wondering how good the celts are going to be, without one of the big three, even if it is the lesser one.. the bobcats did a good job beating them.. you guys are like a bunch of bitter old women, looking for any instant to pile on the knicks.. try getting laid, smoke a good cigar, and follow another team for a while.. usually works for me...

No you're just someone who got overly excited about the 1 victory over the Bulls. You've reverted back to the same ole TKF. You only see fit to pile on when it's according to your liking. Anything outside of this you feel it's over the top.

please, stop acting like you didn't cream in your pants when the knicks beat the bulls and then you took a swig of vodka, put on your mean face and then went to the computer typing how much you hate the knicks, as if you are the anti knicks gangsta... please , stop posing...... you don't know me.

Actually I was thinking WOW Joe Smith and Aaron Gray really have a legit shot to win this game for the Bulls.

actually they didn't. they had to take gray out in cruch time because he was turning the ball over and commiting fouls.. Joe smith always kills the knicks, he has our number.. but I am not suprised, curry and zach can't guard their own shadows.... It is no suprise that every big, good or stiff has great games...... we know that.... but the bulls are bad, there is a reason why they are where they are... so them losing to another bad team in the knicks with or without deng is no suprise..

And when they took him out the Bulls were up 92-83 10:00 left to play in the 4rth. So through 3qrts Aaron Gray a rookie mind you did more than his part to contribute to them having a legitimate chance to beat us. It was well before crunch time TKF LOL!

http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/playbyplay?gameId=280108004&period=4

hm. my bad, for some reason I thought gray was in the game late, but it was that other scrub, tyrus thomas, nevertheless, if you call a 9 point lead with basically a whole quarter left to play, a legitimate chance at winning a game... then have at it.. i won't bother with that argument... If you feel aaron gray gave them a legit shot at beating us, then maybe you should put your resume in to coach the bulls, because they took him out early and he never returned from what it seems, so maybe it is just not me, that felt that the bulls were not going to have a legitimate shot with gray in the game, to beat the knicks..

But keep on believing.... no matter how ridiculous it may sound..

You're hen pecking what a shame!

whatever bro.... If you still believe that the had a shot to beat us with aaron gray playing, then you must know something myself and the bulls coaches don't know....

I'm taking into consideration their play through 4qrts TKF not henpecking a portion of the game like you're trying to do.

again, do you think that if they had kept gray in the game, they would have had a shot to win. They took gray out because he turned the ball over didn't look as comfortable as he did earlier in the game and figured their best chance was with ben in and him out... again, that does not constitute a legitimate chance with gray playing.....

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by arkrud:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by tkf:

did ray allen play?

How should the Bobcats feel about this victory since Ray didn't play?

I think they should feel good regardless.

I'm just wondering why TKF is inquiring if Ray played.

I was wondering if anyone was going to lessen this victory, like they do when the knicks beat a team without their best player. Regardless of record..

thats all....

I figured so.

So are you saying the Celtics without Ray aren't as good as the Bulls without Deng?

no.. that is what you are saying..

I am wondering how good the celts are going to be, without one of the big three, even if it is the lesser one.. the bobcats did a good job beating them.. you guys are like a bunch of bitter old women, looking for any instant to pile on the knicks.. try getting laid, smoke a good cigar, and follow another team for a while.. usually works for me...

No you're just someone who got overly excited about the 1 victory over the Bulls. You've reverted back to the same ole TKF. You only see fit to pile on when it's according to your liking. Anything outside of this you feel it's over the top.

please, stop acting like you didn't cream in your pants when the knicks beat the bulls and then you took a swig of vodka, put on your mean face and then went to the computer typing how much you hate the knicks, as if you are the anti knicks gangsta... please , stop posing...... you don't know me.

Actually I was thinking WOW Joe Smith and Aaron Gray really have a legit shot to win this game for the Bulls.

actually they didn't. they had to take gray out in cruch time because he was turning the ball over and commiting fouls.. Joe smith always kills the knicks, he has our number.. but I am not suprised, curry and zach can't guard their own shadows.... It is no suprise that every big, good or stiff has great games...... we know that.... but the bulls are bad, there is a reason why they are where they are... so them losing to another bad team in the knicks with or without deng is no suprise..

And when they took him out the Bulls were up 92-83 10:00 left to play in the 4rth. So through 3qrts Aaron Gray a rookie mind you did more than his part to contribute to them having a legitimate chance to beat us. It was well before crunch time TKF LOL!

http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/playbyplay?gameId=280108004&period=4

hm. my bad, for some reason I thought gray was in the game late, but it was that other scrub, tyrus thomas, nevertheless, if you call a 9 point lead with basically a whole quarter left to play, a legitimate chance at winning a game... then have at it.. i won't bother with that argument... If you feel aaron gray gave them a legit shot at beating us, then maybe you should put your resume in to coach the bulls, because they took him out early and he never returned from what it seems, so maybe it is just not me, that felt that the bulls were not going to have a legitimate shot with gray in the game, to beat the knicks..

But keep on believing.... no matter how ridiculous it may sound..

You're hen pecking what a shame!

whatever bro.... If you still believe that the had a shot to beat us with aaron gray playing, then you must know something myself and the bulls coaches don't know....

I'm taking into consideration their play through 4qrts TKF not henpecking a portion of the game like you're trying to do.

again, do you think that if they had kept gray in the game, they would have had a shot to win. They took gray out because he turned the ball over didn't look as comfortable as he did earlier in the game and figured their best chance was with ben in and him out... again, that does not constitute a legitimate chance with gray playing.....

Aaron Gray didn't necessarily have to be there in the 4rth qrt TKF. He carried them in the 3rd helping his team build up a substantial lead going into the 4rth. That's when the thought crossed my mind. Both of their play up to that point gave them a legit shot especially with Gray going out 2 min into the 4rth with his team up almost double digits. If the Bulls won the Gray would have got bench Kudos while Joe receives starter Kudos.

You can sell me on Joes smith, he was a dagger in our sides all night, but Gray? yea, he made a few good plays here and there, but that is about it.... had we lost, Joe smith would have been the story.. plain and simple.... but this is all moot. we won....

Posted by majorleads:

Posted by tkf:



You can sell me on Joes smith, he was a dagger in our sides all night, but Gray? yea, he made a few good plays here and there, but that is about it.... had we lost, Joe smith would have been the story.. plain and simple.... but this is all moot. we won....

How can Joe Smith be a dagger in our sides when the goal is a top 3 pick and Isiah Thomas fired?