Posted by newyorknewyork:


I would probably go with Lee, he will be cheaper, and way more efficent. Shoots 50-60% from the field, 80+ form the Ft line, only commits under 2 turn overs. With a very good play making PG, Lee can be a 14-15pts 10-11reb guy with high percentages and low turnovers.

That's an understatement.
With a good play making point guard everybody on the team would be doing better........... .

The kings announcers were loving david lee, and basically said, this is why the kings can't trade artest to the knicks.. because lee's name is the focal point, and they said, he is really good, and really young.... and the knick are not moving him...

Posted by EnySpree:

Tyson chandler type? It that the same as a marcus camby type?

Ok so dalembert is not going anywhere......get over it......other that him? Hilton Armstrong? Hornets don't need lee or zach with david west there(just dropped 40pts).


Any other bright ideas?

Jakeem Noah. At the trade deadline if Ben Wallace still looks shot. I would trade ZBO for Noah & Wallace. Bulls get a young low post scorer and drop a Ben Wallace salary which his production probably won't match. Reunite the florida alum in Lee & Noah who would both be very actice/hustle players for our frontcourt.

Posted by Anji:

Posted by newyorknewyork:


I would probably go with Lee, he will be cheaper, and way more efficent. Shoots 50-60% from the field, 80+ form the Ft line, only commits under 2 turn overs. With a very good play making PG, Lee can be a 14-15pts 10-11reb guy with high percentages and low turnovers.

That's an understatement.
With a good play making point guard everybody on the team would be doing better........... .

Thats not really what I said, or my point, but I agree with you. I gave specific #s in which I would forsee Lee obtaining with a better PG. Even with an upgraded PG I would still probably choose Lee over Randolph since he sweeps the board(no pun intended) in terms of efficency even without a playmaking PG.

RealGM SportsRealGM NBARealGM MLBRealGM NFLRealGM NHLRealGM Tix More from RealGM
MLB: Source: Four Teams Offer Lowell 4-Year Deal
NFL: Browns Could Franchise Anderson?
NHL: Panthers' Martin: Trades Aren't The Answer

Trade Checker ™ | GM Resources | News | Scores & Stats | Transactions | Teams | Players | Forums | Power Rankings
Trade Checker ™
Trade Checker ™
Home > Trade Checker ™
RealGM Trade Checker™
Powered by RealGM: Software Provider to NBA Teams
Step 1: Select the TeamsChoose at least two teams from the menus below to start your trade. Step 2: Choose the PlayersSelect the players you wish to trade from the rosters below. Step 3: Verify the TradeConfirm that your trade proposal is valid according to the NBA collective bargaining agreement. Successful Trade Scenario
Congratulations on a successful trade.
Due to New York, New Orleans, and Memphis being over the cap, the 25% trade rule is invoked. New York, New Orleans, and Memphis had to be no more than 125% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here. This trade satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
Trade ID
Trade ID #4292328
Every trade made by fans is allocated a unique Trade ID which you can share with friends and fellow basketball fans to allow them to see your trade scenario.



Try Another Trade or visit our Trade Forum.
New York Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: -19.0 ppg, -7.6 rpg, and -5.1 apg.
Incoming Players
Peja Stojakovic
6-9 SF / SG from Serbia-Montenegro (Foreign)
13.1 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 1.1 apg in 30.6 minutes
Mike Miller
6-8 SG from Florida
13.4 ppg, 8.4 rpg, 3.5 apg in 37.5 minutes
Outgoing Players
David Lee
6-9 PF from Florida
10.3 ppg, 8.8 rpg, 1.1 apg in 28.4 minutes
Nate Robinson
5-9 PG from Washington
9.6 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 1.9 apg in 20.1 minutes
Fred Jones
6-2 SG from Oregon
5.0 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 1.0 apg in 18.3 minutes
Malik Rose
6-7 PF from Drexel
1.0 ppg, 1.0 rpg, 0.3 apg in 9.7 minutes
Jamal Crawford
6-5 SG / PG from Michigan
19.6 ppg, 3.0 rpg, 5.4 apg in 41.6 minutes
New Orleans Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: +3.2 ppg, +9.7 rpg, and +1.3 apg.
Incoming Players
David Lee
6-9 PF from Florida
10.3 ppg, 8.8 rpg, 1.1 apg in 28.4 minutes
Fred Jones
6-2 SG from Oregon
5.0 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 1.0 apg in 18.3 minutes
Malik Rose
6-7 PF from Drexel
1.0 ppg, 1.0 rpg, 0.3 apg in 9.7 minutes
Outgoing Players
Peja Stojakovic
6-9 SF / SG from Serbia-Montenegro (Foreign)
13.1 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 1.1 apg in 30.6 minutes
Memphis Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: +15.8 ppg, -2.1 rpg, and +3.8 apg.
Incoming Players
Nate Robinson
5-9 PG from Washington
9.6 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 1.9 apg in 20.1 minutes
Jamal Crawford
6-5 SG / PG from Michigan
19.6 ppg, 3.0 rpg, 5.4 apg in 41.6 minutes
Outgoing Players
Mike Miller
6-8 SG from Florida
13.4 ppg, 8.4 rpg, 3.5 apg in 37.5 minutes

© 2000-2007 RealGM, L.L.C. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertising Opportunities | About Us | Site Map | Contact RealGM

Lee by a landslide so far

Posted by Siar617:

Posted by arkrud:

Scoring is replaceable.
23 or 17 per is not a big difference.
Rebounding is good for both.
Defense is better by Lee but just by effort.
This just is why I like Lee better.
Also he is dependable 100% and he does so many small things to help team win.

when did dlee ever average 17 points
and when did he ever play d
you're just amking stuff up

Lee will have 17+ if he will start and play 35-40 min. No doubt about it. Ansd 12-14 RB.
His defense is not good but better that Zach. He has non.

Posted by King1:

Lee is in his third year and he will get better because he works hard. He will get a dependable jumper and become a better defender. Zach has been in the league 6 years and with the body he has the older he gets the less effective he will be. You can have 20 and 13 from Zach or 14-12 from Lee. The difference is one makes 13 and Lee will make 7 million. That gives you 6 on a vet guard or someone else. Lee will never be the scorer Zach is but he will be more efficient and will be a nice role player.

King, I love Lee but lets be realistic here. How long has Lee been playing ball? I have a hard time believing that after, lets say, 10-15 years of playing hoops that a guy who has no jumper yet will get one in the near future. Defense I can better understand because some of that comes from court awareness, but even there, a lot of D is effort, and I don't know how much extra Lee can put into it.

The point is, I think Lee stands up reasonably well against Randolph because of the energy, leadership and intangiables he brings. I just don't believe we should expect a substantially different game from him as years go by. I think pretty much what we see is what we'll get.