[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

I didn't watch any preseason-Chandler Question.
Author Thread
EnySpree
Posts: 44925
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

10/30/2007  7:14 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by EnySpree:

Chandler is a nice strong small fwd. I can see him being like a poor mans rashard lewis......poor man I said......chandler isn't very explosive but he is athletic. He also doesn't seem like he is comfprtable settling for the outside shot but he knocks them down consistantly enough. In 3 year wilson chandler could be the starting 3 for our knicks.......right now? Knicks are screwed.

Wally Z., wally z, wallly z, wally z.............

you like wally? Dude can shoot but he is a non-defensive guy. I don't even know what team he is on these days.

If I was the knicks gm wally z would already be a knick. I would have traded dickau and jones for him. The guy is healthy now and can still fill it up.....he proved that this pre-season already for seattle.

During the pre-season the knicks did a lot of passing around. Imagine how it would feel to have wally z catch a open look? Imagine everyone on the other team saying "noooooooo!". Wally is needed here. He's a vet and a guy that grew up a Knick fan.

Chandler is good but he's about 2 years away from being a starter if that's in his future.

Shaboing boing.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
AUTOADVERT
joec32033
Posts: 30641
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
10/30/2007  7:25 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

I think instead of trying to train Chandler to be a 2 guard, why don't we let him carve out a role at his natural position and then find someone that already knows how to play offense/defense at the 2 guard position?

Just a thought. At some point it makes sense to grab guys that are already successful at certain things instead of training others to do it.

I absolutely 100% agree with this. Jamal is the best two guard we have!
~You can't run from who you are.~
martin
Posts: 81040
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
10/30/2007  7:45 PM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by Bippity10:

I think instead of trying to train Chandler to be a 2 guard, why don't we let him carve out a role at his natural position and then find someone that already knows how to play offense/defense at the 2 guard position?

Just a thought. At some point it makes sense to grab guys that are already successful at certain things instead of training others to do it.

I absolutely 100% agree with this. Jamal is the best two guard we have!

I think Marbury is the best 2 guard we have.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
joec32033
Posts: 30641
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
10/30/2007  8:41 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by Bippity10:

I think instead of trying to train Chandler to be a 2 guard, why don't we let him carve out a role at his natural position and then find someone that already knows how to play offense/defense at the 2 guard position?

Just a thought. At some point it makes sense to grab guys that are already successful at certain things instead of training others to do it.

I absolutely 100% agree with this. Jamal is the best two guard we have!

I think Marbury is the best 2 guard we have.

Therin lies the problem.
~You can't run from who you are.~
TheGame
Posts: 26658
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
10/31/2007  8:29 AM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by martin:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by Bippity10:

I think instead of trying to train Chandler to be a 2 guard, why don't we let him carve out a role at his natural position and then find someone that already knows how to play offense/defense at the 2 guard position?

Just a thought. At some point it makes sense to grab guys that are already successful at certain things instead of training others to do it.

I absolutely 100% agree with this. Jamal is the best two guard we have!

I think Marbury is the best 2 guard we have.

Therin lies the problem.

Actually, Nate is the best 2 guard that we have, which is even a bigger problem.
Trust the Process
VDesai
Posts: 43302
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
10/31/2007  8:52 AM
Marbury's not a 2. Neither is Craw really, or Nate. The problem is we have no 2.
Silverfuel
Posts: 31751
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
10/31/2007  8:59 AM
Posted by VDesai:

Marbury's not a 2. Neither is Craw really, or Nate. The problem is we have no 2.
agreed. These hybrid guards suck.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
I didn't watch any preseason-Chandler Question.

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy