[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

C'mon now. Where are all the threads about how we suck?
Author Thread
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
10/23/2007  10:42 AM
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by kam77:

No, not really. Its a lesson that the season is long and pre-season means jack. And only a ninnie would get uptight about any pre-season defeat. So all the negative nancys and debbie downers should man up to their stupid proclamations. right or wrong, we don't know how the season is gonna turn out yet. to react the way 90% of this place did over the weekend is the reason why this place gets a bad name sometimes. accept that losses happen and move forward. learn that pre-season is very often non-indicative of anything. the atlanta hawks are 6-1.

what fun is it to take the wait and see approach? let people hate on the team. let people hate on those haters. it spurns threads and discussion. otherwise this place would be BORING with people making about 2 posts a day while not really saying anything that hasn't been said before.

nobody cares about the w/l record in preseason. nobody. it's all about how they played. they played well last night following two terrible, borderline d-league performances. and i don't think we can count maccabbi.

Why not? misterearl does.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
AUTOADVERT
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
10/23/2007  10:45 AM
Posted by oohah:
Posted by Marv:

Let this team surprise the hell out of us and maintain the focus and purpose they played with last night. That would be one hell of a great surprise for us. But don’t hold your breath waiting for it.

Marv, I don't think this thread is aimed at people being critical or even pissed off at the team.

I think it more about those who revel after losses and ignore or dismiss good efforts.

oohah

look at the game thread and see who posted in it and what they said. especially after the game.
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
10/23/2007  10:48 AM

This thread is just as bad as the threads after we lose.

Gee, ya think?

Lovers should not gloat after a win.

This aint a gloat thread. This is a thread calling out the haters who were so critical before and are strangely silent now. Damn bandwagon jumpin fools... If you HATE, HATE all the time. Don't pacify yourselves into not posting your HATE threads after Wins.

Man UP! Stop riding the fence.
That is the key. It's only ONE game.

Thats what you should have said to yourselves after the loss to the Celts. You guys need to heed your own feedback.


lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
10/23/2007  10:49 AM
look at the game thread and see who posted in it and what they said. especially after the game.

I've seen it. Would you tell me what you are talking about specifically?

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
10/23/2007  10:52 AM
Posted by oohah:
look at the game thread and see who posted in it and what they said. especially after the game.

I've seen it. Would you tell me what you are talking about specifically?

oohah

i think for the most part, most of the posts were from the "downer" contingent of this board and most of them actually complimented the team as the game was going along and even after the game.

the evolution (or de-evolution) of online knicks fans have come to a point where it's more about what other posters say as to actually reacting to what's going on with the team on/off the court.
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
10/23/2007  10:52 AM
Posted by oohah:
look at the game thread and see who posted in it and what they said. especially after the game.

I've seen it. Would you tell me what you are talking about specifically?

oohah


I know... very tame game thread. No gloating. Nothing controversial. But for some reason, only half as long as the other game threads we've had recently...
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
10/23/2007  10:59 AM
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by oohah:
look at the game thread and see who posted in it and what they said. especially after the game.

I've seen it. Would you tell me what you are talking about specifically?

oohah

i think for the most part, most of the posts were from the "downer" contingent of this board and most of them actually complimented the team as the game was going along and even after the game.

the evolution (or de-evolution) of online knicks fans have come to a point where it's more about what other posters say as to actually reacting to what's going on with the team on/off the court.

On the game thread I saw nowhere near the enthusiasm, energy, and let's face it: joy, that I see when the Knicks play badly. After a loss we see 27.5 New York Post style threads created immediately. And they don't seem to be lamenting the loss so much as celebrating it.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
10/23/2007  11:01 AM
Posted by oohah:
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by oohah:
look at the game thread and see who posted in it and what they said. especially after the game.

I've seen it. Would you tell me what you are talking about specifically?

oohah

i think for the most part, most of the posts were from the "downer" contingent of this board and most of them actually complimented the team as the game was going along and even after the game.

the evolution (or de-evolution) of online knicks fans have come to a point where it's more about what other posters say as to actually reacting to what's going on with the team on/off the court.

On the game thread I saw nowhere near the enthusiasm, energy, and let's face it: joy, that I see when the Knicks play badly. After a loss we see 27.5 New York Post style threads created immediately. And they don't seem to be lamenting the loss so much as celebrating it.

oohah

of course not...but you have to say that none of the "hater haters" really posted...and the "haters" that did complimented the team.

you want enthusiasm? then have the team win some games for a long stretch. right now, these type of performances are blips on the radar until they can prove it consistently.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/23/2007  11:04 AM
Posted by Panos:

If you want to talk about suspcious absenses, where's Nixluva since the 40 pt blow out?
Waiting out the storm?

Why do you feel the need to do this? This is perhaps the 4th time I can recall that you've called me out and pretty much challenged me for some kind of reponse. I already explained in another thread that the level of negativity had gotten so thick that it was truly unbearable. I refuse to post when there's that much overreaction.

To me preseason is just that. The games don't count. Coaches try out things and at times teams don't play with intensity. The Knicks had a little of both things. So they looked bad. I think the sad thing is that the very same people, mostly the Haters around here wanted us to totally discount anything done in preseason, but due to the bad losses, a lot of them have practically jumped ship. "we suck" comments and this team is "a joke" type of comments. To read these posts it was clear that many already wrote off the Knicks this year. How stupid is that. If we had won all the games that wouldn't mean that we were destined for a title either. I'm not surprised by how the team played, cuz I already made my assessment of how good I think the team should be.

What shocks me is why there are so many in NY that don't have a better handle on what this team can do. Just look at guys like Zach, Lee, Nate, Balkman, Curry etc and you're talking about guys who can produce at a high level. Should it be unreasonable to assume that this team should get better and better as these young guys play this year. The chemisty should improve and their execution should improve. This should be a playoff team by the end of the year and this team will be able to compete with anyone in the East. We have that kind of talent and I think they're ready to get it done.
Regardless of what this team does in preseason.



[Edited by - nixluva on 10-23-2007 11:05 AM]
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
10/23/2007  11:08 AM
This hater / lover, yin / yang dynamic is built in to the board. It’s become like a political board where each group is like a political party. This goes back at least to UK’s absorption of the Daily News posters, and Layden days.

The tension - and thus the drama - is created by these two extremes. One day one side is up, the next the other side is up.

Of course there are very few posters who really ‘hate’ the team, and very few who unconditionally love it.

It isn’t surprising to me that people bitch, whine and moan when the team isn’t doing well. What would there be to talk about if everything was running perfectly?


[Edited by - basketballjones on 10-23-2007 11:09]
https:// It's not so hard.
subzero0
Posts: 21245
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/24/2003
Member: #410
10/23/2007  11:41 AM
Posted by BasketballJones:

This hater / lover, yin / yang dynamic is built in to the board. It’s become like a political board where each group is like a political party. This goes back at least to UK’s absorption of the Daily News posters, and Layden days.

The tension - and thus the drama - is created by these two extremes. One day one side is up, the next the other side is up.

Of course there are very few posters who really ‘hate’ the team, and very few who unconditionally love it.

It isn’t surprising to me that people bitch, whine and moan when the team isn’t doing well. What would there be to talk about if everything was running perfectly?


[Edited by - basketballjones on 10-23-2007 11:09]

Being upset that a team has lost and whining about it isnt the problem. Everybody does that. The problem is when these certain people start to root AGAINST the team. Like revelling in a loss or rubbing it in other fans faces. Since when is that acceptable behaviour for a TRUE fan? Does that sound like "Pure Knicks Love" to you? No, it sounds like the exact opposite.
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
10/23/2007  12:08 PM
Posted by subzero0:


Being upset that a team has lost and whining about it isnt the problem. Everybody does that. The problem is when these certain people start to root AGAINST the team. Like revelling in a loss or rubbing it in other fans faces. Since when is that acceptable behaviour for a TRUE fan? Does that sound like "Pure Knicks Love" to you? No, it sounds like the exact opposite.

I don't see too much of that happening. I think when it happens it gets blown out of proportion because it is occurring concurrently with a lot of other negative posting, such as people hoping Isiah gets fired, and complaining about specific players or combinations of players that they don't think can contribute to a winning Knicks team.

Clearly many fans have lost patience with Isiah Thomas as the architect and coach of this team. They don't think this is a coherent team. They are not giving him any slack. But "hating" Isiah should not be interpreted as hating the Knicks, IMO.

All the Knicks have to do to stop most of this talk is to win.
https:// It's not so hard.
Panos
Posts: 30714
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
10/23/2007  12:25 PM
Posted by nixluva:

Should it be unreasonable to assume that this team should get better and better as these young guys play this year. The chemisty should improve and their execution should improve. This should be a playoff team by the end of the year and this team will be able to compete with anyone in the East. We have that kind of talent and I think they're ready to get it done.
Regardless of what this team does in preseason.



[Edited by - nixluva on 10-23-2007 11:05 AM]

Why is it that your beliefs that these things "should" happen are more correct than my belief that thay won't? Its not like there is some preponderence of evidence that these will happen. Its just your wishful thinking. I think they should continue to play as badly as they have until they improve their defense (perimeter AND interior), shooting and ball movement. And just because players are a year older, doesn't mean better, unless they are properly coached.

And I called you out because it was clear that you were avoiding the storm from a disgusting showing that showed NO professional pride, pre-season or not, that you could not spin into "shoulds."
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/23/2007  1:35 PM
Posted by Panos:
Posted by nixluva:

Should it be unreasonable to assume that this team should get better and better as these young guys play this year. The chemisty should improve and their execution should improve. This should be a playoff team by the end of the year and this team will be able to compete with anyone in the East. We have that kind of talent and I think they're ready to get it done.
Regardless of what this team does in preseason.
Why is it that your beliefs that these things "should" happen are more correct than my belief that thay won't? Its not like there is some preponderence of evidence that these will happen. Its just your wishful thinking. I think they should continue to play as badly as they have until they improve their defense (perimeter AND interior), shooting and ball movement. And just because players are a year older, doesn't mean better, unless they are properly coached.

1. last year this team started off poorly and that could reasonably be expected given how bad things were the year before. Isiah did however get this team to play better. The team didn't "suck" as some would put it. They were inconsistent. There's a huge difference. The thing is that aside from the mass injuries there's no reason to believe that the team wouldn't have continued to get a little better over the last 19 games last year.

2. You can't truly think that Lee and Nate aren't getting better. 2 bad games isn't proof to me that they aren't going to continue to show growth as they already have. I don't need anything more than my30+ yrs of experience watching players to know when I see players who can have an impact in this league. I think we've been adding some good players in Lee, Nate, Balkman, Chan and even Mardy, tho he's not yet shown much this preseason.

3. We added another true talent in Zach and you can't tell me that he's not going to make a difference for this team. Anyone who does is simply not being honest. In comparison with a team like Boston, the Knicks have less top line talent, but more depth and overall talent. I think that will balance things out and that we'll be more than competitive with teams in the East this year.

4. In terms of our near future, I love what we have in Zach, Curry, Lee, Balkman and Chan. I don't think we'll take a back seat to anyone at the forward and Center positions. I believe this will be the strength of our team over the next few years. If you feel differently i'd like hear why?
Posted by Panos:

And I called you out because it was clear that you were avoiding the storm from a disgusting showing that showed NO professional pride, pre-season or not, that you could not spin into "shoulds."
It is more than clear to me that there's nothing I could say that would change the minds of those who've already given up on this teams chances this year. Why should I join in a hater love fest over 2 preseason games? I'll be here like I've always been when the games count. I've never run from any discussion when things were worse, so why would I do so now. I still believe strongly that this will be a good year.
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

10/23/2007  2:03 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by Panos:
Posted by nixluva:

Should it be unreasonable to assume that this team should get better and better as these young guys play this year. The chemisty should improve and their execution should improve. This should be a playoff team by the end of the year and this team will be able to compete with anyone in the East. We have that kind of talent and I think they're ready to get it done.
Regardless of what this team does in preseason.
Why is it that your beliefs that these things "should" happen are more correct than my belief that thay won't? Its not like there is some preponderence of evidence that these will happen. Its just your wishful thinking. I think they should continue to play as badly as they have until they improve their defense (perimeter AND interior), shooting and ball movement. And just because players are a year older, doesn't mean better, unless they are properly coached.

1. last year this team started off poorly and that could reasonably be expected given how bad things were the year before. Isiah did however get this team to play better. The team didn't "suck" as some would put it. They were inconsistent. There's a huge difference. The thing is that aside from the mass injuries there's no reason to believe that the team wouldn't have continued to get a little better over the last 19 games last year.

2. You can't truly think that Lee and Nate aren't getting better. 2 bad games isn't proof to me that they aren't going to continue to show growth as they already have. I don't need anything more than my30+ yrs of experience watching players to know when I see players who can have an impact in this league. I think we've been adding some good players in Lee, Nate, Balkman, Chan and even Mardy, tho he's not yet shown much this preseason.

3. We added another true talent in Zach and you can't tell me that he's not going to make a difference for this team. Anyone who does is simply not being honest. In comparison with a team like Boston, the Knicks have less top line talent, but more depth and overall talent. I think that will balance things out and that we'll be more than competitive with teams in the East this year.

4. In terms of our near future, I love what we have in Zach, Curry, Lee, Balkman and Chan. I don't think we'll take a back seat to anyone at the forward and Center positions. I believe this will be the strength of our team over the next few years. If you feel differently i'd like hear why?
Posted by Panos:

And I called you out because it was clear that you were avoiding the storm from a disgusting showing that showed NO professional pride, pre-season or not, that you could not spin into "shoulds."
It is more than clear to me that there's nothing I could say that would change the minds of those who've already given up on this teams chances this year. Why should I join in a hater love fest over 2 preseason games? I'll be here like I've always been when the games count. I've never run from any discussion when things were worse, so why would I do so now. I still believe strongly that this will be a good year.


Nothing you said in these paragraphs didn't apply last yr and you keep spewing the same garbage of the coulda, woulda, shoulda, no reason not to, you can't tell me. Every player may or may not have an impact on this team. History has proven certain players will step up and certain ones will take a step back. They key is not will Zach put up 20/10 as a Knick, or will David Lee continue to be a solid double double guy off the bench with all this depth on the team, or if Nate can be a sparkplug off the bench in the mold of a Vinnie "The Microwave" Johnson. It's all about what these players will bring to table that will produce wins. If Zach is a 15/8 guy but the Knicks win, then great... who cares that his numbers severely fell off from his final season in Portland. If Marbury has to come off the bench because he can't adaquatley incorporate Curry and Zach's strengths into the system(whatever Hodge Podge system we're running) and we look to turning the keys over to Crawful, if it produces wins who cares. You act like every single player on this team is going to have a standout yrs. Hate to break it to your gullible self that ain't happenin.

And Panos is right what you're trying to reason on holds absolutely no weight here you've probably been more wrong about this team than any other fan that post on this board over the past few yrs.

[Edited by - TrueBlue on 10-23-2007 1:11 PM]
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
10/23/2007  2:04 PM
In nixluva's defense, he's here win or lose and always pollyanish.

I actually respect that.

It's the Lovers who try to tell the rest of us that if we don't believe this team is on it's way to something special, we must be stupid, that I have a problem with.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

10/23/2007  2:08 PM
Posted by islesfan:

In nixluva's defense, he's here win or lose and always pollyanish.

I actually respect that.

It's the Lovers who try to tell the rest of us that if we don't believe this team is on it's way to something special, we must be stupid, that I have a problem with.


Not quite he was very incognito the past 2 losses(almost a span of a week) and using the "EXCUSE" there was too much hate on this board at the time he couldn't bear posting, is garbage. If you love this team and this board you stick around no matter what. This is a predominantly negative board because we have a losing team get used to it and get over it. If and when we start winning games to the point we expect to win games then we'll all feel invincible, mighty, and Optimistic about everything.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
RemBee76
Posts: 20755
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #89
USA
10/23/2007  2:26 PM
Boy, things were bad when we had the whiners whining about the team and the whiners whining about the whiners whining about the team. Now you got the whiners whining about the whiners whining about the whiners whining about the team? This isn't a politicized forum, it’s a kindergarten.

There are varying extremes, sure, but seems obvious to me there is a substantial element here actively rooting against the Knicks because they don’t want Isiah, Marbury or (to a slightly lesser extent) Curry to succeed under any circumstances. Even if it means more years of darkness for their second favorite team.

Ain’t nothing wrong with that. More power to you. But don’t expect to go unchallenged on a Knicks fan site where yes, there are still some Knick fans. If we all accept that, I think we will all have to endure a whole lot less whining.
Its like a groupie website, or bitter ex-wives club. -Sebstar
subzero0
Posts: 21245
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/24/2003
Member: #410
10/23/2007  2:32 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by Panos:
Posted by nixluva:

Should it be unreasonable to assume that this team should get better and better as these young guys play this year. The chemisty should improve and their execution should improve. This should be a playoff team by the end of the year and this team will be able to compete with anyone in the East. We have that kind of talent and I think they're ready to get it done.
Regardless of what this team does in preseason.
Why is it that your beliefs that these things "should" happen are more correct than my belief that thay won't? Its not like there is some preponderence of evidence that these will happen. Its just your wishful thinking. I think they should continue to play as badly as they have until they improve their defense (perimeter AND interior), shooting and ball movement. And just because players are a year older, doesn't mean better, unless they are properly coached.

1. last year this team started off poorly and that could reasonably be expected given how bad things were the year before. Isiah did however get this team to play better. The team didn't "suck" as some would put it. They were inconsistent. There's a huge difference. The thing is that aside from the mass injuries there's no reason to believe that the team wouldn't have continued to get a little better over the last 19 games last year.

2. You can't truly think that Lee and Nate aren't getting better. 2 bad games isn't proof to me that they aren't going to continue to show growth as they already have. I don't need anything more than my30+ yrs of experience watching players to know when I see players who can have an impact in this league. I think we've been adding some good players in Lee, Nate, Balkman, Chan and even Mardy, tho he's not yet shown much this preseason.

3. We added another true talent in Zach and you can't tell me that he's not going to make a difference for this team. Anyone who does is simply not being honest. In comparison with a team like Boston, the Knicks have less top line talent, but more depth and overall talent. I think that will balance things out and that we'll be more than competitive with teams in the East this year.

4. In terms of our near future, I love what we have in Zach, Curry, Lee, Balkman and Chan. I don't think we'll take a back seat to anyone at the forward and Center positions. I believe this will be the strength of our team over the next few years. If you feel differently i'd like hear why?
Posted by Panos:

And I called you out because it was clear that you were avoiding the storm from a disgusting showing that showed NO professional pride, pre-season or not, that you could not spin into "shoulds."
It is more than clear to me that there's nothing I could say that would change the minds of those who've already given up on this teams chances this year. Why should I join in a hater love fest over 2 preseason games? I'll be here like I've always been when the games count. I've never run from any discussion when things were worse, so why would I do so now. I still believe strongly that this will be a good year.

Good post.
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

10/23/2007  2:49 PM
Posted by RemBee76:

Boy, things were bad when we had the whiners whining about the team and the whiners whining about the whiners whining about the team. Now you got the whiners whining about the whiners whining about the whiners whining about the team? This isn't a politicized forum, it’s a kindergarten.


There are varying extremes, sure, but seems obvious to me there is a substantial element here actively rooting against the Knicks because they don’t want Isiah, Marbury or (to a slightly lesser extent) Curry to succeed under any circumstances. Even if it means more years of darkness for their second favorite team.

Ain’t nothing wrong with that. More power to you. But don’t expect to go unchallenged on a Knicks fan site where yes, there are still some Knick fans. If we all accept that, I think we will all have to endure a whole lot less whining.


It appears from your statement the Whiners never changed and remained the same group. You need to distinguish.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
C'mon now. Where are all the threads about how we suck?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy