[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Frye taking a shot at the Knicks?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 2 of 3 ‹ Previous 1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
10/10/2007  3:23 PM
Wasn't that his rap coming out of college? Why did people expect different. I'm under the impression that we got what we drafted. I think he just had a difficult time adjusting to his new role that Isiah had for him. He wasn't a fit. He was a fit when we drafted him and not a fit a year later. That's nothing new. Guys being fits when we acquire them and not a fit a year later has been the story of the last 7 years for us.
I just hope that people will like me
AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
10/10/2007  5:14 PM
Posted by kam77:

Channing Frye is Allan Houston in Tim Duncan's body.

huh? Allan Houston would have been amazing if he could shoot and create shots like he did but was 6'11"!
Solace
Posts: 30004
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
10/10/2007  5:17 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by kam77:

Channing Frye is Allan Houston in Tim Duncan's body.

huh? Allan Houston would have been amazing if he could shoot and create shots like he did but was 6'11"!

Yeah, but it would've been sad for a 6'11" guy to get under 2 rebounds a game.
The Knicks 2026 NBA Champions!
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
10/10/2007  5:45 PM
So all of you Lovers bashing Frye, does that mean that you believe Isiah blew that lottery pick?
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
K22
Posts: 25143
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/18/2006
Member: #1182
USA
10/10/2007  5:50 PM


So, uh... yeah.
-- the preceding post was brought to you by the letter K and the number 22.
Solace
Posts: 30004
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
10/10/2007  5:50 PM
Posted by islesfan:

So all of you Lovers bashing Frye, does that mean that you believe Isiah blew that lottery pick?

Nooooo! Stop with your blasphemy! Isiah is a drafting genius; Frye turned to crap on purpose! All bow down to Isiah and lick his boots! Anyone who does not believe in Isiah will burn in hell!!!!

[Edited by - Solace on Oct 10 2007 5:52 PM]
The Knicks 2026 NBA Champions!
EnySpree
Posts: 44925
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
10/10/2007  7:01 PM
^^^enough with that nonsense already.......frye is a puss and glad hes gone. nothing else to it.....no hidden agendas.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Solace
Posts: 30004
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
10/10/2007  7:02 PM
Posted by EnySpree:

^^^enough with that nonsense already.......frye is a puss and glad hes gone. nothing else to it.....no hidden agendas.

You avoided Isles' question.
The Knicks 2026 NBA Champions!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
10/10/2007  7:09 PM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by EnySpree:

^^^enough with that nonsense already.......frye is a puss and glad hes gone. nothing else to it.....no hidden agendas.

You avoided Isles' question.

He totally blew the pick. I foolishly supported it at the time, but I expect our team president to know more than I do!
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
10/10/2007  7:13 PM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by EnySpree:

^^^enough with that nonsense already.......frye is a puss and glad hes gone. nothing else to it.....no hidden agendas.

You avoided Isles' question.

No he didn't.

And to Eny's credit, he's been saying that stuff about Frye long before he became an ex-Knick.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
10/10/2007  7:15 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by EnySpree:

^^^enough with that nonsense already.......frye is a puss and glad hes gone. nothing else to it.....no hidden agendas.

You avoided Isles' question.

He totally blew the pick. I foolishly supported it at the time, but I expect our team president to know more than I do!

Maybe it's because it wasn't a late first rd pick, who you can get credit for picking a one dimensional role player or a backup.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
Marv
Posts: 35574
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
10/10/2007  7:19 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by EnySpree:

^^^enough with that nonsense already.......frye is a puss and glad hes gone. nothing else to it.....no hidden agendas.

You avoided Isles' question.

He totally blew the pick. I foolishly supported it at the time, but I expect our team president to know more than I do!

i totally disagree. put yourself back into that time and place. who would have been better picks? ike d? hardly. granger? we needed to take the risk on a potential 6'11" contributor at that time more than an injured 6'8" guy. bynum? jury was out then and is still out now. jarret jack? no way he gets picked at 8 then, especially by a team with stephon marbury and no bigs.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
10/10/2007  7:26 PM
Bynum should have been the pick for a team saying they were looking to accumulate young players with upside.

If they pick Bynum, they don't sign James to that ridiculous contract and they don't trade 2 lottery picks for Curry.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
10/10/2007  7:29 PM
Posted by Marv:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by EnySpree:

^^^enough with that nonsense already.......frye is a puss and glad hes gone. nothing else to it.....no hidden agendas.

You avoided Isles' question.

He totally blew the pick. I foolishly supported it at the time, but I expect our team president to know more than I do!

i totally disagree. put yourself back into that time and place. who would have been better picks? ike d? hardly. granger? we needed to take the risk on a potential 6'11" contributor at that time more than an injured 6'8" guy. bynum? jury was out then and is still out now. jarret jack? no way he gets picked at 8 then, especially by a team with stephon marbury and no bigs.
I think Briggs was right about Bynum and the Lakers picked him because they're a more patient organization than the Knicks. Starbury has yet to show that he can play any role on a winning team. A guy like that shouldn't form the basis of your drafting decisions.
EnySpree
Posts: 44925
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
10/10/2007  7:31 PM
Posted by islesfan:

Bynum should have been the pick for a team saying they were looking to accumulate young players with upside.

If they pick Bynum, they don't sign James to that ridiculous contract and they don't trade 2 lottery picks for Curry.

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
EnySpree
Posts: 44925
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
10/10/2007  7:31 PM
Posted by islesfan:

Bynum should have been the pick for a team saying they were looking to accumulate young players with upside.

If they pick Bynum, they don't sign James to that ridiculous contract and they don't trade 2 lottery picks for Curry.

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Marv
Posts: 35574
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
10/10/2007  7:32 PM
Posted by islesfan:

Bynum should have been the pick for a team saying they were looking to accumulate young players with upside.

If they pick Bynum, they don't sign James to that ridiculous contract and they don't trade 2 lottery picks for Curry.

frye was coming off a great tournament where he took his team deep, blocked a bunch of shots, rebounded and scored. he was a very solid pick.
EnySpree
Posts: 44925
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
10/10/2007  7:38 PM
Posted by Marv:
Posted by islesfan:

Bynum should have been the pick for a team saying they were looking to accumulate young players with upside.
If they pick Bynum, they don't sign James to that ridiculous contract and they don't trade 2 lottery picks for Curry.

frye was coming off a great tournament where he took his team deep, blocked a bunch of shots, rebounded and scored. he was a very solid pick.

I agree marv......alot of us including me thought he would be a stud.....wrong kind of stud.....maybe we should have been specific.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Marv
Posts: 35574
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
10/10/2007  7:41 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by EnySpree:

^^^enough with that nonsense already.......frye is a puss and glad hes gone. nothing else to it.....no hidden agendas.

You avoided Isles' question.

He totally blew the pick. I foolishly supported it at the time, but I expect our team president to know more than I do!

i totally disagree. put yourself back into that time and place. who would have been better picks? ike d? hardly. granger? we needed to take the risk on a potential 6'11" contributor at that time more than an injured 6'8" guy. bynum? jury was out then and is still out now. jarret jack? no way he gets picked at 8 then, especially by a team with stephon marbury and no bigs.
I think Briggs was right about Bynum and the Lakers picked him because they're a more patient organization than the Knicks. Starbury has yet to show that he can play any role on a winning team. A guy like that shouldn't form the basis of your drafting decisions.

marbury was coming off a very solid season. jack wasn’t rated that high and it would have bean insane to take him 8th. bynum is showing potential but he was also benched by jackson for poor work ethic. in favor of that stellar performer kwame brown! bynum could still easily turn out to be benoit benjamin II and frye could have a solid career.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
10/10/2007  8:57 PM
Posted by Marv:
Posted by islesfan:

Bynum should have been the pick for a team saying they were looking to accumulate young players with upside.

If they pick Bynum, they don't sign James to that ridiculous contract and they don't trade 2 lottery picks for Curry.

frye was coming off a great tournament where he took his team deep, blocked a bunch of shots, rebounded and scored. he was a very solid pick.

He was soft from the second sperm met egg. You don't waste a lottery pick on someone like him. He was never the type to carry a team. He was a typical Arizona big man. Soft, liked to play on the perimeter and didn't like contact unless it was against someone smaller.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
Page 2 of 3 ‹ Previous 1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Frye taking a shot at the Knicks?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy