Posted by jazz74:

underrated: q rich- leadership quality and overall demeanor makes him a true professional and valuable teammate who doesn't get the credit he deserves.

overrated: curry- i like him and he is a good low post scorer but ten or fifteen years ago he would have been an average center. he has the same states as rony seikley which isn't flattering.

Good post. I'm hoping Q's operation works out well for him. A healthy Q who not only could play every night, but who could play without pain would be huge for the Knicks.

Posted by jazz74:

underrated: q rich- leadership quality and overall demeanor makes him a true professional and valuable teammate who doesn't get the credit he deserves.

overrated: curry- i like him and he is a good low post scorer but ten or fifteen years ago he would have been an average center. he has the same states as rony seikley which isn't flattering.

u took my 2 choices

Are we talking only current knicks? If so:

Overrated: Q. The guy is a leader? He doesn't even speak to the media. He can't stay healthy. He has lapses on defense resulting in 3pters. He kicked the scorers table once and had a fight with marbs so he is a leader? I don't buy it.

Underrated: nate. I think the little bastard has a willingness, to show he belongs and can be an impact player. He's imature but I think he maybe growing up in year 3. Headaches aside he is a very good player skill wise. His ahooting numbers are awesome for his stature

Overrated: the 2007-8 roster
Underrated: Patrick Ewing

Duh.

Overrated: Eddy Curry/Stephon Marbury (tie) Both players are not top 50 NBA players. Period.

We don't need them to be Scottie and MJ.

Posted by kam77:

Duh.

Overrated: Eddy Curry/Stephon Marbury (tie) Both players are not top 50 NBA players. Period.

We don't need them to be Scottie and MJ.

Wow, what a statement (do you actually have a point before you post?). If the criteria is to be a .500 team, I agree. It's just sad that people on this board actually think they're better than they are. Both players are garbage in many senses of the word.

Overrated = Curry/suckbury (draw) with JJ1, JJ2 very close behind (good thing Francis is gone)
Underrated = I wish we had' an underrated Knick

1st year and Rookies not included

Posted by Allanfan20:

I love Crawford and what he has to offer, but he hasn't reached his potential, and he seems to have a plateau career. He makes a lot of mistakes. And NO, Crawford hardly ever gets "Bashed" on this board, except by MS and maybe a couple of others.

True, he hardly gets bashed, but I think the lack of being bashed has sided because of some of the great shots he's taken (game winners) that made up for some of his mistakes. This leads to another question I have, based on this is. 'How many games did he lose, directly responsible because his mistakes? I can't think of one.

I noticed that there is a big difference here when talking who the best Knicks are. It seems a lot of people talk about who the best is, but do not facter (compare) them to the entire league. Talk about one's own little world. This is what sets realists and deniers apart.

Posted by 4949:

Posted by COSSUCKS:

How can Marbury/Curry/Crawford be over rated when they are bashed 365 days a year on these boards?

Underrated: Crawford
Overrated: Balkman

Maybe the fact that thier bashed 365 days a year should tell you something. Dedicated to the end huh?

Yeah it tells me many people on this board love to hate the Knicks. Big surprise, lol.

Posted by COSSUCKS:

Posted by 4949:

Posted by COSSUCKS:

How can Marbury/Curry/Crawford be over rated when they are bashed 365 days a year on these boards?

Underrated: Crawford
Overrated: Balkman

Maybe the fact that thier bashed 365 days a year should tell you something. Dedicated to the end huh?

Yeah it tells me many people on this board love to hate the Knicks. Big surprise, lol.

More like they hate most of *these current* Knicks