[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

2007-2008 year - Would you sign on the dotted line for this right now?
Topic LOCKED
Author Thread
Silverfuel
Posts: 31751
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
7/11/2007  8:07 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Are you smoking something thinking 7 extra rebounds is going to win us a lot more games.
Are you smoking something thinking it *won't* win us a lot more games?
Last years stats are proof that you are out of your mind. Someone makes a good point and you come back without any evidence and call them stupid. Rebounds don't win games. Look at the links I posted that prove New York does not need rebounding help. They need defense which Lee does not help us much with. I think you have gone so far over in your Curry bashing that you have lost touch with reality.

I think you have reached a new level in posting so much but not saying anything. Did you know New York was the 4th best rebounding team in the league last year? We were better than Utah, San Antonio, Detroit, New Jersey, Dallas etc. In fact, the only teams better than us were the Bulls, the Cavs and the Nuggets. Put that in your crack pipe.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/basketball/nba/stats/2006/teams/team_rebounding/0_byTOT_RBND_PER_GAME.html
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=teamstatreb&season=2007&seasontype=2

[Edited by - Silverfuel on 07-11-2007 08:09 AM]
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
AUTOADVERT
Silverfuel
Posts: 31751
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
7/11/2007  7:53 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

I never called anyone stupid. I do NOT do name calling. We also had a center who led the league in pts in the paint last year and still had an awful team. Does that mean low-post scoring is irrelevant to winning or does it mean you can't attribute a team's record to any one stat alone? Any defensive problems are irrelevant to whether Lee or Curry should start because they're both equally bad at man to man and help defense. Lee at least makes up for it with steals, hustle, and defensive rebounding. I know you think Curry is a franchise player and I think he's just a scoring specialist. It shouldn't be too surprising that we have very different views on how he should be used, should it?
So whats your point exactly? First you say we should start a Zach & Lee back court because they would get us 7 extra rebounds. When COSSUCKS brought up a valid point about a undersized Center, you called him a bull****ter. Then when asked if you think 7 extra rebounds would win us games, you say yes. Now when I you are given proof that we don't need rebounds, you start giving me a bad analogy of points in the paint not being a winner either? Your write so much but say absolutely nothing. I am done with your posts.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/11/2007  8:46 PM
When COSSUCKS brought up a valid point about a undersized Center
Curry is an undersized center mentally, which is worse than being undersized physically. He plays defense like he's 4'2".
Then when asked if you think 7 extra rebounds would win us games, you say yes. Now when I you are given proof that we don't need rebounds, you start giving me a bad analogy of points in the paint not being a winner either?
Explain why it's a bad analogy (or don't call it a bad one).
Your write so much but say absolutely nothing.
If you keep saying that, do you think it will eventually come true?
Cash
Posts: 20431
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/22/2007
Member: #1319
USA
7/11/2007  8:47 PM
Posted by Silverfuel:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Are you smoking something thinking 7 extra rebounds is going to win us a lot more games.
Are you smoking something thinking it *won't* win us a lot more games?
Last years stats are proof that you are out of your mind. Someone makes a good point and you come back without any evidence and call them stupid. Rebounds don't win games. Look at the links I posted that prove New York does not need rebounding help. They need defense which Lee does not help us much with. I think you have gone so far over in your Curry bashing that you have lost touch with reality.

I think you have reached a new level in posting so much but not saying anything. Did you know New York was the 4th best rebounding team in the league last year? We were better than Utah, San Antonio, Detroit, New Jersey, Dallas etc. In fact, the only teams better than us were the Bulls, the Cavs and the Nuggets. Put that in your crack pipe.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/basketball/nba/stats/2006/teams/team_rebounding/0_byTOT_RBND_PER_GAME.html
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=teamstatreb&season=2007&seasontype=2

[Edited by - Silverfuel on 07-11-2007 08:09 AM]

I have a lot of problems with this post regarding rebounding. Team Rebounding is a stat that can be influenced by a number of factors.

For example:
Suppose we had a team with some pretty poor jumpshooters.
Suppose we had a team with some pretty poor shotblockers.
Suppose we had a team that turns the ball over as much as anyone in the league.
Suppose we had a team that played weak defense and rarely put the other team on the line because they would rather save their fouls for offense.
Suppose we had a team that didn't get to the line often on offense.

Wouldn't these factors give us a team with a lot of rebounds without even talking about the quality of rebounding. Eddy Curry is a very poor rebounder. If you don't think that hurts the team, I don't know what to tell you.

I thought the original post was fair. When you already have a post player that has a somewhat complete game who is going to demand the ball on offense, why wouldn't you just surround him with a very good all-around player that is good without the ball instead of a guy who is only effective when he has the ball and only when he isn't being double teamed?
babyKnicks
Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191
USA
7/11/2007  9:14 PM
Posted by islesfan:

In this scenario, basically everything goes right but they still only win 42 games?

Then you have them probably knocking off the #1 or 2 seed in the east.

You're not exactly presenting a scenario that a majority of people wouldn't take. The only thing that would give someone pause is winning "only" 42 games.

Hate to say it, but was thinking the same thing. DAMN YOU ISLESFAN!!!
Let's go Knicks. That's amare
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/11/2007  9:51 PM
Posted by Cash:
Posted by Silverfuel:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Are you smoking something thinking 7 extra rebounds is going to win us a lot more games.
Are you smoking something thinking it *won't* win us a lot more games?
Last years stats are proof that you are out of your mind. Someone makes a good point and you come back without any evidence and call them stupid. Rebounds don't win games. Look at the links I posted that prove New York does not need rebounding help. They need defense which Lee does not help us much with. I think you have gone so far over in your Curry bashing that you have lost touch with reality.

I think you have reached a new level in posting so much but not saying anything. Did you know New York was the 4th best rebounding team in the league last year? We were better than Utah, San Antonio, Detroit, New Jersey, Dallas etc. In fact, the only teams better than us were the Bulls, the Cavs and the Nuggets. Put that in your crack pipe.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/basketball/nba/stats/2006/teams/team_rebounding/0_byTOT_RBND_PER_GAME.html
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=teamstatreb&season=2007&seasontype=2

[Edited by - Silverfuel on 07-11-2007 08:09 AM]

I have a lot of problems with this post regarding rebounding. Team Rebounding is a stat that can be influenced by a number of factors.

For example:
Suppose we had a team with some pretty poor jumpshooters.
Suppose we had a team with some pretty poor shotblockers.
Suppose we had a team that turns the ball over as much as anyone in the league.
Suppose we had a team that played weak defense and rarely put the other team on the line because they would rather save their fouls for offense.
Suppose we had a team that didn't get to the line often on offense.

Wouldn't these factors give us a team with a lot of rebounds without even talking about the quality of rebounding. Eddy Curry is a very poor rebounder. If you don't think that hurts the team, I don't know what to tell you.

I thought the original post was fair. When you already have a post player that has a somewhat complete game who is going to demand the ball on offense, why wouldn't you just surround him with a very good all-around player that is good without the ball instead of a guy who is only effective when he has the ball and only when he isn't being double teamed?
because we gave up consecutive lottery picks for the guy who "is only effective when he has the ball and only when he isn't being double teamed"

Silverfuel
Posts: 31751
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
7/11/2007  9:57 PM
Posted by Cash:

I have a lot of problems with this post regarding rebounding. Team Rebounding is a stat that can be influenced by a number of factors.

For example:
Suppose we had a team with some pretty poor jumpshooters.
Suppose we had a team with some pretty poor shotblockers.
Suppose we had a team that turns the ball over as much as anyone in the league.
Suppose we had a team that played weak defense and rarely put the other team on the line because they would rather save their fouls for offense.
Suppose we had a team that didn't get to the line often on offense.

Wouldn't these factors give us a team with a lot of rebounds without even talking about the quality of rebounding. Eddy Curry is a very poor rebounder. If you don't think that hurts the team, I don't know what to tell you.
Oh, I am sure it does but its the alternative that I don't agree with. I wonder how exactly would Zach Randolph, essentially a 6'8 Curry with an added jumpshot, help playing at center.
I thought the original post was fair. When you already have a post player that has a somewhat complete game who is going to demand the ball on offense, why wouldn't you just surround him with a very good all-around player that is good without the ball
Who are you talking about here? Is Lee your good all-around player? Because I think Lee isn't a good all-around player. I think Lee is a phenomenal rebounder but I don't think he is a good defensive player. So a) who is your post player with somewhat of a complete game and b) who is your good all-around player you are going to surround him with?
instead of a guy who is only effective when he has the ball and only when he isn't being double teamed?
Isn't that the same as a guy who is only effective while rebounding the ball? Lee cannot create his own shot, he doesn't have a consistent jump shot and he isn't a very good defensive player. If all you are getting with Lee is rebounding, I think we can make that up with Zach Randolph's rebounding. Also, Balkman at the 3 would be a perfect defense and defensive intensity guy.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
7/11/2007  11:21 PM
Posted by nixluva:

Our problems will come on the defensive end. To start games, teams that have quick lineups will be a challenge. This is why it's important for Curry and Zach to come in, in great shape. They're gonna be weak links if they're not ready. We'll be alright with our bench players who are quicker and more athletic, but it's gonna be interesting to see how the team plays D when the starting unit is on the floor. It looks like we'll continue to have a defensive unit come in off the bench to change the pace.

Defense and matchups may be a reason why Jared may start next year. When we play teams like Toronto, we're gonna need someone who can matchup with Bosh. I doubt he's gonna want to see Zach try to stay with Bosh. Q would be too small. So he may go with this lineup. Steph, Q, Jared, Zach & Curry. Then bring Jamal, Mardy, Lee, Balkman off the bench.

Even with a period of adjustment i think this team will still manage to win games. We just have too much depth and strength for teams in the East. When exactly is the let down gonna come for teams against us. Before you could count on the time when Steph, Q & Curry sat down. Now there really won't be a down time IMO. We'll keep Zach in there and bring in Lee and Balkman. Mardy will be able to come in and give us more size and defense. This team is gonna be better than a lot of you realize. I think to many of us and the Media are stuck with memories of this team from last year and they aren't recognizing the growth that will take place with another year together and an improved roster as well.

Even our bench is more equipped with guys that can fill needs. Nate, Nichols, Chandler, Morris, James & Malik or Jones & Dickau, depending on who Isiah keeps. This team is gonna win more than 42 games IMO.

Another promised Nix translation:

1. We have huge problem with defense
2. Our starters defense suck
3. We will get into huge hole at the start of the game
4. Backup unit will come up to close the gap (is it a news?)
5. Eddy and Zack are weak links of this team
6. They can come out of shape at the beginning of the season
7. Jarred might start... again...
8. We will straggle against young athletic teams like Toronto
9. Bosh will destroy us. We have nobody to defend him
10. We will have long adjustment period
11. But we do win some games (not many zo)
12. Steph, Q, and Eddy will not manage to play all season and will eventually set down
13. Team was bad last season and as it cannot get worth it should get better
14. We will start beating East team when they break down and start tanking
15. We have long line of bench player to play 2 min each


"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/5/2007
Member: #1241

7/11/2007  11:30 PM
BONN, are you a member on 6speedonline ?
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27833
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
7/12/2007  12:10 AM
I'll take the Afro-American (Halfro?-American) Steve Blake...woot! Thats like 7 asts per game.... And Qrich sans back probs for 75% of the season... hmmms...send me the insurance waiver. Curry + Randolph = something other than 570 lbs... take my twinkies and call me a medic... cause I am a swooning...... game on.. sign me up... not ready for the season tickets but, I'll get some floor seats every now and again...
You know I gonna spin wit it
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060

7/12/2007  12:22 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Zach & Curry co-exist reasonably well. They avg. 36 pts & 17 boards between them.
I bet if you start Lee and Zach you'll get close to the 36 pts but also get 23 rbs. I realize Isiah would never do it because he has to justify all the lottery picks he gave up for Eddy, though.

Why do you jump in every thread and turn it into a bash Eddy Thread? I kid you not, all of your posts need to be stickied and lumped together because they all sound the same.
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569

7/12/2007  11:22 AM
Posted by bigbeast:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Zach & Curry co-exist reasonably well. They avg. 36 pts & 17 boards between them.
I bet if you start Lee and Zach you'll get close to the 36 pts but also get 23 rbs. I realize Isiah would never do it because he has to justify all the lottery picks he gave up for Eddy, though.

Why do you jump in every thread and turn it into a bash Eddy Thread? I kid you not, all of your posts need to be stickied and lumped together because they all sound the same.

Some people without naming names are obsessed and jealous of Curry because Curry is everything he wishs he was.

Taller than 5 foot 3 inchs
Strong. Bigger than 115 pounds.
Able to satisfy his girlfriend without needing to take pills to do it.
Liked by other people. No social issues forcing him to take more pills.
MS
Posts: 27065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
7/12/2007  11:25 AM
Golden State was actually a good team when they get in, when baron and jrich are both on their games they are the best backcourt in the nba, you can't make that claim about the knicks.

Cleveland was lucky they got a pass to the second round and nj really wasn't mentally ready and the pistons by all accounts gave up and mailed it in.

I do think a starting lineup of zach, lee, balkman, q, marbury would be very effective just because of second shot opps would be close to zero for other teams. Curry averages 5rbbs for his career so he does play a lot smaller than 6'11 and please lets not act like there are a lot of great shotblocking centers out there that would give zach problems if you play him at center considering his speed he would find a way to score.......

A playoff series win i think i would sign up for, but i think if we get into the playoffs we should be washington, orlando, cleveland, there is really no excuse if you can stick balkman and q on lebron i think you can pound their frontcourt out of the game.........

If isiah uses his frontcourt tandem less than expected i think it benefits everyone, when one rests the other plays......
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
7/12/2007  11:27 AM
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by bigbeast:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Zach & Curry co-exist reasonably well. They avg. 36 pts & 17 boards between them.
I bet if you start Lee and Zach you'll get close to the 36 pts but also get 23 rbs. I realize Isiah would never do it because he has to justify all the lottery picks he gave up for Eddy, though.

Why do you jump in every thread and turn it into a bash Eddy Thread? I kid you not, all of your posts need to be stickied and lumped together because they all sound the same.

Some people without naming names are obsessed and jealous of Curry because Curry is everything he wishs he was.

Taller than 5 foot 3 inchs
Strong. Bigger than 115 pounds.
Able to satisfy his girlfriend without needing to take pills to do it.
Liked by other people. No social issues forcing him to take more pills.

This is COSSUCKS own personal cry for help. It doesn't get anymore straightforward than this.

Aside from the imaginary girlfriend that is.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569

7/12/2007  11:28 AM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by bigbeast:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Zach & Curry co-exist reasonably well. They avg. 36 pts & 17 boards between them.
I bet if you start Lee and Zach you'll get close to the 36 pts but also get 23 rbs. I realize Isiah would never do it because he has to justify all the lottery picks he gave up for Eddy, though.

Why do you jump in every thread and turn it into a bash Eddy Thread? I kid you not, all of your posts need to be stickied and lumped together because they all sound the same.

Some people without naming names are obsessed and jealous of Curry because Curry is everything he wishs he was.

Taller than 5 foot 3 inchs
Strong. Bigger than 115 pounds.
Able to satisfy his girlfriend without needing to take pills to do it.
Liked by other people. No social issues forcing him to take more pills.

This is COSSUCKS own personal cry for help. It doesn't get anymore straightforward than this.

Aside from the imaginary girlfriend that is.

Just spoke the truth. I realize you and your type hate that.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
7/12/2007  11:35 AM
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by bigbeast:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Zach & Curry co-exist reasonably well. They avg. 36 pts & 17 boards between them.
I bet if you start Lee and Zach you'll get close to the 36 pts but also get 23 rbs. I realize Isiah would never do it because he has to justify all the lottery picks he gave up for Eddy, though.

Why do you jump in every thread and turn it into a bash Eddy Thread? I kid you not, all of your posts need to be stickied and lumped together because they all sound the same.

Some people without naming names are obsessed and jealous of Curry because Curry is everything he wishs he was.

Taller than 5 foot 3 inchs
Strong. Bigger than 115 pounds.
Able to satisfy his girlfriend without needing to take pills to do it.
Liked by other people. No social issues forcing him to take more pills.

This is COSSUCKS own personal cry for help. It doesn't get anymore straightforward than this.

Aside from the imaginary girlfriend that is.

Just spoke the truth. I realize you and your type hate that.

I know it's the truth, you poor poor thing.

I hope you get the help you're desperately looking for.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569

7/12/2007  11:39 AM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by bigbeast:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Zach & Curry co-exist reasonably well. They avg. 36 pts & 17 boards between them.
I bet if you start Lee and Zach you'll get close to the 36 pts but also get 23 rbs. I realize Isiah would never do it because he has to justify all the lottery picks he gave up for Eddy, though.

Why do you jump in every thread and turn it into a bash Eddy Thread? I kid you not, all of your posts need to be stickied and lumped together because they all sound the same.

Some people without naming names are obsessed and jealous of Curry because Curry is everything he wishs he was.

Taller than 5 foot 3 inchs
Strong. Bigger than 115 pounds.
Able to satisfy his girlfriend without needing to take pills to do it.
Liked by other people. No social issues forcing him to take more pills.

This is COSSUCKS own personal cry for help. It doesn't get anymore straightforward than this.

Aside from the imaginary girlfriend that is.

Just spoke the truth. I realize you and your type hate that.

I know it's the truth, you poor poor thing.

I hope you get the help you're desperately looking for.

The person in question knows exactly who he is. I'm sorry to say it isnt you. You would have thought an Islander fan would feel that inadequate. Maybe thats why you relate.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
7/12/2007  2:30 PM
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by bigbeast:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Zach & Curry co-exist reasonably well. They avg. 36 pts & 17 boards between them.
I bet if you start Lee and Zach you'll get close to the 36 pts but also get 23 rbs. I realize Isiah would never do it because he has to justify all the lottery picks he gave up for Eddy, though.

Why do you jump in every thread and turn it into a bash Eddy Thread? I kid you not, all of your posts need to be stickied and lumped together because they all sound the same.

Some people without naming names are obsessed and jealous of Curry because Curry is everything he wishs he was.

Taller than 5 foot 3 inchs
Strong. Bigger than 115 pounds.
Able to satisfy his girlfriend without needing to take pills to do it.
Liked by other people. No social issues forcing him to take more pills.

This is COSSUCKS own personal cry for help. It doesn't get anymore straightforward than this.

Aside from the imaginary girlfriend that is.

Just spoke the truth. I realize you and your type hate that.

I know it's the truth, you poor poor thing.

I hope you get the help you're desperately looking for.

The person in question knows exactly who he is. I'm sorry to say it isnt you. You would have thought an Islander fan would feel that inadequate. Maybe thats why you relate.

COSSUCKS how you know about Eddy sexual powers?
Are you a girl?

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569

7/12/2007  2:53 PM
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by bigbeast:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Zach & Curry co-exist reasonably well. They avg. 36 pts & 17 boards between them.
I bet if you start Lee and Zach you'll get close to the 36 pts but also get 23 rbs. I realize Isiah would never do it because he has to justify all the lottery picks he gave up for Eddy, though.

Why do you jump in every thread and turn it into a bash Eddy Thread? I kid you not, all of your posts need to be stickied and lumped together because they all sound the same.

Some people without naming names are obsessed and jealous of Curry because Curry is everything he wishs he was.

Taller than 5 foot 3 inchs
Strong. Bigger than 115 pounds.
Able to satisfy his girlfriend without needing to take pills to do it.
Liked by other people. No social issues forcing him to take more pills.

This is COSSUCKS own personal cry for help. It doesn't get anymore straightforward than this.

Aside from the imaginary girlfriend that is.

Just spoke the truth. I realize you and your type hate that.

I know it's the truth, you poor poor thing.

I hope you get the help you're desperately looking for.

The person in question knows exactly who he is. I'm sorry to say it isnt you. You would have thought an Islander fan would feel that inadequate. Maybe thats why you relate.

COSSUCKS how you know about Eddy sexual powers?
Are you a girl?

He has several kids so unlike the poster in question he must be able to perform
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
7/12/2007  3:21 PM
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by bigbeast:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Zach & Curry co-exist reasonably well. They avg. 36 pts & 17 boards between them.
I bet if you start Lee and Zach you'll get close to the 36 pts but also get 23 rbs. I realize Isiah would never do it because he has to justify all the lottery picks he gave up for Eddy, though.

Why do you jump in every thread and turn it into a bash Eddy Thread? I kid you not, all of your posts need to be stickied and lumped together because they all sound the same.

Some people without naming names are obsessed and jealous of Curry because Curry is everything he wishs he was.

Taller than 5 foot 3 inchs
Strong. Bigger than 115 pounds.
Able to satisfy his girlfriend without needing to take pills to do it.
Liked by other people. No social issues forcing him to take more pills.

This is COSSUCKS own personal cry for help. It doesn't get anymore straightforward than this.

Aside from the imaginary girlfriend that is.

Just spoke the truth. I realize you and your type hate that.

I know it's the truth, you poor poor thing.

I hope you get the help you're desperately looking for.

The person in question knows exactly who he is. I'm sorry to say it isnt you. You would have thought an Islander fan would feel that inadequate. Maybe thats why you relate.

COSSUCKS how you know about Eddy sexual powers?
Are you a girl?

He has several kids so unlike the poster in question he must be able to perform

Making kids is not a big thing. Blocking shoots and rebounding is much more difficult.
But I would not comment on his skills outside bbal. This is his personal business.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Topic LOCKED
2007-2008 year - Would you sign on the dotted line for this right now?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy