[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

"we don't need offense as much as we need perimeter defense."
Author Thread
Killa4luv
Posts: 27774
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
7/5/2007  7:26 PM
Posted by TMS:

in all seriousness, i have to disagree with you here bro... defensive teams win championships... we had 7 guys on the roster averaging in double figures last year & it netted us 33 wins... in comparison, the Spurs had only 3 guys average in double figures, but the difference is that team plays excellent team defense, plays a very intelligent style of game & knows how to control the pace of a game better than any other to suit their style... our team can score the ball with the best of them... it's the other areas that need to be addressed on this team... that's why i was so puzzled about the Zach trade (sorry to bring that up again, just using it as an example)... we need a shotblocker & perimeter defender in the worst way, & a guy who knows how to control the tempo of the game & orchestrate (if Steph decides to put his mind to it i think he can handle that part decently well this year, but he's slowly but surely approaching Ron Artest levels of insanity the more i listen to him speak)

um, its a little deeper than that pro, their 3 double figure guys are all all-stars, and one is a perrenial mvp contender, guaranteed hall of famer and quite possibly the best player to play at his position. They play good defense, but offensively there is no match for them. They have 3 furious weapons out there, and they can score their points anywhere on the court in any offense in any fashion. Scoring is a huge part of why they dont lose.
AUTOADVERT
EnySpree
Posts: 44925
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

7/5/2007  7:56 PM
The knicks can score for 45 minutes then can score when it counts. When they do score when it counts that's when they win.

Knicks aren't this crisp offensive team. Zach is gonna do what channing was supposed to do. The knicks will be a lot more on point and will win more games that way.

About this defense, a lot of guys get on craw but when he went down the team went down. He has proven that he means a lot to this team especially down the stretch of games. He comes up with plays and is not bothered by the nyc lights.

Ok now. Perimeter defenders? Who?!?! Who out there can the knicks get that would be worth so much? Knicks need craws ability to be a passer and scorer from outside. So now the knicks have enough scoring without him so they should trade him for who? I just want to have a name thrown out there. Simply saying a perimeter defender is a cop out. Truth is there is no way that simply getting a guy that Can defend with less offense is gonna make any type of impact. One player like that won't make a difference. Its a team concept.

Ok so the knicks should trade Q, craw, marbs, Nate, for who?

The knicks are supposed to George mikan teams untill the clock runs out? Keep getting stops and pray that you keep the game in the 20s so you have shot at winning?
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/5/2007  8:12 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by TMS:

in all seriousness, i have to disagree with you here bro... defensive teams win championships... we had 7 guys on the roster averaging in double figures last year & it netted us 33 wins... in comparison, the Spurs had only 3 guys average in double figures, but the difference is that team plays excellent team defense, plays a very intelligent style of game & knows how to control the pace of a game better than any other to suit their style... our team can score the ball with the best of them... it's the other areas that need to be addressed on this team... that's why i was so puzzled about the Zach trade (sorry to bring that up again, just using it as an example)... we need a shotblocker & perimeter defender in the worst way, & a guy who knows how to control the tempo of the game & orchestrate (if Steph decides to put his mind to it i think he can handle that part decently well this year, but he's slowly but surely approaching Ron Artest levels of insanity the more i listen to him speak)

um, its a little deeper than that pro, their 3 double figure guys are all all-stars, and one is a perrenial mvp contender, guaranteed hall of famer and quite possibly the best player to play at his position. They play good defense, but offensively there is no match for them. They have 3 furious weapons out there, and they can score their points anywhere on the court in any offense in any fashion. Scoring is a huge part of why they dont lose.

look, i'm not saying scoring is unimportant... obviously you need to score points to win games, but the reason the Spurs won the championship is because they control the pace of the games they play & play terrific team defense... the Knicks averaged only 1 point less per game than the Spurs did last year... the reason they won only 33 games is because they played horrible defense all year long... they allowed 10 more points per game to the opposition than the Spurs did... there's your disparity.

[Edited by - TMS on 07-05-2007 8:13 PM]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569

7/5/2007  8:17 PM
Didnt Golden State give up a nba worst 106.9ppg last season?

Didnt the Mavericks give up 92ppg?

Didnt GS detroy the Mavs in both the regular season and playoffs?

Surely we cant just point to 1 single thing and say thats why we lost
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569

7/5/2007  8:18 PM
Also didnt 5 playoff teams give up more ppg than we did?
Solace
Posts: 30004
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
7/5/2007  8:21 PM
Posted by COSSUCKS:

Didnt Golden State give up a nba worst 106.9ppg last season?

Didnt the Mavericks give up 92ppg?

Didnt GS detroy the Mavs in both the regular season and playoffs?

Surely we cant just point to 1 single thing and say thats why we lost

and that's why it's considered an upset. An upset which probably doesn't happen 9 out of 10 times. For some reason, it happened this time; it doesn't make Golden State a good team.
The Knicks 2026 NBA Champions!
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/5/2007  8:23 PM
Posted by TMS:

it's not about not knowing defense or not knowing how to coach... i'm saying if Isiah knew what he was doing he'd have brought in the type of players that would fill the lack of defense on this team by now... a good shotblocker to defend the paint... a shutdown perimeter defender... not looking at guys who don't fill the noticeable needs on this team & choose instead to address an area on this team that did not need to be addressed.

Just so you and I can get on the same page here, I was originally responding to Enyspree who blamed Isiah's "coaching". Perhaps I should've quoted him to make that more clear.
Posted by EnySpree:

Anyway I think its a coaching problem and isiah has said as recently as the zack press conference that the knicks will concentrate on that so they won't get beat by the 3. That's the only way to correct it.

I think EnySpree made some good points I just didn't agree with that one.

Now with regard to Isiah's roster moves, who are all these 2 way players that are great perimeter defenders that Isiah has passed up on? Teams don't usually give up 2 way players in the 1st place. IF they do there's usually something wrong. Either personality wise or money wise. From what I can see he's been trying to address the need for better perimeter defenders by adding guys like Jared, Balkman, Collins. However these guys can only have a limited efffect cuz they're 1 way role players. Now Chandler and Nichols may eventually be developed into solid 2 way players. From what I can see most of his additions on the perimeter in the last 3 years have been guys that can defend. Now in terms of starting material, Q's only real problem has been staying on the court. If he's healthy the guy has shown that he can defend. He finally got Steph to defend.

The whole Idea of adding Artest is to put a starting quality 2 way player in there to help on the perimeter and overall team D. We'll have to see if he makes that deal.

Now I do agree that this teams BEST defense is gonna be it's offense. Which is why Isiah has added Zach. We aren't really setup to be a dominant defensive team. So in that case he's making sure that we can be a more dominant offensive team. But if you're paying attention he's not doing it with a lot of jump shooting. He's instead looking to establish high % post and midpost play. This mixed with better 3pt shooting whould make this one of the toughest teams to stop. Cutting down on TO's will also help the D. There are really only 3 good defensive teams in the East. Chi, Clev and Det. None of them are equipped to stop our Post up game. If we can improve the perimeter D enough we'll be able to at least slow down the perimeter game of these teams and give ourselves a good chance to win. Getting to the line more and not having many long scoring droughts is another thing Isiah accomplishes with improving the offense. We made things easy on defenses last year, but not anymore. They're gonna have to cover a lot more of the court now.
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569

7/5/2007  8:24 PM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by COSSUCKS:

Didnt Golden State give up a nba worst 106.9ppg last season?

Didnt the Mavericks give up 92ppg?

Didnt GS detroy the Mavs in both the regular season and playoffs?

Surely we cant just point to 1 single thing and say thats why we lost

and that's why it's considered an upset. An upset which probably doesn't happen 9 out of 10 times. For some reason, it happened this time; it doesn't make Golden State a good team.

It happened all year not just in the playoffs.

It is an upset but just pointing to points allowed or scored will never give much context to anything.

If you looked at points differential that would make much more sense.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/5/2007  8:37 PM
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by COSSUCKS:

Didnt Golden State give up a nba worst 106.9ppg last season?

Didnt the Mavericks give up 92ppg?

Didnt GS detroy the Mavs in both the regular season and playoffs?

Surely we cant just point to 1 single thing and say thats why we lost

and that's why it's considered an upset. An upset which probably doesn't happen 9 out of 10 times. For some reason, it happened this time; it doesn't make Golden State a good team.

It happened all year not just in the playoffs.

It is an upset but just pointing to points allowed or scored will never give much context to anything.

If you looked at points differential that would make much more sense.

The most important stat is Point Differential. You simply want to score more than your opponents no matter what level of D you play. Some teams aren't great defensively, but they outscore their opponents by enough to win. ie Phx.

In the Playoffs style matchups play a big part in who wins. GS was a bad matchup for the Mavs style. If Dallas doesn't face them they might have gone to the finals.

We are going to be a bad matchup for teams in the East cuz we are gonna be too much inside for them. For 48 minutes we'll be in their grill and that will put a lot of pressure on teams to try and stop our Mass and Power inside. We also rebound like crazy too so that will also wear on our opponents. We were already one of the best teams in the league at getting to the line and that will only get worse for them. As poor a defender as many believe Zach is. It's all relative. In comparison to Frye, he's gonna seem quicker and more forceful. He's not gonna get blocked out as much as Frye did.
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
7/5/2007  10:24 PM
alot depends on the guards staying disciplined

turnover (7 per from Curry + Randolph) or miss (low to mid 30's from deep for Knick wings) and its off to the races especially for teams with speed and shooters on the wings bigs with a motor and pgs who rebound like

Kidd Carter RJ and Krstic

Rondo Allen Pierce and Jefferson

Ford Bargnani Parker and Bosh

in the Atlantic alone

[Edited by - McK1 on 05-07-2007 10:26 PM]
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/5/2007  10:33 PM
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by COSSUCKS:

Didnt Golden State give up a nba worst 106.9ppg last season?

Didnt the Mavericks give up 92ppg?

Didnt GS detroy the Mavs in both the regular season and playoffs?

Surely we cant just point to 1 single thing and say thats why we lost

and that's why it's considered an upset. An upset which probably doesn't happen 9 out of 10 times. For some reason, it happened this time; it doesn't make Golden State a good team.

It happened all year not just in the playoffs.

It is an upset but just pointing to points allowed or scored will never give much context to anything.

If you looked at points differential that would make much more sense.

i thought that's what i was doing.


[Edited by - TMS on 07-05-2007 10:34 PM]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060

7/5/2007  10:36 PM
Posted by EnySpree:

The knicks can score for 45 minutes then can score when it counts. When they do score when it counts that's when they win.

Knicks aren't this crisp offensive team. Zach is gonna do what channing was supposed to do. The knicks will be a lot more on point and will win more games that way.

About this defense, a lot of guys get on craw but when he went down the team went down. He has proven that he means a lot to this team especially down the stretch of games. He comes up with plays and is not bothered by the nyc lights.

Ok now. Perimeter defenders? Who?!?! Who out there can the knicks get that would be worth so much? Knicks need craws ability to be a passer and scorer from outside. So now the knicks have enough scoring without him so they should trade him for who? I just want to have a name thrown out there. Simply saying a perimeter defender is a cop out. Truth is there is no way that simply getting a guy that Can defend with less offense is gonna make any type of impact. One player like that won't make a difference. Its a team concept.

Ok so the knicks should trade Q, craw, marbs, Nate, for who?

The knicks are supposed to George mikan teams untill the clock runs out? Keep getting stops and pray that you keep the game in the 20s so you have shot at winning?

You raise a question here that I posed in another thread. Who is this shotblocker thats sitting at home waiting for Isiah to call? I think instead of looking at these one dimensional defenders, we need guys who can have some sort of impact on both sides of the ball. JJ2 was a disaster on O last year as would Fred Jones be.

As far as the Knicks leaving guys open on the perimter, its a recognition flaw/and instinctive flaw. When a offensive player darts towards the lane, the Knick wing defender instinctively leaves his man to cut him off at the foul line and is supposed to get back to his man in time in case of a kick back. This seems to have been drilled into them by a coaching philosophy. But the Knicks don't seem to recognize the players they are gaurding. Its one thing to leave Eric Snow to help on a penetrator, but you can't leave Damon Jones to help on someone else. All Damon Jones does is shoot. Knicks need more recognition and decide who to help off of who not to.

[Edited by - bigbeast on 05-07-2007 10:39 PM]
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30367
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
7/5/2007  11:24 PM
This team is not going to play good defense next yr. Its just not going to happen unless we make changes. What we must do is focus on dominating and being so effiecent(spell) on offense that we cappable of making up for our lack of defense.

I still can't see what Crawford's role is going to be with the new lineup?

Like I stated in a post a couple days ago. In the last 27yrs not one NBA champion won the championship without strong to great frontcourt defense. So why are we eager and content to do just enough just to try and make playoffs rather then setting our sites on championships.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/5/2007  11:44 PM
a few years of being horrible & it seems like certain fans are content to return to being a mediocre one again.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/6/2007  12:20 AM
!st off this is not just about this year only. It may not always be possible to build the perfect team in one quick offseason of moves. Most teams have to do it in stages. Why does it sound like many of us don't want to go along for the ride and watch this team progress and build towards a contender? Do you expect to go from 33 wins to a Title just like that? We at least took a step in the right direction IMO. I think most would agree that the team is better.

It's gonna take a combination of things. Better Team D, Fewer TO's and solid 3pt shooting to keep the D honest on Zach and Curry. We should be able to raise our point diff into the +side. Last year we were -2.8 and I don't see that happening again with a higher % offense for 48 mins. Getting to +2 would be a good start for this team. If we get good Perimeter D that could be just enough to do it. Point Diff is a stat that I will pay a lot of attention to this year.

SA - +8.4
Phx - +7.3
Dal - +7.2
Chi - +5.0
Hou - +4.9
Det - +4.2
Cle - +3.9
Uta - +2.9
Den - +1.7
Tor - +1.0
Orl - +0.8

Each of those teams does it in a diffferent way. Some with great D. Others with great O and the best with Great D and O. I'm sure you already know which teams are which. If we can stay away from a ton of Blowouts that would help.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/6/2007  12:24 AM
Do you expect to go from 33 wins to a Title just like that?

dude, it's been 4 years since Isiah took over & we've been going downhill ever since... last year we had a small improvement but still didn't even sniff the playoffs... your standards have been brought so low that you consider eeking out an 8th seed in a weak Eastern Conference is something to jump up for joy in achieving... this team should have been there a couple years ago.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/6/2007  12:42 AM
Posted by TMS:
Do you expect to go from 33 wins to a Title just like that?

dude, it's been 4 years since Isiah took over & we've been going downhill ever since... last year we had a small improvement but still didn't even sniff the playoffs... your standards have been brought so low that you consider eeking out an 8th seed in a weak Eastern Conference is something to jump up for joy in achieving... this team should have been there a couple years ago.

No it's only your impatience that warps your ability to deal with this situation. In your mind 4 years is a long time. TOO LONG. In the real world it actually can take time to put a winning team together. Now we started this off going in the wrong direction, but since we added Curry 2 years ago we've gotten back on the right road. It had some pot holes in year one, namely LB, but last year wasn't a bad year in every way. Only the fact that we didn't make the playoffs and gain some experience.

If you can't see what we've added to this team in the last 3 off seasons then I don't know what to tell you. You'll never see it. it's not about having lower standards. It's about understanding where you're at in the process. Something that many Knick fans haven't been able to grasp. Exactly what would you prefer? A complete rebuild? Then you'd most definitely be waiting a few years for that team to be built into a winner. You also better have some damn good luck too. So what's your wish exactly? How quickly do you think this process would happen if we did a complete rebuild. Cuz there are many teams still waiting for their rebuild to bear fruit. I haven't seen any of them actually win a title yet. Heck most traditional rebuilds haven't even made the Conf. finals.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30367
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
7/6/2007  3:57 AM
How good should this team be with up to 4 lotto picks all selected by Isiah Thomas? Or at best 4 mid rd picks? He gave that up when he traded for Marbury & Curry.

How about cap flexability to build a contender. He gave that up when he traded for Marbury & his contract. S&T for Jamal Crawford & gave him a 7yr deal. Signed Jerome James 5yrs 30mil, Signed Jefferies for 5yrs 30mil. Not to mention J.Rose, M.Rose, Taylor, & Francis.

With all those lotto picks & all that money given away shouldn't we be a contender at this point? Shouldn't Curry, James, Jefferies, Crawford, Marbury all be leading us deep into the playoffs year after year with all the picks as well as 100-200mil spent so far??

Patience would be going for cap space and keeping draft picks to target a franchise player by either high lotto picks or having the cap flexability to acquire one. Doing what we have been doing isn't patience. Its trying to win now. Its not up to us to show patience anymore. Its time for them to show results. When you make win now moves you expect win now results. When you make moves to gain cap flexability thats when you get patience.

Again I will state that in the last 27yrs every championship calibre team has won with a strong to great defensive frontcourt. We might have the worst defensive frontcourt in the NBA right now. I do believe we have some flexability to mold the team into a championship calibre team. But I don't believe Isiah will do what he needs to do. He has done nothing as an NBA exec to make me believe that he will.

The #1 road with the highest success rate is to land a superstar through the draft with a very high lotto pick. But we seem to have run away from that road.
Better Team D, Fewer TO's and solid 3pt shooting to keep the D honest on Zach and Curry.

And we don't have the pieces to do any of them consistantly well. We haven't been a good ball control team since Sprewell was traded in 02/03. Marbury & Crawford who will get 30+mins averaged 5.2 turnovers last season while. Randolph & Curry averaged 6.8 turnovers a game combined and they are going to hold the ball a lot next season. Thats 12 turnovers just by 4 of our possible starting 5 right off the bat. So why should I believe that we will do better? Better team D, We haven't played great D since Camby, or even solid D consistantly since Mutombo & Muhammad in 03-04. So why should I believe that we will get it done in that department this comming season? 3pt shooting is probably the best possibility. But even that isn't a gurantee as we were a 34% 3pt shooting team last season. Our best 3pt shooter Nichols probably won't get much burn at all next season. And we replaced Francis a 38% 3pt shooter last season with Randolph a 29% 3pt shooter.

Im not trying to be negative. But I am trying to make a point. Why should I assume that they are going to do these things when they haven't in yrs. Its up to them to prove to me that they could do these things consistantly.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
Panos
Posts: 30702
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
7/6/2007  9:07 AM
Posted by newyorknewyork:

Im not trying to be negative. But I am trying to make a point. Why should I assume that they are going to do these things when they haven't in yrs. Its up to them to prove to me that they could do these things consistantly.

Because 'luva says so, and if you "can't grasp that, I don't know what to tell you."
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
7/6/2007  9:18 AM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by TMS:
Do you expect to go from 33 wins to a Title just like that?

dude, it's been 4 years since Isiah took over & we've been going downhill ever since... last year we had a small improvement but still didn't even sniff the playoffs... your standards have been brought so low that you consider eeking out an 8th seed in a weak Eastern Conference is something to jump up for joy in achieving... this team should have been there a couple years ago.

No it's only your impatience that warps your ability to deal with this situation. In your mind 4 years is a long time. TOO LONG. In the real world it actually can take time to put a winning team together. Now we started this off going in the wrong direction, but since we added Curry 2 years ago we've gotten back on the right road. It had some pot holes in year one, namely LB, but last year wasn't a bad year in every way. Only the fact that we didn't make the playoffs and gain some experience.

If you can't see what we've added to this team in the last 3 off seasons then I don't know what to tell you. You'll never see it. it's not about having lower standards. It's about understanding where you're at in the process. Something that many Knick fans haven't been able to grasp. Exactly what would you prefer? A complete rebuild? Then you'd most definitely be waiting a few years for that team to be built into a winner. You also better have some damn good luck too. So what's your wish exactly? How quickly do you think this process would happen if we did a complete rebuild. Cuz there are many teams still waiting for their rebuild to bear fruit. I haven't seen any of them actually win a title yet. Heck most traditional rebuilds haven't even made the Conf. finals.

The 20/20 hindsight fact is this team should have been blown up after 99.

Instead, we keep proscribing aspirin for a brain tumor- and patience isn't going to make the pain go away.

Isiah has one more season to get better- its play offs, or his head.
"we don't need offense as much as we need perimeter defense."

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy