[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

This is our main team on defense
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/30/2007  5:39 PM
The thing is with the dominant size of EC you really couldve put balkman as the starter or back up 4 man[with d lee going 4-5 off the bench] balkman wouldve been a better fit with ec even as a starter because all he cares about is rebounding hustle defending and hes a long 6-7

we might score some points but were going to give them up right back with
the POWER lineup

[Edited by - BRIGGS on 06-30-2007 5:40 PM]

[Edited by - BRIGGS on 06-30-2007 5:41 PM]
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/30/2007  5:46 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

The thing is with the dominant size of EC you really couldve put balkman as the starter or back up 4 man[with d lee going 4-5 off the bench] balkman wouldve been a better fit with ec even as a starter because all he cares about is rebounding hustle defending and hes a long 6-7

we might score some points but were going to give them up right back with
the POWER lineup

[Edited by - BRIGGS on 06-30-2007 5:40 PM]

[Edited by - BRIGGS on 06-30-2007 5:41 PM]

why not Balkman at SF? he's a natural fit there anyway.

Curry
Zach
Balkman
Qrich
Marbury

have Craw lead the second unit, but in all likelihood, we all know QRich is gonna miss at least half the season anyway.
¿ △ ?
This is our main team on defense

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy