[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Is Lebron better than Jordan?
Author Thread
bigpimpin
Posts: 22176
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 11/17/2004
Member: #801
USA
6/13/2007  5:39 PM
Posted by technomaster:

Jordan never made it to the finals when he was 22. Thus... Lebron is clearly better. Not really fair - Jordan missed a lot of time w/ a broken foot that year. Even then, Jordan did not reach the NBA finals until 1991 (age 27--- already a player in his prime).

This is one of the main reasons why I hate these type of discussions. People will start throwing stats and calculations and other insignificant stuff into the fray which has absolutely no bearings upon the matter at hand.

Open your eyes. And you can clearly see the difference in the eras. The worst team in that era would prolly make the EC playoffs in this era.

My God, they barely have true centers in this era. Please, please, please.

STOP!!!

"Anyone who sits around waiting to hit the lottery, whether basketball or real life, in order to better their position is a loser."
AUTOADVERT
technomaster
Posts: 23358
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2003
Member: #426
USA
6/13/2007  7:20 PM
I bet Lebron today would DESTROY Jordan today in a game of 1-on-1. In fact, he'd probably beat him if Jordan were in his prime - he's just so much bigger/beefier that he should be able to use his size to his advantage. It's not like Jordan's a dead-eye shooter.

Anyway, I was bringing up the anti-argument, how Jordan won every time in the finals... but didn't actually reach the finals until much later than Lebron did.

Lebron's still a relative noob. At this point, it's tough to say which players make up the core role players on his team - Verajao? Gooden? Big Z? If Gibson is the 2nd best player on the team right now, yeah, it's pretty gosh darned amazing that the Cavs are even standing in the finals.

Of course, we all need to take a step back - The Cavs were able to handle the Nets and their 3 perimeter stars... and they defeated the Pistons team that still has 3 or 4 core players in their primes from their championship team 3 years ago. (then again, I've always been quick to bash these Pistons as a mediocre group who happened to execute well when they had to!)

The NBA is a very different place from the 90s... and even more so from the 80s. More than anything else I'd blame massive expansion. The Hornets, Heat, Bobcats, Magic, T-Wolves, Raptors, and Grizzlies... that's a lot of teams. Figuring that there are an average of 2 stars per team, that's 14 players that could be part of the other 23 teams. Or if you say there are 3 really high quality players on each of those expansion teams, 21 of the 23 "original" teams could have an extra quality player or star.

Before, you had it made if you found a reliable third option - and you were absolutely killer if you had 4 top players. Nowadays, we're lucky if you manage to throw together 2 stars.

Back to the main discussion point - Lebron brings different elements to the table compared to Jordan. He's much more of a hybrid of Magic Johnson and Michael Jordan than one or the other. He's not the scorer or defender that Jordan was, nor is he offensive orchestrator that Johnson was (then again, Johnson played all of his career w/ Kareem, Worthy, Scott, Cooper, and a host of others).

Regarding the killer instinct, he sure seemed to have that killer instinct mentality when he scored all those points against the Pistons - but now that his team is completely overmatched, he doesn't? Sheesh.

Time to just watch and enjoy. I spent so many years *hating* Michael Jordan, Pippen, and the Bulls that I don't think I fully appreciated their brilliance until it was over. Now all that's burned into my brain is every brilliant moment Jordan had against the Knicks... and all those damned finals appearances I watched thinking, "damn it, we should have beaten the Heat" or "damn those pacers, that f-in' Reggie Miller". It wasn't always the Bulls who beat us, but it was always the Bulls in the finals for a long time.
“That was two, two from the heart.” - John Starks
bigpimpin
Posts: 22176
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 11/17/2004
Member: #801
USA
6/13/2007  8:23 PM
MJ wasn't a dead-eye shooter but guess what? Neither is LeBron. But at least MJ could make free throws.

As for the 1-on-1 matchup, must I remind you the game of basketball isn't as 'bout the physical being as it is mentally.

Again, MJ is much more determined than Bron
"Anyone who sits around waiting to hit the lottery, whether basketball or real life, in order to better their position is a loser."
NYKniCksFan87
Posts: 22170
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/13/2004
Member: #700
6/13/2007  9:23 PM
MJ had waaay more heart than any player we label as being great now, guys we call superstars never had the killer instinct mj had
''We don't have the luxury to take anybody lightly,'' New York's Quentin Richardson said. ''We're not that good.''
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
6/13/2007  10:04 PM
LeBron is not better than Jordan as we all are seeing is that Jordan was a lot better shooter than LeBron. LeBron can be stopped but Jordan could not be stopped as his handle was tighter than LeBron's also. LeBron falls in love with long jumpers and he isn't that good with it. Don't know if he will get better in that dept.
Ira
Posts: 24693
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
6/13/2007  10:24 PM
As I remember it, Jordan's 3 point shot became a weapon later in his career.
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
6/14/2007  9:31 AM
Posted by Ira:

As I remember it, Jordan's 3 point shot became a weapon later in his career.


That is true, but Jordan was lights out in the midrange game. LeBron isn't even that with his mid-range jumper.
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
6/14/2007  9:38 AM
You have to factor in he is being guarded by the best on ball defender in the league, and then once he beats him he has to beat the best interior defender in the league, while having the luxury of kicking out to ?

We are measuring at this point in their career, not when jordan became an unstoppable force, and the knicks defense i believe was better in the mid 90's than the spurs today. But Jordan faced them a lot later in his career
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
6/14/2007  9:58 AM
LeBron is 22 and if you will pair him with any other superstar of this league you will make him a champ.
If he will move to any of the top 8 teams (except Cavs) most likely this team will win it all.
He is in Cleveland to promote bbal to the area which never win and they have nothing to help leBron because they have him.
The success in today’s NBA is measured by money which player makes for himself, the team, and NBA.
And LeBron is out of rich in this department.
If league decided that it is time for leBron to be a champ to get more “green” - this will be arranged accordingly and in timely manner.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Is Lebron better than Jordan?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy