[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

23rd pick vs. 9th pick
Author Thread
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
5/23/2007  11:32 AM
Posted by martin:
Posted by djsunyc:

if i'm pheonix - i trade amare for kg.

whoa, why?

how much longer does nash have?

trading marion is a tough move for pheonix b/c they have nobody else that can replace what he brings.

they're not going to trade to get younger, b/c that takes them out of the title picture.

they need a big man that can defend - something amare doesn't do.

and kg is a better, more well rounded player than amare.

and amare is one of the FEW players minny can sell to their fanbase in order to move kg.

so the suns window is small, they should go all in and get kg to try to get past dallas and the spurs. and when amare was missing all of 2005 - they won 54 games and got to the WCF's - but still couldn't get past dallas or the spurs.

nash, bell, marion, diaw, kg - i'll take it.
AUTOADVERT
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
5/23/2007  11:32 AM
Posted by nixluva:

Right now we have Nate, Q, Steph and Jamal who are all capable of hitting from outside. Balkman, Lee and Collins are a work in progress, but I think they'll get a little better as we move along. The idea of taking Sean Williams is pretty interesting in that there really aren't many young bigs that are natural shotblockers and he is one of them. We could always look to pick up a Kapono or Matt Carroll to fill our need for another shooter. I'd remind you that despite Nate being a hot head, not a good defender and IMO too small, he CAN SHOOT! He get's his shot off in the NBA without a problem and since he's so quick he can easily find the open space on the floor. I may not love his flaws, but I do like his energy and shooting ability. If Isiah sticks with him, I would understand.

A big SG like Almond would be an interesting pickup, but I have a feeling that Isiah sees our biggest problem is on the DEFENSIVE side of the ball. We can score with anyone in the league. We just need to get more stops. In crunchtime, If you put Curry, Williams, Balkman, Collins and Steph on the floor you have a pretty good defensive unit that can still score.

I could understand him looking to Sean Williams, but then i'd expect that he'd have to make a trade, cuz we'd have too many PF's. Frye and Jared in particular and now we also have Morris. So it would only make sense to do some kind of trade either for a pick or maybe he does make a go for KG or JO.


I like williams, I think that is the best pick to make, long, elite athlete, shotblocker. We can move one of our bigs to make room. I like nate, He is an idiot but nate can play, he has a lot of talent and as you said, despite his size can get his shot off and can shoot...
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
5/23/2007  11:44 AM
Posted by martin:
Posted by tkf:

forget gasol, I like this shawn williams kid. elite athlete and shotblocker, perfect to put alongside curry and with some of his off the court questions, he will be there at 23.. that is a no brainer...

are the Knicks picking williams because he is the perfect compliment to Curry or because he is the right talent and piece at the PF spot?

I hope it's the later.

To get late into the playoffs EVERY starter on the team needs to be solid on both sides of the court (or at least not overly deficient) and have a the smarts, intensity, and team orientation. I hope williams has that otherwise I don't want him.


I hope it is a combination of both. He is what we need and what we need at PF, he had some off the court problems, I mean hell he got kicked off the team midseason, that is not a good thing..... I hope Isiah does his homework if he does grab this kid..
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
EnySpree
Posts: 44925
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

5/23/2007  1:13 PM
KG for amare? Nah man. If the suns wanna get gully they go after JO. The dude was a major defensive presence this season. I could see them trading Marion for JO and slide amare to power fwd. They lose some speed but gain some power. JO can match up better with Duncan and make him hurt a little.

The knicks can try to get Indians to relay Marion for channing and a burrito bowl from chipotle. Damn those things are freaking good!
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
5/23/2007  1:45 PM
In the last 2 seasons we have drafted 3 players that can or do play PF and yet are still looking for someone to compliment Curry at the position. That bothers me.
I just hope that people will like me
Allanfan20
Posts: 36018
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
5/23/2007  2:00 PM
I agree Bip, but 2 of those players were drafted before we even had Curry. It sounded like we were almost gonna build the team around Channing Frye, purely, before the Curry trade.

I also think Isiah might have picked Balkman for the small foward spot, which makes Jefferies even more stupid.

Regardless, as always, this is a huge draft for our us, now and the future.

Bip, who do you like? I've been very curious, and I know you said you don't know a ton of players outside of Uconn, but I'm still curious what you'd like to see happen.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
5/23/2007  2:09 PM
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by martin:
Posted by djsunyc:

if i'm pheonix - i trade amare for kg.

whoa, why?

how much longer does nash have?

trading marion is a tough move for pheonix b/c they have nobody else that can replace what he brings.

they're not going to trade to get younger, b/c that takes them out of the title picture.

they need a big man that can defend - something amare doesn't do.

and kg is a better, more well rounded player than amare.

and amare is one of the FEW players minny can sell to their fanbase in order to move kg.

so the suns window is small, they should go all in and get kg to try to get past dallas and the spurs. and when amare was missing all of 2005 - they won 54 games and got to the WCF's - but still couldn't get past dallas or the spurs.

nash, bell, marion, diaw, kg - i'll take it.

I could be wrong, but Amare plays decent defense- I think he is hurt by a lack of size against someone like Duncan who has inches over him.

I think if Phoenix had gotten the pick from Atlanta (4 or lower), they could have bundled the three first round picks & perhaps Marion for KG. Minny would have had 4 picks in a super deep draft & they could sell that to the fans.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
5/23/2007  2:22 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:

I agree Bip, but 2 of those players were drafted before we even had Curry. It sounded like we were almost gonna build the team around Channing Frye, purely, before the Curry trade.

I also think Isiah might have picked Balkman for the small foward spot, which makes Jefferies even more stupid.

Regardless, as always, this is a huge draft for our us, now and the future.

Bip, who do you like? I've been very curious, and I know you said you don't know a ton of players outside of Uconn, but I'm still curious what you'd like to see happen.

Allan, your post above just verbalized what I was thinking in my head. We seem to be just adding players. Let's say that Balkman was drafted to be a SF than that means our future looks like this.

SF-Balkman
PF-?
C-Curry
PG-Collins
SG-?

I say ? at the shooting guard because if your core is Balkman, Curry and collins than you desperately need one of your 30 minute guys to be a consistent shooter or else Curry is going to be seeing quadruple teams for the rest of his career. 3(really 7 years) into our plan and we only have one guaranteed starter for 2-3 years from now. We keep singing the praises of our GM for building this team yet we have no idea who is going to be in our line-up. I think it's time for Isiah to consolidate some young talent and bring in starting compliments to his building block. I personally would trade the pick with a Nate and Frye and go for a higher pick or a younger 2 way player at any position.

As for the guys I'm high on. I don't consider myself an expert when I only see guys like Brewer play 4 times a year and some of the others once or twice. Outside of the big east I just don't have an opinion on these guys because the sample is too small.
I just hope that people will like me
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
5/23/2007  2:23 PM
Posted by nixluva:

Right now we have Nate, Q, Steph and Jamal who are all capable of hitting from outside. Balkman, Lee and Collins are a work in progress, but I think they'll get a little better as we move along. The idea of taking Sean Williams is pretty interesting in that there really aren't many young bigs that are natural shotblockers and he is one of them. We could always look to pick up a Kapono or Matt Carroll to fill our need for another shooter. I'd remind you that despite Nate being a hot head, not a good defender and IMO too small, he CAN SHOOT! He get's his shot off in the NBA without a problem and since he's so quick he can easily find the open space on the floor. I may not love his flaws, but I do like his energy and shooting ability. If Isiah sticks with him, I would understand.

A big SG like Almond would be an interesting pickup, but I have a feeling that Isiah sees our biggest problem is on the DEFENSIVE side of the ball. We can score with anyone in the league. We just need to get more stops. In crunchtime, If you put Curry, Williams, Balkman, Collins and Steph on the floor you have a pretty good defensive unit that can still score.

I could understand him looking to Sean Williams, but then i'd expect that he'd have to make a trade, cuz we'd have too many PF's. Frye and Jared in particular and now we also have Morris. So it would only make sense to do some kind of trade either for a pick or maybe he does make a go for KG or JO.

They might be capable of hitting from the outside, just like I am capable of hitting an NBA 3 pointer. But, if this team is rolling the dice with Currry as our 'Franchise' player, and the offense is going to be dumped into Mr Turnover, then we need someone who can hit 3 pointers at an above average clip, especially if they are going to be wide open with double & triple teaming on Curry.

Marbury, last year .357 from the 3pt line- and a career .325
Q shot .376 last year and is a career .355 shooter
Jamal shot .320 last year and is a career .342 shooter

And tiny Nate shot .390 last year and is a career .393 shooter

Face it- for curry and his turnovers, our outside shooters got plenty of open looks- and a lot of them ended up with Jeffries launching an open 3 that bricked away.

None of those players you mentioned, with the possible exception of Nate, are STRONG outside shooters.
technomaster
Posts: 23358
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2003
Member: #426
USA
5/23/2007  2:47 PM
For the record, here are the previous 10 #23 picks:
Josh Boone
Francisco Garcia
Sergio Monia (?!!? picked by Portland in their overseas development program, I presume)
Travis Outlaw
Tayshaun Prince
Brandon Armstrong
DeShawn Stevenson
Devean George
Tyronne Lue
Bobby Jackson

Here are the previous 10 #9 picks:
Patrick O'Bryant
Ike Diogu
Andre Iguodala
Mike Sweetney
Amare Stoudemire
Rodney White
Joel Przybilla
Shawn Marion
Dirk Nowitzki

At #23, you get a lot of swingmen and shooting PGs - a lot of solid rotation players. The best #23 pick in the last decade seems to be Tayshaun Prince.

Looks like you get some really good all-NBA type players at #9 along w/ some big man stiffs. There are quite a few good choices for top player with Dirk, Marion, and Amare.

Of course, in most of these drafts, there have been some all-nba-type studs picked after #23...
“That was two, two from the heart.” - John Starks
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
5/23/2007  3:26 PM
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by Allanfan20:

I agree Bip, but 2 of those players were drafted before we even had Curry. It sounded like we were almost gonna build the team around Channing Frye, purely, before the Curry trade.

I also think Isiah might have picked Balkman for the small foward spot, which makes Jefferies even more stupid.

Regardless, as always, this is a huge draft for our us, now and the future.

Bip, who do you like? I've been very curious, and I know you said you don't know a ton of players outside of Uconn, but I'm still curious what you'd like to see happen.

Allan, your post above just verbalized what I was thinking in my head. We seem to be just adding players. Let's say that Balkman was drafted to be a SF than that means our future looks like this.

SF-Balkman
PF-?
C-Curry
PG-Collins
SG-?

I say ? at the shooting guard because if your core is Balkman, Curry and collins than you desperately need one of your 30 minute guys to be a consistent shooter or else Curry is going to be seeing quadruple teams for the rest of his career. 3(really 7 years) into our plan and we only have one guaranteed starter for 2-3 years from now. We keep singing the praises of our GM for building this team yet we have no idea who is going to be in our line-up. I think it's time for Isiah to consolidate some young talent and bring in starting compliments to his building block. I personally would trade the pick with a Nate and Frye and go for a higher pick or a younger 2 way player at any position.

As for the guys I'm high on. I don't consider myself an expert when I only see guys like Brewer play 4 times a year and some of the others once or twice. Outside of the big east I just don't have an opinion on these guys because the sample is too small.

Good post, but I think this needs to be answered. Is balkman really starting material in the NBA if he can develop a jumper. If he is, then I don't see why not stand pat and go for sean williams. But if you feel he isn't, then we should package frye and whoever, move up and try to grab corey Brewer from Florida..
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/23/2007  7:57 PM
My thread was just a joke, Martin!
martin
Posts: 80980
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
5/23/2007  10:31 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

My thread was just a joke, Martin!

bad joke. waste of time.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/23/2007  10:34 PM
The point was that some point will blindly support whatever asset the Knicks have.
And the voting was pretty close before you locked it anyway!

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 05-23-2007 11:03 PM]
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/23/2007  11:57 PM
I know that a lot of Isiah's moves look redundant or poorly made, but you have to look at things differently when you're taking chances on late draft picks. You may really like a players talent, but usually there are some questions about players that fall to late in the draft, which is why they aren't higher. So Isiah often takes a guy in the draft that could turn out to be a find or just as easily flop. None of our draft picks have been of the lock variety.

So he added Jared a known NBA player and drafted Balkman who seems to have more upside. If Balkman actually turns out to be better, GOOD. The same with Frye and James. If we don't get them then we have nothing in terms of size. Adding Curry, made sense even if it seems like we wasted a pick and MLE on Frye and James. The same goes for Morris. If he turns out to be a useful player, GOOD. Lee will still likely come off the bench for us, cuz that's how I think Isiah sees him. If Lee improves greatly, GOOD. You get the idea. The only time you don't do things like this is when you get a can't miss talent. We haven't had any of those in the last few years.
EnySpree
Posts: 44925
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

5/24/2007  12:40 AM
Well the point of this thread is the debate on where the knicks think they are and who they actually consider part of the big picture.

The decision has been made on curry being the foundation of what the knicks do. Who else is down with this? You got balkman, lee, Nate, craw, Frye, etc. What's really going on here?

The knicks looked good when they were scrappin and played at a high energy level. Teams couldn't match it. That's just a testament to why the knicks are a lotto team again.

So the knicks are at a point where they are looking at a transition. Where do they go from here? What needs to happen to make this team better without losing the chemistry that was building.

I think the knicks need to understand what was working and get the guys here that fill in what wasn't.

Francis is a good player but he's too selfish, to the point where he goes to extreams if he can't get the touches and minutes he feels he deserves. That's not what the knicks are looking to do. How can isiah make use of his contract, rid the team of his distractions while bringing in some players that make sense to what they are trying to do.

Trading Francis effects the draft pick cuz there are only but so many roster spots available. That could also effect Frye and Nates worth to the team. I like the idea of trading Nate and Frye with 23 to move up.

All this kinda ties in with each other. The knicks can move up to get a guy like brewer, then with a Francis trade they can waive who the don't want and keep whoever they feel fits the needs of the club.

Its an exciting time. Its almost like isiah has to make these types of moves. How disappointing would it be if isiah just stays still and drafts 23 and that's it?
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
6/5/2007  10:30 AM
Okay I will unleash the secret for everyone. With the 23rd pick the New York Knicks select Coby Karl.
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
6/5/2007  3:20 PM
Would you trade up say a Jamal Crawford/Frye package to Minny for Ricky Davis and their pick?

We are trying to be uncovential and obviously reducing our contracts is very important. Crawford and Davis are similar, Ricky a little stronger

Looking at: Thorton, Wright, Conley, Noah, perhaps brewer or green, good talent with the TWolves pick.

McHale is dumb enough to do anything and I think he might gamble if frye is involved.....
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/5/2007  3:53 PM
Posted by MS:

Would you trade up say a Jamal Crawford/Frye package to Minny for Ricky Davis and their pick?

We are trying to be uncovential and obviously reducing our contracts is very important. Crawford and Davis are similar, Ricky a little stronger

Looking at: Thorton, Wright, Conley, Noah, perhaps brewer or green, good talent with the TWolves pick.

McHale is dumb enough to do anything and I think he might gamble if frye is involved.....

Hell yes. Ricky is better than Jamal and I'd much rather have the sixth pick than Channing. I'm not sure the T Wolves would do it and I doubt Isiah would do it if we're not giving up unprotected draft picks!
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
6/5/2007  3:54 PM
we could always through in the number 23 to make it work
23rd pick vs. 9th pick

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy