Marbury is a cancer............ what arguement is there against that???? Zero.

Really how many games has Crawford won over his career, time for Isiah and the fans to really look at Crawford as a player.

6 years in the league without any real improvement, a shooting percentage that moves from 39-41%, if we can make him a smart player? He is a street baller nothing else, and is too dumb for prime time.

Crawford in the NBA
-O playoff games

As a Bull
2001-21 wins
2002-30 wins
2003-23 wins
2004-47 wins, substract crawford add deng and gordon as Rookie

As a Knick
Prior to Crawford 39 Wins
2004-33 wins
2005-23 wins
2006-33 wins

Why is it so hard for fans that are supposed to be intelligent to realize that Crawford between his rushed shots that lead to transition baskets, his ****ing around with the ball, off balanced shots, highlight style and lack of defense that Crawford is a real addition by substraction player.....

Nothing is faulty about my logic, if you have any concept of what wins basketball games, then you can't want Crawford playing starters minutes. If you want to play him as a sixth man that gets his shot and plays if he has it going or goes back to the bench because he is shooting 3-15 thats fine.

You can't have low percentage dumb players be one of your top 4-5 players on your team if you expect to win.

Having Crawford playing 38 minutes with a license to gun, is going to put you in the lottery, and Isiahs inability to actually coach players and come up with a real game plan only further effectived the franchise. If your a good shooter when your set and can get to the rim at will, why you shoot an awful percentage is beyond me.

Posted by MS:

Nothing is faulty about my logic, if you have any concept of what wins basketball games, then you can't want Crawford playing starters minutes. If you want to play him as a sixth man that gets his shot and plays if he has it going or goes back to the bench because he is shooting 3-15 thats fine.

You can't have low percentage dumb players be one of your top 4-5 players on your team if you expect to win.

Having Crawford playing 38 minutes with a license to gun, is going to put you in the lottery, and Isiahs inability to actually coach players and come up with a real game plan only further effectived the franchise. If your a good shooter when your set and can get to the rim at will, why you shoot an awful percentage is beyond me.

You are speaking semantics really. Most 6th men get starters minutes, so your beef with JC is that he starts with no guard on the team that could really spilt time with him??? I don't believe that. All JC really is a 3rd, 4th option on a team where he is the best perimeter option. Is that his fault??? No, he was brought in to be the third wheele to Houston and Marbury. So why blame when houston retired and Marbury being a point guard plus a scorer is too hard on him??? I'll take the 21 points on 42 percent shooting he was giving us as a scorer after we started to start JC.

And Honestly if you wish to look at the JC Vs Marbury issue it pretty boils down to this season
Minus JC/Q/Lee and with 19/7Curry, Frye, JJ2, Nate, Balkman, Collins, Rose.... Marbury went 5-11.
Minus Marbury/Q/Frye and with 14/7Curry, Qwoods, Ime, rookie Nate, rookie Lee, Rose, Butler Jamal Crawford went 4-7. CANCER, Marbury is a CANCER!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by jaydh:




if he is a cancer, JC is cancer w/aids


[Edited by - jaydh on 04-24-2007 12:49 PM]

[Edited by - anji on 04-24-2007 5:00 PM]