[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Is Nate sneaking up on us?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
4/10/2007  10:25 AM
Posted by nixluva:

As With all of our young players, this time has provided a great opportunity to see what they've got. Isiah has been all over Nate and it may be paying off. We'll see if he can keep it up. No one denies his talent. It's his maturity level and self control that we want to see improve. If he could also be just a bit more team oriented and look for setting up his teammates, no one would have a problem with keeping him. If he can't learn to do those things, then we may see isiah use him in a trade this summer.

Wait Isiah jumped all over Nate for something. Why aren't you calling him a hater??????

I just hope that people will like me
AUTOADVERT
Nalod
Posts: 72400
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
4/10/2007  10:43 AM
Posted by oohah:
Nobody denies his talent, like a jumping servant!

nice one Imus!

oohah

I meant "Sirvant".

Nice one Rev Al! Make somthing from nothing.

HARDCOREKNICKSFAN
Posts: 26191
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 6/24/2002
Member: #263
USA
4/10/2007  11:00 AM
I'm glad Nate's stepping up. He's still an occasional loose cannon, but has been maturing since he's gotten more burn.
Another season, and more adversity to persevere through. We will get the job done, even BETTER than last year. GO KNICKS!
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
4/10/2007  1:48 PM
Posted by MS:

Pietrus is 6'7 and can play defense, nate is 5'7 and doesn't play any. hopefully this ups his value and we can move the guy. Nate scores we lose for the most part, he is really not a good lockeroom personality.

If we can find a way to package jamal, morris, frye for something good than nate is a good asset off the bench, but you need to move a lot of these guys that have personal agendas other than winning

MS, Pietrus is 6'7 but has no impact. Pietrus has not help the Warriors win anything neither. He has no agenda but is he motivated to play in the league? He came into the league with comparisons to MJ but never lived up to anything like that. His defense is overrated. He is a SG that just broke double digit ppg (under Nellie), only manage to grab 4 rpg on a offensive minded team, his assist numbers are bad, he improved his FG % this year because he drives more. At this point in time, I would say that we could get alot better than Pietrus. I am with MCK1, I would go after McCants who has a true upside.

[Edited by - pharzeone on 10-04-2007 1:49 PM]
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
4/10/2007  1:54 PM
McCants sucks, just what we need here a guy with loads of talents that plays when he wants. Defense is not really all that overrated especially when you see the impact collins and balkman have, if we could get a guy like pietrus cheap i would do it wouldn't throw the farm at thim.

Your playing with a lot more scorers in gs, but nate can score there is no debating it. But he is only useful if crawford is off this team, we can't have two guards that are out of control and turnover prone. Nate is a much more efficient three point shooter. Nate is not really popular with his teammates from what i have heard, but if we play him 20 minutes a night and let him be more of a spot up shooter i think thats fine. I thought isiah should have used him as an iverson off the bench running multiple screens to get him open.

I believe the knicks have to do something to get acquire another player and a morris,frye,crawford package could be enticing to teams
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
4/10/2007  2:19 PM
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by earthmansurfer:

Dam, I missed the game, but it looks like Nate had another decent performance. 24pts and not much else. Shot 45% or so.
Anybody that watched the game have any comments?

He was cool as usual
I guess he gives no dmm for which of two teams he plays.
If the rules will permit he can play for both. He will produce double points and double turnovers
He is the next reason after popcorn why people still come to watch basketball

He had two turnovers.

And he's averaging just over 1 the last 6 games.

Maybe you are talking about the Nate earlier in the year...
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
Is Nate sneaking up on us?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy