Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Of the three players, Bynum's the only one who has a chance of being a good two-way player.
Curry could be a dominating player in the NBA for years while Bynum and Frye cannot.
Why can't Bynum?
Isles this is for you, the same way that Balkman can't be better than Ty Thomas, Gay or Roy. Got it.
I realize that you're trying to turn it on me but it doesn't make any sense. First of all I never said that Balkman can't be better but in terms of a projection it's certainly much more likely that those players will be better than Balkman. All of them are high lottery picks and Balkman himself thought that he'd be going in the 2nd round.
Bynum was a lottery pick, has a young body that if developed can be physically dominating, has raw developing high level skills that he's just learning to use and already has a great feel for the game. Put that all together and I think it's very possible that he can develop into a dominating player.
So why don't you think that Bynum can become a dominating player?
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System