[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

I am soooo sick of Marbury
Author Thread
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
4/5/2007  10:47 AM
>>bury is a career 20 and 8 guy who has seen the playoffs, what, twice? Shutout and a couple of 40 point performances again SA? What's his career W/L?

Martin - would you agree that the great Kevin Garnett has the same issue of struggling to make a franchise better?

Just for the record, unlike those who advocate for a "franchise" player, I have always advocated a team that has six guys in double figures.

Hit the open man





[Edited by - misterearl on 04-05-2007 10:48 AM]
once a knick always a knick
AUTOADVERT
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
4/5/2007  10:49 AM
>>Try decaf in the morning

The LEAST you can do is have an original line. Stop stealing my material.
once a knick always a knick
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
4/5/2007  10:51 AM
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by nixluva:

OH HERE WE GO AGAIN Some of you KILL me with you lack of understanding. Tell me how exactly Andre Miller being on this team is supposed to make them more of a winner? If i'm not mistaken he got traded FROM a playoff team with a SUPERSTAR and they took on AI who is pretty much a scorer like Steph, so how does that logic wash? Denver didn't feel that he gave them a better chance to win.

The thing is that we just don't have our top scoring shooters. We were one of the top scoring teams in the league and lately we can barely get to 90. Obviously we aren't as potent as we once were. It also makes us easier to defend. But that's right just blame it all on Steph. Despite the fact that he's picked up the slack on scoring and is still playing hard on D.

when i said it, i wasn't talking about this team post injuries. i'm talking about this team with crawford, q, and lee. andre miller is more of what this team needs than steph. look at what miller is doing with that squad in philly. and i bet many knicks fans believe our supporting staff is better.

I agree.
Only one question:
Who is our supporting staff is supporting?
Do we have somebody to support?... May be they supporting Isiah?
But he is not handicapped. May he have mental problems? Then players cannot help - he needs a doctor...





"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
4/5/2007  10:53 AM
I think that it's great that Andre Miller has been good for this Sixer group, but I still remind you that he just got traded from a playoff team that sent him away for a scoring PG. Andre actually had shooters to pass to and since their offense isn't so limited that makes his job easier than Steph's. Andre doesn't HAVE to be the big scorer for his team cuz he has scorers still on the floor with him. Steph didn't have to do as much scoring when we had our guys. Andre looked good last night, but if we had our guys during this stretch I don't think we're even worrying about our playoff spot cuz we'd be in a playoff spot right now.
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
4/5/2007  10:55 AM
I don't blame Marbury. I accept him for what he is. He's a great player, in his way. I don't think he's the right kind of point guard for the team, but he is who is and he's what we've got.

I don't want to turn every thread to Isiah, but this is the team he put together. It's not a good mix yet, IMO. You want optimism? Maybe he'll get it right next year, or the year after that... Maybe when Marbury retires....
https:// It's not so hard.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
4/5/2007  10:56 AM
---> Andre looked good last night, but if we had our guys during this stretch I don't think we're even worrying about our playoff spot cuz we'd be in a playoff spot right now.
[/quote]



How do you know? If you tell me what I have for breakfast--I will believe you:)
RIP Crushalot😞
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
4/5/2007  10:57 AM
Try some of this in the morning:

https:// It's not so hard.
martin
Posts: 80979
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
4/5/2007  11:07 AM
Posted by misterearl:

>>bury is a career 20 and 8 guy who has seen the playoffs, what, twice? Shutout and a couple of 40 point performances again SA? What's his career W/L?

Martin - would you agree that the great Kevin Garnett has the same issue of struggling to make a franchise better?

Just for the record, unlike those who advocate for a "franchise" player, I have always advocated a team that has six guys in double figures.

Hit the open man





[Edited by - misterearl on 04-05-2007 10:48 AM]

stay on topic Earl, we talking about Marb, right?
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
4/5/2007  11:09 AM
I thought we were talkin' 'bout practice.
once a knick always a knick
Elite
Posts: 26372
Alba Posts: 23
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #510

4/5/2007  11:10 AM
i personally think marbury has been playing his ass off lately and is the last person to point a finger at.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
4/5/2007  11:38 AM
Posted by BRIGGS:

---> Andre looked good last night, but if we had our guys during this stretch I don't think we're even worrying about our playoff spot cuz we'd be in a playoff spot right now.

How do you know? If you tell me what I have for breakfast--I will believe you:)
[/quote]

BRIGGS come on man! You KNOW that this team was playing better ball than this when we were healthy. We were playing .500 ball and that would've been enough to have insured us a playoff spot. I happen to think we would've played above .500 during March if we had all of our guys. We had 8 home games and at the time we were playing very well at home. I think this team would've peaked in March.

Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
4/5/2007  11:43 AM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by BRIGGS:

---> Andre looked good last night, but if we had our guys during this stretch I don't think we're even worrying about our playoff spot cuz we'd be in a playoff spot right now.

How do you know? If you tell me what I have for breakfast--I will believe you:)

BRIGGS come on man! You KNOW that this team was playing better ball than this when we were healthy. We were playing .500 ball and that would've been enough to have insured us a playoff spot. I happen to think we would've played above .500 during March if we had all of our guys. We had 8 home games and at the time we were playing very well at home. I think this team would've peaked in March.


[/quote]

I agree with you Nixluva. But at some point as an organization we have to stop worrying about "if this would have happened" and start making things happen. Yes if we had not lost these guys we'd probably be in the playoffs. But even without them, we still have our two best players in teh line-up and still should beat teams like Philly and Portland at home. And IF WE HAD DONE THAT we would have still be in good shape for the playoffs.

Enough excuses. The injuries hurt, but the opportunities are still there we just aren't taking advantage of them. A loss to Philly is acceptable if you give 100%. But we slept through the 1st half last night during a playoff run and killed an opportunity. But of course you are okay with sleep walking through a half because we have guys injured.

Even WAlt was disgusted with that last night.
I just hope that people will like me
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

4/5/2007  11:59 AM
This is my deal with Marbury, as it always has been. It's his Dr Stephyll and Mr Hydebury modes.

When he's a distributor his demeanor and energy is low-key, debonaire, almost passive. When he gets to score for himself he turns into the manic, possessed Mr Hydebury, with energy oozing from every pore of his body.

What would he be like if he played with the Hydebury zeal as a distributor? I don't see these two different sides from players like Nash, Kidd, CP3, TJ Ford, Parker, etc.
Sure, they turn things up a notch now and then, they try to impose their will on the bucket from time to time, but it's not in contrast to an otherwise near-somnambulistic state.

Marbury, as leader, PG, floor general, will-imposer, big-time contributer, deciding factor... whatever you want to call him... has to set a determined, high energy, will to win by any means necessary, tone nightly and consistently, and not from quarter to quarter, or game to game.

This dude ain't leading us anywhere. These flashes of brilliance of his are no more impressive then those from Tim Thomas, Eddy Curry, Jamal Crawford, or any other under-achieving, enigmatic screw ball.

What I'll give him credit for is not brawling with teammates and throwing the coach under the bus this year. But the fact that that is a notable accomplishment speaks volumes in and of itself.
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

4/5/2007  12:08 PM
Posted by BlueSeats:

This is my deal with Marbury, as it always has been. It's his Dr Stephyll and Mr Hydebury modes.

When he's a distributor his demeanor and energy is low-key, debonaire, almost passive. When he gets to score for himself he turns into the manic, possessed Mr Hydebury, with energy oozing from every pore of his body.

What would he be like if he played with the Hydebury zeal as a distributor? I don't see these two different sides from players like Nash, Kidd, CP3, TJ Ford, Parker, etc.
Sure, they turn things up a notch now and then, they try to impose their will on the bucket from time to time, but it's not in contrast to an otherwise near-somnambulistic state.

Marbury, as leader, PG, floor general, will-imposer, big-time contributer, deciding factor... whatever you want to call him... has to set a determined, high energy, will to win by any means necessary, tone nightly and consistently, and not from quarter to quarter, or game to game.

This dude ain't leading us anywhere. These flashes of brilliance of his are no more impressive then those from Tim Thomas, Eddy Curry, Jamal Crawford, or any other under-achieving, enigmatic screw ball.

What I'll give him credit for is not brawling with teammates and throwing the coach under the bus this year. But the fact that that is a notable accomplishment speaks volumes in and of itself.


You just had to throw the form of the word ENIGMA in there didn't you. I agree with everything you said he's like Water to the team's Oil or vice versa. He doesn't mix and never did.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
4/5/2007  12:09 PM
Blueseats, I think I have to remind you that we didn't see any jekyl and hyde from him when he came here and we had shooters around him. He was avg'ng near double digit assists and even after the trading of those guys he ended up avg'ing 9.3 assists for us that year. It's not always just about Steph, but you have to have a team that is CAPABLE of finishing what a guard does. The guys you mentioned all have that. Steph doesn't have that and hasn't really had that on a high level since he's been here.

I believe that we will get this team to that point and that Steph will do fine when we do. When Q was healthy he saw a lot of shots and there was no problem, but we also have to remember that this team has been trying to establish some things this year for the 1st time. Curry has NEVER been THE focus of a teams entire offense and he's found it harder to handle than he may have realized. The same goes for Steph who hasn't really been that good at feeding the post. I would hope that we can address those issues as we go along and I think that part of that will be an increased role for Mardy. We'll see.
TheGame
Posts: 26657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
4/5/2007  12:16 PM
Guys, I just don't think Marbury has it in him to be a Nash/Kidd-type of distributor. He is not a pure PG. He is a combo guard that can pass and penetrate. I am happy with his play because I have come to the conclusion that this is the best that he can play. We just have to develop these other players so that they can play with him.

It is kind of like Chauncey Billups. Billups is not a great creator, but he is a solid pg and you put him on a team like Detroit with other solid veterans that know how to play, and you get a Finals MVP. Marbury is the same way. He is simply not capable of taking a bunch of players that don't know how to play and create offense for them. You surround him with vets and he turns into a solid PG. That is why losing guys like Q and Crawford and to a lesser extent Lee, really hurt. Those were the heady players that understood how to create their own offense and create offense for others that really masked Marbury's shortcomings. Without those guys, we are left waiting for Marbury to do something that he simply is not capable of consistently doing.
Trust the Process
martin
Posts: 80979
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
4/5/2007  1:01 PM
Earl, strange coincidence.

From Isola today:

They are 8-11 when Stephon Marbury is the leading scorer.

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/knicks/2007/04/these_numbers_arent_pretty.php
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Marv
Posts: 35571
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
4/5/2007  1:07 PM
Posted by BasketballJones:

Try some of this in the morning:


you know this remains a very underrated bourbon. they're alwyas pushincg the high-end fancy-ass bourbnos, but sometimes there is just nothing better in this world than some old-fashioned tennessee sour mash neat.
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
4/5/2007  1:13 PM
HOw many Symptoms do we have to show game in and game out before some adment we have Marbury poisoning???

Constant First quarter Blowouts
Anemic third quarters
Little understanding of the things that wins, like Freethrows and when to shoot
Horrible execution at the end of games/Quarters
Continual 17 plus turnover games
Poor Team consentration for most of our games
Terrible Loses in games we should win
Terrible In Division Record
ect...

I can keep going, but who doesn't see "game in and out" what this guy lacks and how this team hurts because of it. It's always waiting for some player to get healthy, or he needs one or two Allstars from some other team to play better. He never had a real Team, or he is learning to be a team player. Excuses don't tell why Andre Miller can get a 25-26 record with basically just AI2 but Marbury could only lead the knicks to a "28-35" record even with everybody healthy. And nobody would say the 6'ers have a better "supporting" case or better scorers or better players..... they have a better leader. Lee having a breakout season and all the knicks were is 28-35??? Curry taking the most focus off of Marbury with his 19 and 7 since KG and all the knicks were is 28-35?? A guard in the backcourt in JC who put more points, as many assist and handled the ball half the game for marbury and all the knicks were is 28-35???? Balkman, Nate, Frye, and Q, threw out the season coming up with monster games here and there...........and all the knicks were is 28-35!!!!! The knicks never had a leader and never will as long as Marbury is here. A real leader doesn't lose to the Sonics/NO twice/ 76'ers/ Magic/ Blazers mostly at home with the playoffs on the line. I don't care who is injuried. I can name 25 players in the NBA that could win most of those games with CUrry, Frye, Collins, Balkman, JJ2, Rose and Nate as their supporting cast.

So here we are suppose to find reasons to why Marbury is still losing, missing the playoffs again, still needing more teammates, with another coach at wits end, after another season of basically scrapping an offense for him, alienating another player.......... like most of his career. When the simplist answer is to get rid of HIM!!!


[Edited by - anji on 04-05-2007 1:16 PM]
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

4/5/2007  1:21 PM
Posted by nixluva:

Blueseats, I think I have to remind you that we didn't see any jekyl and hyde from him when he came here and we had shooters around him. He was avg'ng near double digit assists and even after the trading of those guys he ended up avg'ing 9.3 assists for us that year. It's not always just about Steph, but you have to have a team that is CAPABLE of finishing what a guard does. The guys you mentioned all have that. Steph doesn't have that and hasn't really had that on a high level since he's been here.

I believe that we will get this team to that point and that Steph will do fine when we do. When Q was healthy he saw a lot of shots and there was no problem, but we also have to remember that this team has been trying to establish some things this year for the 1st time. Curry has NEVER been THE focus of a teams entire offense and he's found it harder to handle than he may have realized. The same goes for Steph who hasn't really been that good at feeding the post. I would hope that we can address those issues as we go along and I think that part of that will be an increased role for Mardy. We'll see.


I'm not talking about a quantity of shots, passes or assists, I'm talking about his demeanor, passion and energy.

Do I need to remind you of his 2004 "homecoming" blowout by Houston?

Eventually he was allowed to simply be the show. Yes, when Steph is allowed to be the man and "be" the offense is when you see passion.

You also realize that your suggesting that the reviled Layden built a better team for Marbury than Isiah, right?

And why did that come to an end? We'll, first off, if you believe his cousin, it was because he got Van Horn traded. And also because his unholy alliance with Isiah, which put him above Wilkens in the pecking order (remember Wilkens in his press conference saying "this isn't my team, it's Steph's"), contributed to Lenny quitting.

Then came the Olympics, where Marbury was faced with far more talent then he's ever had and he knew not what to do with them. Is Steph good at feeding the post? Duncan would foul out trying to find position before Marbury could find him. Athletic guys like Lebron and RJ were wasted on Steph. I can only remember him pushing tempo once and it was a bad pass to Jefferson trapped on the sideline. all he could do was hit Iverson on the perimeter for duds. Brown wanted him sent home for not being able to "get it" and for not being a good student.

So there, with far more talent than he's ever had or ever will have, Marbury's only memorable moment was when he took over for himself and scored 31, yet you think it's about the quality of his supporting cast. Marbury can't elevate his teammates so it's always a matter of building a supporting cast good enough to carry Marbury, yet he's "too god" in the minds of many, like yourself, to shoulder criticism.

That's the same attitude he's always had about himself too that's driven a wedge between himself and teammates. Recall his 5/3 quitter's performance last year against orlando? When questioned why he scored so few points he said it was because his teammates were "hot" so he fed them. But amazingly, when asked why he had so few assists he said because guys weren't hitting their shots! Which was it, they were hot or couldn't hit? Either way, it's their fault.

There is a story often repeated around the Meadowlands that dates back to a night in 2000-01. It's about Stephon Marbury and his teammates leaving the court after getting trampled (a common event in those days), when they were suddenly met by the point guard's mom, the redoubtable Mabel. And Mom, in a very loud voice, had some advice for her son: "Don't worry, Stephon, it's not your fault," she said. "It's all these other lousy players."

Upon which a veteran Nets teammate observed, "Now you know why he is how he is."


It figures: even when the "old" Nets traded for a supertalent--they got Marbury in an enormous three-team, nine-player deal in 1999--they ended up with the wrong one. "The difference between last year and this year?" ponders an emotional Kenyon Martin, taking out his furiously repressed feelings on his sneaker laces in the near-deserted Nets locker room an hour before facing the Indiana Pacers. `This year we have guys who want to play. Last year we had some people in here who were too busy tapping themselves on the shoulder, telling themselves how great they were."

"Last year, we didn't play any defense," forward Aaron Williams, a 6'10" supersub, chimes in from the next stall. "On any NBA team, the leader sets the tone. And our leader didn't bother playing D most nights."

"He thought he was too good for that--then he'd blame everybody else, pointing fingers," Martin adds. "I'm not naming any names, you understand, but this was an unhappy, divided locker room last year. And the division was one guy on one side and everyone else on the other."

"Yes, we did have one guy in here last year who thought he was too good for everybody else on the team and didn't mind saying so," smiles GM Rod Thorn, still remaining strictly incognito about the "one guy's" identity. "And he was, too. Better than everyone else, that is. But it all didn't add up to much, did it?"


Nixluva, when two HOF coaches and guys like Wade, Iverson, RJ, Lebron, Duncan, Boozer, et al, aren't good enough for Steph, when and where do you think we will be able to acquire the talent to support him?
I am soooo sick of Marbury

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy