[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Who's better? Mardy Collins v. Marcus Williams
Author Thread
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
4/3/2007  1:24 PM
These arguments are moronic. If Williams was on the Knicks we'd be talking about how great he is and Mardy wouldn't even enter the conversation. Let's just work with what we have, realize that Marcus will not come here until after he suffers a near career ending knee injury and try drafting a PG in this years draft/hope Mardy develops a shot.
I just hope that people will like me
AUTOADVERT
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
4/3/2007  8:50 PM
present day, Williams edges out Collins
who would you pick to be your floor general in three years, I think I'd go with Collins

Its closer than it looks now because of Collins' defense, if he improves on his handle and outside shot he'll be money.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
4/4/2007  12:49 AM
i think Marcus has a much higher upside than Mardy (purely based on the things that have been written about him, not on what i've seen from him at the NBA level), but i think Mardy's game fits our needs well right now... we need a bigger, physical defensive minded G who plays a good fundamental game... if he ever develops a perimeter jumper, he could be a valuable piece of our future
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
4/4/2007  3:24 AM
Posted by Marv:

i'm extremely pleased that mardy is revealing that he has an nba game. boy did this guy look out of his league () earlier in the season.

but i'd still much rather have williams. guy has the potential to be an absolute assist machine in this league. it would have been real interesting to have seen how he would have done at finding eddy in the post, whether he would have set frye up for better spot up j's and what he could have done out on the break with lee and balkman filling.

Marv,

Williams has two of the best finishers in the game in Carter and Jefferson, Nachbar can finish with most anybody, and Krstic is(was) a nice player to throw it to. Moore, House and Kidd can score. My point is he has had better options to rack up assists with the Nets than with the Knicks and he hasn't shown himself to be a superior floor general. The only player I have seen that he has real synergy with is Josh Boone, and they had already played several years together.

Williams appears to have all the offensive skills including passing, but even with those great scorers around him, he seems to think shoot first. And I don't think he would have had a different mindset with the Knicks not to mention his god-awful defense.

I really don't think he would have been much of an asset to this team considering our needs.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30362
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
4/4/2007  5:57 AM
I tell you what. Williams & Collins would have been a great 1-2 punch if they were both on the same team at PG. Williams would be the style, Collins would be the substance.

If we didn't have Marbury, Crawford, Francis & Nate and were going into last yrs draft looking to snatch up 2 pgs. We would have came off lovely with that combo.

The thing about Williams though is that you could find a PG like him in every draft every yr. And you can find them late in the rds to. After Marbury, Francis are off the books, and Nate is possible traded or even Crawford. I doubt it would be impossible to find a PG like Williams in future drafts to team up with Collins. As a matter of fact Crawford & Collins kind of fit each other if we end up keeping Crawford. Add a big solid SG and we could have a lot of size at the guard postition down the road.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
4/4/2007  10:28 AM
You never draft 2 PGs at the same time.
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
4/4/2007  11:27 AM
Posted by newyorknewyork:

I tell you what. Williams & Collins would have been a great 1-2 punch if they were both on the same team at PG. Williams would be the style, Collins would be the substance.

If we didn't have Marbury, Crawford, Francis & Nate and were going into last yrs draft looking to snatch up 2 pgs. We would have came off lovely with that combo.

The thing about Williams though is that you could find a PG like him in every draft every yr. And you can find them late in the rds to. After Marbury, Francis are off the books, and Nate is possible traded or even Crawford. I doubt it would be impossible to find a PG like Williams in future drafts to team up with Collins. As a matter of fact Crawford & Collins kind of fit each other if we end up keeping Crawford. Add a big solid SG and we could have a lot of size at the guard postition down the road.

i'd love to see a Crawford & Collins backcourt personally
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Allanfan20
Posts: 36013
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
4/4/2007  11:44 AM
Too early to tell. I still say Mardy is a nice backup, ala Charlie Ward. Marcus has a far greater upside with better talent. I think NYNY is right. The 2 would have gone well together.

I think overall, this board is going just a little too crazy over Mardy though. You'd think he's a star in the making, based on some of the things people say here. I guess we all have a little mustafaaab in us though.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
4/4/2007  11:45 AM
I would love to see a Crawford/Nate/Frye trade for Warrick/Johnson/Lowry and future number 1
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
4/4/2007  11:48 AM
I think NYNY is right. The 2 would have gone well together.

Think again. Mark Jackson and Rod Strickland didn't go well together. Mardy Collins is a #1 draft pick and so is Marcus Williams. They were drafted a couple spaces apart. You can't draft them both and then sit one while the other plays. You just end up with unhappy players and bad chemistry. Why waste a second first round pick on the exact same position you just drafteed for? What message does that send?
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
Allanfan20
Posts: 36013
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
4/4/2007  11:54 AM
I am not talking about the draft. I'm talking about the players guy. If Marcus is a 30 minute a game player, and say Mardy plays the backup 18 plus a few minutes at backup SG, what's so bad about that? This is called building a basketball team. If you drafted Williams, and there's a shotblocker, but he sucks at everything else with a poor work ethic, along with Collins, who do you go with? I'd take Collins and be patient in finding a shotblocker later on. I'm sure based on todays needs, though, Isiah would have taken the crappy shotblocker.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Allanfan20
Posts: 36013
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
4/4/2007  11:59 AM
Think again. Mark Jackson and Rod Strickland didn't go well together.

PS, this is a completely different scenario. Those 2 were starters worthy of heavy minutes. Williams is a starting talent who's playing behind Kidd but would be a 25 MPG starter on most other teams. Collins is a backup who could at times, do pretty decent as a starter.

[Edited by - Allanfan20 on 04-04-2007 12:31 PM]
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
4/4/2007  12:05 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:

Too early to tell. I still say Mardy is a nice backup, ala Charlie Ward. Marcus has a far greater upside with better talent. I think NYNY is right. The 2 would have gone well together.

I think overall, this board is going just a little too crazy over Mardy though. You'd think he's a star in the making, based on some of the things people say here. I guess we all have a little mustafaaab in us though.

i don't think Mardy will ever be a star, but he can be a solid pro just like Eric Snow... we don't need that many star players on this team, just guys who know what they're doing & know where to get the ball in game situations... Mardy demonstrates a good understanding of that... him & Jamal in the backcourt means you have 2 guys on the floor who know how to get the ball inside to Curry w/consistency... that means you have Curry a lot more focused during games & battling harder to gain position downlow because he knows his effort isn't going to be wasted by watching Marbury, Francis or Nate dribble a couple times looking to dump it down to him & then give up & swing it back the other way because they have no idea how to make a low post entry pass.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
4/4/2007  12:11 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:
Think again. Mark Jackson and Rod Strickland didn't go well together.

PS, this is a completely different scenario. Those 2 were backups. Williams is a starting talent. Collins is a backup who could at times, do pretty decent as a starter.

Jackson and Strickland were backups? What??
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
4/4/2007  12:13 PM
i'd take Jax or Strick over Marcus Williams everytime (if they were about the same age obviously)
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Allanfan20
Posts: 36013
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
4/4/2007  12:29 PM
Posted by kam77:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Think again. Mark Jackson and Rod Strickland didn't go well together.

PS, this is a completely different scenario. Those 2 were backups. Williams is a starting talent. Collins is a backup who could at times, do pretty decent as a starter.

Jackson and Strickland were backups? What??

My bad, I meant starters. Edit underway.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Allanfan20
Posts: 36013
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
4/4/2007  12:35 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Allanfan20:

Too early to tell. I still say Mardy is a nice backup, ala Charlie Ward. Marcus has a far greater upside with better talent. I think NYNY is right. The 2 would have gone well together.

I think overall, this board is going just a little too crazy over Mardy though. You'd think he's a star in the making, based on some of the things people say here. I guess we all have a little mustafaaab in us though.

i don't think Mardy will ever be a star, but he can be a solid pro just like Eric Snow... we don't need that many star players on this team, just guys who know what they're doing & know where to get the ball in game situations... Mardy demonstrates a good understanding of that... him & Jamal in the backcourt means you have 2 guys on the floor who know how to get the ball inside to Curry w/consistency... that means you have Curry a lot more focused during games & battling harder to gain position downlow because he knows his effort isn't going to be wasted by watching Marbury, Francis or Nate dribble a couple times looking to dump it down to him & then give up & swing it back the other way because they have no idea how to make a low post entry pass.

TMS, Crawford and consistent don't belong in the same sentence. I like the guy too, but in the games I watched, which are most of them, he did get a lot of assists to Curry, but messed up just as many times, trying to feed Curry. Again, I like him, but he's a super erratic player and hasn't shown any signs of improving that unless he's playing for Larry Brown.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
4/4/2007  3:37 PM
i didn't say he was a consistent player... i said he was good at getting the ball down low to Curry consistently... plug in Mardy who has good fundamentals playing alongside him w/his solid defense & decision making, & i think it's a tandem that can work... Marbury's game is not a good fit alongside Curry IMO.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Who's better? Mardy Collins v. Marcus Williams

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy