It's nice that poor kids can get a decent shoe for a fraction of what it used to cost. That's great. But it's not charitable. Is he giving these shoes away? Is Marbury subsidizing the costs?
Target offers plenty of cheap clothing and shoes. That's not a charity. You can get pretty cheap shoes at Payless. That's not a charity.
Marbury found a niche to sell sneakers to. Great business, but hardly charity. Again, it's nice poor kids can have sneakers, but that's only because he found a niche.
Posted by NYKniCksFan87:
i dont see the implication of marbury missing practice....
i think marbury has been our best player from the start, he was the catalyst of the knicks after the brawl,
also, what marbury is doing is great, its all for a charitable cause and no matter how u spin it, even if marbs is selling the shoes for 14.98, how much profit can he make, i think alot of under privelidged kids arehappy to wear their starburys
Sure, but then you see plenty of people who aren't underprivileged buying the sneakers and merchandise as well... instead of buying one pair for $60, they're gettign 4 pairs for $60. Also, there isn't an established market for $15 NBA sneakers. Considering basketball is a way of life in the innercity, it makes a lot of sense to target that market for basketball sneakers. I imagine the % of households with Marburys is higher than Adidas.
No one thinks Walmart is noble for targeting the same demographic.