Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by Queeniepop:

Yes, if you repeat things...for no reason at all, you think people listen more.

Jamal shoots 64.5% in the final three minutes of games.

Yes, if you repeat things...for no reason at all, you think people listen more.

Jamal shoots 64.5% in the final three minutes of games.

SO what's the point of putting this up?

DJ showed that he doesn't. You said this so people would believe and never get called on it. Posters should be aware how much this happens on this board, it's really bad.

True you make my head spinn. Can you tranlate please what does it means?

Posted by arkrud:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by Queeniepop:

Yes, if you repeat things...for no reason at all, you think people listen more.

Jamal shoots 64.5% in the final three minutes of games.

Yes, if you repeat things...for no reason at all, you think people listen more.

Jamal shoots 64.5% in the final three minutes of games.

SO what's the point of putting this up?

DJ showed that he doesn't. You said this so people would believe and never get called on it. Posters should be aware how much this happens on this board, it's really bad.

True you make my head spinn. Can you tranlate please what does it means?

I think Queennie has gone on record in particular when the news broke out about Jamal season ending injury of how important he is to this team especially in the 4rth qrt. She mentioned he shot somewhere around 65% in the final minutes of the 4rth qrt. DJ then today shows that the dude shoots below 40% in the final minutes of the 4rth. Now I don't know if I'm 100% it was Queen but I'm leaning heavily toawrds it. I also don't know how serious she was when she said it. Nevertheless crap like this is spewed on this board all the time as facts.


[Edited by - TrueBlue on 03-02-2007 4:51 PM]

I think we should pick well into the 30's always.

Posted by TMS:

If New York is obligated to convey its own 2007 1st round pick to Utah via Phoenix, then New York's obligations to convey a 1st round pick to Chicago are extinguished.

what would you guys prefer... to keep the pick & swap w/CHI this season & still owe UTA a pick in the coming years, or to get it over with & just give CHI's pick over to UTA this year & not owe any 1st rounders after this season?

Briggs posted as such earlier- I'd agree- in fact- I wonder if we could get Utah to send us a 2nd rounder this year to us for us to give up the pick this year.

I look at it like this- we're late lotto this year- chances are good that, barring miracles, we're back to lotto again- and 2010 we might be lotto bound as well.

Cutting through all the crap: There is a possibility that we will not have ONE first round pick in the deepest draft in years, and we definitely don't have a 2nd round pick in one of the deepest drafts in years.

Posted by joec32033:

Cutting through all the crap: There is a possibility that we will not have ONE first round pick in the deepest draft in years, and we definitely don't have a 2nd round pick in one of the deepest drafts in years.

No but at least we have Eddy and Steph to carry us to .400!