Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by Anji:

YOur head is too far inbetween your butt cheeks, your point makes zero sense. Kidd and Carter are suppose to be top 10 or 20 players, they should be able to carry their team against the Hawks and sixers. They aren't getting any sympathy for me or any knicks fan. Nothing Homer or gutless about it. The Nets are suppose to be a Title contending team, missing player 3 and 4 shouldn't effect them that much against the teams that have been handing them L's. Do you understand that logic??? Jared Jeffries and Q are not in that situation. Why are you trying to work them into this thread is beyond me....... Go moan on a Nets Board if that is your angle.

[Edited by - anji on 02-07-2007 11:19 PM]

Once again you don't understand how important a starting center/big is to this game. I guess Wade isn't so superstar either since his team was below .500 without Shaq. I guess Kobe isn't so Super either considering the Lakers record without Lamar Odom is well below .500. K.G. he isn't super at all his teams have been hovering around or below .500 every since Cassell left.

Posted by Anji:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by Anji:

YOur head is too far inbetween your butt cheeks, your point makes zero sense. Kidd and Carter are suppose to be top 10 or 20 players, they should be able to carry their team against the Hawks and sixers. They aren't getting any sympathy for me or any knicks fan. Nothing Homer or gutless about it. The Nets are suppose to be a Title contending team, missing player 3 and 4 shouldn't effect them that much against the teams that have been handing them L's. Do you understand that logic??? Jared Jeffries and Q are not in that situation. Why are you trying to work them into this thread is beyond me....... Go moan on a Nets Board if that is your angle.

[Edited by - anji on 02-07-2007 11:19 PM]

Once again you don't understand how important a starting center/big is to this game. I guess Wade isn't so superstar either since his team was below .500 without Shaq. I guess Kobe isn't so Super either considering the Lakers record without Lamar Odom is well below .500. K.G. he isn't super at all his teams have been hovering around or below .500 every since Cassell left.

All those teams having better records then the nets missing more important players too. I could careless about the Nets missing the fourth and third players on their teams.

Posted by Anji:

Wouldn;t want to be them????
YOu put Kidd and Carter on the knicks for Marbury and Curry then removed two of Crawford/Q/Lee/Frye... That team ain't scoring 36 first half points against the Hawks. I could careless and I would like to have the caliber of 1&2 they have and be minus my 3/4.

So what you are saying is the Knicks have depth New Jersey doesn't. So when New Jersey has to sub in their poor bench depth to replace the injured starters what does New Jersey really have? Outside of Williams, who is a rookie what does New Jersey have that puts fear into the opponents eyes?

[Edited by - TrueBlue on 02-07-2007 10:51 PM]