[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

I really liked the way we played last night
Author Thread
TheGame
Posts: 26656
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
2/4/2007  11:26 AM
Posted by islesfan:

Balkman got a DNP-CD
None of last year's rookies started and all got fewer minutes than usual.

If Larry Brown had done that, some of you would have vilified him for it.

Are we building for the future or are we looking to win games with Jerome James getting more minutes than he deserves?

I was not happy to see Balkman not play, but Frye, Lee, and Curry are our future too and they got plenty of minutes. MOreover, JJ1, with the 3 years remaining on his deal after this one, is going to be around whether we like it or not, so we might as well see if he can contribute. I was really surprised at the interior defense that JJ1 showed. He not only did a solid job against his own man, but he provided the type of help defense that this team has really been missing. If he can block shots and intimidate like that every night, I would not mind seeing him play more of a role with the team. What last night's game showed is that when you match Curry up with a defensive-minded, shot-blocker that can protect the rim, Curry can be effective because he is going to get the other team's frontcourt in foul troble and the PF can help mask Curry's defensive deficiencies.
Trust the Process
AUTOADVERT
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/4/2007  11:35 AM
Posted by islesfan:

Balkman got a DNP-CD
None of last year's rookies started and all got fewer minutes than usual.

If Larry Brown had done that, some of you would have vilified him for it.

Are we building for the future or are we looking to win games with Jerome James getting more minutes than he deserves?

i think there's two sides of the coin. lb did some crazy stuff last year...that i supported. why? b/c i knew the culture here and i knew lb was a prick but his way got results...and most importantly, winning results. so i let alot of stuff he did slide b/c i thought it would be a 5 year plan and lb had to break a few (in our case a TON) of eggs to get going.

alot of people didn't like his methods and didn't understand them. but i feel many didn't take into account the atmosphere of the team, the market, the culture of the organization which starts from the owner on down, and the pressures of gm'ing and coaching in nyc. lb was forcing change. i didn't care about the lineups or any of that BS. i only cared about the direction we were trying to go in over the next 5 years and the culture that was to be developed here. but that didn't fly with alot of folks here and the most important folk in dolan.

so now you have isiah, who the players like, and who, both he and the organization, is operating as if last year was completely lb's fault. everything is right with the team and the organization and the guy that tried to change things was wrong. and why shouldn't they think that? he's the outsider trying to fix a well oiled machine (in their eyes). he is used to winning and is used to well built organizations over his past 4 stops (spurs, indy, philly, and detroit). so when he walks into the knicks, he doesn't like what he sees so he tries to change it. was he right? we'll never know but 30 years of history dictates that he is.

anyway, back to isiah. in reality, ANY coach that came in this year would've been better than the 23 win benchmark some are using. the clusterfcuk of lineups, rotations, etc. these kids could develop and become decent players...but will we ever go anywhere significant? will we get past the 1st or 2nd round of the playoffs? are we trying to build a title team? will the same culture that's been permeating here for 7 years continue and hold us back? we know now that dolan and co. are afraid of change. they like things done their way regardless of wins or losses (i.e layden here for 4 years, sather for 7). so winning a title is not a top priority. so if that's the case, how much pressure is there on a GM to win BIG rather than to just win a little to keep his owners happy?

we'll see how this plays out over the long haul. some fans have made up their mind that we're not headed down the righteous path of title building. i am one of them. i have seen how all title teams before this one have been built. i have seen the major components needed to win (franchise player, frontcourt defense, heady guard play). and i see us not having any of those pieces. it's very tough to do, but we are ignoring all methods taken before. some like to give a guy like isiah credit for being aggressive and doing some unconventional things, especially with the hand he was dealt. i'm in the other camp thinking that his unconvential methods, althoughy sexy, ultimately will not take us where we want to go. so, to me, we're going to be stuck at some point, in a similar position of the pacers, trying to figure out whether to blow it up again or keep making recycling/lateral moves like the trade they just made for murphy + dunleavy.

i guess i can sit back and enjoy the ride or i can come on these boards and speak my mind. whatever, win or lose, i still get the same amount of enjoyment following them.

ok, i just ranted like an idiot and my thoughts were kind of all over the place. i need to get me some food.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41012
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
2/4/2007  11:37 AM
Posted by fishmike:


the key is effort every night. Its nothing more complicated than that. Doesnt it bother you when you hear Curry talking about making a statement against certain teams and opponents? I thought good players and ALL STAR players look to do that every night, but thats just me. Until these guys and this team realize you have to "bring it" every night every minute they play they will never be a winning team

I was about to make a post that was very similar to this one. I agree Fish, I was very happy with the way the team played last night, but they have to learn to do this EVERY single game, not just every 3 games or something like that.

Also, I think Curry is our most consistent player. He plays very well offensively every night and he also plays very poorly defensively every game, either way that makes him our most consistent player, which is both good and bad. Good win, bring the same effort the rest of the season and this team will be in the playoffs.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/4/2007  11:45 AM
tough to judge on that game b/c orlando was somewhat depleted. them losing grant hill would the equivalent of us losing steph - the guy that settles it all down on the court.

a win is a win but the only thing (imho) to take away from this game, and it's a big thing, is that eddy is just a dominant post up player.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/4/2007  11:49 AM
Posted by Anji:

^^^^ You said point guard right???? THe postion that is like 5 for a dollar in the NBA is going to be hard to find??? Hell how many teams have two or three they might want to keep and it's going to be hard to find another? I would beg to differ. And Marcus ain't that great. His Jamal Tinsely/Andre Miller it's not like he is Felton/Pau/Deron Good.

felton, paul, and deron could be ELITE point guards. marcus may not reach ELITE status, but you're telling me that a team of players like jamal, quentin, lee, frye, and curry wouldn't be happy with a guy like andre miller getting them the ball? don't undervalue andre - the guy is a damn good point guard. and tinsley (even though i hate him) is still darn good when healthy.

nj, det, wash, char, spurs, nook, utah and the suns are the only teams that don't need an andre miller type of pg on their roster.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/4/2007  11:51 AM
Man if I were D Lee, I'd be so eager to get out of this organization. There's no way a .400 team should be treating him like a bench player with fluctuating minutes.
martin
Posts: 80901
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/4/2007  12:03 PM
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by islesfan:

Balkman got a DNP-CD
None of last year's rookies started and all got fewer minutes than usual.

If Larry Brown had done that, some of you would have vilified him for it.

Are we building for the future or are we looking to win games with Jerome James getting more minutes than he deserves?

i think there's two sides of the coin. lb did some crazy stuff last year...that i supported. why? b/c i knew the culture here and i knew lb was a prick but his way got results...and most importantly, winning results. so i let alot of stuff he did slide b/c i thought it would be a 5 year plan and lb had to break a few (in our case a TON) of eggs to get going.

alot of people didn't like his methods and didn't understand them. but i feel many didn't take into account the atmosphere of the team, the market, the culture of the organization which starts from the owner on down, and the pressures of gm'ing and coaching in nyc. lb was forcing change. i didn't care about the lineups or any of that BS. i only cared about the direction we were trying to go in over the next 5 years and the culture that was to be developed here. but that didn't fly with alot of folks here and the most important folk in dolan.

so now you have isiah, who the players like, and who, both he and the organization, is operating as if last year was completely lb's fault. everything is right with the team and the organization and the guy that tried to change things was wrong. and why shouldn't they think that? he's the outsider trying to fix a well oiled machine (in their eyes). he is used to winning and is used to well built organizations over his past 4 stops (spurs, indy, philly, and detroit). so when he walks into the knicks, he doesn't like what he sees so he tries to change it. was he right? we'll never know but 30 years of history dictates that he is.

anyway, back to isiah. in reality, ANY coach that came in this year would've been better than the 23 win benchmark some are using. the clusterfcuk of lineups, rotations, etc. these kids could develop and become decent players...but will we ever go anywhere significant? will we get past the 1st or 2nd round of the playoffs? are we trying to build a title team? will the same culture that's been permeating here for 7 years continue and hold us back? we know now that dolan and co. are afraid of change. they like things done their way regardless of wins or losses (i.e layden here for 4 years, sather for 7). so winning a title is not a top priority. so if that's the case, how much pressure is there on a GM to win BIG rather than to just win a little to keep his owners happy?

we'll see how this plays out over the long haul. some fans have made up their mind that we're not headed down the righteous path of title building. i am one of them. i have seen how all title teams before this one have been built. i have seen the major components needed to win (franchise player, frontcourt defense, heady guard play). and i see us not having any of those pieces. it's very tough to do, but we are ignoring all methods taken before. some like to give a guy like isiah credit for being aggressive and doing some unconventional things, especially with the hand he was dealt. i'm in the other camp thinking that his unconvential methods, althoughy sexy, ultimately will not take us where we want to go. so, to me, we're going to be stuck at some point, in a similar position of the pacers, trying to figure out whether to blow it up again or keep making recycling/lateral moves like the trade they just made for murphy + dunleavy.

i guess i can sit back and enjoy the ride or i can come on these boards and speak my mind. whatever, win or lose, i still get the same amount of enjoyment following them.

ok, i just ranted like an idiot and my thoughts were kind of all over the place. i need to get me some food.

good thoughts man.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
2/4/2007  12:05 PM
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by holfresh:


I think the key is interior defense...I think the tone was set early in the game that Howard wasn't going to bully the Knicks on the interior...It was a gamble by IT that worked...He has to find a way to get JJ mins at center with Curry at the PF against big front lines..I have alway thought if the Knicks could play interior defense this team can take a step to the next level..Curry was able to get two centers in foul trouble and he had his way...I really hope this defensive presence can be build upon in the second half...Wow who would have thought JJ was the shot blocker we needed up front...We need to get JJ about 15 mins a game...Frye and Lee's mins will suffer but the Knicks need the interior defense...

the key is effort every night. Its nothing more complicated than that. Doesnt it bother you when you hear Curry talking about making a statement against certain teams and opponents? I thought good players and ALL STAR players look to do that every night, but thats just me. Until these guys and this team realize you have to "bring it" every night every minute they play they will never be a winning team

YEA FISH I agree. when you hear and see eddy play this way, you know he is capable, you know this team is capable, it is the effort on a consistent basis that is lacking.

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
izybx
Posts: 22366
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 10/16/2006
Member: #1178
USA
2/4/2007  12:13 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

Man if I were D Lee, I'd be so eager to get out of this organization. There's no way a .400 team should be treating him like a bench player with fluctuating minutes.

If you had watched the game you might have a clue as to why he didnt play that much last night. He was in foul trouble for most of the game.
Beat the Evil Empire. BEAT MIAMI
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
2/4/2007  12:27 PM
izybx - Lee's four turnovers did not help much either.

It is interesting to note the absence of basketball critique of Lee's play, for better or for worse. Is the campaign to make him a starter a permanent cause?

In the context of team, if sixth man good enough for John freakin' Havlicek, is it NOT good enough for David Lee?

I want the Knicks to win the game FIRST. Individual agendas are a distant second.

And I love David Lee.

You play to win the game

[Edited by - misterearl on 02-04-2007 12:33 PM]
once a knick always a knick
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/4/2007  1:00 PM
Posted by izybx:
Posted by Bonn1997:

Man if I were D Lee, I'd be so eager to get out of this organization. There's no way a .400 team should be treating him like a bench player with fluctuating minutes.

If you had watched the game you might have a clue as to why he didnt play that much last night. He was in foul trouble for most of the game.

I'm not talking about one game; I'm talking about his whole NYK career.
TheGame
Posts: 26656
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
2/4/2007  1:25 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by izybx:
Posted by Bonn1997:

Man if I were D Lee, I'd be so eager to get out of this organization. There's no way a .400 team should be treating him like a bench player with fluctuating minutes.

If you had watched the game you might have a clue as to why he didnt play that much last night. He was in foul trouble for most of the game.

I'm not talking about one game; I'm talking about his whole NYK career.

You guys kill me with the supposed dissing of Lee. Lee is a second year player picked #30 in the draft and is getting nearly 30 minutes a game. Do you know how many second year players would kill to be getting the minutes that Lee is getting. We paid off Taylor just so Lee and Frye could have minutes, but somehow the Knicks are disrespecting Lee and treating him badly, huh? I know some people don't think that anyone on this team actually plays other than Lee, but guys like Curry, Frye, Marbury, Crawford, and Q are out there playing too. I am glad Lee has a good head on his shoulder and does not see his apparent "dissing" the way some people do. IMHO the fans and the media need to stop trying to create controversy over the Lee issue. Like I said before, on any other team that did not have IT as the coach, it would not be half the issue that it is here.
Trust the Process
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

2/4/2007  6:11 PM
I somewhat agree with DJ.

I watch the game last night knowing the Magic just swatted the nets by 30 and showed no offense aginst the knicks.

This yrs season is so wishy washy that all most can hope for is a playoff birth and a run like 1999.

Defense plays a large part to how far teams advance in the playoffs.
The knicks are more entertaining than last yr, but IMHO anything would be more entertaining than last yr.


I will watch the knicks hoping that they do well and at the same time wishing they went a different direction.

It's great watching curry serve up oppossing centers in the league and watching jamal go for 52 in a win.

But it's also dissapointing Jamal playing like he's still in highschool and curry playing like he would rather be at REDLOBSTER instead of playing defense.

So personaly, I will sit back and watch and see what this team does with all the consistent inconsitency.

Still waiting for atleast a 6 game winning streak

[Edited by - playa2 on 02-04-2007 18:13]
JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/4/2007  6:19 PM
Posted by fishmike:

I bet money on the Knicks winning last night... the payout was 2:1 with no point (straight win/loss).

Why?

Because the Knicks ALWAYS play very well and usually win immediatly after blowout losses. Look at our game log. Our best wins of the year against good teams come after embarassing losses. This is our pattern

We play our usual half effort and win some lose some usually based on whether or not we get a great shooting night from someone

We get our asses handed to us by an inferiour team or a team without their best players and get embarassed.

We come back the next game and actually play with max effort, especially on defense. This usually = a win

Immediatly following we are back to our sloppy half effort type games for a few until the next blowout loss.

Result? about a .400 team

Isiah's learning its awfully tought to coach effort every night

Fair post. I think this is reflective of Marbury's personality and his impact on the team. When he feels he has to prove himself or something about the team he leads a strong effort and it trickles down to the rest of the team. last night he wanted to prove that Eddy was an all-star.

unfortunately, even if Marbury has made some improvements effort-wise, he's never understood what it takes to lead an NBA team night in and night out and that's why I don't think he's ever won 50 games. the effort is never consistent. you look at guys like JKidd, Nash, Billups - they go out every night with this mentality of wanting to prove themselves at the highest level. Marbury just doesn't do that often enough.
¿ △ ?
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/4/2007  10:58 PM
Posted by TheGame:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by izybx:
Posted by Bonn1997:

Man if I were D Lee, I'd be so eager to get out of this organization. There's no way a .400 team should be treating him like a bench player with fluctuating minutes.

If you had watched the game you might have a clue as to why he didnt play that much last night. He was in foul trouble for most of the game.

I'm not talking about one game; I'm talking about his whole NYK career.

You guys kill me with the supposed dissing of Lee. Lee is a second year player picked #30 in the draft and is getting nearly 30 minutes a game. Do you know how many second year players would kill to be getting the minutes that Lee is getting. We paid off Taylor just so Lee and Frye could have minutes, but somehow the Knicks are disrespecting Lee and treating him badly, huh? I know some people don't think that anyone on this team actually plays other than Lee, but guys like Curry, Frye, Marbury, Crawford, and Q are out there playing too. I am glad Lee has a good head on his shoulder and does not see his apparent "dissing" the way some people do. IMHO the fans and the media need to stop trying to create controversy over the Lee issue. Like I said before, on any other team that did not have IT as the coach, it would not be half the issue that it is here.

You're in the very small minority
http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topic.asp?t=19845&page=lu#newunreadpost
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

2/4/2007  11:01 PM

Not as small as you think...

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/5/2007  7:36 AM
I guess you missed the thread with the poll
babyKnicks
Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191
USA
2/5/2007  7:55 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:

I guess you missed the thread with the poll

you need to get a grip and stop constantly talking about lee because a poll indicates the uk mafia will come to your aid, this argument is a dead end as we got a win with JJ1 starting, Frye playing well and lee was in foul trouble.

Let it rest.

[Edited by - babyknicks on 02-05-2007 07:56 AM]
Let's go Knicks. That's amare
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
2/5/2007  8:11 AM
I guess the point is that Lee is putting up all-star numbers, Frye is putting up role player numbers and Jerome James has been playing like an NBDL player for most of this season, so it'd be logical that Lee start. Not unreasonable.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
2/5/2007  11:38 AM
Posted by babyKnicks:
Posted by Bonn1997:

I guess you missed the thread with the poll

you need to get a grip and stop constantly talking about lee because a poll indicates the uk mafia will come to your aid, this argument is a dead end as we got a win with JJ1 starting, Frye playing well and lee was in foul trouble.

Let it rest.

[Edited by - babyknicks on 02-05-2007 07:56 AM]

Let me preface my remarks by saying that I do think ultimately it makes sense that Lee start next to Curry so they can grow together but I am in no way going to kill Isiah over his decision to give him 30 minutes off the bench as opposed to 30 minutes in the starting line-up. In other words, I would start Lee, but this is not an "Isiah is an idiot" situation for not starting him.

That being said I don't understand babyknicks why it's okay for you and I to say it's not important that Lee start. But when someone expresses the opinion that they feel that he should be starting somehow it digresses into the same tired "UKmafia" boring post. Why not just discuss why or why not you think he should be starting?
I just hope that people will like me
I really liked the way we played last night

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy