I agree, but I know you expected Frye to be "threatening" and there was also a contingent of Brown haters, of which you were one of the more vocal, who felt Brown was misusing Lee at SF and killing his game. I don't know if you shared their view, but that's what I'm trying to reconcile. Some of these same people also thought, at the time of his signing, that Jeffries would be just what this team needed at SF to shore our perimeter D.
At the time, none of these hopes/expectations (Lee starting, Jeffries starting, Frye "threatening") were unreasonable in and of themselves, but it's also hard to do all of them concurrently. But a lot of people positioned themselves to be right if any and all of those things happened. So I was just wondering what your expectations were with Frye, Lee and Jeffries all vying for two 2)frontcourt positions. Their was also the possibility of Q in the mix for SF starters with Francis at SG.
Gotta Run Blue so quickly:
1)I never hated Brown I really disliked his unwillingness to make any adjustments to his personnel.
2 Did anyone think that brown was killing Lee's game by playing him at SF? I don't remember that, but that certainly was not me. I just wanted the kid playing period. DNP's were killing him and us. Lee deserved 30+ minutes a game last year!
3) Frye and Lee co-exist nicely, Lee's playing time does nothing to hurt Frye's production. What seems to be hurting Frye is that he is the number 4 option and specifically the front-court is geared to getting Curry off and Frye is played to be a outside-shooting complement. That is okay, Frye is playing the role he has been given better all the time.
4) I don't give a rat's ass about Jeffries, he has never entered any of my equations really.
oohah
