[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

It's shocking how Isiah isn't gone at this point...
Author Thread
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/15/2007  12:08 PM
I think the main focus was to get Curry to progress. With time Frye will come around. We have a good coaching staff minus the Head Coach of course
AUTOADVERT
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
1/15/2007  12:16 PM
Stupid to fire Isiah mid year since he has already ****ed the franchise through the roof with money.....however

DLee is known for being great with either hand, improving your free three shooting is not progress through coaching....HE passes well now? Where were you last year, he has always passed well.....

Curry outscoring centers while providing no interior dfense, doesn't matter so much if you can't do anything on defense..... Yao made him look like a little girl, Okafur had a much bigger impact on friday, Camby outplayed him twice, Okur outplayed him, even Sammy D outplayed once as well .....Points don't tell the story.

I wonder if your brother gets murdered, you break up with your wife to be, and you get traded in one offseason and your pg doesn't make the effort to find you contributes to you having an off year. So Isiah gets credit for his mental well being?
SugarRayRichardson
Posts: 21557
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/28/2006
Member: #1169

1/15/2007  12:31 PM
Posted by MS:

Stupid to fire Isiah mid year since he has already ****ed the franchise through the roof with money.....however

DLee is known for being great with either hand, improving your free three shooting is not progress through coaching....HE passes well now? Where were you last year, he has always passed well.....

Curry outscoring centers while providing no interior dfense, doesn't matter so much if you can't do anything on defense..... Yao made him look like a little girl, Okafur had a much bigger impact on friday, Camby outplayed him twice, Okur outplayed him, even Sammy D outplayed once as well .....Points don't tell the story.


I wonder if your brother gets murdered, you break up with your wife to be, and you get traded in one offseason and your pg doesn't make the effort to find you contributes to you having an off year. So Isiah gets credit for his mental well being?

You just named 7 games out of 38. Why dont you focus on the other 31 games instead of the 7 bad games?
I LOVED how Curry just exploded in the 4th, speaking as a fan of the Raptors, Curry looked well, scary I think is the word. Or Shaq-like Curry: 19.1ppg-7.3rpg-58%fg
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
1/15/2007  1:13 PM
Game 2 vs. Atlanta
Curry 20pts 2rbs 3tos
Zaza 20pts 7rbs 1tos

vs. Denver
Curry 4pts 2rbs 3tos
Camby 10pts 7rbs 4ass 2blks 0tos

Curry 19pts 3rbs 0blks 3tos
Camby 24pts 9rbs 7blks 3ass 0tos


vs Houston
Curry 7pts 5rbs 2-11
Yao 35pts 17rbs 7bklks 8tos

Curry 8pts 2rbs 0blks 4tos 3-10
Yao 26ots 9rbs 3blks 4tos

vs Miami
Curry 13pts 5rbs 0blks 4tos
Mourning 7pts 7rbs 4blks 1to

vs. Minny
Curry 14pts 6rbs 0blks 2tos
Blount 17pts 6rbs 0blks 4tos

vs. Cavs
Curry 24pts 5rbs 0blks 4tos
Z 12pts 12rbs 3blks 1to

There really aren;t a lot of big men out there to begin with that are good, so eddy should be doing his thing all the time......

The two best big men in the league other than shaq really outplayed him badly, there are a number of games that eddy has brought it, but above are just a sample of games, when you factor in he rarley gets a blk, never gets an assist and is high to prone, offensive production sometimes is not enough
Killa4luv
Posts: 27773
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
1/15/2007  2:21 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

it's a new year and a different league but 1 year ago today, nj was 19-15. if the expected did happen this year (meaning the east wasn't the worst league ever), then the knicks and the raps would be 6-8 games back.

Yeah and if Larry had coached like he was supposed to last year, Chicago would have picked 10th or 11th at the earliest (35 wins) and not 2nd. Alot of things would be different IF the expected happened but it didn't.
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
1/15/2007  5:47 PM
IF IF IF.

fact of the matter is isiah is lost as a coach and as a GM. the overpaying/mere fact that he signed jerome james and jared jeffries should merit his pink slip.
#Knickstaps
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/16/2007  8:58 AM
BigSmooth - did I mention it ain't your money?

Why is Dolan's checkbook balance even an issue here?

Just think of an alternate vision:

The extremely young Knicks frontcourt (Curry, Frye, Lee, Jeffries, Balkman) stays together and continues to mature together.

Marbury contunues to share the ball, smiles every once and a while and never speaks another word for people to pick apart like piranna after flesh.

Isiah stumbles on a scorer for the backcourt by the next draft.

It could happen





once a knick always a knick
GoNyGoNyGo
Posts: 23559
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/29/2003
Member: #411
USA
1/16/2007  9:59 AM
Listen with all his faults - IT has gotten us a franchise level PG, who is now finally starting to play that way. A franchise level C, who he has developed better than previous coaches in NY or CHi. He has gotten us young talent to be excited about in Lee, Frye, N8 and Balkman. Q is solid. Craw needs refinement still but there is no questioning his ability to breakdown defenders and hit the big shot.

Yes the JJ's have been disappointing. Yet, when JJ1 plays, you can see why IT got him. He is intimidating and can score offensively. JJ2, whom I really dislike right now, has shown flashes of good defnsive IQ. They are role players. Yes overpaid but...

So, compared to what he inherited, if IT is fired the next GM has pieces to work with.

The keys to the Knicks are Marbury and Curry. If they play great, the Knicks are a decent team looking for that 2 or 3 that can propel them to the next level.
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
1/16/2007  10:23 AM
This is the one debate that really has to end. Fire Isiah? Why?

Here's the big question; what is the next coach going to improve?

Isiah should coach this team for better or for worse until Stephon's contract runs out. Until then, it makes no sense to bring in someone new.

The team is playing better than they did last year. They can actually finish games now. They have a player who at least should go to the all-star game. They have good young players.

It sure has been a bumpy ride, but the team is better and we have to keep him around.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/16/2007  10:31 AM
>>To think, I actually respected Thomas as a coach, at the beginning of the season, but now he's doing nothing but peeing on the grave of Red Holzman and saying it's OK to do so as well.

Peeing on Red's grave?

Okay, you can cut the drama...

To be honest Allanfan20 - if you ever studied the tactics of Red Holzmam, you might see that Isiah employs a few of Red's favorite strategies

1. Red was famous for getting a deliberate technical foul to get his teams attention at the precise moment they needed a distraction or emotional boost. Isiah may not have the same timing, but he knows how to get the attention of refs.

2. Benching anyone who is playing sluggish at any time. The fact Isiah sat Marbury a month ago speaks volumes of the "no favorites" rule when it comes to minutes. Red was known to sit all five starters at once.

3. An effective bench. The rebounding machine Dave Stallworth is recast as David Lee. Or David Lee could be closer to Phil Jackson in playing style points. You decide.

The streaky Cazzie Russell is recast as the streaky Jamal Crawford.

Jerome James as Harthorne Wingo for comic relief.

You could look it up.








[Edited by - misterearl on 01-16-2007 10:32 AM]

[Edited by - misterearl on 01-16-2007 10:33 AM]
once a knick always a knick
Allanfan20
Posts: 36008
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
1/16/2007  1:58 PM
Posted by JohnWallace44:

This is the one debate that really has to end. Fire Isiah? Why?

Here's the big question; what is the next coach going to improve?

Isiah should coach this team for better or for worse until Stephon's contract runs out. Until then, it makes no sense to bring in someone new.

The team is playing better than they did last year. They can actually finish games now. They have a player who at least should go to the all-star game. They have good young players.

It sure has been a bumpy ride, but the team is better and we have to keep him around.

Isiah built this mess of a team, and somebody has to destroy it, and I don't think Isiah is going to either A)Destroy it and/or B) Destroy it, but put up a better team. To me, his drafting has been overrated. Solid, but overrated. He can't trade, he overpays (Making players untradeable. Has nothing to do with it not being my $$$$$) How can you trust Isiah, as GM alone.

And as an employer, he strikes me as a guy who just wants to be everyone's friend, on the Knicks that is, and I don't think that's nescessarily a good tactic.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/16/2007  2:11 PM
why destroy the team?
once a knick always a knick
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/16/2007  2:13 PM
Allanfan - do you really want to give away Curry, Frye and David Lee for draft picks?

what does destroying the team include?
once a knick always a knick
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/16/2007  2:36 PM
>>Isiah built this mess of a team, and somebody has to destroy it, and I don't think Isiah is going to either A)Destroy it and/or B) Destroy it, but put up a better team.

Actually, Isiah "dismantled" the untradeable dreck that Layden assembled. We are just now seeing brief glmpses of the Knicks freshmen and sophomore class learn to play as one.


>>To me, his drafting has been overrated. Solid, but overrated.

Allanfan- what is your criteria for any NBA GM being sucessful in the draft?

>>How can you trust Isiah, as GM alone?

You are not supposed to trust ANY professional executive. Unless you care more about the gossip and innuendo, than results on the basktball court, I could care less about Isiah Thomas, or Billy Knight or Kenvin McHale.... as people.

I care about the players trusting each other on the floor, first and foremost.


This isn't a popularity contest. sheesh. It's a battle to conceal your hand and deal the cards you are dealt in a high stakes poker game.
once a knick always a knick
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/16/2007  2:38 PM
Then again, I never cared much for Eddie Donovan as a person either.

At least until he traded for DeBusschere

Donovan and Red did not get along but they produced a winner after five years of struggle, turnover and some of the worst Knicks records in franchise history

[Edited by - misterearl on 01-16-2007 2:50 PM]
once a knick always a knick
GoNyGoNyGo
Posts: 23559
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/29/2003
Member: #411
USA
1/16/2007  3:08 PM
Misterearl, you sound like you've been around and followed this team for many years. My earliest memories are right after the 73 win. I remember them trading Clyde in 77 and being upset. Dollar Bill, Action Jackson, Wingo....the list goes on. I also remember things no fan should have to remember! That being said, I get the feeling that many on this site want a quick solution. They seem to only remember the 90's one of the best eras of Knick basketball..probably 2nd best. While I too would live to see a change right away, I am seeing some building being done here. Winning does not happen overnight unless you get a MJ or LJ...but hey they did not win right away either did they?

The point is that only in NY does the GM have to be perfect with every move and be a winner right away. A diamond takes many years to form, people. We may not have one here, but and IT may not be the one who brings it but the crucifictions need to stop.
Allanfan20
Posts: 36008
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
1/16/2007  3:15 PM
misterearl: This is why I think Isiah is overrated as a drafter. I don't think he's bad at it to start off. He's solid. However, the problem has been this while he's been here. He's picked a couple of nice guys to have, but he picked them based on short term need. When he picked Frye, he flat out said he did it b/c he can contribute right away. Then you see Andrew Bynum, a guy who plays at the same position and is going to be better than both Curry and Frye. He'd be ready in 3 years probably, which goes by so fast, and he'd be ready to make an impact. Why couldn't we be patient and just take Bynum? It's not like our record is good anyway.

Again, a short term and long term problem we had was point guard. We need one. We had one in our laps last Summer, and while Ro Balkman is nice and a very hard working/playing and likeable player (I personally don't see how anyone can dislike him), we could have gotton guys like him with the MLE, who are even better than him and Jefferies. We need and needed Marcus Williams or Rondo. Imagine how much better Curry would be with Marcus Williams running the point?
Allanfan - do you really want to give away Curry, Frye and David Lee for draft picks?

MisterEarl, please search strongly through every one of my posts and tell me where I said trade those guys for draft picks? I don't think I did, however, I will say this. If I can trade one or 2 of them for a guaranteed chance to get Greg Oden, then I do that. However, in terms of trading those guys, I'd rather trade them for young players who are starting to establish themselves as very good players at least.

Misterearl, to finish, I think Isiah should destroy it, not b/c I don't like the players he has chosen. I said in the "Who do you like" thread, that I like all of the players on the team, besides Jerome. The reason I know it needs to be destroyed is because none of them go together. Our best lineup is Q, Marbury, Crawford, Lee and Curry and that entirely depends on them playing defense and them hitting their shots. Regardless, they are still inconsistent. Therefore, when your best lineup is inconsistent and even that makes you worry, then you know you gotto make changes to get guys who will play defense all the time (ANd hopefully one or 2 that can block shots) and also compliment eachother on offense. Meaning, have guys who can penetrate, have others who can shoot, have guys who can post up, have a guy or 2 that will just float around and be scrappy, and of course, have a star or even superstar. You need guys who have roles and you know will fulfill them every single night. Isiah collected guys that make you worry about them fulfilling them.

And to top it off, Isiah makes excuses for this team left and right and NEVER takes blame for himself. It's very annoying.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/16/2007  3:19 PM
GoNyGo - the best trait that Isiah brought to the job was his aggressiveness.

While some would prefer the perfect transaction with every step that ain't hapening with any NBA executive. They all make mistakes, some in bunches. Just look at the comparitive tranactions through the years.

Historically, dating abck to the days of Gulf+Western, the Knicks executive office has always been a source of espionage, sabotage and rumor. See Van Gundy versus Ernie Grunfeld. and I like Ernie.

The best thing the Knicks have for the moment is some sense of continuity. No matter what people deduct from his public comments, even if by trial and error, Isiah has been fearless when it comes to making changes. That is a good thing.

How many of us can admit a mistake, in public, and move on?

Despite the fact many people simply hate Isiah's fingetprints are all over the franchise, I simply enjoy watching the youn players find their collective voice.

They are finally fighting back together.





once a knick always a knick
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/16/2007  3:23 PM
Allanfan - my take is that Isiah has been there as a player and understands how long it takes for a team to learn toughness and trust.

I don't label his explanation as making excuses due to some arbitrary timetable. Could he be trying to protect his young players from the media pressure and the highest scrutiny of any team in the league?
once a knick always a knick
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/16/2007  3:24 PM
If more people were less concerned with appearances, perhaps they could enjoy the baby steps of this season. Isiah could be a nasty, lyin', cheatin' SOB and it would not make any difference to my quality of life. I simply want the Knicks to play better basketball. Lately, since the Denver rumble, how can anyone watch and claim there is not something different taking place?

It's not personal

it's srictly business

[Edited by - misterearl on 01-16-2007 3:26 PM]
once a knick always a knick
It's shocking how Isiah isn't gone at this point...

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy