Posted by izybx:

Posted by Anji:

Posted by izybx:

Posted by Anji:

Posted by MS:

It makes perfect sense

Frye
10.1pts 5.7rbs 0.6ass 0.6stls 1.0blks 11fga 40%from the field

Lee
10.7pts 10.7rbs 1.7ass 1.0stls 0.4blks 7fga 61.5%from the field

So 68 power fowards are shooting a higher percentage from the field than Channing Frye, a guy that doesn't defend at all, yet Isiah uses his offensive logic and his ability to shoot the ball as his reasoning, unless Lee reminds him of Larry Bird, I can't see how him can keep making these claims about a player that is average more points on 4 less shots, 2nd best shooting percentage in the nba, 4 more rebounds, not to mention tied at 3.8 on the offensive glass for the league lead and one more assist, but he is less productive......

Forgt that, I wanted to choke Isiah when I read he saw JJ2 and Lee as the same offensively.

I think he means that Lee and Jeffries are not threats from the perimeter, considering that was the central theme of that particular interview (lack of perimeter shooting).

Do you think Lee has a better jumpshot then Jeffries??? YEs or NO.
Plus he does all that other "Stuff".

I have a better jump shot than both of them. Is a bad jumpshot better than no jumpshot, yes. But his point was that neither provides the perimeter shooting that is needed to keep zones from shutting our offense down. I think that is the the point if his statement. And Lee cannot play small forward. Jeffries can. Whos the better player? Lee, of course, but a Lee for Jeffries debate is pointless. Its like saying Balkman should start at center. Lee cant play the position in question.

I agree. If Lee is going to start, it should be in place of Frye. A replacement for Jeffries anemic Offense isn't on the team as of yet. Hopefully thats in the plans. I hate the idea of a player who only plays on one side of the ball at a highly skilled position like Sf.