[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Is Marbury a top 10 point guard?
Author Thread
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

1/1/2007  7:18 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:

That goes with my other thread. Its hard to judge because he instantly played like a top 10pg when he was playing with Curry, Lee, Frye, Crawford, Cato, Balkman. But now that Jefferies is back and playing big mins he went back to being very average.

So does his inconsistancy have to do with the lineup?? Or is he just being inconsistant?? Its hard to tell since Isiah changed up the rotation. If he stuck with what worked then we would know the real deal.

Jeez, top 10 PGs don't have their entire game thrown off by a little lineup change.

Story of Marbury's career - that one little tweak too many: be it injury, lineup change, coaching change, whatever, that derails a season.
AUTOADVERT
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30353
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
1/1/2007  11:35 PM
I said right now no. 4 games ago yes. I didn't say Marbury was or wasn't a top 10. Only thing I said was right now no. 4 games ago yes.

So if your assuming I am argueing that Marbury is a top 10 pg then stop yourself right now.

My points on Marburys consistancy isn't based on me argueing Marbury is a top 10pg. Just the fact that he was playing like a top 10pg vs some very strong teams with a certain lineup. So if thats what helps him play like a top 10pg then we should stick to it since we were winning. But we don't know if its because of the lineup change or not because we didn't keep that lineup for a long period of time to truley judge. Isiah should stick with that lineup since it seemed to be our most successful for a while so we can all judge there chemistry & level of play based on a longer sample than the few games they played.

The end.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
Allanfan20
Posts: 36008
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
1/2/2007  1:35 AM
To me, the lineup shouldn't really effect Marbury. Curry should be helping him more b/c he draws the doubles. Jefferies shouldn't be even getting the ball often. Crawford and Marbury will switch guard spots. And why Marbury defers to Crawford is beyond me, and that's another frustrating thing, and that's NOT being a top 10 PG.

When we had Houston or Sprewell, neither one defered to eachother. If they had a shot opportunity, they would take it. If one was so hot, let them have the ball, but you would never see either one of them leaning on the other.

Marbury, with his talent, should be playing like a top 10 guard every game no matter who he's with, unless he has Wade and Shaq, but he doesn't. Jefferies being in the lineup is a poor excuse.

And speaking of excuses, not to go off topic, but what was up with Kenny Smith making up the "They're heads are not in the game b/c it's New Years Eve" excuse. He in particular should know that it's not an excuse. Even Mike Breen seemed baffled by that.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30353
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
1/2/2007  2:25 AM
Posted by Allanfan20:

To me, the lineup shouldn't really effect Marbury. Curry should be helping him more b/c he draws the doubles. Jefferies shouldn't be even getting the ball often. Crawford and Marbury will switch guard spots. And why Marbury defers to Crawford is beyond me, and that's another frustrating thing, and that's NOT being a top 10 PG.

When we had Houston or Sprewell, neither one defered to eachother. If they had a shot opportunity, they would take it. If one was so hot, let them have the ball, but you would never see either one of them leaning on the other.

Marbury, with his talent, should be playing like a top 10 guard every game no matter who he's with, unless he has Wade and Shaq, but he doesn't. Jefferies being in the lineup is a poor excuse.

And speaking of excuses, not to go off topic, but what was up with Kenny Smith making up the "They're heads are not in the game b/c it's New Years Eve" excuse. He in particular should know that it's not an excuse. Even Mike Breen seemed baffled by that.

One thing about excuses. Now I didn't hear Kenny Smith talking about New Years Eve. So I don't know the tone he used. But not everything is meant to be an excuse like so many people like the make it out to be. Some things people are just saying to either be taken into consideration or just commenting on what could be happening weather its right or wrong. All Kenny Smith could have been doing is commenting on what he thought was happening. Not making the excuse that its alright for them to be playing that way since its new yrs.

And like me talking about the lineup that Marbury was successful with. You guys are taking it as me making an excuse to why Marbury is playing poorly right now. But basically all I was doing was observing and commenting on how he played great with a certain lineup and how I would like to see that lineup for a longer period of time and see if he can maintain that level of play. Thats basically it.

So does his inconsistancy have to do with the lineup?? Or is he just being inconsistant?? Its hard to tell since Isiah changed up the rotation. If he stuck with what worked then we would know the real deal.


Maybe people thought I was asking retorical(spell) quesitons, but I was really asking those questions.

Eddie Curry played better with David lee than Frye for an extented period of time. I don't remember people saying how Curry should play great reguardless of who is around him. Jamal Crawford seems to play better as a starter than off the bench. I don't remember to many people saying that Crawford should play great reguardless of comming off the bench or not. Instead I herd start Lee since it makes Curry better. And start Crawford since it makes Crawford better. Again just another observation.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
EnySpree
Posts: 44925
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

1/2/2007  5:27 AM
Marbs doesn't know the game. Period. He is a great talent but he doesn't know how to play. He keeps saying he has to change his game like he has to play wing for the rangers now. Fuck him.

Marbs should walk into a gym and drop 20 and 8 easy. The knicks are built for him. Curry being forced feed? Ok so who is the point guard again? Marbs has the ball so he can call his own number when its available. Its easy to me. He should look to distribute, but take every shot the defense gives him. Not much change in his game at all.

The answer to this is he is a big freakin baby with no basketball IQ. He doesn't know how to win and he can't "see" the game. I mean he should be all day but he is more like all gay.

How many bitches do the knicks have on the team? Now if marbs was traded some how he is gonna be a key memberin that team getting a ring playing out of his mind. You know that's how it will go down.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Allanfan20
Posts: 36008
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
1/2/2007  8:13 AM
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by Allanfan20:

To me, the lineup shouldn't really effect Marbury. Curry should be helping him more b/c he draws the doubles. Jefferies shouldn't be even getting the ball often. Crawford and Marbury will switch guard spots. And why Marbury defers to Crawford is beyond me, and that's another frustrating thing, and that's NOT being a top 10 PG.

When we had Houston or Sprewell, neither one defered to eachother. If they had a shot opportunity, they would take it. If one was so hot, let them have the ball, but you would never see either one of them leaning on the other.

Marbury, with his talent, should be playing like a top 10 guard every game no matter who he's with, unless he has Wade and Shaq, but he doesn't. Jefferies being in the lineup is a poor excuse.

And speaking of excuses, not to go off topic, but what was up with Kenny Smith making up the "They're heads are not in the game b/c it's New Years Eve" excuse. He in particular should know that it's not an excuse. Even Mike Breen seemed baffled by that.

One thing about excuses. Now I didn't hear Kenny Smith talking about New Years Eve. So I don't know the tone he used. But not everything is meant to be an excuse like so many people like the make it out to be. Some things people are just saying to either be taken into consideration or just commenting on what could be happening weather its right or wrong. All Kenny Smith could have been doing is commenting on what he thought was happening. Not making the excuse that its alright for them to be playing that way since its new yrs.

And like me talking about the lineup that Marbury was successful with. You guys are taking it as me making an excuse to why Marbury is playing poorly right now. But basically all I was doing was observing and commenting on how he played great with a certain lineup and how I would like to see that lineup for a longer period of time and see if he can maintain that level of play. Thats basically it.

So does his inconsistancy have to do with the lineup?? Or is he just being inconsistant?? Its hard to tell since Isiah changed up the rotation. If he stuck with what worked then we would know the real deal.


Maybe people thought I was asking retorical(spell) quesitons, but I was really asking those questions.

Eddie Curry played better with David lee than Frye for an extented period of time. I don't remember people saying how Curry should play great reguardless of who is around him. Jamal Crawford seems to play better as a starter than off the bench. I don't remember to many people saying that Crawford should play great reguardless of comming off the bench or not. Instead I herd start Lee since it makes Curry better. And start Crawford since it makes Crawford better. Again just another observation.

Honestly, you make a very good point and you're asking very good questions. Yes, certain players do play best with certain lineups and certain players play better starting than on the bench, and the other way around. However, I think I have to make an exception for Stephon Marbury, as I believe he needs to be the best player on this team. I think for a guy with his talent, he needs to be bustin' it and playing like the best PG in the league, as he proclaims, no matter who is in the lineup. Everyone needs to be bustin' it obviously, but for him, he should be doing something worthy of his talent everytime he's on the floor, whether it's controlling the offense or scoring, being a leader regardless, and NOT deferring to Jamal Crawford unless he's red hot. Jamal will get his shots. It's amazing how he doesn't even seem to realize that he has these beautiful options and doesn't take advantage of them. He wants a good image? How about, like you said, play consistently. Hopefully those lineups that you mentioned, NewYork, will come, but he still needs to be playing like the superstar he's capable of playing like. It's time that he start throwing some lobs to Curry, and it's time for him to start taking some jumpshots. He's a good shooter, yet it seems so rare when he actually takes one in recent times.

NewYork, I wasn't criticizing you or your question, if that's what you could have been interpreting my last post as. I'm not sure. I just meant that Marbury needs to be at his best, no matter who is in the lineup.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

1/2/2007  9:57 AM
Posted by newyorknewyork:

I said right now no. 4 games ago yes. I didn't say Marbury was or wasn't a top 10. Only thing I said was right now no. 4 games ago yes.

So if your assuming I am argueing that Marbury is a top 10 pg then stop yourself right now.

My points on Marburys consistancy isn't based on me argueing Marbury is a top 10pg.
Just the fact that he was playing like a top 10pg vs some very strong teams with a certain lineup. So if thats what helps him play like a top 10pg then we should stick to it since we were winning. But we don't know if its because of the lineup change or not because we didn't keep that lineup for a long period of time to truley judge. Isiah should stick with that lineup since it seemed to be our most successful for a while so we can all judge there chemistry & level of play based on a longer sample than the few games they played.

The end.


Don't sweat it NY, I didn't mean to hold you accountable to the top 10 business. It wasn't about you at all.

You know me, I'm just tired of trying to figure out what's wrong for poor ol' Steph this time. Every year it's something different, and yet it's the same. I'm just tired of it.
anrst
Posts: 22707
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/7/2005
Member: #1054
USA
1/2/2007  12:46 PM
Gus Johnson thinks so
VDesai
Posts: 43302
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
1/2/2007  12:57 PM
I think he still has top 10 PG talent even if his physical ability is now half of what it was. His head has never been all the way there though and might never be.
Allanfan20
Posts: 36008
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
1/2/2007  2:05 PM
Posted by anrst:

Gus Johnson thinks so

He's a lying to you. You heard me. Lying.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Is Marbury a top 10 point guard?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy