[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Lee and Balkman equal skinny rebounding machines!
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Swishfm3
Posts: 23357
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/28/2003
Member: #392
12/19/2006  9:51 AM
Posted by unstopaball12:

remember those were the two picks people bood during draft day

yup...because Knick fans have a high basketball IQ and know everything
AUTOADVERT
Swishfm3
Posts: 23357
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/28/2003
Member: #392
12/19/2006  9:53 AM
but to the topic.

I like the lineup OOHAH posted.

Lee at the 4
Frye at the 3
and Q playing the 2 guard.
martin
Posts: 80901
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/19/2006  10:04 AM
Posted by Swishfm3:

but to the topic.

I like the lineup OOHAH posted.

Lee at the 4
Frye at the 3
and Q playing the 2 guard.

Frye ain't guarding any 3 any time soon.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
12/19/2006  10:07 AM
Posted by Swishfm3:

but to the topic.

I like the lineup OOHAH posted.

Lee at the 4
Frye at the 3
and Q playing the 2 guard.


Actually, in my lineup, Lee is the 3. Make no mistake, we would be giving up speed, but the other team would have to deal with our height, rebounding, and shot-blocking.

Make them match up to us.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/19/2006  10:16 AM
Lee won't be able to guard guys like Paul Pierce, Carmelo Anthony, Lebron, etc... he's best suited for the 4.

ideal Knick rotation:

1st team:
C - Curry
PF - Lee
SF - Jefferies
SG - Q Rich
PG - Marbury (if he continues to play well otherwise i prefer Jamal)

2nd team:
C - Cato
PF - Frye
SF - Balkman
SG - Jamal
PG - Nate

Malik can come in if a guy gets into foul trouble or is just having an off night... Big Turd serves no function other than as comic relief in blowout wins,
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
martin
Posts: 80901
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/19/2006  10:17 AM
Posted by oohah:
Posted by Swishfm3:

but to the topic.

I like the lineup OOHAH posted.

Lee at the 4
Frye at the 3
and Q playing the 2 guard.


Actually, in my lineup, Lee is the 3. Make no mistake, we would be giving up speed, but the other team would have to deal with our height, rebounding, and shot-blocking.

Make them match up to us.

oohah

it's an OK lineup only. If you have either a 3 or 4 with an outside shot, the defense would be tested.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
12/19/2006  10:36 AM
Posted by martin:
Posted by oohah:
Posted by Swishfm3:

but to the topic.

I like the lineup OOHAH posted.

Lee at the 4
Frye at the 3
and Q playing the 2 guard.


Actually, in my lineup, Lee is the 3. Make no mistake, we would be giving up speed, but the other team would have to deal with our height, rebounding, and shot-blocking.

Make them match up to us.

oohah

it's an OK lineup only. If you have either a 3 or 4 with an outside shot, the defense would be tested.

The thing is, this team is not yet balanced right in terms of personall. That is why I keep holding out hope for Ray Allen, though now he is having some injuries that are scary.

Though the lineup of Curry, Frye, Lee, Q, and Marbury is only OK as you said, I think it puts our best players on the floor all at one time. Maybe they won't always fall behind i the first 12!

The lineup of Marbury, Francis/Crawford, and Q is unbalanced as well (Q is a shooting guard in my eyes.).

This team is unbalanced, but it can be decent, and some changes will have to be made to balance it, but it will take some more time. I think Jeffries fits in nicely.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
12/19/2006  1:45 PM
Marbury has been inconsistent largely because isiah is a foul that has brought in too many of the same players and feels he has to play everyone so he has been yanking steph in and out of the lineup and its hard to get any sort of rythm......

jamal can take a years absence if it was up to me, he shoudln't even be mentioned playing in the first unit
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
12/19/2006  1:57 PM
Posted by MS:

Marbury has been inconsistent largely because isiah is a foul that has brought in too many of the same players and feels he has to play everyone so he has been yanking steph in and out of the lineup and its hard to get any sort of rythm......

jamal can take a years absence if it was up to me, he shoudln't even be mentioned playing in the first unit

exactly just look at how well Marbury is playing without francis and nate! too bad we'll go back to the 19 guard rotation once everyone comes back
K22
Posts: 25143
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/18/2006
Member: #1182
USA
12/19/2006  2:00 PM
Posted by MS:

Marbury has been inconsistent largely because isiah is a foul that has brought in too many of the same players and feels he has to play everyone so he has been yanking steph in and out of the lineup and its hard to get any sort of rythm......

Freudian slip? :)
-- the preceding post was brought to you by the letter K and the number 22.
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
Lee and Balkman equal skinny rebounding machines!
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy