Posted by PresIke:
So because Isiah dissed Fratello after giving him Mike impression he was hired, and was not this means that Isiah told Brown he would move players and didn't?
That is not a logically consistent argument, my friend, and frankly I'm surprised somer here are willing to accept this as any legitimate reason to take your theory to be true.
Simply because Isiah might have misled or lied (to use the term you might prefer) to Fratello about coaching the team does not mean that Isiah told Brown he would cut players and didn't. The only plausible reason that works would be if you already belief that Isiah did what you say, and are just looking for something that sounds like it might support it. Otherwise, this possible Fratello thing in no way can be cunstrued as evidence.
Your argument possesses about the same logical consistency as some of the 9-11 conspirasy theories (some of which may be true, but most people, or none of us REALLY know), like the one that says that there is NO possible way that the WTC could have fallen the way it did without explosives detonated in the building. There is no way to prove this true because the evidence is not there, so the "conspirasy theorist" has the convenience of having no one who can refute the claim either. But the theorist has all of the right to claim that this is what happened, usually becaue they already believe that this is what HAD to have happened our of ones own view of things.
pres, I agree the fratello situation tells us little of isiah's agreement with brown, but go to wfan's website and see if you can find mike francesa's interview of isiah (december '05), and you will hear isiah himself say things like 'it's the players job to conform to the coach, and if they don't, or can't, they will be moved", and "if it comes down to a choice between some players or the coach, we're siding with the coach, we're rolling with the coach."
it was the very same interview in which isiah told us our core was eddy, frye and LB.
12/4/2006 11:35 PM