Brevin Knight is a much more complete player than Nate is right now... for all the groaning & whining about needing a "head" out on the floor who knows how to lead, play defense & be an orchestrator on this board, it's surprising to me how you could be against a trade to get us a player who fits that description.

yes, Brevin Knight's older, but as of now, he's a better player than Nate... i love Nate & the energy he plays with, but if you're looking to get a true PG to help guys like Curry, D Lee, Frye, Q & Crawford be better players themselves, then Brevin Knight makes a ton of sense for this franchise.

it's too bad you can't argue a point without throwing insults or seeing the big picture of how a trade could actually help a team.

Talk about "the big picture" you want to trade a young guy for 1-2 yr loan of a player and I'm looking at the next 7-10yrs. How did the Mo cheeks-Rod Srickland trade work out?