Posted by bobs3304:
On a side note, this is why you NEVER build a team around a PG. Good PGs are the most abundant resource in the league. Star big men are the least, and most valuable to a team.
Depends what you mean by "good PG".
Maybe what you mean is....never build around Stephon Marbury?
(ie: Payton, Kidd, Robertson, Stockton, West, Cousy, Magic, Nash, etc, etc.)
Marbury was brought in. On a team with Houston, Van Horn, Mutombo, Kurt Thomas, and a solid bench, not bad...
Then we trade away a lot of that strength and built an undertalented running team around Marbury. This flunked badly. Phoenix didn't *build* around Nash, they built around Amare and Marion, and brought in Nash to compliment those players. That's the difference. Same with Kidd. He was (a star in his own right) brought in to help compliment the young talented core they had (Martin, Van Horn, Kittles).
Having a top PG is great, but you couldn't put any PG on a team that had Nazr, KT, TT and Craw as your starters, with an, honestly, awful bench, and expect to be a good team. That's one of the reasons why Isiah's GMing was just so bad. You need that big man and another very good player, then bring in Marbury. Don't tear apart the team to build it around Marbury, because he's not good enough to get you there.
Either way, Cancerbury is definitely the wrong fit, and I totally agree with any views that state this. He needs to go, but even if Marbury succeeded in NY, Isiah's plan was a failure from the getgo.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.