[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

UK Post Analysis: Generally Negative or Positive?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Panos
Posts: 30693
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
11/19/2006  9:52 AM
Posted by islesfan:

Just wondering but what would be the point to all this?

The point is that this is just an exploratory stage.
It gives the site "Patriot Act" powers allowing those in charge (the homers)
the ability to monitor the activity of the enemies of the state (the haters).
The next step will be to round up the perpetrators and ship them off to Guantanamo Bay
as enemy combatants silencing them indefinitely,
or until the supreme court (Martin, Andrew) can deem this unconstitutional.
AUTOADVERT
PresIke
Posts: 27673
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
11/19/2006  10:17 AM
Once again the "realists" showing their obnoxious side. I find it interesting that some of you claim to know what the agenda is or try to use such a question as a means for propogating your own point of view.

Anyway, it ain't that big of a deal, but was merely a question asked in light of the previous question that had been raised about activity after a loss. Why that requires some of you to act like 12 year olds is beyond me, and I certainly hope you don't behave that way with people in person.

The sound byte responses, which pretty much lack any substance, and assert certaintly about what they know, are pretty typical of EXACTLY what's behind the questions I've been asking, which is about what's behind the "rants" about this team and others who make any attempts to even point out any obvious positive.

Personally, I am critical of this team, but just not in the manner in which some here are, and I prefer to support them generally. That doesn't jibe with the "usual suspects" so they inisist on labeling and attacking those who don't fall in line with their view. I don't have a problem with being critical of the Knicks, but that doesn't mean that I have to shut up and let the over-the-top critics who resort to demenaing and childish criticisms of the Knicks and some fans to dominate the conversation here.

I was merely curious about checking with some level of objectivity who is the actual dominate voice, rather than what we all see from our own biased perspectives. Too bad that question had to turn into an opportunity for the so-called "realists" to make it into I'm being stupid for asking such a question, and use my question as a means of humor.

So thank you all who contributed to showing how certain individuals here can't resist but show their true colors when it comes to dealing with people who don't agree with you.

It is also unfortunate that those that keep trying to pin me as a "kool aid" drinker obviously don't have much insight into other points of view. I'd love to have a decent conversation with some kind of attempt at understanding, but since I have yet to see that kind of concession from those who are so anti-Isiah, anti-fill in the blank, when it comes to the Knicks, the misunderstanding and personal attacks appear to not be ending anytime soon. Hopefully, I'm wrong.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
martin
Posts: 80913
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/19/2006  10:20 AM
Posted by PresIke:

Once again the "realists" showing their obnoxious side. I find it interesting that some of you claim to know what the agenda is or try to use such a question as a means for propogating your own point of view.

Anyway, it ain't that big of a deal, but was merely a question asked in light of the previous question that had been raised about activity after a loss. Why that requires some of you to act like 12 year olds is beyond me, and I certainly hope you don't behave that way with people in person.

The sound byte responses, which pretty much lack any substance, and assert certaintly about what they know, are pretty typical of EXACTLY what's behind the questions I've been asking, which is about what's behind the "rants" about this team and others who make any attempts to even point out any obvious positive.

Personally, I am critical of this team, but just not in the manner in which some here are, and I prefer to support them generally. That doesn't jibe with the "usual suspects" so they inisist on labeling and attacking those who don't fall in line with their view. I don't have a problem with being critical of the Knicks, but that doesn't mean that I have to shut up and let the over-the-top critics who resort to demenaing and childish criticisms of the Knicks and some fans to dominate the conversation here.

I was merely curious about checking with some level of objectivity who is the actual dominate voice, rather than what we all see from our own biased perspectives. Too bad that question had to turn into an opportunity for the so-called "realists" to make it into I'm being stupid for asking such a question, and use my question as a means of humor.

So thank you all who contributed to showing how certain individuals here can't resist but show their true colors when it comes to dealing with people who don't agree with you.

It is also unfortunate that those that keep trying to pin me as a "kool aid" drinker obviously don't have much insight into other points of view. I'd love to have a decent conversation with some kind of attempt at understanding, but since I have yet to see that kind of concession from those who are so anti-Isiah, anti-fill in the blank, when it comes to the Knicks, the misunderstanding and personal attacks appear to not be ending anytime soon. Hopefully, I'm wrong.

you must be a liberal who hates our troops.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
jaydh
Posts: 23174
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/16/2001
Member: #96
11/19/2006  10:41 AM
one thing is for sure, last season during the 6game win streak islesfan was no where in sight.
babyKnicks
Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191
USA
11/19/2006  10:49 AM
Posted by jaydh:

one thing is for sure, last season during the 6game win streak islesfan was no where in sight.

I remember that. He was celebrating.
Let's go Knicks. That's amare
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
11/19/2006  11:15 AM
Posted by martin:
Posted by PresIke:

Once again the "realists" showing their obnoxious side. I find it interesting that some of you claim to know what the agenda is or try to use such a question as a means for propogating your own point of view.

Anyway, it ain't that big of a deal, but was merely a question asked in light of the previous question that had been raised about activity after a loss. Why that requires some of you to act like 12 year olds is beyond me, and I certainly hope you don't behave that way with people in person.

The sound byte responses, which pretty much lack any substance, and assert certaintly about what they know, are pretty typical of EXACTLY what's behind the questions I've been asking, which is about what's behind the "rants" about this team and others who make any attempts to even point out any obvious positive.

Personally, I am critical of this team, but just not in the manner in which some here are, and I prefer to support them generally. That doesn't jibe with the "usual suspects" so they inisist on labeling and attacking those who don't fall in line with their view. I don't have a problem with being critical of the Knicks, but that doesn't mean that I have to shut up and let the over-the-top critics who resort to demenaing and childish criticisms of the Knicks and some fans to dominate the conversation here.

I was merely curious about checking with some level of objectivity who is the actual dominate voice, rather than what we all see from our own biased perspectives. Too bad that question had to turn into an opportunity for the so-called "realists" to make it into I'm being stupid for asking such a question, and use my question as a means of humor.

So thank you all who contributed to showing how certain individuals here can't resist but show their true colors when it comes to dealing with people who don't agree with you.

It is also unfortunate that those that keep trying to pin me as a "kool aid" drinker obviously don't have much insight into other points of view. I'd love to have a decent conversation with some kind of attempt at understanding, but since I have yet to see that kind of concession from those who are so anti-Isiah, anti-fill in the blank, when it comes to the Knicks, the misunderstanding and personal attacks appear to not be ending anytime soon. Hopefully, I'm wrong.

you must be a liberal who hates our troops.


At least the forum admin set a good example.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
babyKnicks
Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191
USA
11/19/2006  11:25 AM
be careful...rv and others have been banned (not warned, but banned) for being backed into a corner and pointing out this same issue.

there is nothing you can do short of starting your own board.

accept or post elsewhere.

UK is for negativity and releasing anger anonymously.

that's what i gather...you want to post, you have to ignore/not respond to islesfan...he's rude and negative for a reason.

he runs the board.

[Edited by - babyknicks on 11-19-2006 11:27 AM]
Let's go Knicks. That's amare
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
11/19/2006  11:42 AM
After we've studied this extensively and we deternmine that there are more posts after a loss, what do we do next?
https:// It's not so hard.
martin
Posts: 80913
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/19/2006  11:55 AM
Posted by tomverve:
Posted by martin:
Posted by PresIke:

Once again the "realists" showing their obnoxious side. I find it interesting that some of you claim to know what the agenda is or try to use such a question as a means for propogating your own point of view.

Anyway, it ain't that big of a deal, but was merely a question asked in light of the previous question that had been raised about activity after a loss. Why that requires some of you to act like 12 year olds is beyond me, and I certainly hope you don't behave that way with people in person.

The sound byte responses, which pretty much lack any substance, and assert certaintly about what they know, are pretty typical of EXACTLY what's behind the questions I've been asking, which is about what's behind the "rants" about this team and others who make any attempts to even point out any obvious positive.

Personally, I am critical of this team, but just not in the manner in which some here are, and I prefer to support them generally. That doesn't jibe with the "usual suspects" so they inisist on labeling and attacking those who don't fall in line with their view. I don't have a problem with being critical of the Knicks, but that doesn't mean that I have to shut up and let the over-the-top critics who resort to demenaing and childish criticisms of the Knicks and some fans to dominate the conversation here.

I was merely curious about checking with some level of objectivity who is the actual dominate voice, rather than what we all see from our own biased perspectives. Too bad that question had to turn into an opportunity for the so-called "realists" to make it into I'm being stupid for asking such a question, and use my question as a means of humor.

So thank you all who contributed to showing how certain individuals here can't resist but show their true colors when it comes to dealing with people who don't agree with you.

It is also unfortunate that those that keep trying to pin me as a "kool aid" drinker obviously don't have much insight into other points of view. I'd love to have a decent conversation with some kind of attempt at understanding, but since I have yet to see that kind of concession from those who are so anti-Isiah, anti-fill in the blank, when it comes to the Knicks, the misunderstanding and personal attacks appear to not be ending anytime soon. Hopefully, I'm wrong.

you must be a liberal who hates our troops.


At least the forum admin set a good example.

I'll take you to task Tom, what's your beef?
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
11/19/2006  12:10 PM
Posted by jaydh:

one thing is for sure, last season during the 6game win streak islesfan was no where in sight.

That's a load of crap.

If anything I post less after losses. Hey, how about the Negative Police track that too?
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
11/19/2006  12:14 PM
Classic case of meta-discussion.
Then there is meta-discussion: second-order discussion, discussion about the discussion or the participants or the forum instead of discussion about an on-topic issue.
http://www.fitz-claridge.com/node/18

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta-discussion



[Edited by - basketballjones on 11-19-2006 12:16]
https:// It's not so hard.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
11/19/2006  12:20 PM
Posted by babyKnicks:

be careful...rv and others have been banned (not warned, but banned) for being backed into a corner and pointing out this same issue.

there is nothing you can do short of starting your own board.

accept or post elsewhere.

UK is for negativity and releasing anger anonymously.

that's what i gather...you want to post, you have to ignore/not respond to islesfan...he's rude and negative for a reason.

he runs the board.

[Edited by - babyknicks on 11-19-2006 11:27 AM]

Cool, now rvhoss is referring to himself in the 3rd person. You're such a pathetic loser.

LMAO so you admit that you were banned. So I guess another option is to come back after you've been banned under another name and then cry about how you were treated when it was your own (racist) actions that got you banned in the first place.

Do us all a favor and go start your own board. I'll even throw you a bone and sign up just so that you can ban me.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
martin
Posts: 80913
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/19/2006  12:34 PM
Posted by babyKnicks:

be careful...rv and others have been banned (not warned, but banned) for being backed into a corner and pointing out this same issue.

there is nothing you can do short of starting your own board.

accept or post elsewhere.

UK is for negativity and releasing anger anonymously.

that's what i gather...you want to post, you have to ignore/not respond to islesfan...he's rude and negative for a reason.

he runs the board.

[Edited by - babyknicks on 11-19-2006 11:27 AM]

rvhoss/babyKnicks, like this: Andrew and I are limited in our time. We have hundreds of different people who post on a DAILY basis. How do expect us to moderate each and every person out there? We ban people and also let them right back in. Most mature people know to email us if they have been banned to ask why it happened, we just don't have the time or the energy to sit there and initiate an email (lucky for us, it's the position we are in). We set up this website and moderate it for free because this is our hobby. We certainly don't complain too much when crap posters come by and make light of our hobby; we sure do try to influence the level at which we expect folks to post... can't be 100% but we try.

If you have a problem with Isles that you would want us to help out with, why not ask us? That's what most responsible people do (and have done). Also, have you asked Isles to cut it out? Tell him to move on if it bothers you so much.

Seriously, act more mature.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
11/20/2006  1:16 PM
The team is 4-7 and won 23 games last year and was under .500 the years prior to that, wouldn't it make sense that the mood of the board is generally negative? Should fans be happy with losing? Why do we all care so much what other people posts. If you disagree with a point refute it. But caring whether someone is positive or negative just reeks of low self-esteem.

Bip has spoken.
I just hope that people will like me
fishmike
Posts: 53903
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/20/2006  1:24 PM
Bip has spoken.
... and the masses shall follow
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
UK Post Analysis: Generally Negative or Positive?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy