[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

everyone give briggs a hand, kobe and bynum are going to win 3 titles together
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
nyk4ever
Posts: 41012
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
11/8/2006  12:38 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by tkf:

geez, the bynum bandwagon hopping has already begun. A lot of you talk about the knicks players crumbling under adversity, most of you are the same way. after 4 games, Bynum is a franchise talent, frye stinks, and IT has no eye for talent.... Yea we have issues, I am not jumping ship, I watched the game, I saw bynum score some easy baskets in that triangle offense, heck even walton looks great, and Odom.. wow.. so I am not going to go overboard here..


MY lord!

Sorry buddy, the Bynum bandwagon hasn't just begun, it began a loooong time ago.


the bandwagon makes it's appearance after every good game Bynum has, & is in the shop for repairs during others.

Not really TMS. You've heard people talking about Bynum since before he was drafted. Look at his stats this year, they are STUD stats for a 19yr old. If you want Briggs to make a thread about every single game he plays, I'm sure he would, I'll be glad to post in the same thread as well.

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 11-08-2006 12:39 PM]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
AUTOADVERT
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
11/8/2006  12:42 PM
Bynum has looked good, but KG is washed up.
¿ △ ?
rain
Posts: 20762
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/13/2002
Member: #353
USA
11/8/2006  1:06 PM
I'll give props.. it was a good call by Briggs. I didn't think Bynum would produce this quickly. We'll see over the long haul how he'll develop his offensive game.. but right now, he's looking like a very shrewd selection.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
11/8/2006  1:06 PM
Gotta give Briggs credit. I thought he'd be very good but he's definitely progressed quickly and is a potential franchise talent.

Channing Frye was the safe pick and Isiah took it. It was another "win now" type move that lacked any foresight. Frye had a very limited ceiling especially compared to Bynum.

If we draft Bynum, we don't sign James and we don't make the Curry trade. Maybe we don't stink as much as we did last year and get the #2 pick but we're probably lottery bound so maybe we get Brandon Roy with last year's #1 pick.

What kind of potential do you think this team would have?

C Andrew Bynum
PF David Lee
SF Brandon Roy (moving to SG after Starbury leaves)
SG Stephon Marbury
PG Marcus Williams

And having our #1 pick this year in what's supposed to be a great draft.

I hate Isiah.

[Edited by - islesfan on 11-08-2006 1:08 PM]
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/8/2006  1:34 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by tkf:

geez, the bynum bandwagon hopping has already begun. A lot of you talk about the knicks players crumbling under adversity, most of you are the same way. after 4 games, Bynum is a franchise talent, frye stinks, and IT has no eye for talent.... Yea we have issues, I am not jumping ship, I watched the game, I saw bynum score some easy baskets in that triangle offense, heck even walton looks great, and Odom.. wow.. so I am not going to go overboard here..


MY lord!

Sorry buddy, the Bynum bandwagon hasn't just begun, it began a loooong time ago.


the bandwagon makes it's appearance after every good game Bynum has, & is in the shop for repairs during others.

Not really TMS. You've heard people talking about Bynum since before he was drafted. Look at his stats this year, they are STUD stats for a 19yr old. If you want Briggs to make a thread about every single game he plays, I'm sure he would, I'll be glad to post in the same thread as well.

we're 5 games into the season... Bynum's had 2 good games & 3 that were average to subpar... he looks good for a 19 yo, i'll give u that... i do like his passing ability for a bigman... as far as being a consistent scorer in the low post, i'll have to see him do it on a much more consistent basis before i go crazy on the kid... you think Bynum's #'s look great for a 2nd year player out of HS, go check out some of #'s Eddy Curry put up during his 2nd season in the NBA:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/c/curryed01_2003.html
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38583
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
11/8/2006  1:56 PM
woulda, coulda, shoulda...Can we please not harp on what could have happened if we did this or that? I am all about what we have now. We have a young core. I say we only need to do 1 move..

Trade Marbury. Maybe for the Lakers since everyone is claiming they need a PG. We can send Blubbury and Frye for Odom, Kwame and a future 1st rounder.

Lakers can have Bynum, Frye, Radmanovic, Blubbury and oh yeah...Kobe

we then start the following...

PG-Francis
SG-Q Rich
SF-Odom
PF-Lee
C-Curry

That would be a good defensive team at the 2,3 and 4 spot. We can then sit Lee and put JJ2 in when he comes back.

Bench
Nate
Mardy
Balkman
Cato
Kwame
Malik

I would be happy with this group...but I would be happy with any FUbury less roster.
martin
Posts: 80930
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/8/2006  2:00 PM
Posted by NYKBocker:

woulda, coulda, shoulda...Can we please not harp on what could have happened if we did this or that? I am all about what we have now. We have a young core. I say we only need to do 1 move..

Trade Marbury. Maybe for the Lakers since everyone is claiming they need a PG. We can send Blubbury and Frye for Odom, Kwame and a future 1st rounder.

Lakers can have Bynum, Frye, Radmanovic, Blubbury and oh yeah...Kobe

we then start the following...

PG-Francis
SG-Q Rich
SF-Odom
PF-Lee
C-Curry

That would be a good defensive team at the 2,3 and 4 spot. We can then sit Lee and put JJ2 in when he comes back.

Bench
Nate
Mardy
Balkman
Cato
Kwame
Malik

I would be happy with this group...but I would be happy with any FUbury less roster.

Odom is good. Marbury sucks. Why do this deal if you are the Lakers?
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
11/8/2006  2:24 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by buddapaw:


This applys to everyone except BRIGGS

Half the board wanted Andrew Bynum. Isiah Wanted Channing Frye

Agreed. The only bandwagon hopping is some of the Frye supporters now realizing Bynum is superior. However, a good amount liked Bynum; Briggs was not the only one.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38583
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
11/8/2006  10:31 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by NYKBocker:

woulda, coulda, shoulda...Can we please not harp on what could have happened if we did this or that? I am all about what we have now. We have a young core. I say we only need to do 1 move..

Trade Marbury. Maybe for the Lakers since everyone is claiming they need a PG. We can send Blubbury and Frye for Odom, Kwame and a future 1st rounder.

Lakers can have Bynum, Frye, Radmanovic, Blubbury and oh yeah...Kobe

we then start the following...

PG-Francis
SG-Q Rich
SF-Odom
PF-Lee
C-Curry

That would be a good defensive team at the 2,3 and 4 spot. We can then sit Lee and put JJ2 in when he comes back.

Bench
Nate
Mardy
Balkman
Cato
Kwame
Malik

I would be happy with this group...but I would be happy with any FUbury less roster.

Odom is good. Marbury sucks. Why do this deal if you are the Lakers?


I am banking on that Frye's value will be enough to make this trade. A Bynum and Frye frontcourt sounds very good.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
11/8/2006  10:44 PM
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by martin:
Posted by NYKBocker:

woulda, coulda, shoulda...Can we please not harp on what could have happened if we did this or that? I am all about what we have now. We have a young core. I say we only need to do 1 move..

Trade Marbury. Maybe for the Lakers since everyone is claiming they need a PG. We can send Blubbury and Frye for Odom, Kwame and a future 1st rounder.

Lakers can have Bynum, Frye, Radmanovic, Blubbury and oh yeah...Kobe

we then start the following...

PG-Francis
SG-Q Rich
SF-Odom
PF-Lee
C-Curry

That would be a good defensive team at the 2,3 and 4 spot. We can then sit Lee and put JJ2 in when he comes back.

Bench
Nate
Mardy
Balkman
Cato
Kwame
Malik

I would be happy with this group...but I would be happy with any FUbury less roster.

Odom is good. Marbury sucks. Why do this deal if you are the Lakers?


I am banking on that Frye's value will be enough to make this trade. A Bynum and Frye frontcourt sounds very good.

I don't know if people realize this - but the lakers have league pass. they know Frye and Marbury suck.
¿ △ ?
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
everyone give briggs a hand, kobe and bynum are going to win 3 titles together
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy