[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Knicks-Brown Dispute Resolved
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 2 of 5 ‹ Previous 1  2  3  4 Next ›Last »
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
10/31/2006  12:13 AM
Vecsey, Vecsey, Vecsey, Vescey, Vescey!!!!!!!!!
I'll never trust this' team again.
AUTOADVERT
K22
Posts: 25143
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/18/2006
Member: #1182
USA
10/31/2006  12:14 AM
Who cares how much money the old man got? The point is IT'S FINALLY OVER. Time to move on to things that matter again.
-- the preceding post was brought to you by the letter K and the number 22.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41012
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
10/31/2006  12:14 AM
Posted by K22:

Who cares how much money the old man got? The point is IT'S FINALLY OVER. Time to move on to things that matter again.

Yup, exactly.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081
10/31/2006  12:16 AM
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by 4949:
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by Rich:

This thread is becoming a Rorschach Test.

bingo.

My take is that Larry was forced to give back every penny the Knicks ever paid him. With interest.

Then why is it a private matter. I think Brown gets most of the money, but the Knicks get to pay in small amounts over a number of years. I sure would hate to be an insurance company, putting a bid in for the Knicks, a high, high risk team. I wouldn't be able to push my premium high enough to make any profit.

it's a private matter because they don't want to set a precedent either way. don't worry I'm sure someone like vecsey will get the scoop.

The precedent was already set in Detroit where LB got half of what was owed to him on the three years left on his contract...
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
10/31/2006  12:17 AM
Posted by holfresh:
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by 4949:
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by Rich:

This thread is becoming a Rorschach Test.

bingo.

My take is that Larry was forced to give back every penny the Knicks ever paid him. With interest.

Then why is it a private matter. I think Brown gets most of the money, but the Knicks get to pay in small amounts over a number of years. I sure would hate to be an insurance company, putting a bid in for the Knicks, a high, high risk team. I wouldn't be able to push my premium high enough to make any profit.

it's a private matter because they don't want to set a precedent either way. don't worry I'm sure someone like vecsey will get the scoop.

The precedent was already set in Detroit where LB got half of what was owed to him on the three years left on his contract...

he agreed for a 1/2 payment buyout b/c he had a $50 mil check waiting a 90 minute flight away...
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
10/31/2006  12:20 AM
I think LB got a kick in the nuts.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
10/31/2006  12:22 AM
Posted by holfresh:
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by 4949:
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by Rich:

This thread is becoming a Rorschach Test.

bingo.

My take is that Larry was forced to give back every penny the Knicks ever paid him. With interest.

Then why is it a private matter. I think Brown gets most of the money, but the Knicks get to pay in small amounts over a number of years. I sure would hate to be an insurance company, putting a bid in for the Knicks, a high, high risk team. I wouldn't be able to push my premium high enough to make any profit.

it's a private matter because they don't want to set a precedent either way. don't worry I'm sure someone like vecsey will get the scoop.

The precedent was already set in Detroit where LB got half of what was owed to him on the three years left on his contract...

that situation was much different and he agreed to it. this situation was embarassing to the league and the knicks. brown's camp will spin it like they won and camp cablevision will spin it like they won.
¿ △ ?
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081
10/31/2006  12:23 AM
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by holfresh:
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by 4949:
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by Rich:

This thread is becoming a Rorschach Test.

bingo.

My take is that Larry was forced to give back every penny the Knicks ever paid him. With interest.

Then why is it a private matter. I think Brown gets most of the money, but the Knicks get to pay in small amounts over a number of years. I sure would hate to be an insurance company, putting a bid in for the Knicks, a high, high risk team. I wouldn't be able to push my premium high enough to make any profit.

it's a private matter because they don't want to set a precedent either way. don't worry I'm sure someone like vecsey will get the scoop.

The precedent was already set in Detroit where LB got half of what was owed to him on the three years left on his contract...

that situation was much different and he agreed to it. this situation was embarassing to the league and the knicks. brown's camp will spin it like they won and camp cablevision will spin it like they won.

Sounds just like the last situation to me...
nyk4ever
Posts: 41012
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
10/31/2006  12:24 AM
Posted by holfresh:


Sounds just like the last situation to me...


Thats because your not capable of thinking otherwise.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
tapseer
Posts: 20204
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/13/2004
Member: #698
10/31/2006  12:25 AM
I hope he doesn't get a cent...He deserves $40 mil??? For what??? IF IT gets at least 40 wins and the playoffs, then he should get $80 mil!I'm telling you, some of you guys are a joke. LB deserves his money because he sabataged the team? He gets the bulk of the money for 23 wins? ROFLMAO. He definitely didn't try to win with them and if Marbury is the root of all evil here, then why the Knicks record without wasn't 22-0 when he wasn't playing? Marbury missed 22 games and the record was 5-17. They didn't even win half the games he was out. So all that Marbury hating to me goes out the window...
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081
10/31/2006  12:25 AM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by holfresh:


Sounds just like the last situation to me...


Thats because your not capable of thinking otherwise.

right on cue...ur a loser
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
10/31/2006  12:28 AM
Posted by K22:

Who cares how much money the old man got? The point is IT'S FINALLY OVER. Time to move on to things that matter again.

Not so fast my friend. The point is, if Brown gets most of his money, it makes Dol look stupid, which is what we want. But if Brown gets close to nothing, then Dol wins then we all lose.
I'll never trust this' team again.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
10/31/2006  12:30 AM
Posted by holfresh:


Sounds just like the last situation to me...

Instead of telling us what you hoped would be the case, can you tell us what you think logically happened?
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
10/31/2006  12:30 AM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by holfresh:


Sounds just like the last situation to me...


Thats because your not capable of thinking otherwise.

Oh man!
I'll never trust this' team again.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
10/31/2006  12:31 AM
Posted by tapseer:

I hope he doesn't get a cent...He deserves $40 mil??? For what??? IF IT gets at least 40 wins and the playoffs, then he should get $80 mil!I'm telling you, some of you guys are a joke. LB deserves his money because he sabataged the team? He gets the bulk of the money for 23 wins? ROFLMAO. He definitely didn't try to win with them and if Marbury is the root of all evil here, then why the Knicks record without wasn't 22-0 when he wasn't playing? Marbury missed 22 games and the record was 5-17. They didn't even win half the games he was out. So all that Marbury hating to me goes out the window...

A contract is a contract. They gotta pay!
I'll never trust this' team again.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
10/31/2006  12:32 AM
well unless somebody talks, we're never going to know.

so until then...

TURN.

THE.

PAGE.
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081
10/31/2006  12:35 AM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by holfresh:


Sounds just like the last situation to me...

Instead of telling us what you hoped would be the case, can you tell us what you think logically happened?

Well my friend, in case you missed my last post, Larry was paid half of what he was owed in his last buyout agreement with the Pistons...So it would make sense to me that he agreed to a similar percentage given the similar circumstances....If you need any other clarification of post that I already written, please let me know...
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
10/31/2006  12:36 AM
Posted by djsunyc:

well unless somebody talks, we're never going to know.

so until then...

TURN.

THE.

PAGE.

I can't. I need to know and I want to know right' now!
I'll never trust this' team again.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
10/31/2006  12:37 AM
and if the knicks were going to win...this wasn't going to be swept under the rug.

30 minute oprah special had dolan and isiah blame lb for everything and said they had a stack of papers "that high" with evidence to fire with "just cause". so if they were going to win...then a settlement wouldn't have been agreed to.

stern DID NOT want to make a ruling here as it would set a precedent.

so logical thinking says he told dolan to pay up, sweep it under the rug, and move on.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
10/31/2006  12:42 AM
Posted by djsunyc:

and if the knicks were going to win...this wasn't going to be swept under the rug.

30 minute oprah special had dolan and isiah blame lb for everything and said they had a stack of papers "that high" with evidence to fire with "just cause". so if they were going to win...then a settlement wouldn't have been agreed to.

stern DID NOT want to make a ruling here as it would set a precedent.

so logical thinking says he told dolan to pay up, sweep it under the rug, and move on.

Here's a question no one asks: 'Why didn't Dolan or Zeke fire Brown before the season ended, if they planned to do it anyway, as some are saying'.? I mean just how bad did things have to get, to finally get rid of him? Why didn't they?
I'll never trust this' team again.
Page 2 of 5 ‹ Previous 1  2  3  4 Next ›Last »
« Reply To Topic
Knicks-Brown Dispute Resolved
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy