[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Pete Vescey says in shape Curry will keep the Knicks out of the lottery
Author Thread
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
10/1/2006  12:20 PM
When it comes to players with the kind of ability, quickness and size that Curry has it is not an uncommon thing for them to somewhat dominate the ball. It doesn't mean that they hog the ball, or force action, but the focus is generally around that player.

The problem with the Ewing era was that he never had anyone that could be relied upon on a high enough level to help with scoring, and then I believe that the offense became so focused on Ewing that he gradually turned into his own version of the "black hole" offense, making it difficult for him later in his career to demphasize his game.

The problem with Curry is that he struggled in the discipline department. Is that a sign of youth and inexperience or a problem that never goes away? If you have hope for the Knicks you are probably more seeded in the former and if you think the team will be an absolute joke for a long time, you reside in the latter of the two categories.

Of course, the other major problems are that the team is SERIOUSLY lacking in the defense department, shot blocking, outside shooting and roster redundancy/lack of balance.

We'll just have to see what happens.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
AUTOADVERT
SugarRayRichardson
Posts: 21557
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/28/2006
Member: #1169

10/1/2006  12:22 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by SugarRayRichardson:
Posted by Bippity10:

I think Curry is the key to our future and any semblance of a title run over the next 10 years. Isn't that why we traded two first rounders for him? Is this news?

We traded 2 first rounders for Marbs not Curry. For Curry we traded 1 first rounder and an OPTION to SWAP first rounds picks. Why do the media and fans always turn that option to swap picks in to us trading the 2007 pick outright?

and if the Knicks are terrible again this season (Which they very well could) and if the Bulls are very good (Which they probably will be) then the Knicks give up a potential superstar in the making like Greg Oden and Noah.


If if and if.

If the Knicks have the worst record in the league then:

1) At best the Bulls would still only have a 25% chance at the #1 pick
2) If Oden comes out (He is injured now)
3) If Oden becomes a superstar. His HS stats are no greater than many hs players including Curry
4) The Knicks would still get the Bulls pick. It is a option to swap. Not a outright trade.
I LOVED how Curry just exploded in the 4th, speaking as a fan of the Raptors, Curry looked well, scary I think is the word. Or Shaq-like Curry: 19.1ppg-7.3rpg-58%fg
Allanfan20
Posts: 36008
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
10/1/2006  12:26 PM
Damn man, you are drinking kool aid today. Pass me some of that stuff.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
10/1/2006  12:29 PM
The only way the Bulls get Oden is if David Stern rules in arbitration that Brown should never have been fired and he has to coach the team for the remainder of his contract.

Otherwise, we'll be fine.
¿ △ ?
TheGame
Posts: 26656
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
10/1/2006  12:39 PM
In talking about that potential first round swap, making the playoffs is not only important to the development of the players, but also would ensure that we don't give Chicago another lottery pick. IMO it would be very demoralizing for this franchise to send Chicago another lottery pick while we once again pick in the 20s. I still think Curry has the potential to be worth what we gave up, but the morale of the fans and the franchise as a wholly would really be diminished if we ended up giving Chicago a pick that turned into Oden or Noah. I am hoping that this can be a year where the team does something positive and starts to feel good about itself. Making the playoffs would go a long way to accomplishing that.
Trust the Process
SugarRayRichardson
Posts: 21557
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/28/2006
Member: #1169

10/1/2006  12:44 PM
Posted by TheGame:

In talking about that potential first round swap, making the playoffs is not only important to the development of the players, but also would ensure that we don't give Chicago another lottery pick. IMO it would be very demoralizing for this franchise to send Chicago another lottery pick while we once again pick in the 20s. I still think Curry has the potential to be worth what we gave up, but the morale of the fans and the franchise as a wholly would really be diminished if we ended up giving Chicago a pick that turned into Oden or Noah. I am hoping that this can be a year where the team does something positive and starts to feel good about itself. Making the playoffs would go a long way to accomplishing that.

I understand your point but the odds of the Bulls getting Oden are very low. Would you wnat to bet on them.
1) At best they have a 25% chance. Thats if we end up with the worst record in the nba (unlikely) and if Oden comes out (at best a 50% chance. He is injured now)
Realistically the Bulls chance at Oden is less than 7%-10%
I LOVED how Curry just exploded in the 4th, speaking as a fan of the Raptors, Curry looked well, scary I think is the word. Or Shaq-like Curry: 19.1ppg-7.3rpg-58%fg
Allanfan20
Posts: 36008
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
10/1/2006  12:46 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

The only way the Bulls get Oden is if David Stern rules in arbitration that Brown should never have been fired and he has to coach the team for the remainder of his contract.

Otherwise, we'll be fine.

Dude, really, it's getting old...
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

10/1/2006  2:10 PM
Posted by oohah:
Posted by BlueSeats:
Posted by oohah:
You don't try to make apple pie until you've cut the worms out of the apples first.

Half the team was worms? Why did he ask for more worms (Rose and Francis.)?

can you just bookmark our arguments? we've been over this sooo many times.



The question still has not been answered to my satisfaction.


Well I really don't consider it my job to satisfy you, but I will remind folks that joe recently posted numerous articles that show Isiah was rumored to be chasing Jalen for years. I suspect for his "valuable expiring contract", much like he went for Mo.

And I showed that pretty much every rumor of francis coming here included either a PG or defensive bigman that Brown wanted, and that Isiah wanted Francis as an "asset" for a big trade, like for JO or KG. I suspect Brown viewed Francis as a 6 month rental that would also bring along a defender or playmaker of his liking.

In no way do I see Brown wanting these guys as long term solutions. They were intended to be a means to an end, and that end was one Isiah did not provide. Like Mo, they were merely to be "meat"

Until Dolan pinched Isiah's purse strings anyway.

[Edited by - BlueSeats on 10-01-2006 2:20 PM]
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
10/1/2006  2:20 PM
allanfan...I have to beg to differ...it's not getting close to old. what's getting old is the constant negativity in the knicks. i'm reading these posts seriosly wondering if most of you guys are knick fans.

we release a play that has no value...100 posts on how stupid the gm is.

peter vescey finally has something positive to say about the knics, tumbleweeds.

i'm trying to figure out what it will take for some of you to get off of management and start talking about the knicks as a team.

it's quotes like these that are funny and remind me that the haters are just hatin.

but the only way for the bulls to get oden is if larry brown comes back to coach...as he would rather lose his way than win any other way.

curry comes back in shape, 50 wins.

keep the happiness, positivity and kool aid flowing fellas...atleast until martin snuffs it out again (just jokes martin, no need to get your panties in a bunch over this statement).

go knicks.

can you feel the difference?
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by crzymdups:

The only way the Bulls get Oden is if David Stern rules in arbitration that Brown should never have been fired and he has to coach the team for the remainder of his contract.

Otherwise, we'll be fine.

Dude, really, it's getting old...

all kool aid all the time.
wsdm
Posts: 20803
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/16/2006
Member: #1167

10/1/2006  2:29 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

The only way the Bulls get Oden is if David Stern rules in arbitration that Brown should never have been fired and he has to coach the team for the remainder of his contract.

Otherwise, we'll be fine.

Big LOL!
www.selltheknicks.com----No more DOLANOMICS!
Allanfan20
Posts: 36008
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
10/1/2006  2:30 PM
allanfan...I have to beg to differ...it's not getting close to old. what's getting old is the constant negativity in the knicks. i'm reading these posts seriosly wondering if most of you guys are knick fans.

What's getting old is that Brown is 4 months gone and people have this Larry Brown fixation. I wonder if Freud had a theory on that one. He's gone. The only people that should even be mentioning him are Dolan and Isiah to their lawyers and the judge. Nobody should be worried about him anymore. He's gone.

As for Curry, if he comes into camp in great shape, that's the first big step. But in order for him to knock us into the 50 win category, he has to learn how to play a game called basketball.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Nalod
Posts: 72372
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
10/1/2006  2:30 PM
Posted by oohah:

I've been saying this since last december:
That's what a team gets when the guy in charge of the sideline cares more about losing his way than winning any other way. Early into the Knicks' first extended road trip, it became transparent Brown, first and foremost, was intent on domesticating the untamable Stephon Marbury, the theory being Thomas' many other unadoptable pets would then fall into line.

oohah


Its not like the team was a winner before Larry got the gig?

Even Larry said it was going to be rough going the first half of the year.

Nobody was happy about last year. Nobody.

Didn't Larry say last year that Eddy was the franchise player? And wasn't that supposed to be a diss on Starbury?

And yes, Eddy is why we sold our soul to the Bulls.

I for one am on record that who ever the bulls picks does not matter. What matters is what Eddy does!

I like Obnoxious Pete. Always have. Don't agree with it all, but he got a job to do. This team can do very very well if our backcourt knows when to feed his front court and when to take charge.

That is the key. Sneakers or not, thats the gig.
wsdm
Posts: 20803
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/16/2006
Member: #1167

10/1/2006  2:36 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:
allanfan...I have to beg to differ...it's not getting close to old. what's getting old is the constant negativity in the knicks. i'm reading these posts seriosly wondering if most of you guys are knick fans.

What's getting old is that Brown is 4 months gone and people have this Larry Brown fixation. I wonder if Freud had a theory on that one. He's gone. The only people that should even be mentioning him are Dolan and Isiah to their lawyers and the judge. Nobody should be worried about him anymore. He's gone.
Lighten up! Brown did a crappy job and people are just getting a little laugh out of it. Where's the harm?

www.selltheknicks.com----No more DOLANOMICS!
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
10/1/2006  3:01 PM
Posted by wsdm:
Posted by Allanfan20:
allanfan...I have to beg to differ...it's not getting close to old. what's getting old is the constant negativity in the knicks. i'm reading these posts seriosly wondering if most of you guys are knick fans.

What's getting old is that Brown is 4 months gone and people have this Larry Brown fixation. I wonder if Freud had a theory on that one. He's gone. The only people that should even be mentioning him are Dolan and Isiah to their lawyers and the judge. Nobody should be worried about him anymore. He's gone.
Lighten up! Brown did a crappy job and people are just getting a little laugh out of it. Where's the harm?


but laughing at Isiah is more fun
Masterplan
Posts: 21571
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2002
Member: #362
10/1/2006  3:08 PM
i'm trying to figure out what it will take for some of you to get off of management and start talking about the knicks as a team.

probably, for the season to start.
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
10/1/2006  3:08 PM
are they really laughing at isiah, or hatin? :)
all kool aid all the time.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
10/1/2006  3:24 PM
Well I really don't consider it my job to satisfy you, but I will remind folks that joe recently posted numerous articles that show Isiah was rumored to be chasing Jalen for years. I suspect for his "valuable expiring contract", much like he went for Mo.

I did not say it was your job blue. It's just something that does not make sense and the answer is always contradictory.

Isiah did not have to chase Jalen for years. He had many opportunities to land him, and he turned down Rose many times. Until Brown specifically requested him.
And I showed that pretty much every rumor of francis coming here included either a PG or defensive bigman that Brown wanted, and that Isiah wanted Francis as an "asset" for a big trade, like for JO or KG. I suspect Brown viewed Francis as a 6 month rental that would also bring along a defender or playmaker of his liking.

In no way do I see Brown wanting these guys as long term solutions. They were intended to be a means to an end, and that end was one Isiah did not provide. Like Mo, they were merely to be "meat"

Blue, the point is, if he is trying to get rid of "worms" (Malcontents, me-first players etc.), then it does not matter if he viewed Francis as a 6 month rental (But rarely played him in the meantime) or Rose as a rental, its adding more worms when the name of the game is getting rid of them.

It does not make sense. If Brown requested them you cannot just lay that at Isiah's feet; as you have said many times, it only makes sense to let Brown shop for the players he wanted. Francis and Rose are two of his purchases.

oohah



[Edited by - oohah on 01-10-2006 3:25 PM]
Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060

10/1/2006  4:03 PM
I posted direct quotes from Brown pretty much stating that he wanted Francis and Rose. I tried to find the page here but its been deleted. I'll try and find it though.
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

10/1/2006  4:45 PM
Posted by oohah:
Well I really don't consider it my job to satisfy you, but I will remind folks that joe recently posted numerous articles that show Isiah was rumored to be chasing Jalen for years. I suspect for his "valuable expiring contract", much like he went for Mo.

I did not say it was your job blue. It's just something that does not make sense and the answer is always contradictory.

Isiah did not have to chase Jalen for years. He had many opportunities to land him, and he turned down Rose many times. Until Brown specifically requested him.

You lay this out like it's common knowledge, but it reads like inside info to me. In truth it's pure conjecture.

And what is contradictory? The most logical reason that Jalen came when he did is the trade deadline the year prior to an expring contract actually expiring is the best economic time to make the trade. That way you pay the least for it. One could argue that the summer is really the pinnacle, but you'd need to be under the cap or have a trade exception to offer for that to work. neither applies to us.

years prior isiah was trying to swing Donyell Marshall and others in the deal, which probably would have meant saddling with one of our not so good contracts. This may have been the first year Isiah was willing to trade straight up for Jalen and a pick.
And I showed that pretty much every rumor of francis coming here included either a PG or defensive bigman that Brown wanted, and that Isiah wanted Francis as an "asset" for a big trade, like for JO or KG. I suspect Brown viewed Francis as a 6 month rental that would also bring along a defender or playmaker of his liking.

In no way do I see Brown wanting these guys as long term solutions. They were intended to be a means to an end, and that end was one Isiah did not provide. Like Mo, they were merely to be "meat"

Blue, the point is, if he is trying to get rid of "worms" (Malcontents, me-first players etc.), then it does not matter if he viewed Francis as a 6 month rental (But rarely played him in the meantime) or Rose as a rental, its adding more worms when the name of the game is getting rid of them.

It does not make sense. If Brown requested them you cannot just lay that at Isiah's feet; as you have said many times, it only makes sense to let Brown shop for the players he wanted. Francis and Rose are two of his purchases.

I'm not trying to lay it solely at isiah's feet, I'm explaining how the two of them could have come up with this together, and I'm explaining how after the fact the both of them could have wanted them gone. I just see them each having different motives for the same deal. I think the one motive they did share is that if they don't work out they can be bait, and if they do work out they just might help plug the hole we had while Marbury was out. short term planning just might be the intersection between Brown, Isiah and Dolan.

Unfortunately some wont want to buy that because it would fly in the face of their contention that Brown wanted to lose.

I really don't see the basis for your argument. You know Isiah promised larry 'his" players, and you know brown had his eyes set on players who were rumored to be included in the Francis trade. Isiah even told us he was pursuing them. Clearly he came up short in the totality of the package Brown was after, and i wouldn't be surprised if that was why Brown went fishing for himself.

I think Larry would have been tickled for francis to succeed, so as to displace marbury. Whether or not that would have been enough for isiah to give up on steph we'll never know - I suspect not. Regardless, an inside report stated that Francis was only showing up to practice like twice a week, and drunk at that. Chances are he was doing the same in Orlando. It's not surprising that they had a radically losing record with him and a radically winning one without. Nobody can make that work. But if brown had gotten the rest of the package he wanted at least he'd have those other components to work with. Instead all he got was the drunk.

You say my arguments don't make sense but in fact they're the only ones that do.

[Edited by - BlueSeats on 10-01-2006 4:58 PM]
wsdm
Posts: 20803
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/16/2006
Member: #1167

10/1/2006  4:52 PM
Posted by bigbeast:

I posted direct quotes from Brown pretty much stating that he wanted Francis and Rose. I tried to find the page here but its been deleted. I'll try and find it though.

Everyone knows the quotes where Brown said at the press conference announcing the Francis trade that he bugged Isiah to get Steve as soon as he found out Steve was available. I can't recall a coach ever making a stronger public endorsement of a trade in my lifetime.
www.selltheknicks.com----No more DOLANOMICS!
Pete Vescey says in shape Curry will keep the Knicks out of the lottery

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy