do you have incontrovertible proof that everyone else on the knicks did a wonderful job? no one can argue that LB did a great job; i would just extend the blame to players who lived up to selfish, me-first, cancerous reputations all season.
unless you can fulfill your ridiculous burden of proof for other knicks on the hot seat- marbury, IT, dolan- any other opinion is as legitimate as yours. IMO.
I never said ANYONE did a wonderful job. One can theorize that the biggest problem was not Brown, but it takes so much sophisticated twisting of logic, that is violates the rule of "Occam's razor", explained:
"the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating, or "shaving off," those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory. In short, when given two equally valid explanations for a phenomenon, one should embrace the less complicated formulation. The principle is often expressed in Latin as the lex parsimoniae (law of succinctness):"
Of course the validity of the Brown defense relies almost exclusively on his history before the Knicks, so I would not even say it is "equally valid".
The burden of proof to indict LB is not ridiculous; it's ridiculously obvious. Do you extend the Blame to Malik Rose? Channing Frye? David Lee? Antonio Davis? Those are some of Brown's biggest critics. Are they the me-first players you described?
Yes, they are all idiots, Brown does not make mistakes! Strangely enough every one of those players were described as being on the Brown side during the season.
I have fulfilled this burden of proof so many times over my fingers hurt. Why don't you step up and fullfill yours with actual examples rather than generalities?
oohah