[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Good Francis article
Author Thread
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/5/2006  1:54 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by nixluva:

DAMN you guys are just incredible. The man is saying things he's NEVER said before. He seems sincere and at least he recognizes his failings and where he needs to changes. Have you ever heard him say anything about WINNING before? No you guys just can't stop yourselves from being negative. From everything i've been reading its obvious that these guys want to prove that they can win this year. I think isiah will harp on the "Its us against the world" theme. It should work since it really is that way for them. Almost no one thinks they can play winning ball. From the coach to the players, there is a sense that they have to band together and prove that they can play as a team.

If you really look at this situation its a very good thing that's happening right now. This team has a chance to have a good year. I see no reason to be so sarcastic towards them. Guys have hit rock bottom and they don't like it. It sounds to me like not only are they preparing their bodies but their minds to be in the right mental state for this coming season. Isn't that what we want to hear at this point, as opposed to more defiant talk about "ME".


did you become a knicks fan just last year? if so there's nothing wrong with that but just so you know there's been tons articles written exactly like this over the years like Vin Baker & Jerome James for example. The media has nothing to write about

I've been a knick fan for a longtime. I'm 41. I just don't see what any of those other things have to do with this situation. I'm not saying you have to buy into everything that's being written, just be a bit more aware of where this team is at mentally. You guys just don't seem to do anything more than make sarcastic remarks about the players and coach on this team. I think you guys are so locked into your opinions about this team that you can't allow yourselves to see what this team is likely to accomplish this year.

THIS YEAR the team will have a much bigger contribution from its better young players. THIS YEAR the team will likely establish the beginnings of an identity. Stability and consistency. THIS YEAR the team is even more setup to be successful than before. Barring any unforseen health problems, this team looks stronger coming into this year than last year. There are fewer personnel changes and that's a good thing. You KNOW that the coach is committed to making this work and the players are motivated to prove they aren't the losers LB said they were. All of these things are good signs for this team. You all know we have the talent to compete, now with everyone being more together almost out of necessity, I expect that to translate into a better performance. There are other factors but you get the idea.

Many of you have serious doubts about the team and seem not to really like the teams players. You may like the KNICKS but you don't seem to like the players or have any faith that they can play winning ball. I on the otherhand DO like the players and I do have faith that they can play winning ball.

AUTOADVERT
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
9/5/2006  2:03 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by nixluva:

DAMN you guys are just incredible. The man is saying things he's NEVER said before. He seems sincere and at least he recognizes his failings and where he needs to changes. Have you ever heard him say anything about WINNING before? No you guys just can't stop yourselves from being negative. From everything i've been reading its obvious that these guys want to prove that they can win this year. I think isiah will harp on the "Its us against the world" theme. It should work since it really is that way for them. Almost no one thinks they can play winning ball. From the coach to the players, there is a sense that they have to band together and prove that they can play as a team.

If you really look at this situation its a very good thing that's happening right now. This team has a chance to have a good year. I see no reason to be so sarcastic towards them. Guys have hit rock bottom and they don't like it. It sounds to me like not only are they preparing their bodies but their minds to be in the right mental state for this coming season. Isn't that what we want to hear at this point, as opposed to more defiant talk about "ME".


did you become a knicks fan just last year? if so there's nothing wrong with that but just so you know there's been tons articles written exactly like this over the years like Vin Baker & Jerome James for example. The media has nothing to write about

I've been a knick fan for a longtime. I'm 41. I just don't see what any of those other things have to do with this situation. I'm not saying you have to buy into everything that's being written, just be a bit more aware of where this team is at mentally. You guys just don't seem to do anything more than make sarcastic remarks about the players and coach on this team. I think you guys are so locked into your opinions about this team that you can't allow yourselves to see what this team is likely to accomplish this year.

THIS YEAR the team will have a much bigger contribution from its better young players. THIS YEAR the team will likely establish the beginnings of an identity. Stability and consistency. THIS YEAR the team is even more setup to be successful than before. Barring any unforseen health problems, this team looks stronger coming into this year than last year. There are fewer personnel changes and that's a good thing. You KNOW that the coach is committed to making this work and the players are motivated to prove they aren't the losers LB said they were. All of these things are good signs for this team. You all know we have the talent to compete, now with everyone being more together almost out of necessity, I expect that to translate into a better performance. There are other factors but you get the idea.

Many of you have serious doubts about the team and seem not to really like the teams players. You may like the KNICKS but you don't seem to like the players or have any faith that they can play winning ball. I on the otherhand DO like the players and I do have faith that they can play winning ball.

Nixluva the exact same team won 23 games last year. Can you blame people for ahving doubts. Yes people all agree this year will be better. But most objective fans are wondering how this team will truly respond. We don't know because we haven't seen them respond positively yet. I'm just curious as to when a "I will wait and see approach" became being locked in and the "we will be great this year at all costs" became the flexible view.

There is no sarcasm intended by me at all. I am just calling it the way I see it. Last year my talented team won 23 games. Regardless of the excuses everyone makes for them the end result was still 23 wins. Results means everything to me. I don't care about potential. I agree with all you say about hte potential of this team. I agree about the improvements. I agree with everything. But it's still just talk. We still won 23 games last year.

Talk and nothing changes. Win on the court and everyone stops doubting you. It's a very simple concept. I think some just need everyone to hop on and say how fantastic things are to validate their own predictions.
I just hope that people will like me
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
9/5/2006  2:07 PM
nixluva, having a wait & see approach is hardly pessimistic, nor is it a negative way of looking at things... once u stop having those preconceived notions about what others might be thinking you will come to the same conclusion as we have.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/5/2006  2:15 PM
You think that somehow I don't realize that its the results on the court that matter most? It's the offseason, so all I can comment on right now is how I see things developing for this team and what I predict will happen and why. What i'm saying is that mixed in with the wait and see approach are others who already have made up their minds. if you truly believe we have a better chance to actually win this year then say so. If you think we'll fail then say so. IF not all you're really saying is that you DON'T have an opinion until you see the games. That's fine, then you really don't need to comment since you don't have a take on the team as yet.

I don't care about what the record was last year. That was last year. I remind you that we started the year last year with: Steph, QRich, Barnes, AD & Curry and this year we'll likely start Steph, Francis, Jared, Frye & Curry. DOn't tell me that's the same players! The rotation will be different too as will the amount of minutes our better players will play. The offense and defense will be different. The atmosphere is already different and the Coach will be different. This is NOT LAST YEAR. We won't have 8 new players this year. We have more returning players playing a key role. If the players come in to camp in shape as they seem to be on target to do, then that too will be different. I'm not just saying that I believe this team will be better without any valid reasons. I see no way that things will be the same as last year. Of course we won't know for sure how much better the team will be until the end of the coming season, but its my opinion at this time.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
9/5/2006  2:42 PM
I'll sum it up this way. I look at this roster and I should be amped. I should be dreaming of 50 win seasons and 2nd round of playoffs easily. This should be an absolute guarntee for me. Instead I am hoping for 38 wins. Maybe 40. And praying they can make it to the playoffs.

My question is where else but in NY is predicting that your team will underachieve by 10-15 games considered an optimistic approach to a season. That is how much NY fans are settling. I called this 5 years ago, and 5 years ago even I didn't beleive the nonsense I was spewing, and sadly it is becoming true right before my very eyes. NY fans are settling. No longer do we demand that our Knicks acheive what their talent calls for. If you do that and are unsatisfied when this occurs you are a pessimist. But if you get real excited about your team underachieving by 10 or 15 gmaes you are a friggin real fan.

To all those from MSG this is not new but I will say it again for the rest of the "optimists": We must change the atmosphere in NY. We have accepted this culture of losing for long enough. We must take the power away from the players that are strategically lowering our expectations from them and give the power back to a coach that demands more (Hopefully Isiah will be this coach). Management is sellign us a bill of goods. Yes 38 wins at this point is progress but it's progress from a wasted season back to the situation we were in 3 years ago that we hated then. Why is it today that same situation is now a good thing. Because management is selling us a bill of goods. Some have accepted this bill of goods ("the optimists") some are demanding that players produce what they are capable of ("psesimists").

We all are predicting around the same amount of wins. Quibbling and thinking there is some huge difference between 38 wins and 42 wins is silly. The goal is not to build a team capable of winning 42 games and is better than last year's debacle. The goal is to eventually win a title. We need to find out who can help us to that end and who cannot. Excuses are not part of the agenda. All the LB excuses are gone. If they come out ready to play this year and give us an effort than they can be here as we grow. If not, no excuse should be allowed to cut them slack. We must demand more in order to get 50 wins out of a 50 win roster. If not we will forever be saying it's "optimistic" and "great" for a 50 win roster to win 32 games. And we will always be defending them and blasting others that ask more. Enough is enough.
I just hope that people will like me
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
9/5/2006  2:48 PM
Look, we haven't seen jack worth being optimistic about since the year we pick up CAMBY and SPREE and we went to the finals that year. Since then it's been a whole lot of talk and off season rhetoric year after year. You can can't be surprise or taken back by some of the comments.

Vin Baker and TT were prime examples of the off season bull sh... some of these players say and then follow it up with either a injury rattled season or a bunch of complaints. I would love to see us have the best back court in the league ( which we have the potential to be) but Its up to IT to make that work, especially when neither players strength is passing, shooting 3s, or leadership.
ES
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
9/5/2006  2:48 PM
Posted by nixluva:

You think that somehow I don't realize that its the results on the court that matter most? It's the offseason, so all I can comment on right now is how I see things developing for this team and what I predict will happen and why. What i'm saying is that mixed in with the wait and see approach are others who already have made up their minds. if you truly believe we have a better chance to actually win this year then say so. If you think we'll fail then say so. IF not all you're really saying is that you DON'T have an opinion until you see the games. That's fine, then you really don't need to comment since you don't have a take on the team as yet.

I don't care about what the record was last year. That was last year. I remind you that we started the year last year with: Steph, QRich, Barnes, AD & Curry and this year we'll likely start Steph, Francis, Jared, Frye & Curry. DOn't tell me that's the same players! The rotation will be different too as will the amount of minutes our better players will play. The offense and defense will be different. The atmosphere is already different and the Coach will be different. This is NOT LAST YEAR. We won't have 8 new players this year. We have more returning players playing a key role. If the players come in to camp in shape as they seem to be on target to do, then that too will be different. I'm not just saying that I believe this team will be better without any valid reasons. I see no way that things will be the same as last year. Of course we won't know for sure how much better the team will be until the end of the coming season, but its my opinion at this time.

Nixluva. You are 100% correct. Most people don't have an opinion because they have no friggin idea what this team will do. It's a valid view. I don't know if I am going to get a team that reaches it's potential and wins games. Or if I'm going to get a team that whines and excuses it's way to 23 wins. So once again what is the issue? Most people's predictions are very similar. So what makes one an optimist and one a pessimist? Again I will reiterate an optimist is one who says his 50 win roster will win 38 games woohoo!!!! Go Knicks. I'm an optimist". While a pessimist is one who says "my 50 win talent is going to win 38 games, what changes can we make to get 50 win talent that actually wins 50 games"

Everyone has manned up. Everyone has given their estimate of wins. They are all in the exact same ball park of mediocrity. But Optimists are okay with underachievement and are actually excited by it. While pessimists are analyzing the situation objectively and wondering where we really are as a team and an organization
I just hope that people will like me
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
9/5/2006  2:51 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

I'll sum it up this way. I look at this roster and I should be amped. I should be dreaming of 50 win seasons and 2nd round of playoffs easily. This should be an absolute guarntee for me. Instead I am hoping for 38 wins. Maybe 40. And praying they can make it to the playoffs.

My question is where else but in NY is predicting that your team will underachieve by 10-15 games considered an optimistic approach to a season. That is how much NY fans are settling. I called this 5 years ago, and 5 years ago even I didn't beleive the nonsense I was spewing, and sadly it is becoming true right before my very eyes. NY fans are settling. No longer do we demand that our Knicks acheive what their talent calls for. If you do that and are unsatisfied when this occurs you are a pessimist. But if you get real excited about your team underachieving by 10 or 15 gmaes you are a friggin real fan.

To all those from MSG this is not new but I will say it again for the rest of the "optimists": We must change the atmosphere in NY. We have accepted this culture of losing for long enough. We must take the power away from the players that are strategically lowering our expectations from them and give the power back to a coach that demands more (Hopefully Isiah will be this coach). Management is sellign us a bill of goods. Yes 38 wins at this point is progress but it's progress from a wasted season back to the situation we were in 3 years ago that we hated then. Why is it today that same situation is now a good thing. Because management is selling us a bill of goods. Some have accepted this bill of goods ("the optimists") some are demanding that players produce what they are capable of ("psesimists").

We all are predicting around the same amount of wins. Quibbling and thinking there is some huge difference between 38 wins and 42 wins is silly. The goal is not to build a team capable of winning 42 games and is better than last year's debacle. The goal is to eventually win a title. We need to find out who can help us to that end and who cannot. Excuses are not part of the agenda. All the LB excuses are gone. If they come out ready to play this year and give us an effort than they can be here as we grow. If not, no excuse should be allowed to cut them slack. We must demand more in order to get 50 wins out of a 50 win roster. If not we will forever be saying it's "optimistic" and "great" for a 50 win roster to win 32 games. And we will always be defending them and blasting others that ask more. Enough is enough.



So on paper you honestly feel this is a 50 win team ?
ES
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

9/5/2006  2:54 PM
We've got talent. We did last year too. So did teams like Portland, Golden State, Seattle, etc. But none exceeded 35 wins.

I'm sure they all had huge "spin" machines in motion, and had swarms of highly optimistic fans. But the season isn't won thru hype.

Optimism wont win games, nor an offense with a nifty name or a deep bench. Good chemistry and hard work are required. We expect better in both regards this year, but it wouldn't be the first time we were disappointed.

[Edited by - blueSeats on 09-05-2006 2:56 PM]
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
9/5/2006  2:56 PM
I think in terms of sheer talent. Yes. Everybody on this team could be in the rotation for nearly every team in the league. at least three have all-star talent in a league where one all-star can mean playoffs and two is a guarantee.

But as a coach, I know talent and potential mean shiot. It's nothing. It should not be considered when building a team. What should be considered is how the parts fit. Or how the players will make themselves fit. That is why we lose. But even if you think this is a 45 win roster or a 40 win roster does it change the message?
I just hope that people will like me
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
9/5/2006  2:57 PM
I've said to Nixluva multiple times that talk isn't going to solve any of the Knicks problems. I'm waiting for the season to start, I think the team is going to win 37 or 38 games and play absolutely no defense(other than Jared), which to me would be a terrible year. All I can do is predict what I think will happen based on prior results and what players have done in the past, if your doing anything more than that, then your fooling yourself.

We'll see what happens when the season starts, I'll be the first person in line for the Knicks to play really well but I don't think it's going to happen. Geez, I must be one hell of a demented human-being to think that way.

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 09-05-2006 2:58 PM]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
9/5/2006  3:02 PM
Again we should not be building a team around how many wins we can get. We should be building a base around guys that can win a title. 50 win teams have won titles and 60 win teams have won titles. Total wins is not a concern. Building a "team" that we don't have to pray comes into camp in shape, that plays d, dives for loose balls and will subjugate their games for a teammate are what we need. If this results in 23 wins that is a good thing. If it results in 32 wins that is a good thing. If it results in 42 wins that is a good thing. Why? because it's something you can build on. But a 40 win team that bickers and argues and makes excuses is a waste of time.

the excuses are gone this year. We should not here any of them. I don't want talking. I don't want anything but players that are coming into camp focused on turning things around with their play.
I just hope that people will like me
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
9/5/2006  3:30 PM
Well with that being said, the questions are still there. Are we balance enough, and do we have the right coach? Defensively were going to struggle like 25 other teams. And I think when you look at this league today as much as we try an ignore the fact, there aren't that many denfensive minded players in the nba, probably 2 out of every 10 players.

I have threw out the notion that what looks good on paper is always a lock to win.
ES
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
9/5/2006  3:39 PM
Knicks I agree with you that the NBA doesn't play very good defense. And I will also go against the notion that you need to be a defensive juggernaut to win a title. But you do have to be able to play some defense. You will not find an NBA champion that was at least not a good defensive team. You don't have to shut the other team down but you have to be able to get stops. We can't get stops. Our guys must be able to get stops or we need to replace them with guys with a little more balance to their games.

Our players can do this by improving their individual d, and/or improving their commitment to a team concept which in turn will lead to better team defense. With a good offensive team you can have less talent on D, but you still need to play d. Our team showed absolutely no commitment to defense. This has been going on for years. It's time to demand more regardless of hwat the rest of the NBA is doing. We cannot lower our standards to be like the rest of the NBA. We must raise our standards in order to bring us the first title in over 30 years. If we do this, and you see the defense improve the offensive fire power becomes important. Without that commitment the offensive firepower is just entertainiment.

In the end noone is aksing us to be the Knicks of the early 90's. But solid defense should not be too much to ask, and if it is then we need to get rid of those guys that don't like the question.
I just hope that people will like me
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
9/5/2006  3:53 PM
what i want to see is guys playing unselfishly & not caring about their stats or putting individual concerns about how many minutes they're playing over the overall concern the team needs to have to win games, period... i don't expect to see this team playing stellar defense because most of these players are not strong defensive players to begin with, but i DO expect to see an overall improvement somewhat in team defense because we've added some defensive minded players who are being looked to fill the holes that were so prevalent last year...

i expect to see these guys putting that team first type attitude into PRACTICE ON THE FLOOR & not just making nice sounding empty quotes for the news tabloids in the offseason before the true test of the NBA season really begins... this is not me saying what Francis & Marbury have promised to do this offseason are meaningless because i'm assuming they won't deliver, but i am withholding any sort of enthusiasm until i see them actually deliver on what they're promising this season... they've never given me a reason to put much into their words in the past to begin with... that's in no way a pessimistic or negative way of looking at things... it's just a pragmatic & realistic approach.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
9/5/2006  5:01 PM
Going back to Francis amd Marbary. Their good numbers and All-Star yerars was coming when thay was playing in a systems which was using their scoring and slashing abilities. And mostly because it was no other scoring choises on the rosters.
It was also a result of the athletic abilities of both guards. They was young and strong.
All this is not the case any more. They are older and not so healthy.
And the Knicks is not a team of suporting role players but all the way around.

They will probably reestablich their game but it will be on some other clubs who need them... to not suck badly...
The best thing for Francis and Marbs is to be traded to the team where they will play the way they accoustomed to play
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/5/2006  5:53 PM
Posted by arkrud:

Going back to Francis amd Marbary. Their good numbers and All-Star yerars was coming when thay was playing in a systems which was using their scoring and slashing abilities. And mostly because it was no other scoring choises on the rosters.
It was also a result of the athletic abilities of both guards. They was young and strong.
All this is not the case any more. They are older and not so healthy.
And the Knicks is not a team of suporting role players but all the way around.

They will probably reestablich their game but it will be on some other clubs who need them... to not suck badly...
The best thing for Francis and Marbs is to be traded to the team where they will play the way they accoustomed to play

I have to shake my head when I read stuff like this. Even at this stage in his career, Steph is still too much for any defender. He may not have the exact same hops he once had, but he's still explosive. Heck Steve Nash is older than Steph and Francis and he's still movin. Francis may have lost just a tad of his athleticism, but he's still able to throw it down with no problem.

You also don't seem to understand how they'll be used in this offense. They'll actually be getting help from their bigs to get open and force teams to switch. Once that happens they will easily be able to get by a bigger slower defender. Screens and cuts are a big part of this offense and really we haven't made use of them to the degree that other teams have against us. Rather than go away from Steph and Francis being big scorers for this team, Isiah will likely make use of their scoring ability as well as our other guards. Our bigs will be able to feed off of that for much easier baskets.

nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
9/5/2006  6:40 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by arkrud:

Going back to Francis amd Marbary. Their good numbers and All-Star yerars was coming when thay was playing in a systems which was using their scoring and slashing abilities. And mostly because it was no other scoring choises on the rosters.
It was also a result of the athletic abilities of both guards. They was young and strong.
All this is not the case any more. They are older and not so healthy.
And the Knicks is not a team of suporting role players but all the way around.

They will probably reestablich their game but it will be on some other clubs who need them... to not suck badly...
The best thing for Francis and Marbs is to be traded to the team where they will play the way they accoustomed to play

I have to shake my head when I read stuff like this. Even at this stage in his career, Steph is still too much for any defender. He may not have the exact same hops he once had, but he's still explosive. Heck Steve Nash is older than Steph and Francis and he's still movin. Francis may have lost just a tad of his athleticism, but he's still able to throw it down with no problem.

You also don't seem to understand how they'll be used in this offense. They'll actually be getting help from their bigs to get open and force teams to switch. Once that happens they will easily be able to get by a bigger slower defender. Screens and cuts are a big part of this offense and really we haven't made use of them to the degree that other teams have against us. Rather than go away from Steph and Francis being big scorers for this team, Isiah will likely make use of their scoring ability as well as our other guards. Our bigs will be able to feed off of that for much easier baskets.

I still don't understand how you overlook the fact that the only times that Marbury and Francis have been successful in their careers is when the ball has CONSTANTLY been in their hands. In a motion offense, it is going to require Steph and Francis to totally change the way they've played in the past and both times they've tried doing that before they have failed (see phoenix trading Marbury.) The fact that you will not take in opinions other than your own is a bit disturbing. You still don't seem to understand the fact that we're all hear to make predictions and thats what we're doing. Your arguing with people on what THEY think will happen. This leads nowhere.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
9/5/2006  7:03 PM
I still don't understand how you overlook the fact that the only times that Marbury and Francis have been successful in their careers is when the ball has CONSTANTLY been in their hands. In a motion offense, it is going to require Steph and Francis to totally change the way they've played in the past and both times they've tried doing that before they have failed (see phoenix trading Marbury.) The fact that you will not take in opinions other than your own is a bit disturbing. You still don't seem to understand the fact that we're all hear to make predictions and thats what we're doing. Your arguing with people on what THEY think will happen. This leads nowhere.


nyk4ever,

What's up dude?

Anyways, what do think will happen this year?

Also, what number of wins do you consider acceptable, what number will make you happy, and more importantly, what does it mean to you?

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
9/5/2006  7:13 PM
Posted by oohah:
I still don't understand how you overlook the fact that the only times that Marbury and Francis have been successful in their careers is when the ball has CONSTANTLY been in their hands. In a motion offense, it is going to require Steph and Francis to totally change the way they've played in the past and both times they've tried doing that before they have failed (see phoenix trading Marbury.) The fact that you will not take in opinions other than your own is a bit disturbing. You still don't seem to understand the fact that we're all hear to make predictions and thats what we're doing. Your arguing with people on what THEY think will happen. This leads nowhere.


nyk4ever,

What's up dude?

Anyways, what do think will happen this year?

Also, what number of wins do you consider acceptable, what number will make you happy, and more importantly, what does it mean to you?

oohah

Not much Oohah, how about yourself?

Wins to me are not important, I'm with everyone about the talent on this team but talent doesn't always translate to wins. I still think Marbury and Francis are extreme cancers and I think the sheer fact that they are on this team will limit any success the team can have. As I said earlier, wins are not the overlying determinant of what is a successful season for me. I will deem this season a success if the team plays well TOGETHER on offense and they ALL bust their butts on defense. If they do these things, I think it will translate to a playoff appearance and I will be very happy, even it doesn't translate to a playoff appearance. With all that being said, I can't just simply overlook(like some others on this board love to do) the fact that a few of key guys have extremely checkered pasts on the basketball court. These guys are the key to our season and this is why I have many doubts going into the season.

If I HAVE to pick a win total, I'm going to say 37-38 wins along with no defense from most players, except for guys like Jared and Lee and maybe Jamal. I'm extremely eager to see how Frye comes back and improves his defense off last year and the summer league, it's going to be a huge factor on what kind of player he's going to be in the NBA. Yes, I know I'm "labeled" as a pessismist on this board, but I like to think of myself as a realist instead.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Good Francis article

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy