[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

who will win more games this year bobcats or knicks?
Author Thread
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/4/2006  10:56 AM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by TMS:

woopdee doo, i got the names mixed up... you know damn well who i was referring to... your insistence on downgrading this team's talent & uplifting every other team & player in the NBA is getting to be an old tired act... you'd probably think Michael Jordan sucked if he wore a Knicks' uniform... you'd argue that Primo & Ely are just as good as Curry & Frye? just what are you using to base that argument on? because it can't be on watching these guys play the game... show me some #'s that would indicate those 2 guys are better players.

don't try to change the subject by going on about payroll... the comment you made was that the Bobcats had superior TALENT than the Knicks.

Frye played 4 for us if you werent watching the game, but if you want to go that way Okafor is better than Curry or Frye at any position. Primo and Ely>Curry and JJ

you said Brezec & Ely were better at the C than anyone the Knicks could run out there for 48 minutes... if you weren't watching the Knicks games last year, Frye did log some minutes at the 5 on certain rotations... Okafor's better than Frye, i already acknowledged that... Wallace & Morrison are better than anyone we have at the SF... other than that, the Knicks have more talent at the other positions.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
AUTOADVERT
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/4/2006  11:00 AM
[quote]Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by TMS:

.

the comment you made was that the Bobcats had superior TALENT than the Knicks.


They do and every person outside of a few Knick fans who have little knowledge of teams outside of the metro area know it as well.


funny, but i can recall many people INSIDE the NBA, GM's, players & sports commentators alike, point out the fact that the Knicks are alot more talented than their record indicates... i can recall Clyde, Gus, Mike Breen & John Andariese point out the fact that the Knicks should be blowing out teams like the Bobcats because of their superior talent... but what do they know? they have limited knowledge of teams outside of the metro area too i guess... nothing to match up to your vast knowledge of all things NBA i guess.

[Edited by - TMS on 08-04-2006 11:00 AM]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
8/4/2006  11:02 AM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by TMS:

woopdee doo, i got the names mixed up... you know damn well who i was referring to... your insistence on downgrading this team's talent & uplifting every other team & player in the NBA is getting to be an old tired act... you'd probably think Michael Jordan sucked if he wore a Knicks' uniform... you'd argue that Primo & Ely are just as good as Curry & Frye? just what are you using to base that argument on? because it can't be on watching these guys play the game... show me some #'s that would indicate those 2 guys are better players.

don't try to change the subject by going on about payroll... the comment you made was that the Bobcats had superior TALENT than the Knicks.

Frye played 4 for us if you werent watching the game, but if you want to go that way Okafor is better than Curry or Frye at any position. Primo and Ely>Curry and JJ


your the one just blindly saying that people are better. can you back it up with stats? cuase marbury had a higher effciency that felton despite the fact that last year was his worst year since his rookie year. and also you have to factor in the larry brown effect. every single knick on the team posted career lows under brown. (except I suppose for the rookies who hadnt had careers yet)

[Edited by - slimpack on 08-04-2006 11:05 AM]
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
8/4/2006  11:26 AM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by crzymdups:

the Knicks have a lot more talent. the question is how that talent plays together.

the knicks have a lot more talent?

which position?

PG - Marbury > Felton
SG - Francis > Gerald Wallace (if they use him there, out of position)
SF - Jefferies < Morrison - though Jefferies is a glue guy who is a superior defender
PF - Frye < Okafor - slim margain, but Okafor is more complete.
C - Curry > Brezec - no question

bench
Crawford > Brevin Knight
Lee > Sean May
Nate > Matt Carroll
QRich > Bernard Robinson
Mo Taylor <Othella
Balkman
Collins
Jalen Rose


talent-wise, the Knicks are deeper. Bobs have Okafor and Morrison who are both extremely talented, albeit with major questions - is Okafor's back okay? can Morrison defend in the NBA? is he fast enough? we'll see. but talent-wise? Knicks have more talent.
¿ △ ?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/4/2006  11:49 AM
Posted by SlimPack:
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by TMS:

woopdee doo, i got the names mixed up... you know damn well who i was referring to... your insistence on downgrading this team's talent & uplifting every other team & player in the NBA is getting to be an old tired act... you'd probably think Michael Jordan sucked if he wore a Knicks' uniform... you'd argue that Primo & Ely are just as good as Curry & Frye? just what are you using to base that argument on? because it can't be on watching these guys play the game... show me some #'s that would indicate those 2 guys are better players.

don't try to change the subject by going on about payroll... the comment you made was that the Bobcats had superior TALENT than the Knicks.

Frye played 4 for us if you werent watching the game, but if you want to go that way Okafor is better than Curry or Frye at any position. Primo and Ely>Curry and JJ


your the one just blindly saying that people are better. can you back it up with stats? cuase marbury had a higher effciency that felton despite the fact that last year was his worst year since his rookie year. and also you have to factor in the larry brown effect. every single knick on the team posted career lows under brown. (except I suppose for the rookies who hadnt had careers yet)

[Edited by - slimpack on 08-04-2006 11:05 AM]

contracts the same Ill offer you Ray Felton for Stephon Marbury will you take my deal?


contracts the same Ill offer you Gerald Wallace for Steve Francis will you take my deal
contracts the same ill offer you okafor for Frye will you take my deal?
Contracts the same Ill over you adam Morrison for Jared Jeffries[who will be our new starting 3] will you take my deal?
RIP Crushalot&#128542;
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/4/2006  12:04 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

contracts the same Ill offer you Gerald Wallace for Steve Francis will you take my deal
contracts the same ill offer you okafor for Frye will you take my deal?
Contracts the same Ill over you adam Morrison for Jared Jeffries[who will be our new starting 3] will you take my deal?

dude, you're completely changing the terms of your statement now... you said in talent alone the Bobcats were superior... we're not talking about other factors that would determine preference like attitude, age, character, leadership, etc... if you want to count all those things, of course people would take a guy like Felton over Marbury... we've already pointed out Okafor, Morrison & Wallace as superior talents to what the Knicks have at their respective positions... now how about considering the other 12 guys on the roster, or don't they count in this discussion?

[Edited by - TMS on 08-04-2006 12:05 PM]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
8/4/2006  12:09 PM
Knicks are a much much deeper team. But hey, on paper means nothing. Bobcats have a lot going for them, but in Brigg's view, it's the grass is always greener. Just remember, OK$ has been real injury prone and hasn't played so much yet. If he can't stay healthy, I'm gonna have to take Channing Frye. But if he can get healthy, give me OK4 anyday.

Brezek has some talent too, but if Eddie Curry can stay in shape, Knicks will have an advantage there too.

Bobcats got the advantage with Wallace but if Marbury/Francis get their heads out of their arses, they own CHarlotte at the PG. BUt that's the problem. None of them play defense and it always seems that the PGs going against us play great.

I would say it's still a head to head race, but I gotto give CHarlotte the slight advantage based on doing better than the Knicks last season. But maybe having Jefferies improves that.

Briggs, who cares if TMS got his name wrong? As long as he knows the player.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
nyballer
Posts: 21019
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/4/2001
Member: #108
USA
8/4/2006  12:15 PM
bobcats IMO have a better plan in play. the knicks have a bunch of guys that need the ball in their hands to score. the bobcats have their one good post-up player in may and occasionally okafor, a very good penterating point guard, and their scorer in morrison. wallace will get his garbage points and easy buckets, felton will score, okafor gets put backs, and may will do alright in the post. knicks have 4 pg's that dominate the ball, swingmen that can't shoot, and big men that don't rebound.
"easy like sunday morning..." - walt clyde
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
8/4/2006  12:18 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

contracts the same Ill offer you Gerald Wallace for Steve Francis will you take my deal
contracts the same ill offer you okafor for Frye will you take my deal?
Contracts the same Ill over you adam Morrison for Jared Jeffries[who will be our new starting 3] will you take my deal?

Contracts the same I'll offer you Eddy Curry for Brezec - take it?
How about Nate Robinson for Bernard Robinson?
I'd take Frye over Morrison, too.
¿ △ ?
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
8/4/2006  12:22 PM
Bobcats are building a team. The Knicks are slapping pieces of meat together and hoping the coach can mix it into somehting appetizing(I'll work on that analogy for next time). The knicks have talent on this squad. Francis, Marbury and Curry alone have enough talent to take this team to .500 in my opinion. But they along with Jalen and JJ and Mo and a couple others have the heads and the excuses to drag us to the bottom of the standings.

We have loads of talent. But talent means squat when that talent is too busy saying they can't play hard because they don't like the way the coach operates.

[Edited by - bippity10 on 08-04-2006 12:23 PM]
I just hope that people will like me
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
8/4/2006  12:48 PM
I like the Bobcats talent but I can see that team as a horrible mixed bag as well. Okafor can't be productive if he can't stay on the court. Adam Morrison could be the next best player but he could be next bust. I think he will be productive with Okafor on the floor but he will be in bad shape when he isn't. I like Felton, better than Williams. I have always been a fan of Gerald Wallace. I would take Gerald Wallace over any of our SF. Curry is still the x factor.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/4/2006  12:49 PM
no doubt, talent doesn't always equate to W's... that's a separate argument... if you were to ask me which roster i'd rather have, w/all the payroll, character, age & talent issues combined, i'd choose Charlotte to build from over the Knicks because it's a much more flexible situation to work out of.

[Edited by - TMS on 08-04-2006 12:50 PM]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060

8/4/2006  12:54 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:

I like the Bobcats talent but I can see that team as a horrible mixed bag as well. Okafor can't be productive if he can't stay on the court. Adam Morrison could be the next best player but he could be next bust. I think he will be productive with Okafor on the floor but he will be in bad shape when he isn't. I like Felton, better than Williams. I have always been a fan of Gerald Wallace. I would take Gerald Wallace over any of our SF. Curry is still the x factor.


I like Wallace to, but heres my question? where does Wallace play with Morrison on board. Playing Wallace at the 2 does not play to his stregnths. Wallace aint a perimeter player. He's a baseline player who can block shots, rebounds, and clean up all the garbage around the rim.
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/4/2006  1:04 PM
I'll let myself be a little childish too.
Who will have more posts that show good logical reasoning skills: Guns when he comes online drunk or Fish when sober?

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 08-04-2006 1:04 PM]
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
8/4/2006  1:07 PM
Posted by bigbeast:
Posted by Pharzeone:

I like the Bobcats talent but I can see that team as a horrible mixed bag as well. Okafor can't be productive if he can't stay on the court. Adam Morrison could be the next best player but he could be next bust. I think he will be productive with Okafor on the floor but he will be in bad shape when he isn't. I like Felton, better than Williams. I have always been a fan of Gerald Wallace. I would take Gerald Wallace over any of our SF. Curry is still the x factor.


I like Wallace to, but heres my question? where does Wallace play with Morrison on board. Playing Wallace at the 2 does not play to his stregnths. Wallace aint a perimeter player. He's a baseline player who can block shots, rebounds, and clean up all the garbage around the rim.

I see their relationship much like Spree and Houston. Morrison will probably play more 2 guard roles while Wallace will be used to play off the perimeter (slasher role). The beauty of Wallace is that you don't need to call too many plays for him to be effective. He is the type of player that I was hoping Ariza would turn into and may still turn into. But Briggs is right, Bickerstaff, has put together some nice young talent. They have guys that I wanted the Knicks to get Brezec, Ryan Hollins, Jake Voskuhl, Wallace, Matt Carroll. That is a nice young team.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
cshoops
Posts: 20049
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/3/2002
Member: #329
USA
8/4/2006  3:15 PM
Knicks make playoffs. Barbeque Bobcats in post season at my place.
who will win more games this year bobcats or knicks?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy